Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fast forward to 15:19 if the timecode link doesn't work.

Is it sad that I know that Bob, at some point in the past three days, has watched this video? It explains so much of his more recent sperging.

His new obsession with this weird "FICTION IS FICTION MEANS YOU CAN WRITE ANYTHING YOU WANT!" despite the fact that it's not in any way actually what that clip is trying to get across.

His sudden strange interest, but complete lack of knowledge of Dracula.

He probably found it because he wanted to watch YouTube clips about how Superman is shitty because fucking of course, Bob.

He doesn't even read Wikipedia. He watches YouTube.
I wouldn't pin it on that. He was using the argument at least since The Last Jedi came out because there were complaints about things making no logical sense or not being consistent with the universe like the "hyper-space as a weapon" scene.
 
Even more Venom sperging.
View attachment 438793

Do you know how words work?
View attachment 438791

tfw Matt Groening trolls Bob.
View attachment 438792


It's almost like Bob doesn't think before he spews his verbal diarrhea or something.
Matt Groening and The Simpson’s are very familiar with controversy and calls for censorship since the show started.

A bunch of basement dwelling, Twitter shrieking, white people and unfunny Indians aren’t going to change anything. No one cares, especially fans of the show.
 
Now that you mentioned it, it reminds me of a similar video Dan Olson did on the subject:


Essentially, he argues that verisimilitude matters less than the ideological message a work is imparting. In fact, they're more than willing to see verisimilitude destroyed for the sake of imposing their worldview on a piece of fiction. To people like him and Blob, the diegesis, the fictional space that a work is based in, is nothing more than a heap of intellectual garbage that they can rummage through to find things to smear the author with. So because George R.R. Martin depicts the world of A Song of Ice and Fire as a medieval, harsh, and violent one where violence against women is commonplace, he endorses violence against women regardless of what he actually believes. In other words, they believe a depiction of something to necessarily be an endorsement of it and not just an element to aid in the verisimilitude of the diegesis.
All of fiction would be tainted by this theorem as most stories only happen because of the actions of an antagonist provoking the protagonist into action.
 

It will never completely dawn on him that he is an actual honest to fucking God NAZI, will it? He throws the term around so callously to accuse others without ever having any idea what it actually means. What the Nazi’s actual philosophy and beliefs were. He just knows they were the evil ones so anyone he thinks is evil = Nazi’s. If you were to actually examine “National Socialism” aka Nazi’s you would find Bob and his Twitter ravings staring back at you.
 
He just knows they were the evil ones so anyone he thinks is evil = Nazi’s. If you were to actually examine “National Socialism” aka Nazi’s you would find Bob and his Twitter ravings staring back at you.
A lot has to do with Bob's ignorance towards history and the reasons why the Nazis rose to power.
 
Here's a new "Good Enough Movie" video about The Thin Man from 1934.
Dude, enough, Stop spamming Bob's videos. This thread doesn't need an update every time bob sharts out a vid unless he says something noteworthy and/or stupid, and even then, least you could do is time stamp the the parts where bob does.
 
Last edited:
It's not just me, right? He blew major parts of the actual novel.

He seems to be annoyed that newer incarnations of Dracula gloss over the very interesting cast of supporting characters in favor of focusing on the (in Bob's view) less interesting monster.

Does this have anything to do with Count Dracula embodying the very height of taboo Victorian sexual desirability? Could be!

Fucking the book doesn't really have all that many supporting characters? The Doctor's Assistant. Lucy's Mother. Harker's boss. And Renfield. Only one of those is interesting and he's still a main character. Everyone else is pretty much not a character, it's like the zoo keeper or those dock workers that help them track down Dracula or give interviews for the news clippings. Fuck I forgot his Daughters...

So yeah, he can't read either, what a goddamn surprise. He probably thinks all that 'Mina is his reincarnated love' is in the book too.
 
I am just saying this thing once and want you to put it into context and learn from it: You are for the moviebob thread what I was for Dobsons. So just stop for your own good.
This past week I’ve been acting like a serpging twat like Bob. I’m going get off for a while and cool until I can back hopefully fresh and act less dumb.
 
Yeah unless you have the mental fortitude to hardline the verbal garbage that Bob spews like Sexy above, it isn't the best of your health to focus on Bob.

Agree. Stare into that fat, blobby abyss for too long and it will begin sperging about the Superior Future all over you.

Bob is a particularly dangerous lolcow because he's cartoonish enough to make you dismissive of him, but smug and self-assured in a way that induces maximum irritation in his listeners. In other words, the amount of anger he creates in you is disproportional to the amount of threat he is to you. The worst thing he could do to you is drag you down to his level of discourse, which will eventually happen if you let his mouthblatherings get to you. To wish vengeance upon Bob is a pointless exercise, since there's nothing you can do which is worse than what Nature and Bob's own lack of fortitude has done to him.
 
In other words, the amount of anger he creates in you is disproportional to the amount of threat he is to you. The worst thing he could do to you is drag you down to his level of discourse, which will eventually happen if you let his mouthblatherings get to you.

Agreed. Something to keep in mind is that for all his delusions of grandeur, Bob is a guppy in a unfathomably vast ocean and that the actual influence he has is negligible. In keeping with the marine metaphor, he tends to school with ideologies and trends he views as the "winning" side of history. The cognitive dissonance he demonstrated when he swore blind allegiance to the Democrats despite the glaring corruption of Hillary Clinton and the DNC reveals the depths of his stupidity. Similarly, the only reason why he cares about Marvel so much is that the MCU is currently the hottest trend in entertainment. While I believe that he was aware of X-Men and Spider-Man in their heyday, I seriously doubt that he knew much about Iron Man aside from the name prior to 2008. When one looks at his tirades, it is helpful to remember that it is the ravings of a psychopathic (albeit impotent) man-child that never psychologically grew past the age of eight.

If anything, it is the people who defend Bob that raise my hackles.
 
Agreed. Something to keep in mind is that for all his delusions of grandeur, Bob is a guppy in a unfathomably vast ocean and that the actual influence he has is negligible. In keeping with the marine metaphor, he tends to school with ideologies and trends he views as the "winning" side of history. The cognitive dissonance he demonstrated when he swore blind allegiance to the Democrats despite the glaring corruption of Hillary Clinton and the DNC reveals the depths of his stupidity. Similarly, the only reason why he cares about Marvel so much is that the MCU is currently the hottest trend in entertainment. While I believe that he was aware of X-Men and Spider-Man in their heyday, I seriously doubt that he knew much about Iron Man aside from the name prior to 2008. When one looks at his tirades, it is helpful to remember that it is the ravings of a psychopathic (albeit impotent) man-child that never psychologically grew past the age of eight.

If anything, it is the people who defend Bob that raise my hackles.

It's also worth remembering that even a light read of his Twitter feed shows that this is exactly the response he wants from people, at least those he considers beneath him (which seems to be nearly everyone, whether for political or cultural reasons). He's a nasty, hostile fuck, and he thrives on the idea he can engender hostility in others. If you genuinely lose your temper with Bob, he's won.

Which is why mockery is better, especially friendly mockery. Don't think of him as MovieBob, Angry Fat Fuck With A Chip On His Shoulder. Think of him as Bubba Sugardumpling.
 
(This is what Moviebob actually believes.)
MarvelMovies.JPG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back