Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
upload_2018-1-15_15-3-13-png.357556
Gotta love that hyper-delusional reply that somehow tries to spin being a basement dwelling asshole as a good thing.

It's not.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Maybe his next book can be called "Why I'm A Paranoid Shut-In".
Hikkiko.JPG
Hikkiko0.JPG
Hikkiko1.JPG


This is the same asshole who said it's safer to be in Boston at night than Idaho.
Directions.JPG
Directions0.JPG


Again, he gets salty whenever someone calls him a eugenicist.
Eugenics.JPG
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BlueSpark
Liberals really DO believe that "blackness" is a uniform, monolithic state of being that all people with dark skin share - that's why their Identity Politics crap is idiotic and unnuanced. You can't slap all of the people who are descended from an entire friggin' continent with a single label and expect it to explain their place in the universe

When white men do this, it is called "Orientalism" and is said to be a BAD thing; but when the woke do that, it is called "Solidarity" and is claimed to be EMPOWERING!

Hikkiko.JPG


Who gave this dumbskull Sartre to read?!

This kind of "philosophy" is wrongheaded and is especially pernicious for anti-social spergs like Bobby. Hell is other people, yet Heaven is also other people.
 

Or Bob, you can not worry about the unlikely event any of that shit will happen and live your life like any human being has for the past 10 millenia. We're lucky to live in a time when, for most of us, common diseases are more likely to inconvenience us than kill us and where "whether or not I eat tonight" doesn't depend on me being skilled with a slingshot or .22- luxuries my grandparents' generation didn't have.
 
Bob's master race talk does get to me sometimes and while it's funny because he's the complete opposite of any kind of superman, it's sad that there are others who like these ideas and someone can be that into it that they openly talk about branding people for life or having machines rip them apart for being "not truly human". His rants give you a weird cocktail of laughter, frustration, and sadness.
 
Bob's master race talk does get to me sometimes and while it's funny because he's the complete opposite of any kind of superman, it's sad that there are others who like these ideas and someone can be that into it that they openly talk about branding people for life or having machines rip them apart for being "not truly human". His rants give you a weird cocktail of laughter, frustration, and sadness.
I think this is common to people that fantasize about master races, ubermenschen and the like. Hitler was far removed from his concept of the Aryan superman he loved to tout. And what is Bob if not a fat, exceptional Hitler minus the opportunity and drive?

EDIT: Probably also why they flock to mythology and comic books- they're people that feel powerless and oppressed, and want simplistic supermen to idealize. This is not a criticism of myth and comics, just how tards like these view them.
 
I think this is common to people that fantasize about master races, ubermenschen and the like. Hitler was far removed from his concept of the Aryan superman he loved to tout. And what is Bob if not a fat, exceptional Hitler minus the opportunity and drive?

EDIT: Probably also why they flock to mythology and comic books- they're people that feel powerless and oppressed, and want simplistic supermen to idealize. This is not a criticism of myth and comics, just how tards like these view them.
That would explain why he insists they're supposed to be self-inserts or whatever term we're using today. When Bob sees the Avengers, he doesn't seem to see them distinct characters, he sees the Avengers the vehicle for the reader/watcher's fantasies. All of them can disappear as long as he gets the masks and the legacy that comes with it to line up in anyway with his world views. It's a strange view for someone who claims to be a fan but it makes sense for someone more interested in "powerful" iconography.

On the other hand, I'm might be talking out my ass about cartoon characters.
 
Last edited:
Maybe his next book can be called "Why I'm A Paranoid Shut-In".
View attachment 357988 View attachment 357989 View attachment 357990

This is the same asshole who said it's safer to be in Boston at night than Idaho.
View attachment 357985 View attachment 357986

Again, he gets salty whenever someone calls him a eugenicist.
View attachment 357987
Good god what a fucking psychopath. If he wasn't shaped like a human bean bag and didn't believe "Bah-ston" was a perfect multi cultural utopia I'd be afraid that he would start shooting people on the streets or something.
 
Good god what a fucking psychopath. If he wasn't shaped like a human bean bag and didn't believe "Bah-ston" was a perfect multi cultural utopia I'd be afraid that he would start shooting people on the streets or something.

Bob would probably shit himself if he was in the same room as a real, loaded firearm. And failing that he'd probably be dumb enough to accidentally discharge it.
 
This might come off as kind of autistic and rambling because it's late and I'm waiting on a sleeping pill to kick in, but does anyone know if Bob has ever outright lied about something?

I've noticed this pattern of behavior where Bob seems very insistent to avoid (intentional) falsehoods in favor of deflection. For example, he's never denied being a basement dwelling freak, but he always insists on referring to it as a basement apartment as if the people making fun of him give a shit. It seems like an outright lie would make him seem less pathetic, but he instead goes for the deflection. Why would he do this? It's not like he's a man of strong principles. I guess autism prevents him from lying of something.

I really noticed this with the whole first person shooters did 9/11 thing. When Bob was shown that podcast he went for the deflection almost immediately with that, "I don't remember this person" bullshit. The only specific claim he would outright deny was his father dying when he was young, which was an offhand comment made by the guy on the podcast that even he wasn't sure he remembered correctly. Anyway, the fact Bob wouldn't come out and straight deny the actual meat of the podcast is the big reason I think it's true. Again though, wouldn't lying about it be the much more sensible route? It would be so easy to just say, "no, I don't think EA did 9/11, that's crazy" but he didn't. Although I realize Bob is anything but sensible.

None of this is to say everything or even anything Bob says is correct either. If you tried to make a drinking game out of every falsehood he spouts on any given day you would die. But I think in those cases it's him simply being too stupid or delusional to not realize what he says is garbage.
 
Maybe his next book can be called "Why I'm A Paranoid Shut-In".
View attachment 357988

It gets me that Bob rates "Republican" as more dangerous than "Chemtrail nutter" or "Creationist." It's also kind of amazing how he always takes his rants just that smidge too far and shows of just how batshit he really is.
 
This might come off as kind of autistic and rambling because it's late and I'm waiting on a sleeping pill to kick in, but does anyone know if Bob has ever outright lied about something?

I've noticed this pattern of behavior where Bob seems very insistent to avoid (intentional) falsehoods in favor of deflection. For example, he's never denied being a basement dwelling freak, but he always insists on referring to it as a basement apartment as if the people making fun of him give a shit. It seems like an outright lie would make him seem less pathetic, but he instead goes for the deflection. Why would he do this? It's not like he's a man of strong principles. I guess autism prevents him from lying of something.

I really noticed this with the whole first person shooters did 9/11 thing. When Bob was shown that podcast he went for the deflection almost immediately with that, "I don't remember this person" bullshit. The only specific claim he would outright deny was his father dying when he was young, which was an offhand comment made by the guy on the podcast that even he wasn't sure he remembered correctly. Anyway, the fact Bob wouldn't come out and straight deny the actual meat of the podcast is the big reason I think it's true. Again though, wouldn't lying about it be the much more sensible route? It would be so easy to just say, "no, I don't think EA did 9/11, that's crazy" but he didn't. Although I realize Bob is anything but sensible.

None of this is to say everything or even anything Bob says is correct either. If you tried to make a drinking game out of every falsehood he spouts on any given day you would die. But I think in those cases it's him simply being too stupid or delusional to not realize what he says is garbage.
It's possible he avoids directly lying because that would imply he's wrong about something and a guy with genes as Superior as Bob does not make mistakes. The only problem to him is that everyone else "doesn't get it".
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Flexo
That would explain why he insists they're supposed to be self-inserts or whatever term we're using today. When Bob sees the Avengers, he doesn't seem to see them distinct characters, he sees the Avengers the vehicle for the reader/watcher's fantasies. All of them can disappear as long as he gets the masks and the legacy that comes with it to line up in anyway with his world views. It's a strange view for someone who claims to be a fan but it makes sense for someone more interested in "powerful" iconography.

Look at how he is completely :autism: for Mario, a character especially designed to have minimal personality for the sake of player immersion.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Done
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back