Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Check out the cast interviews where there is so much self-congratulatory nonsense about being "the first Puerto Rican elf!" (lol) or "the first female dwarf color!" (that one isn't even an exaggeration) or how so many of the trained monkeys actors are "activists" and you'll see where some of the dread is coming from.

There are also just a lot of red flags for people who've been sandbagged by this crap before in multiple franchises that went woke. Elrond, a character who at the time of this series should be anywhere from around 1800 to over 3000 years old, and who should be an established, seasoned, elder, is depicted as something out of a Middle-earth boy band, and looking hopelessly naive to the much savvier Galadriel (whose depiction as an armored warrior leading armies has got a whole host of problems of its own).

Some of the criticism is overblown -- although the actress playing the black dwarf Disa is the most obnoxious on this stuff by a wide margin, there's really no lore problem with having dark-skinned dwarves, especially if they want to flesh out the various dwarven bloodlines beyond the line of Durin depicted in LotR. Similarly, I don't think the occasional dark-skinned elf is anything to get worked up about.

For more concrete criticisms, wait until the show comes out. But the cast interviews and the nasty defensiveness of the showrunners is plenty of cause for concern.

EDIT: One specific line from the Disa actress -- not sure if it's been echoed by her castmates -- is especially obnoxious, and that is showing more characters "of colour" and of course female characters with so much "agency" makes this version of Tolkien so much more accessible ... as if the most popular fantasy novel ever written was so occulted and closed off because it didn't have a fat loudmouth black dwarf in it somewhere. It's the elevation of superficial qualities of race and gender over the universal human experience that afflicts every franchise that goes to the mat on "representation" and it's hitting the last franchise that needs it.

Ok that's enough. Go watch a Nerdrotic video or something if you want more.

EDIT 2: Bob is fat and 99% has never read Lord of the Rings. Might have gotten a third of the way through The Hobbit when he was in high school.
That is something I have hated about modern entertainment now is that the writers, show runners and trained monkey's actors will always says; "Our work is better then the original because it is more accessible and people can actually see themselves on screen." That is just how utterly narcissistic and vapid entertainment has become. If kids today only wanted to see themselves on screen and in books then manga wouldn't be so fucking popular as it is. Just because someone is black doesn't mean they can't enjoy Tolkien. I remember a few years ago when I went to Barnes & Noble and I saw a black teenage girl go to the fantasy section and picked out The Hobbit. That is how timeless and accessible Tolkien's work is. Anybody can read them and relate to the story as it is timeless.
When modern writers and show runners talk about making a classic work or history "accessible" and "relatable" what they really mean is that they are trying to rewrite history. Progressives hate how "white" , "hetero" and "problematic" the past and many classic works of art are and seek to rewrite them to make it seem like the past was always this progressive melting pot. It is disgusting and shows how modern progressive can not just let the past be. "He who writes the past writes the future" as they say.
 
Last edited:
That is something I have hated about modern entertainment now is that the writers, show runners and trained monkey's actors will always says; "Our work is better then the original because it is more accessible and people can actually see themselves on screen." That is just how utterly narcissistic and vapid entertainment has become. If kids today only wanted to see themselves on screen and in books then manga wouldn't be so fucking popular as it is. Just because someone is black doesn't mean they can't enjoy Tolkien. I remember a few years ago when I went to Barnes & Noble and I saw a black teenage girl go to the fantasy section and picked out The Hobbit. That is how timeless and accessible Tolkien's work is. Anybody can read them and relate to the story as it is timeless.
When modern writers and show runners talk about making a classic work or history "accessible" and "relatable" what they really mean is that they are trying to rewrite history. Progressives hate how "white" , "hetero" and "problematic" the past and many classic works of art are and seek to rewrite them to make it seem like the past was always this progressive melting pot. It is disgusting and shows how modern progressive can not just let the past be. "He who writes the past writes the future" as they say.
Whenever I see someone bitching about not being represented on screen I get major red flags. Like, you're disposed to only care about things if you can see yourself in that position, and you can only do that if it's somebody who looks like you? That's narcissistic at best, and sociopathic at worst.
Ask any child what their favourite thing to watch is and I can almost guarantee it won't even have humans in, yet they have an easy time relating to what's happening. Kids can empathise with a fucking cartoon deer when his mum gets shot, so why can't these adults empathise with a different colour actor on screen?
 
Whenever I see someone bitching about not being represented on screen I get major red flags. Like, you're disposed to only care about things if you can see yourself in that position, and you can only do that if it's somebody who looks like you? That's narcissistic at best, and sociopathic at worst.
Ask any child what their favourite thing to watch is and I can almost guarantee it won't even have humans in, yet they have an easy time relating to what's happening. Kids can empathise with a fucking cartoon deer when his mum gets shot, so why can't these adults empathise with a different colour actor on screen?
All the black kids dressing as Batman and Superman every Halloween can attest to this. Hell, I saw white Black Panthers too post-movie.
 
Whoever gave the dwarf lady that hair style is more hateful toward black people than anyone I've ever met.

I know that Tolkien's son wasn't a fan of Jackson's films, and I get why to an extent. He hated the work being commercialized and he felt it was dumbed down (and getting ripped off on royalties probably didn't help). I get where he was coming from, to an extent, though I still love Jackson's work.

That being said, Jackson was very much respectful of Tolkien's work, and he did his best to adapt some very dense books into some not quite so dense movies. Amazon is basically the manifestation of corporate greed, and I cannot think of a dumber group to appeal to than the retards among us who can only empathize with people of a similar melanin count.

Does anyone really think that the corporate megalith of Amazon is going to be the one to handle these changes with care and depth? Or are they just going to bumble a long with a mediocre fantasy show and blame all the criticism on racism/sexism/whatever straw they can grasp at.
 
Interesting sidenote on China: they got mindfucked early on, even before Mao took over. The educators were all commie at a certain point and competely fucked Chinese written language so that nobody could read the classics. This was all part of a deliberate effort to sever the Chinese people from "Old Culture", because muh superior fyootchah. So then when Mao took over, the students were all for it because they were brainwashed and ignorant.
It is true that Mao invented Simplified Characters (SC) as a ploy to distance people away from classical Chinese culture, but I'm more pragmatic on Simplified Characters. Try writing three 1500-word essays in three hours during your Chinese History exam! I don't share my peers' animosity towards SC; I was born after the Cultural Revolution, and as a child in Hong Kong I learned Regular Characters from school and from life while picked up SC by reading library books -- I didn't even consciously learn them at all; it was just that the science books from Mainland China were so much better than those from Taiwan, and before long I just knew how to read and write SC. I'm often surprised that most non-Mainland Chinese people my age cannot read SC: they are shutting themselves out of a lot of valuable resources.


Baizuos think they know China. Bobby wants to see them socked with two cantaloupe-sized silicone bags.
baizuo.png

This Noah Khrachvik turns out to be another firm Believer of the dictum "No Such Thing As Bad Tactics".
tactics.png
No Bobby you are not joking. Purging not optional if we want Superior Future at all.

rogan.png

thylacine.png
I must have heard about at least half-dozen attempts at resurrecting the Thylacine. Instead of the CNN article, I give you the link to Andrew Pask's "Thylacine Integrated Genetic Restoration Research Lab", the latest hopeful contender. And fuck you Bobby.

mattel.png

Not much from Lesser Brother lately but here is Chrissy's Angel:
kay.png
 
Whenever I see someone bitching about not being represented on screen I get major red flags. Like, you're disposed to only care about things if you can see yourself in that position, and you can only do that if it's somebody who looks like you? That's narcissistic at best, and sociopathic at worst.
Ask any child what their favourite thing to watch is and I can almost guarantee it won't even have humans in, yet they have an easy time relating to what's happening. Kids can empathise with a fucking cartoon deer when his mum gets shot, so why can't these adults empathise with a different colour actor on screen?
A few years ago Mister Metokur had a theory as to why we see grown ass adults like this. It mainly has to do with the fact that millennials and zoomers grew up in one of the most peaceful times in human history. There were no great wars for them to fight, no great rights movement to get behind, no great places to discover. We have two generations of people whose souls are wanting more. You have the more active ones creating insipid gender rights movements (what rights don't trannies have?) but for the more lazy ones they want their entertainment to make them feel important. This is why you are seeing so many grown ass adults demanding that there is this representation in this and that with the hopes of, for a brief few hours, they can feel like they did something with their life. That by living vicariously as this character that looks like them for a few hours they can feel like they conquered something, that they are special and not a total loser. It is basically like herion. These people need that dopamine hit because they aren't getting it anywhere else.
 
Last edited:
Baizuos think they know China. Bobby wants to see them socked with two cantaloupe-sized silicone bags.
View attachment 3612315
One: How many of Moviebob's followers, mutual or not, actually live in China?

Two: To those in China who unironically folow Moviebob, is living in China so bad that you'd rather live in Moviebob's dream world in which Nazi Germany conquered America?



This Noah Khrachvik turns out to be another firm Believer of the dictum "No Such Thing As Bad Tactics".
View attachment 3612342
No Bobby you are not joking. Purging not optional if we want Superior Future at all.
Which joke was that? Quickly searchign Twitter, and the number of Moviebob's "jokes" about traffic are easily countable on two hands.



Joe Rogan defends abortion "rights". Eugenicsbob approves.
 
One: How many of Moviebob's followers, mutual or not, actually live in China?

Two: To those in China who unironically folow Moviebob, is living in China so bad that you'd rather live in Moviebob's dream world in which Nazi Germany conquered America?




Which joke was that? Quickly searchign Twitter, and the number of Moviebob's "jokes" about traffic are easily countable on two hands.




Joe Rogan defends abortion "rights". Eugenicsbob approves.
I think Bob's referring to Bolt-on tits AKA Naomi Wu.

The "Joke about traffic" was the infamous "Eugenics Joke" where Bob bemoaned, while sitting in traffic, that there's some days he's mad that the Natzees had besmirched the concept of eugenics, and that everybody else calls those "weekdays". It's structured like a joke ("you call them weekdays" was the punchline; to wit; EVERY day during the week (5 days) is when he laments the tainting of Eugenics as a concept) but it's not ackshually funny for like a gazillion reasons. Bob now admits the joke was "bad" and insists on rugsweeping it like the narcissist he is.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mola Ram and Flexo
I dunno man, I can't get the image of the Magnavox Odyssey or other Western vidya products out of my mind. Just look at DOOM, for example. Our side of the pond does have a LOT of corruption going on in it, but video games being strictly from Japan is a weeb's image of pop culture. The industry is so much more than thatt


It’s not even a weeb’s image. It’s nostalgia goggles of console gaming from the 90’s when western devs were few and far between due to the strict regulation and requirements Sega and Nintendo had.
Computers were almost entirely dominated by western devs from America and Europe, and the 3DO was a platform almost entirely consisting of western developed games. It’s really not until the playstation/N64 era that western console games started getting more consistent releases.

But even the NES, Genesis, and Snes has western games, they just didn’t have the huge budgets for marketing that the major Japanese games did at the time. America still had a pretty strong arcade scene in that period though.
 
That is something I have hated about modern entertainment now is that the writers, show runners and trained monkey's actors will always says; "Our work is better then the original because it is more accessible and people can actually see themselves on screen." That is just how utterly narcissistic and vapid entertainment has become. If kids today only wanted to see themselves on screen and in books then manga wouldn't be so fucking popular as it is. Just because someone is black doesn't mean they can't enjoy Tolkien. I remember a few years ago when I went to Barnes & Noble and I saw a black teenage girl go to the fantasy section and picked out The Hobbit. That is how timeless and accessible Tolkien's work is. Anybody can read them and relate to the story as it is timeless.
When modern writers and show runners talk about making a classic work or history "accessible" and "relatable" what they really mean is that they are trying to rewrite history. Progressives hate how "white" , "hetero" and "problematic" the past and many classic works of art are and seek to rewrite them to make it seem like the past was always this progressive melting pot. It is disgusting and shows how modern progressive can not just let the past be. "He who writes the past writes the future" as they say.
For some reason, the people who use this representation logic will call you a racist if you say you won't see Black Panther because there aren't any white males in prominent roles.
 
Going on a long rant about Blobby and how I don't believe he's hates DC, but just dudebros who represent his childhood bullies.

DC is quite frankly more woke than Marvel right now.

The films are even with throwing in blink, and you'll miss LGBT shit and Race Swapping and Gender Swapping.

TV Shows no main character has ever been explicitly LGBT except on Runaways and that's from the comics. Every Arrowverse show has multiple LGBT characters it was starting to get hard to find regular straight characters on those shows. Now while so was the source Material Doom Patrol which is good and Sandman also fine would be considered woke.

Animation nothing of note from Marvel. DC Young Justice in Season 4 had Arthur give his thrown to Mera, Lagoon Boy has a Wife and Husband, Halo is Non-Binary and Harper Row is interested in Halo, and Aquaman 2 former Aqualad is now in love with a dude. Then there's Harley Quinn which is now the Adventures of Harley and her girlfriend Ivy which only happened to appraise the purple hair twits on twitter after the bitched about Season One.

Marvel comics right now have Steve Rogers as Cap, Tony Stark as Iron Man, Thor as well Thor, and Bruce Banner as Hulk and none are on the LGBT Whatever spectrum. Biggest crime is Cyclops was cucked when him and Jean decided on having an "open" relationship sure he gets to fuck other women, but no self-respecting heterosexual dude ever said, "Hey babe why not get some new dick?" Only guys who want a guy in the bed and is using the wife as an entry point and cucks do that.

DC Comics in the last few years had Kal-El raped, Bruce Wayne is possibly Bi, Tim Drake Robin a Heterosexual character for 30 years now is Bi with a Boyfriend, Jon Kent son of Lois and Clark who now shares the Superman title is Bi with a boyfriend, and Green Arrow Connor Hawke son of Oliver Queen is A-Sexual.

So why does an SJW loving idiot like Blobby love DC more than Marvel?

1: Marvel is popular, and it makes him pleased something he likes is popular. Although he tries to over sell it with his ridiculous ideas that Marvel is equal to Shakespeare and the Sixteen Chapel. Bitch I like MCU movies but they're the McDonalds of film maybe Chick Fil A at best.

2: Comicsgate Marvel was at the center of it. When it happened the MCU Avengers were riding high, and the Animated Avengers were patterned after them. So, it was Steve Rogers, Tony Stark, Thor Odinson, and Bruce Banner on the big screen and in cartoons. But in comics it was Sam Wilson Cap, Riri Williams Iron Man, Jane Foster Thor, Amadeus Choi Hulk and Perlmutter was side lining the X-Men a popular seller for decades for the Inhumans. You can see why comic retailers were annoyed this was all happening at once when the OG characters were in great demand and instead of understanding their frustration the industry called them sexist and racist and that became the narrative. So, to the SJW crowd Marvel stood up to racist/sexist and defended diversity. Also, since Blobby thinks all Dudebros are racist and sexist you know which side he fell on.

3: He decided Synder, and his fans are Dudebros and thus subhuman and he wants them to suffer since he can't make his childhood bullies suffer. He wants an Adam West type Batman because he thinks camp pisses them off.

Blobby isn't loyal to Marvel or DC only what does my childhood likely like and how can I make it stop to hurt them.
 
DC Comics in the last few years had Kal-El raped, Bruce Wayne is possibly Bi
I agree with most of what you said but these two are wrong. The first one you're referencing was from an ambiguously canon comic referencing a Pre-Crisis story where he was a political prisoner at a work camp though it was spread around out of context. The second one came from a White Knight prequel and isn't even in continuity.
 
Ah, I see. I was picturing a big plastic hotwheels track like the ones I had as a kid.
Oh, that's what Bob was going for. But Bob being Bob, he once again missed that what he was asking for we already more or less have.

Let's be honest, there's no way to make a 1:1 life size Hot Wheels track safe for human use.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back