Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought creationism and anesthesiology were mutually exclusive fields, but then again I'm not an enlightened ubermensch like Matey Potatey.
Creathesiologits.JPG

The fuck it is, you're still tweeting.
RedeemedTwitter.JPG

No, but you certainly are.
Exception.JPG

So being concerned about wide swaths of people being unemployed means I'm a bigot now?
Fyucha.JPG

Notch = Has enough money to last him till the day he dies, so he becomes a shitlord extraordinare.
Bob = Gets by on hipster welfare, and gives leftists a worse name than they already have.
It's so tough to judge who's in a worse-off place.
DQM0.JPG

DQM.JPG

He'll do mental gymnastics to hate it, don't worry.
Somebody give @big baby jesus a medal for being this website's Nostradamus.
LAMT.JPG

Shit, I'd hate to see Bob's version of the "right" people.
TechGov.JPG
 
I thought creationism and anesthesiology were mutually exclusive fields, but then again I'm not an enlightened ubermensch like Matey Potatey.

This is quite simply one of the stupidest things he's ever said (something for which I admit there is stiff competition). An anesthesiologist's job is based purely on observation, mathematical measurements, and empirical experience. His religious beliefs mean exactly fuck-all. You're better off worrying about whether or not he abuses the substance of his trade (which is sadly common) than you are worrying about what books of the Bible he believes in.

I dunno, maybe it's because I spent the last few days driving around a rural stretch of the country and talking to and meeting some very nice, very decent people that I'm finding Bob's horseshit especially galling today.
 
This is quite simply one of the stupidest things he's ever said (something for which I admit there is stiff competition). An anesthesiologist's job is based purely on observation, mathematical measurements, and empirical experience. His religious beliefs mean exactly fuck-all. You're better off worrying about whether or not he abuses the substance of his trade (which is sadly common) than you are worrying about what books of the Bible he believes in.

I'd rather have a creationist anesthesiologist than an anesthesiologist who gets high on his own supply, which is alarmingly common.
 
Would there even be an audience for a MovieBob directed show besides people like us? His views only vaguely overlap with your typical SJW so he's find a way to fuck up with that demographic.
Well, he has Twitter followers, but I'm not sure how many of those are legit, or just following him for the salt he produces.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Flexo
Bob's future might be looking a little less superior...
https://newrepublic.com/article/144...h-argued-demographics-favored-democrats-wrong
The U.S. census makes a critical assumption that undermines its predictions of a majority-nonwhite country. It projects that the same percentage of people who currently identify themselves as “Latino” or “Asian” will continue to claim those identities in future generations. In reality, that’s highly unlikely. History shows that as ethnic groups assimilate into American culture, they increasingly identify themselves as “white.”
. . .
In fact, it’s already happening. In the 2010 Census, 53 percent of Latinos identified as “white,” as did more than half of Asian Americans of mixed parentage. In future generations, those percentages are almost certain to grow. According to a recent Pew study, more than one-quarter of Latinos and Asians marry non-Latinos and non-Asians, and that number will surely continue to climb over the generations.

Unless this is what bob is planning on. Somehow i can see him as thinking the Borg in Star Trek were the good guys.
 
Would there even be an audience for a MovieBob directed show besides people like us? His views only vaguely overlap with your typical SJW so he's find a way to fuck up with that demographic.
Well, you've got his brother watching it out of pity, fellow fatasses like Dobson, Tony Goldmark and Jim Sterling, some Twitter brownnosers and people he himself brownnoses towards like Lindsay Ellis, Siddhant "No negative criticism ever" Adlakha, Sean "Autistic Conan O'Brien" McElwee, etc.

It's like the Algonquin Round Table, if they substituted talent with autism.
 
Bob's future might be looking a little less superior...
https://newrepublic.com/article/144...h-argued-demographics-favored-democrats-wrong


Unless this is what bob is planning on. Somehow i can see him as thinking the Borg in Star Trek were the good guys.
I've been saying this for awhile but I seriously hope this overlooked fact leads to "PURE EUROPEAN GENETICS" ranting from Bob. If demographics worked the way progressives see it than America would be home to black people only by now on merit having having the darkest skin. I don't think you can completely get rid of people who are "white" with interracial marriage, you'd need eugenics or something and good luck getting people on board for genocide and inbreeding that'd fuck yourself over in the long run anyways.
 
Bob's future might be looking a little less superior...
https://newrepublic.com/article/144...h-argued-demographics-favored-democrats-wrong


Unless this is what bob is planning on. Somehow i can see him as thinking the Borg in Star Trek were the good guys.

It still amazes me how much both the Dem's and idiots like Bob bought into that one horrible catch phrase as their entire political philosophy. "Demographics is Destiny" without ever once doing an ounce of historical examination. Real Political Scientists saw the flaw with that from the moment John Judis first postulated it. It's exactly the same as the Dem's constant cries of "We have all the youth, so the Right is dying off, and it will be all Democrats in the future". Somehow they never notice that the Dem's have had all the youth for over 100 years, yet the party balance never changed. It's the same thing with immigrants. The Dem's have total capture of first generation immigrants. By second generation it's about 50-60 percent. By third generation their allegiance corresponds to age and personal economic interests the same as everybody else. A 3rd gen Latino is a Catholic voter indistinguishable from Italian, Irish, etc descent.
 
It still amazes me how much both the Dem's and idiots like Bob bought into that one horrible catch phrase as their entire political philosophy. "Demographics is Destiny" without ever once doing an ounce of historical examination. Real Political Scientists saw the flaw with that from the moment John Judis first postulated it. It's exactly the same as the Dem's constant cries of "We have all the youth, so the Right is dying off, and it will be all Democrats in the future". Somehow they never notice that the Dem's have had all the youth for over 100 years, yet the party balance never changed. It's the same thing with immigrants. The Dem's have total capture of first generation immigrants. By second generation it's about 50-60 percent. By third generation their allegiance corresponds to age and personal economic interests the same as everybody else. A 3rd gen Latino is a Catholic voter indistinguishable from Italian, Irish, etc descent.

I've said it before in this thread but the whole "Demographics is Destiny" thing is basically a load of shit in the long run, not least because it doesn't account for people tending to become more conservative as they get older, see more of the world and start paying taxes etc

In the UK Jews, Hindus + Sikhs voted to leave the EU (generally considered a more conservative stance although this isn't strictly speaking accurate) by a larger margin than White British did, similarly they tend to vote basically in line with White British at General Elections.
Ethnic divisions aren't so much a factor in voting as class divisions are - if you're poor it might be in your best interest to vote Dem/Labour in the UK for whatever reason regardless of your race. Similarly, if you run a successful small business you probably wont take much convincing that the party that wants to lower business taxes is the one for you, regardless of whether you were born in a country or if you moved there 25 years ago.
 
I've been saying this for awhile but I seriously hope this overlooked fact leads to "PURE EUROPEAN GENETICS" ranting from Bob. If demographics worked the way progressives see it than America would be home to black people only by now on merit having having the darkest skin. I don't think you can completely get rid of people who are "white" with interracial marriage, you'd need eugenics or something and good luck getting people on board for genocide and inbreeding that'd fuck yourself over in the long run anyways.
Was it Morgan Freeman who said he's not African-American, he's American because was BORN here, not Africa? I can't remember who said it...
 
Was it Morgan Freeman who said he's not African-American, he's American because was BORN here, not Africa? I can't remember who said it...
You're thinking of Freeman talking about his dislike of Black History Month and the implication that black Americans aren't just Americans. I was more talking about the "progressive" belief that non-whites are all "brown-ish" people with silly cultures who will eternally vote Dem and having one family member who isn't white also makes you into one of those cartoonish stereotypes. It's a really bad over-simplification and not really how it works. It's also kinda weird how they don't see it with how often progressives complain about both "Uncle Toms" and people who pass for white.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back