Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well those kinds of movies make him think, hence why he doesn't care for it.

Here's a criteria for a Moviebob approved movie
  • Must be made by Marvel Studios and/or Disney
  • Must feature witty jokes every five seconds
  • Main cast has to have no white men to make it "diverse"
  • Must have colorful CGI that looks like shit out of a Uwe Bool movie
  • Must be a politically correct SJW propaganda whose ideology aligns with Bob Chipman's politics
  • Has to have a shallow story so Bob can pull some bullshit meaning out of his sticky ass to make him seem like he has deep analysis to the film and make him look smart
  • Can feature any dudebros
  • Must paint Republicans as evil motherfuckers and confusing the liberal side as the good side.
That's his criteria to how he reviews movies honestly.
You forgot "must not have muscular characters who gained their body shape trough conventional possible means unless they are bad guys" and "must have black and white mortality because no way people can be nuanced".
 
I’m not even sure what he’s trying to say with the Wrinkle in Time tweet anymore. As a Disney fan, I’m absolutely appalled with his behavior and blind brand loyalty. As for the Bloodshot movie, it’s by Sony. So it’s probably going to suck by default, but Bob will hate it for all the wrong reasons.
Whenever Bob makes up his (non existent) mind, nothing will be able to change it. He’s an immovable object both metaphorically, and literally.
 
Has Bob been tweeting about "Annihilation" at all? That should be right up his alley, right? Or are he and his ilk manchildren who are too autistic to enjoy anything that isn't "Geek culture" IP?

(yea, I recently watched the HITB for it)
Obviously not, it's a smart film, not a marvel studios product, why would you ever want a smart sci fi film starring an all female cast that isn't a big budget comic book movie. Remember, there are no good female lead films guyz, diversity and shit.
but what about the robots? We can't be racist against them now can we?
We'll try, the fucking clankers.
 
Now hearing the basics of Bloodshot, I am excited for that as well as Lobo as I personally like more violent superhero movies that either play the violence like a 80s action movie, for laughs, or can do something really special with it like Logan, but that is too dark for someone like Bob I guess.

Now if only The Boys got a Netflix special, then we could see Bob really lose his shit over "Da Dudebraus," and the salt shall be glorious.
 
I’m not even sure what he’s trying to say with the Wrinkle in Time tweet anymore. As a Disney fan, I’m absolutely appalled with his behavior and blind brand loyalty

Bob is struggling with the same problem a lot of lefty film critics are dealing with: the movie is aggressively, in your face, socially progressive propaganda ... while at the same time being a pile of hot garbage. They want to champion it as an Important Film, despite it being garish dogshit. In this case it isn't brand loyalty so much as it is political devotion.

(The more I read Ava Duvernay's commentary on the film, by the way, the clearer it becomes that this is nothing less than the rape of a minor literary classic. Disgraceful.)
 
I’m not even sure what he’s trying to say with the Wrinkle in Time tweet anymore. As a Disney fan, I’m absolutely appalled with his behavior and blind brand loyalty.

Whenever Bob makes up his (non existent) mind, nothing will be able to change it. He’s an immovable object both metaphorically, and literally.
I guess he's trying to say Ava DuVernay's like Peter Jackson when he made The Frighteners or Sam Raimi when he made Darkman/The Quick And The Dead. The key difference is that those movies were original IPs which didn't cost that much to make, while DuVernay skipped that phase in order to make a blockbuster based on a beloved property.

Or there's the more likely answer of Bob not wanting to admit that his beloved pee-oh-sees can make shit movies too.
 
I guess he's trying to say Ava DuVernay's like Peter Jackson when he made The Frighteners or Sam Raimi when he made Darkman/The Quick And The Dead. The key difference is that those movies were original IPs which didn't cost that much to make, while DuVernay skipped that phase in order to make a blockbuster based on a beloved property.

Or there's the more likely answer of Bob not wanting to admit that his beloved pee-oh-sees can make shit movies too.
Which should be evident by this weekend's box office, which will bomb hard.

Speaking of A Wrinkle of Time, I've just got out of the movie and oh boy it's a colossal mess. The actors look incredibly lost, especially Chris Pine and Oprah Winfrey, the CGI looks incredibly cheap, feels rushed to the point it might have been chopped up during post-production, and the storyline's a mess that fails to expand or improve upon the novel and instead goes for the usual SJW-propaganda shitfest. Oh, and the dialogue is so cringeworthy it makes the Star Wars prequels' dialogue look like Shakespeare in comparison.

Hopefully this movie though will be the film that finally convinces studios to ignore SJWs.
 
Which should be evident by this weekend's box office, which will bomb hard.

Speaking of A Wrinkle of Time, I've just got out of the movie and oh boy it's a colossal mess. The actors look incredibly lost, especially Chris Pine and Oprah Winfrey, the CGI looks incredibly cheap, feels rushed to the point it might have been chopped up during post-production, and the storyline's a mess that fails to expand or improve upon the novel and instead goes for the usual SJW-propaganda shitfest. Oh, and the dialogue is so cringeworthy it makes the Star Wars prequels' dialogue look like Shakespeare in comparison.

Hopefully this movie though will be the film that finally convinces studios to ignore SJWs.
I'm sure I know the answer to this already, but are the Christian themes from the book preserved?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Flexo
Which should be evident by this weekend's box office, which will bomb hard.

Speaking of A Wrinkle of Time, I've just got out of the movie and oh boy it's a colossal mess. The actors look incredibly lost, especially Chris Pine and Oprah Winfrey, the CGI looks incredibly cheap, feels rushed to the point it might have been chopped up during post-production, and the storyline's a mess that fails to expand or improve upon the novel and instead goes for the usual SJW-propaganda shitfest. Oh, and the dialogue is so cringeworthy it makes the Star Wars prequels' dialogue look like Shakespeare in comparison.

Hopefully this movie though will be the film that finally convinces studios to ignore SJWs.

I want to see that film. Just to see how much of a clusterfuck it is. I'm sure Bobo will come up with some dishonest excuses when his review comes out to try, and defend it. However I'm certain that if SJWs films continue bombing like this. Then Studios will cut their losses.
 
So from what I can gather, you are better off reading the book than watching the movie. Bob will probably say that the movie is the definitive version.
 
It's debatable If bob knows theirs a book.
Then again it's debatable if Bob's read anything after high school

If it wasn't for the fact that he actually has the ability to write, I would say that Bob would be so past the point of being a fan of reading that he must be illiterate.

As for "SJW Movies", I don't see Disney giving it up anytime soon. Disney is just further developing their monopoly on the media to the point that they can push whatever agenda they want and they'll never be driven to give it up.
 
If it wasn't for the fact that he actually has the ability to write, I would say that Bob would be so past the point of being a fan of reading that he must be illiterate.

As for "SJW Movies", I don't see Disney giving it up anytime soon. Disney is just further developing their monopoly on the media to the point that they can push whatever agenda they want and they'll never be driven to give it up.
Unless, there's change in leadership, as in someone taking over Bob Iger's spot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back