Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[SteelPlatedHeart]

re: Bob's response to the dog fucker
View attachment 3075385

I dunno, I don’t need to see all of Cuties or Space Jam 2 to know it sucked shit. The last 30 mins of each isn’t going to suddenly convince me it’s amazing.

 

[blablabla]

you totally can review a movie and not finishing it. you dont have to see the entirety of cuties or that lesbian nun movie to know it will be schock value at best and crap at worst.

blobbo is such a bitch

 

[Product Placement]

On Movieblob side here over dogfucker.

Moviebob is totally right if your job is to review movies then do your fucking job and watch the full movie. Dogfucker is like the game journos who don't beat games before reviewing but at least the game journos can point to some games being 40+ hours plus while dogfucker only has to watch a 2-hour movie. If you don't want to watch all of a movie then don't review it.

If Movieblob was bitching about just normal people doing this I would be also mocking him but he is talking about someone who is failing at their job and makes it pretty clear that is what he is talking about.

Hell must have frozen over for me to agree with moviebob.

 

[BScCollateral]

I dunno, I don’t need to see all of Cuties or Space Jam 2 to know it sucked shit.

I could see it going either way. Nothing wrong with a viewer walking out of a shit movie, but a reviewer's job is to watch a film and analyze it. If every review amounts to "I hated it so much I couldn't sit through it" you're not really doing a good job of it.

 

[SteelPlatedHeart]

I could see it going either way. Nothing wrong with a viewer walking out of a shit movie, but a reviewer's job is to watch a film and analyze it. If every review amounts to "I hated it so much I couldn't sit through it" you're not really doing a good job of it.

True, though “it was so bad I literally couldn’t sit through it.” is a pretty damning statement on its own.

I’ll say it’s not a problem if it’s an occasional thing, but if you’re doing it like every couple weeks, then it’s a bad look.

 

[Brother Wind]

True, though “it was so bad I literally couldn’t sit through it.” is a pretty damning statement on its own.

I’ll say it’s not a problem if it’s an occasional thing, but if you’re doing it like every couple weeks, then it’s a bad look.

One hundred percent this. Incredibly strange people listen to my thoughts on games. And there's nothing quite like me telling them I quit it. In the same sense of telling them I would replay it. I think comparing a film to a game is a bit different. As I firmly believe few video games end super well. Usually because of that whole gameplay chestnut. Things like last levels and last bosses can sour a pretty good game. And then really what's the call there? Is a game bad because the last level sucked ass? Especially because I'm pretty fond of strategy games. It's not like I need to play the last mission to really culminate something like Command and Conquer. Or all the scenarios in Rollercoaster Tycoon. Like do I judge the game on the scenarios or the gameplay?

Anyway. the big thing is that movies are linear 2-3 hour experiences that are only what they are. So, I think you should probably not be leaving a movie often. I think it's a pretty valid point. I always tell people if I hadn't driven three hours to watch The Last Jedi. I would have fucking walked out.

 

[Tronathon242]

I could see it going either way. Nothing wrong with a viewer walking out of a shit movie, but a reviewer's job is to watch a film and analyze it. If every review amounts to "I hated it so much I couldn't sit through it" you're not really doing a good job of it.

I would say a critic's primary job is to say whether something is worth watching/playing/eating or not. It doesn't really matter the particular industry. It can be acceptable to say you didn't finish something and say "avoid it, it sucks" as long as that is made clear.

True, though “it was so bad I literally couldn’t sit through it.” is a pretty damning statement on its own.

I’ll say it’s not a problem if it’s an occasional thing, but if you’re doing it like every couple weeks, then it’s a bad look.

Of course this is also correct. Sometimes you get something you can't deal with, but it's just laziness if you don't make it through at least most of the time.

Has moviebob ever actually debated someone?

Its one thing to tweet a bunch of crap since you can just ignore and not respond to counter points , but to actually have to defend your ideas and statements in real time.

He never will. He's nothing without his GoogleFu for one and he can barely articulate tweets for another, so he would only break down into incomprehensible Kamala Harris-like word salads when forced to defend himself in real time.

 

[Open Window Maniac]

Bob is a potato.View attachment 3074025

It still boggles my mind how Bob's head can be so fat and yet his cheeks are so sunken in like that. It's uncanny.

 

[Plinkettgonist]

Can someone who understands Twitter explain to me why this retard never just replies to people but always quote tweets?

 

[Imposteroak]

Can someone who understands Twitter explain to me why this retard never just replies to people but always quote tweets?

He is what is colloquially known as 100% bitch made in these here rust belt parts of america. There is weeks old road kill that has more back bone than boberto.

 

[Walrus and Carpenter]

Can someone who understands Twitter explain to me why this retard never just replies to people but always quote tweets?

He wants his angels to be able to pile on whoever he is quoting. He is a coward and needs his personal army.

 

[ColorfulCassowary]

On Movieblob side here over dogfucker.

Moviebob is totally right if your job is to review movies then do your fucking job and watch the full movie. Dogfucker is like the game journos who don't beat games before reviewing but at least the game journos can point to some games being 40+ hours plus while dogfucker only has to watch a 2-hour movie. If you don't want to watch all of a movie then don't review it.

If Movieblob was bitching about just normal people doing this I would be also mocking him but he is talking about someone who is failing at their job and makes it pretty clear that is what he is talking about.

Hell must have frozen over for me to agree with moviebob.

One of the things YMS said he couldn't sit through was six minutes long. You can't make it through six minutes, you pompous idiot? He's just such a miserable person.

 

[King Dead]

With regards to the whole Adam thing, my opinion falls in the middle (yep, I'm being a damn fence-sitter). Generally speaking, yes, if you're intending on being a film critic in any fashion, you should probably aim to finish the majority of the movies you watch. However, and this is especially true when you've been watching a lot of movies, you'll generally be able to pick up on whether it's worth your time long before it's over. Yeah, occasionally there'll be some twist that makes a movie pull a 180 on you, but I think most of those cases already have enough to hook you anyway. It's much like the three-episode rule some people use for anime; if it's not drawing you in within three episodes, then that's a failure on the show's part.

That said, I've watched a lot of Adam's review videos, and the amount of movies that he posts reviews for that he didn't finish is pretty small to my recollection. We're talking single digit percentage here. And even when he does, he always mentions in his review that he didn't finish it, so it's not like he's being deceptive. I do think it's silly to apply a numeric score to a movie you didn't finish, but whatever, it's his channel, he can do what he wants.

Regardless, even if Bob had a point, he acted like such a bitch about it that you can't help but be against Bob's position. That's how shitty of a person he is.

Can someone who understands Twitter explain to me why this retard never just replies to people but always quote tweets?

I don't use Twitter either, but from my understanding, a quote tweet only shows up in your feed, while a reply is part of the original thread. The former will not notify the OP, while the latter will. Thus, Bob quote tweets people when he wants to reply to them, but doesn't want their followers blowing up his mentions. Basically, anyone he disagrees with/hates gets his version of the silent treatment in the hopes that they won't notice his comments, and he can continue to hide behind his shield of smug superiority.

It didn't work in this case because Adam just went and replied to each of his quote tweets anyway, so anyone following along immediately found Bob's bitching.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

With regards to the whole Adam thing, my opinion falls in the middle (yep, I'm being a damn fence-sitter). Generally speaking, yes, if you're intending on being a film critic in any fashion, you should probably aim to finish the majority of the movies you watch. However, and this is especially true when you've been watching a lot of movies, you'll generally be able to pick up on whether it's worth your time long before it's over. Yeah, occasionally there'll be some twist that makes a movie pull a 180 on you, but I think most of those cases already have enough to hook you anyway. It's much like the three-episode rule some people use for anime; if it's not drawing you in within three episodes, then that's a failure on the show's part.

That said, I've watched a lot of Adam's review videos, and the amount of movies that he posts reviews for that he didn't finish is pretty small to my recollection. We're talking single digit percentage here. And even when he does, he always mentions in his review that he didn't finish it, so it's not like he's being deceptive. I do think it's silly to apply a numeric score to a movie you didn't finish, but whatever, it's his channel, he can do what he wants.

It also doesn't help that even if Bob has a point, it's immediately undermined by the fact that he makes up his mind about a movie before he watches it.

At least Adam judges a movie by its merits while Bob would watch a movie and still dismiss it for whatever culture war nonsense he can think of or if it is not a brand he loves. Sure he can sometimes watch non-commercial films and enjoy it but its miniscule to how outspoken he is and never gives films a chance or has high hopes and just twists the films he had those hopes for to fit his expectations.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Images seem to work again:

 

[Product Placement]

I dunno, I don’t need to see all of Cuties or Space Jam 2 to know it sucked shit. The last 30 mins of each isn’t going to suddenly convince me it’s amazing.

For a normal person that is totally fine, the issue is when it's your job to review something. Also when it comes to something like Cuties I really don't see people reviewing the full movie without seeing it but rather criticizing its display of the pedo element which for normal people rightfully overshadows any merits the rest of the movie may in fact have if does have any at all. But the point is a big difference between someone saying the new Battlefield game looks like shit and a reviewer giving it a bad review after playing it for 30 minutes much like how Jim Sterling used to do for his reviews. This really is no diffrenet from the whole "game journos don't play games" meme.

With regards to the whole Adam thing, my opinion falls in the middle (yep, I'm being a damn fence-sitter). Generally speaking, yes, if you're intending on being a film critic in any fashion, you should probably aim to finish the majority of the movies you watch. However, and this is especially true when you've been watching a lot of movies, you'll generally be able to pick up on whether it's worth your time long before it's over. Yeah, occasionally there'll be some twist that makes a movie pull a 180 on you, but I think most of those cases already have enough to hook you anyway. It's much like the three-episode rule some people use for anime; if it's not drawing you in within three episodes, then that's a failure on the show's part.

That said, I've watched a lot of Adam's review videos, and the amount of movies that he posts reviews for that he didn't finish is pretty small to my recollection. We're talking single digit percentage here. And even when he does, he always mentions in his review that he didn't finish it, so it's not like he's being deceptive. I do think it's silly to apply a numeric score to a movie you didn't finish, but whatever, it's his channel, he can do what he wants.

Regardless, even if Bob had a point, he acted like such a bitch about it that you can't help but be against Bob's position. That's how shitty of a person he is.

I don't use Twitter either, but from my understanding, a quote tweet only shows up in your feed, while a reply is part of the original thread. The former will not notify the OP, while the latter will. Thus, Bob quote tweets people when he wants to reply to them, but doesn't want their followers blowing up his mentions. Basically, anyone he disagrees with/hates gets his version of the silent treatment in the hopes that they won't notice his comments, and he can continue to hide behind his shield of smug superiority.

It didn't work in this case because Adam just went and replied to each of his quote tweets anyway, so anyone following along immediately found Bob's bitching.

It's super common for him, forget where he said it but any movie he gives 5/10 is normally something he didn't watch all of. While he is sometimes transparent about it that doesn't mean he always is. But really 2 hour when it's your job isn't a huge time commitment and shouldn't be given a pass anyway unless it's one of his reviews on a site like imdb. 1,229 people pay him on patreon per a month to review movies which is a super easy job and clearly aren't just paying him for the Lion King review that he has been editing for 2 or something years but for his bitesize reviews as well.

I do agree Bob is a huge bitch and should just say he who he is talking to, especially if he wants to change someones mind on the topic. This one of the very times were he is right and is something YMS has been criticized for a number of times in the past by both fans and non-fans, the fact Movebob act like this in a situation would have had plenty of support for a change compared to his past "hot takes" is just pitiful.

Images seem to work again:
View attachment 3075596

And this is why people hate Bob the ego, YMS while wrong was pretty respectful in asking for a discussion not even a debate about the topic to which blob response he is not making an ad for him despite the fact YMS has a far bigger fan base with over 1 million youtube followers while blob is stuck at 132k.

He could have went on maybe shown himself in a better light, gain some new connections and gain new fans or even changed YSMs mind on the topic but nope he to decline it in the worst way he could which shows he lacks any backbone to back up anything he says. Hell not responding would have better or even just a no thank you than what he really posted. And this is Blob job and views keep getting worse, this is your business and you need to start treating like such if you want to continue making a living from it.

 

[Boss Bass]

I would say a critic's primary job is to say whether something is worth watching/playing/eating or not. It doesn't really matter the particular industry. It can be acceptable to say you didn't finish something and say "avoid it, it sucks" as long as that is made clear.

The most famous critic of my lifetime used a simple binary to describe a movie’s quality. He then used the rest of his time helping people better understand and enjoy film.

I think “worth watching” is a powerful metric, as it gets directly to the only important question.

 

[Positron]

Some American jouro presumes to speak on behalf of all Russians.

The ricin assassination happened in the United Caliphate. Bobby and co. weren't suicided by a shot at the back of their heads in the US of A, simply because no one took them seriously.

Scarlet Letter R:




Bobby and co. are so childish they're almost adorable.


Everything looks like a video game to the likes of Luke Lockhart and Bobby:


Bobby laughs at couch activists (Futurism article). Why didn't he learn to code and join the WAR?





Yup, it takes more than money; it also takes the evil impetus to ruin the world. Fortunately being a jew means you are born with this evil impetus.

Americans are Nazis:


But don't point out, like Lara Login did, that Ukrainian soldiers wear the Black Sun insignia. This makes you cartoonishly evil.

---

Peter Coffin:


Bobby thinks Russell Brand has mommy issues.





I have no idea what Bobby means. I just know that humans are plain better than robot in all but the most repetitive of tasks, and that the "automation" pipe dream will be dropped once companies realize it costs them more.

Bobby and co. have no sympathy to the casualties of Superior Future's sexual revolution.


Elon Musk is now Elona. Transphobes like Bobby go mask-off:

So Bobby agrees that transsexualism is a mental illness that should disqualify one from business administration. Asshole is right again.

Elona Musk is much more beautiful than any Bobby's Angels: just see how natural and radiant her smile is. And she has a supportive family too!

---

(Archive of NYP article)


"Since when is this still a thing?" Bobby should have asked the same about Moon Knight and Dr. Strange and The Eternals.

And about this:



So is this Ms Marvel a Paki or a Kree? Or are coloreds simply interchangeable?

Whor gets less and less sexy for the average male, but Bobby is hardly an average male.







I want Care Bear Batman or, better, Paradise Lost Batman.

Bobby hates Wonder Woman:


Once again, real life reminds Luke of fiction:


New comedians are more creative and harder working than old goats like Jimmy Kimmel. They even talk about their smelly pussies.


Dob Chipman:


Slobbering at a he/him woman:


Luke found another trigger:

---

I have no idea YMS is a dog fucker; indeed I have no idea who he is. Does he have a KF thread?

Indeed, Bobby also works as a bar bouncer, firearms instructor, survivalist consultant, and male escort for mothers.



Nevertheless, Bobby got a dress-down for disparaging YMS:



Note to Arkle: 1) "argumentum ad populum" is one of Bobby's favorite tactics and 2) there is no such thing as bad tactics.



OK now that I've delivered my load of cargos, I can sleep easy.

Can someone who understands Twitter explain to me why this retard never just replies to people but always quote tweets?

Someone explained to me that this is to prevent his enemies from seeing and replying to his shit repartee. But I think Twitter allows you to see who quote-tweet you no?

 

[AirdropShitposts]

Everything looks like a video game to the likes of Luke Lockhart and Bobby:
View attachment 3075728

Bob thinks U.S. Special Forces are running around active war zones dropping supplies for people to use with nobody noticing?

Bobby hates Wonder Woman:
View attachment 3075784

I don't understand how Wonder Woman 1984 being bad would make the No Man's Land scene in the first film less "iconic" and less interesting to learn about.

Someone explained to me that this is to prevent his enemies from seeing and replying to his shit repartee. But I think Twitter allows you to see who quote-tweet you no?

It doesn't notify the person. When someone replies to your tweet you get a notification but if they quote tweet and you don't follow them you don't see it unless you check the quote tweets.

Doing a quote tweet also posts them to your feed, whereas you have to specifically look for people's replies. Bob doesn't want anyone to miss his epic dunks.

 

[Arthur Morgan]

Can someone who understands Twitter explain to me why this retard never just replies to people but always quote tweets?

It's more likely to show up in people's feeds. Replies only occasionally show up for your followers, but quote tweets are typically front and center. And Bob can't stand the idea of people possibly not seeing his "brilliant" writing.