Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
The "some reason" is actually freakin' explained (however stupid).
"for some reason" is an old cracked.com-style trope where the reviewer/commentator is basically just playing dumb
"lol i don't understand this movie and it makes no sense and that's why it's bad"

even if the "for some reason" is perfectly-well explained for anyone who paid attention. it's that hbomberguy type of "wacky" nonsense commentary
 
I will never tire of Bob ripping on others' physical appearances, but claiming someone looks like a "credibly accused rapist" is especially precious coming from the Captain of the Windowless Van Brigade.

Are you implying that this man:

image.jpeg


Looks in any way like a pedophile?

Better be careful. Bobby boy is from Boston, and he fights. Or he might try to sue you for slander.
 
Way back on page 154 I said this.
View attachment 148233)

I wonder what Bob would have thought about FDR's court packing scheme, although I doubt he even knows what that was.

And now I have the answer.


Of course he supports it. There is no limit to Bob's authoritarian aims nor is there a limit to his stupidity.
 

Damn. For once I agree with Bob as the left doing such a packing scheme would only lead to the right doing the same in turn. While it might be hilarious to see a 21 member SCOTUS, it would be better for the other branches to assert their balancing powers. Really, Linkara, you should know better. (Does twitter just melt brains?)

Of course it would be even BETTER for the SCOTUS to not have been given so much power in the first place but then the left was warned about that in the past too.
 
Damn. For once I agree with Bob as the left doing such a packing scheme would only lead to the right doing the same in turn. While it might be hilarious to see a 21 member SCOTUS, it would be better for the other branches to assert their balancing powers. Really, Linkara, you should know better. (Does twitter just melt brains?)

Of course it would be even BETTER for the SCOTUS to not have been given so much power in the first place but then the left was warned about that in the past too.
Linkara needs to get off twitter the day Bob sounds more rational than you it's the day to reevaluate your life choices.
 
Leave it to Bobby to make pro-choicers sound sociopathic.

Very few doctors and women, including those who administered or underwent abortion, truly believe that a human embryo is a mere clump of cells (much less a "hypothetical" one). They justify abortion by rationalizing that the health and well-being of the mother sometimes trumps that of the future child, not by dismissing the conceptus as something you can just throw in the garbage can.
 

Did he delete it because he realised how it looks is him saying 'oh hey grieving woman who lost her 10 week old baby it was JUST A FETUS and stop CRYING because it was JUST A FETUS and therefore had no value to anyone!' And that maybe that comes across as him being a crass asshole who doesn't know anything about the connections and emotions around pregnancy?

Because equating someone's raw, genuine feelings that a tiny baby fetus has a soul or is a person to a mythical creature seems like something a dickhead, fat middle aged man with no friends who thinks he's somehow smarter than 'all them bible bumpers in the flyover states' would do and wouldn't you know? Bob in a nutshell.

I guess that thing that gets me over this fetus debate is that the left side loves to go on about SCIENCE OVER FEELS, and that Christians are being irrational about thinking unborn babies are people cuz 'fetuses aren't people! They don't feel pain etc etc' but on the same hand will turn around and scream about hurting someone's feelings over a made up pronoun that doesn't exist in our language or defending gender special pseudoscience that isn't proven.
 
The whole 'judicial impeachment' thing strikes me as yet another proggy scheme ripe to blow up in their faces.

First off, exactly what are you going to charge Kavanaugh with? Unlicensed drunken gropery as a teenager? And that's assuming they can even make the charge stick; with Ford's hilarious vagueness surrounding the events, the whole thing could collapse on them like a badly-baked cake.

Meanwhile, I can assure you there are a number of lefty judges just ripe for being hammered under 18 USC 241-242. By all means, Bob, throw us in that there briar patch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back