Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I doubt he'd tackle anything of that caliber. So far, he's stuck pretty consistently to the realm of popular blockbusters. Which is a shame, because I'd get a kick out of how badly he'd fuck up an analysis of something like There Will Be Blood.
I'm not an avid watcher of MovieBob fare, but if I might ask, what tends to be "popular blockbusters" to him? Glancing at his "Really That Good" library, it seems like he goes for either late-Cold War comedies or superhero movies in general. I'm not sure what kind of category you would put Die Hard and Independence Day under but I want to say "summer tent pole" films.

Has he ever referenced to watching at least a fairly "mainstream" (for lack of a better term) classic like Casablanca or at least Citizen Kane? I'd have thought maybe he'd have reblogged the odd think piece comparing Charles Kane to Trump.
 
I'm not an avid watcher of MovieBob fare, but if I might ask, what tends to be "popular blockbusters" to him? Glancing at his "Really That Good" library, it seems like he goes for either late-Cold War comedies or superhero movies in general. I'm not sure what kind of category you would put Die Hard and Independence Day under but I want to say "summer tent pole" films.

Has he ever referenced to watching at least a fairly "mainstream" (for lack of a better term) classic like Casablanca or at least Citizen Kane? I'd have thought maybe he'd have reblogged the odd think piece comparing Charles Kane to Trump.

Would he ever touch The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly? That is a mainstream classic which is perhaps one of the most iconic Westerns of all time and that theme everyone will recognize even if they haven't seen the film? Hell if he loves touching classic action films will he even do a review of Shaft?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robot Holocaust
Would he ever touch The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly? That is a mainstream classic which is perhaps one of the most iconic Westerns of all time and that theme everyone will recognize even if they haven't seen the film?

It's probably too masculine and "dudebro" for him or something.

It'd be interesting to see Bob review "Unforgiven" because of how morally ambiguous it is. Same could go for "High Plains Drifter" in which Eastwood's character pretty much rapes a woman and she ends up enjoying it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lensherr
It's been said before, but it amazes me that Bobbo likes to classify himself as "cultured" and always pushes for multiculturalism over nationalism, and yet it seems his movie tastes revolves around superhero movies and mainstream blockbuster movies. Wishful thinking, but I think it would interesting/funny to see him cover something like "Do the Right Thing" or "Friday." Hell, he didn't even say anything about "Straight Outta Compton," even after other reviewers were talking about it. Some cultured guy he is.
 
Forget all these, how about something PC and fresh from the Oscars, Moonlight?

And I found this on his blog:

BobBallot.png


If he's seen any of his "Top 5" films, I've never read his reviews (only a brief praise of The Neon Demon on Twitter)

And isn't Hardcore Henry (no.3 of Best Director) a cinematic FPS?!
 
Last edited:
Forget all these, how about something PC and fresh from the Oscars, Moonlight?

And I found this on his blog:

View attachment 234013

If he's seen any of his "Top 5" films, I've never read his reviews (only a brief praise of The Neon Demon on Twitter)
Of course he put the Captain America movie on there. Of fucking course. Why would I expect anything different? What a goddamn fanboy.
 
Of course he put the Captain America movie on there. Of fucking course. Why would I expect anything different? What a goddamn fanboy.
The only movies in his Top 10 list that he's actually reviewed are.... *drumroll*...

Kubo and the Two Strings -- a cartoon.
Captain America -- a comic book movie, a Marvel comic book movie.

That's all folks!
 
Shaming directors he doesn't like for mostly having male protagonists: Bob's all for it.
Shaming directors he likes for mostly having male protagonists: Bob's against it.
What a hypocrite:
Spielbeerg.JPG


Jesus 'effin Christ, can it kill him to just shut his brain off and enjoy something without calling it "problematic"? People like him & Dobson are the only people who still say it unironically:
Problematic.JPG
 
If a dang dirty male like Spielberg made mostly women movies feminists will accuse him of "mansplaining" or "appropriating women voices".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
If a dang dirty male like Spielberg made mostly women movies feminists will accuse him of "mansplaining" or "appropriating women voices".
I just realized something about Bob and Spielberg. Spielberg's the one director Bob will white knight at every opportunity. Here's him writing off Elizabeth Banks's complaints as "a joke" (How feminist):
AJoke.JPG

And here he is writing off someone else's complaints about Todd Haynes's upcoming film Wonderstruck being too cloying:
Wonderstruck.JPG

And so, you may ask, "What are you getting here with this slice of Autism?" Well, here's my theory:

With Bob, Spielberg is to movies what Mario is to vidya.

Think about it, considering Bob's manchild tastes in everything, it only makes sense he'd gravitate to Spielberg because 1.) The 80s and 2.) His movies' sentimental, simplistic views towards life. As such, any movie by him gets a free pass just because of the nostalgia Bob attached to his name, even the ones he listed as "problematic":
TempleOfDoom.JPG

As such, consider Bob: Given the innumerable amounts of pop culture garbage he ingested as a kid, he'd taken Spielberg's viewpoints (simplistic, black & white morality), distorted it through his autism and applied it to his own perspective on the world.

Add in a bunch of other factors, such as his unwillingness to tackle artsier, more challenging films, and it's a pretty interesting theory that Spielberg's the film equivalent of Mario to him, and he'll defend him to the bitter end.

(P.S. This is all coming from a guy who likes Spielberg.)
 
What did Danny Elfman ever do to him?:
image.jpeg


It sounds like he supports stalking someone irl for shitposting. Seriously, she posts photos of the dude who did it in the thread:
image.jpeg
image.jpeg


One more rant about the people being ignorant untermensch before the night's out. In other news #KeepAmericaGreat:
image.jpeg


And his most exceptional retweets of the night:
image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
I'm curious what the intent is with people who shout about "everything is inherently political". Is it to justify swinging their hammer around? Is it trying to make it "woke" and with the kids? Cause all it does manage to do is make me even more frustrated with them and make me want to purge anything vaguely political in everything besides actual politics no matter if they're right, left, up, or down which I see could ironically be a political stance in itself.
 
Last edited:
It's usually said as an excuse to justify overt propaghanda, political messages in works are totally fine as long as the concearn is the art rather than the message (compare johnny cash vs christian butt rock). As is a politcal analysis of non-political works, the problem is the idea works on the assumption what you take from a work is the be all and end all, "everything is political" really means "everything is political for me" without the consideration Holyoaks might just be a shitty soap opera about british people. Tolkien nails it in the introduction to lord of the rings

“I cordially dislike allegory in all its manifestations, and always have done so since I grew old and wary enough to detect its presence. I much prefer history – true or feigned– with its varied applicability to the thought and experience of readers. I think that many confuse applicability with allegory, but the one resides in the freedom of the reader, and the other in the purposed domination of the author.

A friend of mine did a really subtle satire of this at university where he interpreted every piece of art through the lens of lovecraftian horror as an Joke essay.
 
It's usually said as an excuse to justify overt propaghanda, political messages in works are totally fine as long as the concearn is the art rather than the message (compare johnny cash vs christian butt rock). As is a politcal analysis of non-political works, the problem is the idea works on the assumption what you take from a work is the be all and end all, "everything is political" really means "everything is political for me" without the consideration Holyoaks might just be a shitty soap opera about british people. Tolkien nails it in the introduction to lord of the rings



A friend of mine did a really subtle satire of this at university where he interpreted every piece of art through the lens of lovecraftian horror as an Joke essay.
What gets me is that it's not even "All media is inherently political", it's "Everything is inherently political" and that's not even me taking an autistically literal interpretation. They literally mean every single thing or action is apparently a political act.
 
What did Danny Elfman ever do to him?:
View attachment 234100

It sounds like he supports stalking someone irl for shitposting. Seriously, she posts photos of the dude who did it in the thread:
View attachment 234102 View attachment 234103

One more rant about the people being ignorant untermensch before the night's out. In other news #KeepAmericaGreat:
View attachment 234105

And his most exceptional retweets of the night:
View attachment 234101 View attachment 234104

Is he trying to say Dennis Rodman wasn't a great NBA player? Are you high? You think he slid on wearing dresses and rainbow hair because he was interesting? Man was one of the greatest defensive basketball players ever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back