- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic
- Thread starter Enriku
- Start date
- Status
UserAccess
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Moviebob needs to stick to easier targets. Writing the entirety of War and Peace to outline a joke that you have to explain does jack shit when somebody puts your on your back just by calling you a potato.
Do more with less language. Word economy, bitch.
Grumpy Pickle Rick
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2020
Because that’s what hacks like Bob do.
I’ve never seen inception or Dark Crystal but I do understand what you’re saying. I too, wish creators put more thought into their plot and settings.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
1) So native americans should just shut up then?
2) So how about you leave Boston?
(and @Bender knows it too
)Ok first, I do want to say that this is probably the Nolan film I would most love to see a sequel to - but for the world. The characters have had their arcs, you could maybe bring back JGL and Tom Hardy but that's about it. Make an anthology-style sequel of someone doing therapy or whatever using this dream tech where you don't have to know or care it's a sequel to Inception and I am THERE.
Second of all, I just want to say that part of what makes the movie work, is that it's super focused. We get a hint from a line that the dream tech was invented by the military to train soldiers and there are some college classes apparently related to it but otherwise we don't bother with uses outside of the heist because the heist is the focus.
As for "why don't they do something crazy with it?" The movie outright spells it out for you:
"My subconscious feels that someone else is creating the world. The more you change things, the quicker the projections converge on you."
Since the goal of the movie is to get something without the subject realizing it, "going crazy" is a bad idea because it clues the subject into something is wrong and gets them to start attacking the dreamers. (indeed if you've ever done work on lucid dreaming, one of the first clues to engage it is when things go crazy) Saying "why don't they do crazy stuff" is like watching a heist movie where the protagonists' goal is to rob a bank without attention and asking "why don't they just blow up the bank?" Heck the movie even outright demonstrates this by having a train appear in the middle of a city, screwing everything up and setting off the subject's "security system." When the crew gets to the second level, they try to calm things down and get "back to normal" to resume the infiltration with the Mr. Charles trick.
Now if you want to talk about outside the film, it's more to do with Nolan wanting to do a "heist" movie for a long time, but he can't ever do just a regular film, he always loves to put a twist on it to make it different. (Just like how TENET is a james bond film - but Nolan tosses in time travel.) It's certainly why I'm a big fan of his as I love just the efforts to make something unique and I highly respect his sheer discipline as a storyteller and that his movies INVITE you to think. Every time I watch Bob or Patrick Williams [sp?] do one of their dumb "shut up about plot holes - stories are all about how you feel" videos I want to shove Nolan down their throats as every one of his movies is a giant middle finger to that view.
Second of all, I just want to say that part of what makes the movie work, is that it's super focused. We get a hint from a line that the dream tech was invented by the military to train soldiers and there are some college classes apparently related to it but otherwise we don't bother with uses outside of the heist because the heist is the focus.
As for "why don't they do something crazy with it?" The movie outright spells it out for you:
"My subconscious feels that someone else is creating the world. The more you change things, the quicker the projections converge on you."
Since the goal of the movie is to get something without the subject realizing it, "going crazy" is a bad idea because it clues the subject into something is wrong and gets them to start attacking the dreamers. (indeed if you've ever done work on lucid dreaming, one of the first clues to engage it is when things go crazy) Saying "why don't they do crazy stuff" is like watching a heist movie where the protagonists' goal is to rob a bank without attention and asking "why don't they just blow up the bank?" Heck the movie even outright demonstrates this by having a train appear in the middle of a city, screwing everything up and setting off the subject's "security system." When the crew gets to the second level, they try to calm things down and get "back to normal" to resume the infiltration with the Mr. Charles trick.
Now if you want to talk about outside the film, it's more to do with Nolan wanting to do a "heist" movie for a long time, but he can't ever do just a regular film, he always loves to put a twist on it to make it different. (Just like how TENET is a james bond film - but Nolan tosses in time travel.) It's certainly why I'm a big fan of his as I love just the efforts to make something unique and I highly respect his sheer discipline as a storyteller and that his movies INVITE you to think. Every time I watch Bob or Patrick Williams [sp?] do one of their dumb "shut up about plot holes - stories are all about how you feel" videos I want to shove Nolan down their throats as every one of his movies is a giant middle finger to that view.
This is also a recommendation that you all need to go play Psychonauts and will quite enjoy it.
Last edited:
JayHarrison
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
As per Moviebob, all actions toward the cruel is not actual cruelty. As a direct result, all verbal (and physical) actions delivered to the perpetually cruel Moviebob will never constitute actual cruelty.
No, the petite bourgeosie will never be the most repulsively reactionary people in the world for as long as Moviebob continues to exist.
Corrected version of that last post: The whole Moviebob mindset is to be as nasty as possible without wanted to be confronted about his racism, sexism, misogyny, hypocrisy, and generally vile demeander.
They're much better as Republicans than devolving into something like you, Bob. Fuck, I'll go so far as to say they're better off as Nazis than to be someone like you; unlike you, even Nazis had standards as to what constituted crossing lines that dare not be crossed.
Moviebob's apostropheitis is almost as bad as his case of unnecessaryhyphenitis.
Moviebob has done literally nothing to move humanity forward. Ergo, Moviebob is on Team Backward.
Then why won't you evolve, Bob? Are you too full of yourself to see that you're one of the actual regressives who would rather destroy than build?
Bad Joe Manchin: Using power plant funding to bolster his bank account.
Good Joe Manchin: Refusing to lick Joe Biden's boots and kiss Moviebob's ass.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
My favorite response that I saw.
I soooooo badly want other consoomers like Luke and Bob to try to claim that Floridians are going to pay more taxes to upkeep Disney theme parks now.
My favorite response that I saw.
I soooooo badly want other consoomers like Luke and Bob to try to claim that Floridians are going to pay more taxes to upkeep Disney theme parks now.
Brobot, I love ya man and you're a fine hunk of steel so I'll accept your words of wisdom on this. It's been over a decade since I've watched it so I'll declare you the winner. I don't like that lampshade of lowkey, no weird stuff because I feel that's a poor crutch. That and almost every dream that I've had is nonsensical so I cannot imagine having a dream as autistically regimented as what's in the movie. That however is a completely different discussion.View attachment 3199660
1) So native americans should just shut up then?
2) So how about you leave Boston?
View attachment 3199618
(and @Bender knows it too
Ok first, I do want to say that this is probably the Nolan film I would most love to see a sequel to - but for the world. The characters have had their arcs, you could maybe bring back JGL and Tom Hardy but that's about it. Make an anthology-style sequel of someone doing therapy or whatever using this dream tech where you don't have to know or care it's a sequel to Inception and I am THERE.
Second of all, I just want to say that part of what makes the movie work, is that it's super focused. We get a hint from a line that the dream tech was invented by the military to train soldiers and there are some college classes apparently related to it but otherwise we don't bother with uses outside of the heist because the heist is the focus.
As for "why don't they do something crazy with it?" The movie outright spells it out for you:
"My subconscious feels that someone else is creating the world. The more you change things, the quicker the projections converge on you."
Since the goal of the movie is to get something without the subject realizing it, "going crazy" is a bad idea because it clues the subject into something is wrong and gets them to start attacking the dreamers. (indeed if you've ever done work on lucid dreaming, one of the first clues to engage it is when things go crazy) Saying "why don't they do crazy stuff" is like watching a heist movie where the protagonists' goal is to rob a bank without attention and asking "why don't they just blow up the bank?" Heck the movie even outright demonstrates this by having a train appear in the middle of a city, screwing everything up and setting off the subject's "security system." When the crew gets to the second level, they try to calm things down and get "back to normal" to resume the infiltration with the Mr. Charles trick.
Now if you want to talk about outside the film, it's more to do with Nolan wanting to do a "heist" movie for a long time, but he can't ever do just a regular film, he always loves to put a twist on it to make it different. (Just like how TENET is a james bond film - but Nolan tosses in time travel.) It's certainly why I'm a big fan of his as I love just the efforts to make something unique and I highly respect his sheer discipline as a storyteller and that his movies INVITE you to think. Every time I watch Bob or Patrick Williams [sp?] do one of their dumb "shut up about plot holes - stories are all about how you feel" videos I want to shove Nolan down their throats as every one of his movies is a giant middle finger to that view.
This is also a recommendation that you all need to go play Psychonauts and will quite enjoy it.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
I enjoy this mental deficiency: Exposing people who are behaving in objectively inappropriate ways toward children and then bragging about it online is "nasty" and "homophobic".
However:
Doxing people for bringing attention to these already existing videos is totally sane and healthy.
Blob obviously is not paying attention to the shifting sands under the DNC.
Oh Blob while I am sure some Repubs are totally Nazis the DNC has so much more in common Addy's special socialism blend. They both love camps, oppression, the stripping of rights, wealth, and lives of undesirables, the nationalization of industry and all infrastructure. Ya know...
More proof Blob never goes anywhere and is culturally ignorant. Compare religious organization counts in red areas vs church counts in blue areas. Walk through some of the shittier parts of Brooklyn sometime and count the various houses of worship. Yeah middle class white suburbanites might build bigger and gaudier churches but for sheer number illegals and blacks smoke them.
I don't know what is more cringe inducing a government official mistaking billion for million or Blob pretending what is going on at the Southern Border is not an open border policy. If you apprehend someone and let them go or even give them bus fare it is not really border control is it Blob?
I am confused as to why this is a thing. Has SoR become some kind of tranny obsession? I remember the game. I remember playing it and SoR2 with my friend during the summer but it was pretty bland.
If you are going to nostalgia rape a property might as well be River City Ransom. At least the gangs and bosses all had some level of character development.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
There's a SoR 4 on Steam. It did really well and was a pretty fun game. Of course, SJW's have to ruin everything for some reason and as always the shipping community destroyed all discourse around the game. Now someone wants to ruin it and all the Angel in the comments can talk about is the Mexican woman with giant cans.
Fuck the Internet.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2020
Sorry to inform Bobby and the insane cat-lady Marcotte, but the polling tells a different story.Some journo thinks Disney was the victim of bullying by the increasingly unpopular GOP (archive of Salon article)
I know it's a hard task but I think it must be done, so who's going to tell Bobby that a lot of liberals hate Disney, or at least has no sympathy with Disney, for myriads of reasons?
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
Bob's "we are the majority" is a total LARP. Most people on the planet, let alone Americans, simply don't think like these terminally online sociopaths. Most people are concerned about things like taxes, groceries, and keeping their families safe. It's a lot harder to keep your family safe when the biggest supplier of their entertainment wants to rape your children. But this won't mean anything to them. Why change and learn and evolve? Much easier to just eat another small amount of McDonald's for an average sized person and bitch about how unfair the world is.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
I've been engaging in some world building for my series and trying to come up with an alternate political ideology to place that world into a protected cold war with "the alliance". Then it struck me, wouldn't it be a kick if Bob's personal beliefs could be turned into a semi-functional ideology partly inspired by technocracy combined with eugenics and a dash of consumerism for the proles/serfs. I'm thinking of something akin to S.M. Stirling's Draka and 1984.
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
So, I found and read the PDF of "Brick by Brick" that was posted somewhere in this thread, a few weeks ago; and it's almost amazing on how smug he is about how Super Mario Bros. 3 influenced his childhood. The entire "prologue" of his journal is him taking the console wars at face value, bragging about working at Blockbuster, twice. Which is promptly followed by him collaborating with some reviewer who he cut ties with for being un-woke; can't remember why because my eyes were glazing over because this is close to 70 pages of narcissism, at this point.
Thankfully, he goes straight for the main event, which is promptly accompanied by an infodump of shit that can easily be looked up online. I actually had to check which year when this was published because of just how out of touch this is for someone who likely had internet access at the time.
But at any rate, the average level for this game takes anywhere from 2 to four minutes to complete and the best this guy can manage is around 5-8 stages with the occasional death sprinkled in. 1-1 is thankfully one of the few levels where he overanalyzes the level design because it's Nintendo's (subtle) attempt in showing people the ropes. From there, it becomes pretty close to him blogging about his progress while offering the occasional bit of trivia on how to farm extra lives. He also periodically goes on an tangent about the Warp Whistles or that old movie where that spastic kid made it to the fourth world by using one of those whistles. At any rate, he finishes the first world, craps out the impression that the second one gives him, and anything that would be remotely interesting is already gone.
He repeatedly dies to an walking skeleton, IIRC; other than that, it's "Wow! This level has an giant fish in it!" Wow! I get to swim in this level with the Frog Suit!" "Wow! These enemies are giant!"
But the childlike wonder dies out in the second half of the fifth world for reasons that should be obvious. It's worth noting that around the time he was splashing around in the third world, his grandmother's health is failing and she passed away shortly before he could finish the game. Sure, the break he took had an large role in this coincidence; but I still find it interesting.
At any rate, he started dying more often in the sixth and seventh worlds with causes the occasional rage quit; almost slides into manchild territory while describing the final area. Grandma passes away in the background while he's playing "Bing Bing, Wahoo!" and he's mostly indifferent to this.
He finally beats Bowser after dying in his castle, a few times and there isn't much to his closing thoughts.
Personally, i think it's entertaining for the opposite reasons why he wrote it on account of how often he gets over entitled over how something IRL pulls him away from this pet project, including his reviewing career. And it would be better if he wrote this an little bit before Y2K so that his audience won't have the internet at their beck and call for an visual explanation of what he's exaggerating about...But then we wouldn't have his grandma expiring in the background while her obese grandson is busy reliving his childhood; which this game didn't have as great as an impression as he making it out to be.
Overall, he's exaggerates too much and while he covers most of the content that the game has; he never really achieved some of the more obscure content that the game has to offer.
Like the coin-riddled airship. (This level warranted an entire paragraph from him, btw.)
It really says an lot that the best part of "Brick by Brick" is his autobiography, which eats up around an third of the book.
Thankfully, he goes straight for the main event, which is promptly accompanied by an infodump of shit that can easily be looked up online. I actually had to check which year when this was published because of just how out of touch this is for someone who likely had internet access at the time.
But at any rate, the average level for this game takes anywhere from 2 to four minutes to complete and the best this guy can manage is around 5-8 stages with the occasional death sprinkled in. 1-1 is thankfully one of the few levels where he overanalyzes the level design because it's Nintendo's (subtle) attempt in showing people the ropes. From there, it becomes pretty close to him blogging about his progress while offering the occasional bit of trivia on how to farm extra lives. He also periodically goes on an tangent about the Warp Whistles or that old movie where that spastic kid made it to the fourth world by using one of those whistles. At any rate, he finishes the first world, craps out the impression that the second one gives him, and anything that would be remotely interesting is already gone.
He repeatedly dies to an walking skeleton, IIRC; other than that, it's "Wow! This level has an giant fish in it!" Wow! I get to swim in this level with the Frog Suit!" "Wow! These enemies are giant!"
But the childlike wonder dies out in the second half of the fifth world for reasons that should be obvious. It's worth noting that around the time he was splashing around in the third world, his grandmother's health is failing and she passed away shortly before he could finish the game. Sure, the break he took had an large role in this coincidence; but I still find it interesting.
At any rate, he started dying more often in the sixth and seventh worlds with causes the occasional rage quit; almost slides into manchild territory while describing the final area. Grandma passes away in the background while he's playing "Bing Bing, Wahoo!" and he's mostly indifferent to this.
He finally beats Bowser after dying in his castle, a few times and there isn't much to his closing thoughts.
Personally, i think it's entertaining for the opposite reasons why he wrote it on account of how often he gets over entitled over how something IRL pulls him away from this pet project, including his reviewing career. And it would be better if he wrote this an little bit before Y2K so that his audience won't have the internet at their beck and call for an visual explanation of what he's exaggerating about...But then we wouldn't have his grandma expiring in the background while her obese grandson is busy reliving his childhood; which this game didn't have as great as an impression as he making it out to be.
Overall, he's exaggerates too much and while he covers most of the content that the game has; he never really achieved some of the more obscure content that the game has to offer.
Like the coin-riddled airship. (This level warranted an entire paragraph from him, btw.)
It really says an lot that the best part of "Brick by Brick" is his autobiography, which eats up around an third of the book.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
I love that he's so shit at the game he deems perfect he chimped out and rage quit several times. 3's not that hard by Nintendo standards.
NerdShamer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
He makes an living by reviewing movies, it's not like that he actually had an reason to get good at something, or actually lie about how bad he is.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
Now, I'm not a super smart thinker like Bob and his angels, but doesn't repealing the tax exempt law simply mean the Church of the Rat has to actually pay taxes now? And wouldn't that mean The Rat has to either pass the cost on to its customers or cut back expenses (or simply leave Florida)?
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
Yes, House of Mouse paying its fair share. Man, I don't know about you but I'm tired of these anti-business, pinko conservatives.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
My understanding is it's not just taxes; it's zoning issues that Disney was allowed to pursue on their own will now have to be submitted to regulations and boards and bureaucrats, just like everyone else. I don't really know all the details, but it's something like that. Know who doesn't have any special privileges like that, though? Universal Studios. From a competition standpoint, this was long overdue.
Open Window Maniac
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2021
"Universal Studios is owned by Warner Brothers. Warner Brothers owes Harry Potter. Harry Potter was written by arch-terf super bigot J.K. Rowling. Therefore, this was a coup done by transphobes to strip the wonderful trans ally Disney of the protections it needs to fight off those bigoted mayo ghouls. This was a direct strike by those filthy, backwards Believers against beautiful and valid trans Thinkers. We need to gas Florida now to protect trans people! #transwomenarewomen"
- Moviebob, probably
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2021
Imagine trying to insult someone by saying how great their father is. If anything is reflected glory, its offspring. You'd rather be gay than have a son or daughter you love and care for that takes after you? This is the male feminist in action.
Imagine trying to talk shit about someones kin because youre "a movie fan".
But yeah, Amanda? She's more successful than Bob.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
Excellent work, but points of for not mentioning the DCU.
- Status