For those who got lost on the last diatribe about Harry Potter and copyrights from Robert, don't worry, he elucidates on that:
View attachment 2565998
Pretty much, big corp will retain copyrights forevar because they will pander to twitter troons.
I think this is another case of Robert vastly over estimating twitter's influence and how this shit works.
Look, twitter cancellations of some hollywood fucks are done by and to other hollywood fuckos who are also too deep in twitter drama, but in general it doesn't create a lot of ripples in the real money maker, as in, Disney giving the boot to that Gina Carano Lady won't do dick to whatever gains they will have with Star Wars, Carano is a mid to small bit star at best and of no consequence.
However, fandom and twitter screetching won't make a difference when there is a genuine loss and gain into their IPs and no matter how much the "fandom" sides with the creators, it means nothing. Joe Shuster, the creator of Superman, died in poverty and debt, just by the time he was a old man DC gave him a 20k per year chump change and credits and when he died, the his family was so fucked they agreed to sign off any rights to Superman as long as DC would pay for Shuster's debt.
And while twitter and reeee troons weren't around, there was a very, VERY public reaction against DC, it was even international news, and they couldn't give less of a fuck.
So the whole "The last best defense re: beating back permanent copyright extension was 'fandom' siding with creators over companies." is utter and complete delusional bullshit, "fandom" doesn't mean shit. The only defense against copyright hog is a contract, a very clear one at that, which is something Rowling does have.
And despise all the twitter drama, Harry Potter shit is still profitable, so, suck the troon dick Robert and cope.