Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • Happy Easter!

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
That Spider-Man take was telling.

Super-Smart at Science.

But Socially Inept, No Friends, Can't Manage his Life, and no Girlfriend.

Okay like it's been pointed out Peter Parker has tons of friends and is usually drowning in pussy off the top of my head Mary Jane Watson, Gwen Stacy, Felicia Hardy AKA Black Cat, Carlie Cooper, Michele Gonzales, Jill Stacy, Debra Whitman, Liz Allan, Betty Brant, Lian Tang, & Silk.

But who does that sound like?

Super Smart at Science (Well in his Fredo type mind), Socially Inept, No Friends, Can't Manage his Life (See my recent Student Post), No Girlfriend.

He only likes Spider-Man because he sees him to be a loser like him.

Blobby never change you're the gift that keeps on giving.
 
Well hey, here we have a Ukrainian lefty fucknut trying to say how Russia tots are fascist guyz..Hey, hey buddy..wanna say anything about the stuff in your government? Like the throwing Nazi salutes, Nazi flags etc.? No? Then kindly shut the fuck up. As for the uniforms, he does realize that "Black uniforms" weren't just a nazi thing? How about the uniform of the Russian naval military or many others. Unless you wanna go "Dem armband guyz!!", from the photo it kinda seems those armbands are used to mark which row of soldiers is marching by.

Bob, you're not a grown adult. You're a fat retarded child who's marinated inside an adult's body.
 
View attachment 3233998

Oh hey, Comics expert Movie Robert once again showing us he never opened a goddamned comic book on his life.

let me put it in twitter fag lingo so Robert can understand me "tell me you never read a Spiderman comics without saying it"

Peter Parker isn't socially inept, never was, and he doesn't suck at people, he is usually well liked by most people who met him, and he has various friends be in civilians and costumed life.

The thing about Peter is that he has a bit of a chip on his shoulder, as he is quick to get confrontational and tends to see the world being unfair to him, even before becoming Spiderman he had no problem talking back to Flash Thompson for even the smallest of the provocations, which was just calling him a nerd at most, and he ignored the robber that would latter kill Uncle Ben because Peter felt no one else would make him any favours, so why should he? The only ones Peter felt like were kind to him was his aunt and Uncle:

View attachment 3235969

But aside from that, Peter Parker never had any trouble being a charmer:

View attachment 3235978

He was dating Betty Brant by issue 11 or 12 I think, but the romance fell off when her brother died and she believes it was because of Spiderman (also she got jealous of Liz Allen).

And speaking of miss Allen:

View attachment 3235980

Yeah, look at that, Peter Parker, social inept everybody.

And it isn't just girls, for all his impulses, most of the time Peter was a very considerate and perceptive guy, and he grew to be more reaching and helpfull of others:

View attachment 3235985

And that was still on the Ditko years (except that last one, was Romita I think), but peter Parker went on to be just like, Sure he had some bad luck, and the whole girl trouble VS Sperhero life that made his adventures fun, but he wasn't a giant loser.

No, what Robert thinks of Spiderman is this:

View attachment 3235997

And look, I also like Raimi's movies as well, but the dweeb Mcguire played wasn't Peter Parker, for all the shit that has been hurdled, Garfield was the closest thing we got to a interpretation of the original character (and don't get me started with Spider-boy Holland).

So no Robert, this shit current comic writters are trying to pull by making Peter parker a clueless dumbass isn't compelling and it isn't in character, it just sucks.

At least read the fucking comics and don't just browse wikipedia for your stupid takes. Ah, but that would take time for checking out Glenn Grennwald for you daily dunk huh?
I think half the problem here isn't just the movies and most recent comics; it's longer-standing than that. IMO it stretches back to the 1960s (but not 1980s Spidey) and 1990s Spiderman cartoons. Bob's literally conflating animation spidey with comics spidey and acting like they're the same thing/continuity. The thing was, Spidey wasn't clueless/friendless/socially inept in those; but the smear campaign by J. Jonah Jameson (in both) did a number on his P.R. image. Hell, the lyrics to the 1960s spiderman theme included, "welcomed, then, he's ignored - action is, his reward". And yeah, Bob has a heavy reliance on Wikipedia at the best of times and it shows.
Fucking Blobert saying "They didn't shoplift from ME!" to excuse the mass shoplifting trend shows just how petty, self-absorbed, and STUPID he fucking is.

Yes, Bob, yes they did.

You see, in order to deal with the shrinkage, the loss, and the lack of employee safety, several things can happen, sometimes more than one:

The items will all be put behind security and you will have to get an employee to get them.
This means:
They will have to hire more employees and increase the cost
OR
You will have to stand there with your thumb in your ass and wait for an overworked employee to open the cage.

They will raise the price of the item to offset the loss
They will raise the price of the item to pay for the additional security
They will stop carrying the product because it attracts thieves.

The store will CLOSE and move away.

So, yes, you fucking Boston retard, they DID steal from you.

You're just too goddamn self-centered and stupid to see how they did it.
Y'know, for a galaxy-brained "THINKER" ™️ , bob sure doesn't think too hard about anything, let alone how shoplifting is, in fact, stealing from him personally. Instead the woke bullshit that was seared into his brain by god-knows-whom (someone who probably convinced him it would get him chicks/laid, most likely lol) has him believing that when the bleks shoplift, they're ackshually stealing from huWhite Spremacy and taking back reparations. Only a crayon-eating, blue curtain analyzing exceptional individual would be too stupid to see how shoplifting harms all of society, not just the owners of the store.

1651441063206.png

Oh, good lord.

:stress:
NO, CHRIS. This is NOT how Going to Church works. Going to Church for the first 15 years of your life and then stopping, does NOT make you "All Set" if you suddenly disbelieve in "Sky Daddy".
Why do I get the feeling he's going to get the same "I never knew you" Bob's getting at the End of Time? (assuming status quo til then)
 
View attachment 3233998

Oh hey, Comics expert Movie Robert once again showing us he never opened a goddamned comic book on his life.

let me put it in twitter fag lingo so Robert can understand me "tell me you never read a Spiderman comics without saying it"

Peter Parker isn't socially inept, never was, and he doesn't suck at people, he is usually well liked by most people who met him, and he has various friends be in civilians and costumed life.

The thing about Peter is that he has a bit of a chip on his shoulder, as he is quick to get confrontational and tends to see the world being unfair to him, even before becoming Spiderman he had no problem talking back to Flash Thompson for even the smallest of the provocations, which was just calling him a nerd at most, and he ignored the robber that would latter kill Uncle Ben because Peter felt no one else would make him any favours, so why should he? The only ones Peter felt like were kind to him was his aunt and Uncle:

View attachment 3235969

But aside from that, Peter Parker never had any trouble being a charmer:

View attachment 3235978

He was dating Betty Brant by issue 11 or 12 I think, but the romance fell off when her brother died and she believes it was because of Spiderman (also she got jealous of Liz Allen).

And speaking of miss Allen:

View attachment 3235980

Yeah, look at that, Peter Parker, social inept everybody.

And it isn't just girls, for all his impulses, most of the time Peter was a very considerate and perceptive guy, and he grew to be more reaching and helpfull of others:

View attachment 3235985

And that was still on the Ditko years (except that last one, was Romita I think), but peter Parker went on to be just like, Sure he had some bad luck, and the whole girl trouble VS Sperhero life that made his adventures fun, but he wasn't a giant loser.

No, what Robert thinks of Spiderman is this:

View attachment 3235997

And look, I also like Raimi's movies as well, but the dweeb Mcguire played wasn't Peter Parker, for all the shit that has been hurdled, Garfield was the closest thing we got to a interpretation of the original character (and don't get me started with Spider-boy Holland).

So no Robert, this shit current comic writters are trying to pull by making Peter parker a clueless dumbass isn't compelling and it isn't in character, it just sucks.

At least read the fucking comics and don't just browse wikipedia for your stupid takes. Ah, but that would take time for checking out Glenn Grennwald for you daily dunk huh?
Here's the thing with Bob's dumb take, even the Raimi Movies that he likes (which are the best Spider-Man movies) had Peter grow and change to be better at various skills. Bob acts like Spider-Man never grew up or changed at all which misses the point of his character. Bob wants his characters to remain the same and never change at all.

These are like his other takes on fictional properties where he wants things to remain the same as he imagined or grew up like Mario actually being this epic thriller or Batman being a very goofy series.
 
Fucking Blobert saying "They didn't shoplift from ME!" to excuse the mass shoplifting trend shows just how petty, self-absorbed, and STUPID he fucking is.

Yes, Bob, yes they did.

You see, in order to deal with the shrinkage, the loss, and the lack of employee safety, several things can happen, sometimes more than one:

The items will all be put behind security and you will have to get an employee to get them.
This means:
They will have to hire more employees and increase the cost
OR
You will have to stand there with your thumb in your ass and wait for an overworked employee to open the cage.

They will raise the price of the item to offset the loss
They will raise the price of the item to pay for the additional security
They will stop carrying the product because it attracts thieves.

The store will CLOSE and move away.

So, yes, you fucking Boston retard, they DID steal from you.

You're just too goddamn self-centered and stupid to see how they did it.
Corporations would never do that. They're Bob's friends. More friends than anyone of the obsolete who took away his superior future. His friends would never hurt him.
That Spider-Man take was telling.

Super-Smart at Science.

But Socially Inept, No Friends, Can't Manage his Life, and no Girlfriend.

Okay like it's been pointed out Peter Parker has tons of friends and is usually drowning in pussy off the top of my head Mary Jane Watson, Gwen Stacy, Felicia Hardy AKA Black Cat, Carlie Cooper, Michele Gonzales, Jill Stacy, Debra Whitman, Liz Allan, Betty Brant, Lian Tang, & Silk.

But who does that sound like?

Super Smart at Science (Well in his Fredo type mind), Socially Inept, No Friends, Can't Manage his Life (See my recent Student Post), No Girlfriend.

He only likes Spider-Man because he sees him to be a loser like him.

Blobby never change you're the gift that keeps on giving.
And there was that "Tobey into the MCU" videos he did where his explanation for Tobey's Spiderman disappearing for a few years is because he was jealous of how much praise the Avengers got, and that his Spiderman was ruled by his insecurities.
 
And there was that "Tobey into the MCU" videos he did where his explanation for Tobey's Spiderman disappearing for a few years is because he was jealous of how much praise the Avengers got, and that his Spiderman was ruled by his insecurities.
That one has a lot of funny implications in it. Mostly with him viewing Tobey's Peter as a disgruntled and disillusioned old guy when he'd only be around 29-32 and the racial masochism angle since he wanted Miles Morales' enemies to all get their powers from Peter's DNA with the main villain being "Ben Reilly" who's a fanboy stereotype that hates Miles for taking "Spider-Man" away from him.

He might as well have done a video about how badly he wants a black guy to twist his nipples.
 
Chris and Bob make me look like Ryan Gosling. Good Lord, they are ugly.

Chris could actually make himself presentable if you'd introduce him to a barber and a razor, or at least a beard trimmer.

Bob's bizarrely shaped head is unfixable, and those eyes will forever be reminiscent of the last thing a Boston hooker sees before she's stuffed under a cellar floor.
 
Basically, they live by this quote from Alan Moore:

View attachment 3235127
This seems like one of those quotes that has aged poorly now that social media has given us insight into how smug and dumb the average person really is. It reminds me of that one Carl Sagan quote about all of us being made of star material. If he could be shown how midwit redditors have butchered that quote, he'd spin in his grave so hard we could solve the energy crisis with his corpse.
 
Screenshot_20220501-184844_Chrome.jpg
New Patreon numbers are out. If I wasn't 100% on the idea that his numbers are fudged, I am now. His subscriber count has trended downward yet he just got a $100 boost. He's done nothing but lost relevancy as a content creator yet only gained notoriety as a lolcow and I'm supposed to believe he's making what he did in 2015? Remember 2015 was the same year of his Pixels review, the literal height of his career.

My current theory is that roughly $3000 is coming in from other sources, since it has literally never dipped below that magic number. If you want a more realistic count, take the current count and subtract 3000. It's easy enough for me to buy he pulls in 1000-1500 a month, as even Spoony still gets a few bucks on people that just don't watch their bank statements. North of 3000 continuously is a bigger fantasy than his space copium.
 
This seems like one of those quotes that has aged poorly now that social media has given us insight into how smug and dumb the average person really is. It reminds me of that one Carl Sagan quote about all of us being made of star material. If he could be shown how midwit redditors have butchered that quote, he'd spin in his grave so hard we could solve the energy crisis with his corpse.
Yeah, a bit.

Look, Alan Moore is a bit of a tit, great writer (even if he has a LOT of turkeys as well) and yada yada yada, but it's better to no hang on his every word, there is a lot of ass talking whenever these "creatives" who buy into their own hype start digging for these contemplative "deep" quotes.

And Alan Moore sure as fuck buys into his own hype.

But I think at least some on the intention of the quote does have some value. If we ignore the condescending part of "The artist knows better" type of crap, and focus a bit on "giving what the audience wants", Yeah, just plain obvious pandering, or churning out safe crowdpleasing stories ain't the best way to go for both artists and audience, it is a loss for both sides.

But to challenge and turn conventional storytelling ain't something easy to do either, and if you gonna do it, be prepared to fail and get a bloddy nose and just don't be grudge the audiences for not getting it.

Also, "art" per si ain't just to be defiant of "conventions", most classical stories are classical for following a classical structure, and so the artist wants to tell his story in the post polished and conventional way for broad apeal, but the inspiration and cleverness comes from the quality of the dialogue, the interesting scenarios, the captivating characters and in the end bad guy loses and good guys wins, just as the audience wants it, but a good artist make it so it comes deserved and satisfying and in the end everybody wins.

So yeah... Alan Moore has a point, but he is a dildo and don't take his word with much weight, he is just a man who said a lot of stupid shit over the years.
 
Ouch! Some Trumpster ghoul bit our coastal elite!
View attachment 3235869
Now it is the perfect time for him to hang out with Bobby. Chris can't smell him, and Bad Things should happen to Bad People.

And this thing might well be infected too!
View attachment 3235853
View attachment 3235854
11.jpg

You may not know these specific people, but you know these people. These people think that movie references, on their own, prompted by only tangential intersections, constitute the height of comedy.

"So he said that the price of this rope would put a dent in my bank balance, and I said 'perfectly balanced, as all things should be.' It was hilarious."

Fuck. I can smell these people through this picture.
 
Bob, you couldn't even say everyone else was catching up to you if we gave you a 10 yard head start, because they would all pass you before you formulated the thought.

Speaking of his finger-on-the-pulse intellect, Bob sees a Jordan Peterson/Red Skull conversation as something somehow worth having a full year after the fact, as if it's either relevant or evergreen or shudder nostalgic. Sounds like he's going to unironically direct a "rent free" at one of his detractors soon.

I don't know who these people are.
lilard.png
The guy is Matthew Lillard, who played Shaggy in the live action Scooby-Doo (and got the voice acting gig once Casey Kasem signed on as disc jockey for the choir invisible). The girl is a goth chick who's still a goth chick in 2022.

Based on the story, it seems Lillard is observant enough to realize someone who still dresses like that at her age probably still also cuts herself.
 
Ya know, looking at Bob's Gameover eater "how to make Sonic better" video, I cannot help and feel he kinda took pointers from Yahtzee's video. Like, I swear his rambles about "murdering the cast" are the same shit that fedora-wearing hipster ranted on in his Sonic Unleashed video.
According to others, Bob stole his obnoxious "talk super fast in a clumsy, reference-laden, unending run on sentence" narration style from Yahtzee, so it's no surprise the Blob would take ideas as well.
 
So I was reading this book by a prison chaplin.

At one point he says:

I would argue that there are several characteristics of a hardened criminal mindset. They are personality traits, attitudes or perspectives on life that, in my experience as a clergyman and prison chaplain, are almost always present in inmates to a greater or lesser extent.​

See... uh... see if any of these sound familiar...
1. Selfishness. The criminal wants what he wants, when he wants it. Instant self-gratification is the rule. Others may own what he wants, but that’s irrelevant. As far as he’s concerned, his desire for it overrides their right of ownership. On the other hand, what’s his is his, and no-one else has any right or claim to it. Only he is important. No-one else has any standing. As one convict said to me contemptuously some years ago, soon after we began working together: “F*** everyone except me.”

2. A manipulative approach to relationships. The criminal will seek to manipulate others to attain his ends. He’ll do so by any means available: wheedling, fits of anger, emotional blackmail, coercion, intimidation, even violence. The end (self-gratification) justifies whatever means are necessary. Any relationship must be run as the criminal wishes. Family, friends, acquaintances, colleagues, even fellow criminals: all are there to be exploited to gratify and satisfy his needs. Their own needs are irrelevant. The world revolves around him — or else.

3. Refusal to accept responsibility. The criminal avoids or evades any acceptance or admission of guilt or responsibility. Even when he displays contrition about his actions, it’s usually an outward show. In reality his only genuine regret is that he was discovered. He’ll blame anything and everything, anyone and everyone except himself for the negative consequences of his crimes. Of course, this means that he’ll eagerly agree with those blaming factors in his background for his crimes — it allows him to slide out of accepting any personal responsibility for his actions. It’s always someone else’s fault.

4. A sense of superiority. The criminal truly believes he’s ‘better’ than those ‘dopes’ who endure normal living and working conditions. He’s superior to their mediocrity. He’s ‘special’. He’s not bound by the restrictions they accept like sheep. He makes his own rules, lives life on his terms, and won’t accept the expectations of others, either individually or collectively, as being in any way legitimate or binding upon him.

5. A quest for power and authority. The criminal will usually not be satisfied with a perpetually subordinate position. He wants others to look up to him and respect him; he wants them to fear him. Whether it be in a criminal or a normal enterprise, he expects to direct others rather than be directed himself. In a large criminal organization such as a gang or the Mafia, he’ll always have bosses to obey, but he’ll also have lesser criminals and victims of his crimes who in their turn will obey and fear him. This satisfies his need for power. (This trait is particularly prevalent in sex criminals. Rape truly is a crime of power, not passion.)

6. A need for excitement. The criminal ‘gets a kick’ out of what he does. Even getting caught has its own thrill. Dealing with the arresting officers (perhaps including an exciting car chase that gets him on TV), establishing his place in the hierarchy in the jail, dealing with the courts, trying to ‘beat the rap’: all have their own emotional intensity. The same applies to life in prison. A really hardened convict may spend more time in the Hole than in general population, aggravate and infuriate staff, annoy other inmates… but he doesn’t care. He’s getting a kick out of his ‘power’ to make others react to him.

7. Inability to feel guilt. Mostly, a criminal doesn’t feel guilty about the crimes he commits. They’re justified because they serve his best interests. He might regard other criminals as ‘guilty’ because he’d never do what they did. I mentioned Adam in Chapter 2. I challenged him once, pointing out that he accused others of theft because they stole from their bosses in the Mob, but when he stole from ordinary people he was guilty of exactly the same crime. He denied it indignantly. His victims were ‘suckers’ who were ‘born to be fleeced’. On the other hand, those who stole from their criminal bosses were ‘cheating’ and deserved all they got. They were guilty. He was innocent. In the same way, I’ve heard a serial rapist condemn child-abusers and threaten to kill them out of hand if he ever identified one. The physical sex crime was the same. The choice of victim made the difference between guilt and innocence in his eyes. Raping and sodomizing an adult was OK: doing the same to a child was unconscionable.

8. Compartmentalization. Criminals have an uncanny ability to put different parts of their lives into separate mental compartments. While they’re engaged with one they ignore the others. There are many examples of child abusers who were loving, caring parents to their own children, yet could inflict the most horrific atrocities on other children without a qualm. I know inmates who appear totally committed to and sincere about their religious beliefs, to the point where they can deliver an excellent summation of moral teaching… yet those same inmates can walk out of the chapel and stab another convict, or arrange a drug deal, without turning a hair. They’ll indignantly deny that they’re acting against the tenets of their faith by such actions: in fact, they might even be praying for Divine assistance while they do it!

9. A state of perpetual anger. Many criminals are always angry. Much of the time this is suppressed and controlled, but it can flare up at the slightest provocation. If he doesn’t get what he wants — anger. When someone resists his attempts to control them in a relationship — anger. If he can’t avoid being forced to admit (if not accept) responsibility for his actions — anger. When someone slights or ‘disrespects’ him, affecting his sense of superiority and need to be in charge — anger. If he gets bored and misses the stimulus of excitement — anger. Instead of reasoning about a problem and asking why something’s happened, the criminal’s reaction is anger at what he perceives to be the cause of the problem: and all too frequently he lashes out at it. If it’s a person, so much the worse for them.

10. A refusal to accept reality. Reality is defined by the criminal on his terms, not by the victim of his crime or by society. A criminal convicted of check fraud will adamantly deny that he’s a thief — he ‘never took anything’. One who stole from a bank didn’t steal from an individual, only an institution, and that’s not theft by his lights. A rapist didn’t do any harm to his victim — ‘she enjoyed it’. A child abuser wasn’t abusing the child at all: he was ‘showing his love’ for his victim. An armed robber who killed his victim when he resisted wasn’t guilty of murder. If his victim had complied with his demands, he wouldn’t have died. He ‘asked for it’ by resisting; therefore, his death wasn’t the robber’s fault. Most criminals will argue that they weren’t convicted because of what they did, but rather because ‘the system’ or ‘the judge’ or ‘the prosecutor’ was against them. It was personal bias that put them behind bars, not the weight of evidence. I could go on forever in this vein, but I’m sure you get the picture.

I think #2 may be the only one he fails at though probably not for lack of trying.
 
View attachment 3237521
New Patreon numbers are out. If I wasn't 100% on the idea that his numbers are fudged, I am now. His subscriber count has trended downward yet he just got a $100 boost. He's done nothing but lost relevancy as a content creator yet only gained notoriety as a lolcow and I'm supposed to believe he's making what he did in 2015? Remember 2015 was the same year of his Pixels review, the literal height of his career.

My current theory is that roughly $3000 is coming in from other sources, since it has literally never dipped below that magic number. If you want a more realistic count, take the current count and subtract 3000. It's easy enough for me to buy he pulls in 1000-1500 a month, as even Spoony still gets a few bucks on people that just don't watch their bank statements. North of 3000 continuously is a bigger fantasy than his space copium.
I wouldn't put it past a number of his sycophants to up their monthly pledges though that number is weird.
1651451879016.png
1651451919034.png
I went back and looked and I didn't see anything out of the ordinary. He wouldn't pick a fight with that one black buy until the end of the month. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some discord Bob set up for his true and honest fans where he has them self dox like DSP and he cried about his finances. That first jump is a jump of $141 and a loss of one patron. What's extra weird, to me at least, is you can see that big drop in patrons followed by some fluctuation but his earnings have a steady and gentle decline. There's a point where his patrons increase but his earnings decrease.

The funny answer, and one that's not possible, to all of this is that Bob and Lesser Brother are laundering movie money into Bob's patreon.
 
New Patreon numbers are out. If I wasn't 100% on the idea that his numbers are fudged, I am now. His subscriber count has trended downward yet he just got a $100 boost. He's done nothing but lost relevancy as a content creator yet only gained notoriety as a lolcow and I'm supposed to believe he's making what he did in 2015? Remember 2015 was the same year of his Pixels review, the literal height of his career.

My current theory is that roughly $3000 is coming in from other sources, since it has literally never dipped below that magic number. If you want a more realistic count, take the current count and subtract 3000. It's easy enough for me to buy he pulls in 1000-1500 a month, as even Spoony still gets a few bucks on people that just don't watch their bank statements. North of 3000 continuously is a bigger fantasy than his space copium.
Bob's number bounce around so much that sites have issues with a accurate count. Here's a screenshot of Bob's Patreon about two weeks or so ago:
Screenshot_20220426-183007.jpg

And this is his current number:
Screenshot_20220501-214946.jpg

I expect his monthly hand-out to increase to $3,300 by the end of the month only for it to dip again in June.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back