Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[Assorted Nuts]

More restaurant choices.

How do you think Bob got so fat?

 

[Here to Lurk]

Sorry if I'm late, but what's with Bob and this "Superior Future" crap? Guy sounds like a Nazi when he says that.

 

[HY 140]

Exactly why is multiculturalism better anyway? They never really explain that.

more food and Nintendo merchandise duh

 

[Gordon Cole]

Sorry if I'm late, but what's with Bob and this "Superior Future" crap? Guy sounds like a Nazi when he says that.

Okay, so during the election, the guy was a die-hard Hillary supporter, and brushed off claims of her fucking up by saying she'll lead us into "the Superior Future", not the much more likely scenario of "the status quo".

Multiculture is superior to monoculture.

Ah, that's why you're so supportive of games not made by Nintendo.

Thought is superior to belief.

Like how Hillary was 100% gonna get the ball rolling for the Star Trek future that only exists in your thumb-shaped head.

Worldliness is superior to provincialism.

Yes, I remember the last time you left Massachusetts, traveled around the globe and didn't act that where you lived was better than anywhere else:

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

Did that fat fucker just put down provincialism? Nigger, you live in Massachusetts - the only state capable of rivaling New York for navel gazing and outright rejection of outsiders. Half of the novels written by Boston authors use this insularity as a primary character trait for their cast of characters. Surely, you read something other than funny books.

Also, deportation is initiated for violating the terms of your visa. If the husbando in question was not a legal permanent resident, he was here on a visa - a visa he had likely overstayed. ICE may have gung ho agents, but I'm pretty sure most of them treat it as a job, just like everyone else in the west.

Also, wait until tubby hears the stories of the INS agents that slap a SEIZED sticker on tax cheats' cars as they pull into the parking lot.

 

[Tranhuviya]

Sorry if I'm late, but what's with Bob and this "Superior Future" crap? Guy sounds like a Nazi when he says that.

Hippy-dippy progressive wonderland where all the dirty Midwestern and Southern poors have been put in camps and the rich, tech-savvy do-nothing elites rule the world in a Nordic Socialist utopia where all the darkies live in peace with the whites.

 

[AnOminous]

Surely, you read something other than funny books.

 

[Absolutego]

Exactly why is multiculturalism better anyway? They never really explain that.

Multiculturalism helped build the USA into the intellectual and cultural powerhouse it is today. The problem is that leftists like Bob have a very shallow understanding of multiculturalism, and don't realize that it only works as a collection of subcultures in service to a greater monoculture. We wouldn't be as adventurous or flexible as a people if it weren't for multiculturalism.

Having a huge pool of subcultures with different beliefs means you can have them battle it out in the public arena of ideas and adopt the best aspects of various subcultures into the greater monoculture. A good example of that is American food, since it's almost entirely food introduced by different immigrant groups and modified to suit the greater culture. It's also why you have that phenomenon of the hyphenated-American, since many immigrants develop a new identity that isn't in line with the old country, but is also a markedly different subculture from the overall American environment. Boston Irishmen are very unlike their relatives in Ireland. Same goes for Italian-Americans, the Scandinavians in the Midwest, Chinese-Americans, Jews (though they're kind of a unique subgroup everywhere they go), and a whole lot more. Music is another great example, since most new music genres since the 19th century have had their start in the USA. Blues, jazz, country, americana folk, techno, funk, etc all got their start or were hugely influenced by American culture.

The problem with multiculturalism as practiced by Bob's ilk is that they miss that critical element of vetting sub-cultural elements by the overall culture and exchanging cultural ideas between each other. Instead of a melting pot, they treat multiculturalism like a salad bar: every culture in its own little bin and you aren't allowed to criticize what you dislike or co-opt elements of it you do like. You are allowed to experience it only at the behest of the members of that culture, and many in the SJW wing resent white people in particular expressing any interest in "minority" cultures at all. The whole rainbow of skin color diversity doesn't mean anything if they all share the same mindset, which is damn near universally the case with most identity politicians.

As with most things, identity politics-obsessed ""progressives"" are ruining what is a good concept at its core and turning it into some kind of awful authoritarian nightmare in service of their cultish ideology.

 

[X-Shaped Weeaboo]

Irony is white people telling n0n-white people that white people are forever their enemies and that only by exploiting their non-whiteness will they ever be able to be equal to the white people that are evil.

I wonder if Bob has ever read Animal Farm? Either way, his shallow interpretation of multi-culturalism is perfect for children who don't any better, hence why it's perfect for him.

 

[Replicant Sasquatch]

Sorry if I'm late, but what's with Bob and this "Superior Future" crap? Guy sounds like a Nazi when he says that.

Bob believes the world was on the threshold of a post-scarcity, post-racial utopia a la Star Trek but then those darn dirty Republicans ruined it all by voting for Trump.

 

[Mola Ram]

Bob believes the world was on the threshold of a post-scarcity, post-racial utopia a la Star Trek but then those darn dirty Republicans ruined it all by voting for Trump.

Because that was going to happen under the august leadership of a shrill, charisma-void grifter like Hillary Clinton.

See, here's what I don't understand. I get hating Trump (I spent a good chunk of the primaries entirely sour on him myself and there's plenty he's doing right now I don't especially like). I get thinking this election was a disaster for the country, even if I think it's overstated. I get the impulse to block Trump at every turn by fair means or foul. I even get the nasty attitude toward Trump voters, ultimately self-destructive as it'll likely be.

What I don't get is investing Hillary with this numinous aura through which she would have ushered in a Progressive Golden Age. She was unpleasant, a terrible campaigner, not particularly distinguished in either her Senate or State Dept. capacities, and had more baggage than a Samsonite warehouse, not to mention a documented propensity for graft and corruption. Is it really so difficult for Bob to admit that however much he despises Trump, the Democrats saddled themselves with a wretched candidate?

Bob of course is far from the only one to do this, but he possesses a furious sincerity about it that I don't see in many other places.

 

[AnOminous]

Because that was going to happen under the august leadership of a shrill, charisma-void grifter like Hillary Clinton.

See, here's what I don't understand. I get hating Trump (I spent a good chunk of the primaries entirely sour on him myself and there's plenty he's doing right now I don't especially like). I get thinking this election was a disaster for the country, even if I think it's overstated. I get the impulse to block Trump at every turn by fair means or foul. I even get the nasty attitude toward Trump voters, ultimately self-destructive as it'll likely be.

What I don't get is investing Hillary with this numinous aura through which she would have ushered in a Progressive Golden Age. She was unpleasant, a terrible campaigner, not particularly distinguished in either her Senate or State Dept. capacities, and had more baggage than a Samsonite warehouse, not to mention a documented propensity for graft and corruption. Is it really so difficult for Bob to admit that however much he despises Trump, the Democrats saddled themselves with a wretched candidate?

Bob of course is far from the only one to do this, but he possesses a furious sincerity about it that I don't see in many other places.

Hillary was a ghastly cunt and anyone who thought she was anything but is a fool. Proof: she is so hatable that she spent $1.2 billion in a campaign against DONALD FUCKING TRUMP and still lost resoundingly.

 

[Feline Darkmage]

You could get angrier without scratching the surface of autism.
View attachment 188518

This made me laugh far more than it probably should have.

 

[Absolutego]

Because that was going to happen under the august leadership of a shrill, charisma-void grifter like Hillary Clinton.

See, here's what I don't understand. I get hating Trump (I spent a good chunk of the primaries entirely sour on him myself and there's plenty he's doing right now I don't especially like). I get thinking this election was a disaster for the country, even if I think it's overstated. I get the impulse to block Trump at every turn by fair means or foul. I even get the nasty attitude toward Trump voters, ultimately self-destructive as it'll likely be.

What I don't get is investing Hillary with this numinous aura through which she would have ushered in a Progressive Golden Age. She was unpleasant, a terrible campaigner, not particularly distinguished in either her Senate or State Dept. capacities, and had more baggage than a Samsonite warehouse, not to mention a documented propensity for graft and corruption. Is it really so difficult for Bob to admit that however much he despises Trump, the Democrats saddled themselves with a wretched candidate?

Bob of course is far from the only one to do this, but he possesses a furious sincerity about it that I don't see in many other places.

When people treat politics like sports teams, they idolize those considered to be on their side and demonize those not on their side. So all the dewy-eyed progressives think she's just like them despite all the evidence otherwise. They project their desires onto her and think she'll usher in a new Era of Good Feelings once Republicans are finally ousted from government control and the Democrats win the demographics war. This isn't limited to the left, either. There are a lot of idealistic alt-right/libertarian kids who think that Trump is basically Ron Paul if he were better at talking shit, here to end foreign wars, secure the borders and fix the debt crisis, when his cabinet and stated policies so far are much more in line with George W. Bush.

Of course, for most of those people, that's because they're young kids with an underdeveloped sense of nuance (and an overly-optimistic outlook) when it comes to politics. In Bob's case, it's actually because:

Spoiler: You already know what this is

:autism:

 

[Emperor Julian]

Exactly why is multiculturalism better anyway? They never really explain that.

Multi-culturalism isnt in off itself 'good' or even 'bad' it is however a sign of a stable society. Even if we ignore the ethics of not killing minorties the moment something goes wrong Allowing the free exhange of idea's and economic benefits while at the same time we avoid the stagent calcification of enforced orthodoxy. Ancient societies where obssesed with enforcing orthodoxy and it was a total waste of time at best-wereas as fresh rush of exported idea's usually led to massive cultural boost and social reforms. I would'nt worry too much about these people being keen on the term, they have no idea what it actually entails. It's debatable how much he understands other cultures and how they interact with the his.

Sorry if I'm late, but what's with Bob and this "Superior Future" crap? Guy sounds like a Nazi when he says that.

Bob effectively wants a post-national technocratic obligarchy where full automisation of manual labour is complete. He's a little hazy on the details of this idea, for example he's never elaborated on if democratic process is still followed in this utopia or what happens to working class people he never defines what exactly he means by intelligence, nor does he ever comment on personality moralty of these smart leaders. But the general gist of it is we're ruled by philosopher kings and social prestige is measured with nothing but intellect. Somehow hillary clinton being elected would push this forward.

Feel free to circle flaws in this idea.

 

[SoberBlitz]

Bob effectively wants a post-national technocratic obligarchy where full automisation of manual labour is complete. He's a little hazy on the details of this idea, for example he's never elaborated on if democratic process is still followed in this utopia or what happens to working class people he never defines what exactly he means by intelligence, nor does he ever comment on personality moralty of these smart leaders. But the general gist of it is we're ruled by philosopher kings and social prestige is measured with nothing but intellect. Somehow hillary clinton being elected would push this forward.

Feel free to circle flaws in this idea.

Pretty sure that Bob's utopia involves limiting citizenship/voting rights to those who comply with the visions and goals of that utopia. We've seen what he thinks of those that vote against "progress", regardless of whether or not that benefits the voter. Among other things, we've seen that he believes that literacy tests were a net positive for the democratic process, albeit his literacy tests would be used to restrict the voting rights of those with inferior cognitive skills rather than targeting non-whites.

 

[Lorento]

Bob effectively wants a post-national technocratic obligarchy where full automisation of manual labour is complete. He's a little hazy on the details of this idea, for example he's never elaborated on if democratic process is still followed in this utopia or what happens to working class people he never defines what exactly he means by intelligence, nor does he ever comment on personality moralty of these smart leaders. But the general gist of it is we're ruled by philosopher kings and social prestige is measured with nothing but intellect. Somehow hillary clinton being elected would push this forward.

Feel free to circle flaws in this idea.

Sure.

 

[KillaClown1488]

I unironically wish that we could institute laws that make property ownership a prerequisite for voting just so edgy fat wannabe-revolutionaries would have less political power.

 

[Lackadaisy]

I unironically wish that we could institute laws that make property ownership a prerequisite for voting just so edgy fat wannabe-revolutionaries would have less political power.

so... roll back the clock to 1784 then?

 

[StraightShooter]

This guy looks like JustinRPG.

Well at least he actually looks more like Mario than the actor in the 90s Super Mario Bros. movie did: