Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump had a phone conversation with the Ukrainian President.
A "whistleblower", who DID NOT HEAR THE CONVERSATION, claimed that something was illegal about it.
Never says what, of course.
The media, being the starving jackal that it is, ran with the story to give Democrats a political angle.
Democrats took the bait, and now Trump is releasing the actual transcript tomorrow, confident that it shows nothing illegal.
In the meantime, Americans are getting a reminder that Joe Biden as VP threatened to withhold foreign aid from the Ukraine unless they fired an investigator who was looking into Biden's son. Biden even bragged about it.

I think the real reasons for the current feeding frenzy, in no particular order, are as follows:

1) Keep impeachment talk alive until the election;
2) Torpedo Biden below the waterline, since Trump and his circle are bound to scream about what shenanigans Biden and his idiot son were up to in Ukraine and China;
3) Distract from some imminent piece of bad news (I suspect Ginsburg is retiring, and you better believe they'll claim Trump can't replace her while impeachment is on the table).

When actual impeachment fails to pan out, Bob (and everyone doing a premature victory dance on Twitter) will look extremely silly, but that's hardly news.
 
We have, as yet, no idea who the whistleblower is. It's just as likely to be an intern or low-ranking pollster or cashier in the gift shop as anyone important. More likely, actually, since Trump's managed to clear most of the leakers out of the executive branch.
 
We have, as yet, no idea who the whistleblower is. It's just as likely to be an intern or low-ranking pollster or cashier in the gift shop as anyone important. More likely, actually, since Trump's managed to clear most of the leakers out of the executive branch.

Well, we do know the whistleblower is represented by this upstanding, totally nonpartisan fellow:

1569365787559.png
 
We have, as yet, no idea who the whistleblower is. It's just as likely to be an intern or low-ranking pollster or cashier in the gift shop as anyone important. More likely, actually, since Trump's managed to clear most of the leakers out of the executive branch.
I don't really like the 'Trump is a 4D Chess grandmaster werewolf' stuff that Styx and hardcore Trump fans talk about (the latter group leaving out the werewolf part), but I still think it's possible that Trump or pro-Trump people did this just to fuck with the media. Not saying that it happened, I just don't think it should be not included within the realm of possibility.
What I want to know is

what will they do, when they have the President that they want? What will they do when everything they wanted is met?
Who do you mean by 'they'? If you mean commies or the social justice crowd then I would have to say that they will get will never truly get what they want. Even if they did turn America into a shithole one-party state where evil white men were in camps then they would still have problems caused by their policies that they can't fix.
If you're talking about Bob then I wouldn't worry about that. Bob will never get what he wants.
 
Who do you mean by 'they'? If you mean commies or the social justice crowd then I would have to say that they will get will never truly get what they want. Even if they did turn America into a shithole one-party state where evil white men were in camps then they would still have problems caused by their policies that they can't fix.
If you're talking about Bob then I wouldn't worry about that. Bob will never get what he wants.
I mean generally the most vocal/popular/richest/most elite of the group who constantly want change that fit their specific views, what will happen when they get what they want? And I'm not speculating on what happens to the state/country/world around them, I'm speculating on what'll go on in their heads when they're needs and complaints are met? Will they just die from a withdrawal of bitching, make more demands for those to be met and eventually be viewed as idiots, or something else? How do we even know if what they want is what they actually want (and it isn't) and they'll stop complaining like spoiled brats throwing tantrums on the floor of the Toys R Us during the holidays?
 
I mean generally the most vocal/popular/richest/most elite of the group who constantly want change that fit their specific views, what will happen when they get what they want? And I'm not speculating on what happens to the state/country/world around them, I'm speculating on what'll go on in their heads when they're needs and complaints are met? Will they just die from a withdrawal of bitching, make more demands for those to be met and eventually be viewed as idiots, or something else? How do we even know if what they want is what they actually want (and it isn't) and they'll stop complaining like spoiled brats throwing tantrums on the floor of the Toys R Us during the holidays?
They'll then turn around and shamelessly demand the eaxct opposite, all while calling everybody else bigots for not giving it to them. See, for example, the black community "civil rights" groups, which relentlessly hyped crack as as a destroyer of black communities until sentences for crack were made much harsher than sentences for powder cocaine. When the predictable result of numerous black men starting getting lengthy sentences for small amounts of crack ensued, they then turned around and started claiming that the very policies they themselves advocated for were racist and needed to be changed. The thing that remained completely unchanged, of course, was the fact that everything bad that happened to black people was the fault of some nebulous "racism" perpetrated by evil white people who needed to be punished. This is why anything "civil rights" leaders say can be safely dismissed out of hand.
 
I mean generally the most vocal/popular/richest/most elite of the group who constantly want change that fit their specific views, what will happen when they get what they want? And I'm not speculating on what happens to the state/country/world around them, I'm speculating on what'll go on in their heads when they're needs and complaints are met? Will they just die from a withdrawal of bitching, make more demands for those to be met and eventually be viewed as idiots, or something else? How do we even know if what they want is what they actually want (and it isn't) and they'll stop complaining like spoiled brats throwing tantrums on the floor of the Toys R Us during the holidays?
Democrats in the funhouse and senate would still obstruct everything and shit their pants and do nothing. I'm completely convinced of that. Their sweet spot is where they're technically in power, but can find an excuse to sit around on their hands, unless it's related to stuffing more voters into their ranks.
I guess class is real but also fake
View attachment 946380
Boo hoo, how could anybody call these people bourgeoisie? Corporate clickbait writers who live off failing adbux, ineffectual "career" artists with no apparent marketable skills or audience, people who got $50,000 basket-weaving degrees, and loudmouth gay activists? These are all highly valuable, hard working, normal people who never could have seen misfortune coming.
 
What I want to know is

what will they do, when they have the President that they want? What will they do when everything they wanted is met?
It’s not that they won’t be pleased it’s that they can never be pleased. I know Bob is a weirdo outlier but he has the same traits of TDS sufferer: An axe to grind, perpetual anger, a shifting ideology that always centers on subjugation, daddy issues, fat. You cannot fix any of these by getting Orange-man bad out of the office EVEN if you were able to magic in the Hilldawg by sacrificing a million barbells by dropping aborted babies on them.

tl;dr Bob and the rest will never be happy because their issues are not of a political nature but of a personal nature as they are all cuckoo bonkers.
 
I mean generally the most vocal/popular/richest/most elite of the group who constantly want change that fit their specific views, what will happen when they get what they want? And I'm not speculating on what happens to the state/country/world around them, I'm speculating on what'll go on in their heads when they're needs and complaints are met? Will they just die from a withdrawal of bitching, make more demands for those to be met and eventually be viewed as idiots, or something else? How do we even know if what they want is what they actually want (and it isn't) and they'll stop complaining like spoiled brats throwing tantrums on the floor of the Toys R Us during the holidays?
I forget where I saw this (I think it was ResetEra, but it might have been Twitter) where some communist was asking people what they'd do if the glorious revolution ever happened. One person responded saying how they'd like to design the uniforms people would wear. I think most of the responses were similar carefree existences where they do whatever they want.

But those answers are unrealistic, the most likely answer it to move the goalposts. You see this in any game deemed "problematic" caves to SJW demands. Devs make changes, SJWs demand more change, dev makes those changes, SJWs demand more. Repeat until the game is a burning husk, or the devs say "no" and the SJWs try and burn the game to the ground. In either case, SJWs won't buy the game.

The odds that Bob's requests will ever be achieved are so slim that he'll complain forever.
 
Still butthurt
View attachment 948610

Pretty sure lolbertarians have sperged about this a lot
View attachment 948611

Justin Murphy wasn't saying he should be allowed to have sex with teenagers. He was saying that a lot of people act like teenagers are somehow fully mature and intelligent when they support their politics but then acknowledge their immaturity in basically every element of law. A less provocative example that probably would have gotten his point across better: Why do democrats currently want to change laws regarding vaping to keep kids from vaping but at the same time think kids should be allowed to guide global policy regarding gun ownership and climate change? If they are not mature enough to decide whether to vape, how are they mature enough to reorder the global economy? That was Murphy's obvious point, not that it is okay to bang 16 year olds.

Twitter rots your brain. It's all about dunking on other people so who cares about understanding what Murphy was actually saying? Obviously he meant that he should be allowed to bang sixteen year olds.
 
Pretty sure lolbertarians have sperged about this a lot
View attachment 948611
Saying nigger isn't illegal Bob, you utter dipshit. Punishment for it is entirely extralegal.

The only way it relates to libertarianism is that it and cancel culture in general has made many right wing libertarians question if there should be limits on libertarianism when it comes to businesses denying people employment due to private, petty bullshit being weaponized by digital lynch mobs. Which is clearly not what Bob is talking about here. The man can't even distinguish between legal and extralegal punitive action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back