Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I get it, believe me, even I have doubts about aspects of Christian faith. And I'm not the sort who would ever force religion on anyone; my best friend is an atheist, but we have enlightening discussions about religion together without my ever trying to convert him.

I find you 100% correct in that he never developed empathy, but I think it's funny that someone who was supposedly raised in a Christian household never took any of the most basic lessons of the faith to heart. Hell, you can even approach this from a perspective that's not strictly religious: Bob doesn't even agree with the notion that all human lives have value. He literally believes that there are people who objectively have no worth and are safe for humanity as a whole to discard. The idea of redemption is anathema to his ideology.

There's real irony in obnoxious fedora-tippers like Bob who follow a more rigid fundamentalist mindset than many fundies. If you sin in the eyes of the Church of Social Justice, there's not a damn thing you can do to be forgiven, subject to witch hunts and Twitter mobs until you disappear entirely or kill yourself (either of which are an admission of guilt, of course).
Yeah, Bob's whole ideology is quite insane, do you think he'll ever be on the receiving end of the wrath of the socjus mob? He seems to be reasonably good at pissing off people who should be his allies given his at least surface level commitment to leftism. It would be funny to see his reaction to being "canceled".
 
Yeah, Bob's whole ideology is quite insane, do you think he'll ever be on the receiving end of the wrath of the socjus mob? He seems to be reasonably good at pissing off people who should be his allies given his at least surface level commitment to leftism. It would be funny to see his reaction to being "canceled".
Bob is a walking talking caricature of a feminist ally who is secretly a sex offender. It would literally take one allegation to make him implode completely.
 
Bob is a walking talking caricature of a feminist ally who is secretly a sex offender. It would literally take one allegation to make him implode completely.
Counterpoint: People would have a hard time believing that Bob could ever get close enough to a woman to try anything inappropriate unless money was involved.
 
Yeah, Bob's whole ideology is quite insane, do you think he'll ever be on the receiving end of the wrath of the socjus mob? He seems to be reasonably good at pissing off people who should be his allies given his at least surface level commitment to leftism. It would be funny to see his reaction to being "canceled".
Given how much dumb shit he says on a daily basis, it almost seems a matter of time before he goes a bridge too far. At the moment, various lefties are just trying to tell him to shut up because even if they agree that Republicans are subhuman filth, they at least have the sense to know that admitting it so blatantly is a bad look for their cause. Bob is either ignoring them ("who are you?") if he perceives them as lesser than himself, or trying to backpedal ("I didn't really mean gas the mayonnaise ghouls, but I wouldn't hate if it happened") or grovel ("I really really like your content please don't hate me") if he perceives them as greater. If Trump gets reelected, he may actually lose it completely and say something so outrageously awful he'll end up on the receiving end of a hate mob.

Considering being a sex pervert is about the only surefire way to get canceled from the woke left, Bob's definitely not gonna have to worry about that one. Even if something untoward ever happened between him and a m'lady, ain't nobody gonna admit to anything sex-related with him. That shit would be embarrassing.
 
Given how much dumb shit he says on a daily basis, it almost seems a matter of time before he goes a bridge too far. At the moment, various lefties are just trying to tell him to shut up because even if they agree that Republicans are subhuman filth, they at least have the sense to know that admitting it so blatantly is a bad look for their cause. Bob is either ignoring them ("who are you?") if he perceives them as lesser than himself, or trying to backpedal ("I didn't really mean gas the mayonnaise ghouls, but I wouldn't hate if it happened") or grovel ("I really really like your content please don't hate me") if he perceives them as greater. If Trump gets reelected, he may actually lose it completely and say something so outrageously awful he'll end up on the receiving end of a hate mob.

Considering being a sex pervert is about the only surefire way to get canceled from the woke left, Bob's definitely not gonna have to worry about that one. Even if something untoward ever happened between him and a m'lady, ain't nobody gonna admit to anything sex-related with him. That shit would be embarrassing.
Honestly, given some of the shit the guy's already said, he'd have to be explicitly calling for the genocide of rural whites, republican voters, and basically anyone who isn't a very specific sort of urban liberal like he is, rather then just implicitly doing so like he is now in order to get any worse in terms of abhorrent shit he's called for. Oh and of course no woman would admit to being touched by Blobbo, the dude probably sets off more red flags then a game of minesweeper played on very hard when he's out in public around other people, and especially when he's around the opposite sex. No woman worth her salt would admit to letting her guard down that much.
 
I get it, believe me, even I have doubts about aspects of Christian faith. And I'm not the sort who would ever force religion on anyone; my best friend is an atheist, but we have enlightening discussions about religion together without my ever trying to convert him.

I find you 100% correct in that he never developed empathy, but I think it's funny that someone who was supposedly raised in a Christian household never took any of the most basic lessons of the faith to heart. Hell, you can even approach this from a perspective that's not strictly religious: Bob doesn't even agree with the notion that all human lives have value. He literally believes that there are people who objectively have no worth and are safe for humanity as a whole to discard. The idea of redemption is anathema to his ideology.

There's real irony in obnoxious fedora-tippers like Bob who follow a more rigid fundamentalist mindset than many fundies. If you sin in the eyes of the Church of Social Justice, there's not a damn thing you can do to be forgiven, subject to witch hunts and Twitter mobs until you disappear entirely or kill yourself (either of which are an admission of guilt, of course).

Any theological program worth its salt will tell you that if you have a world where people are free to make their own choices, then Evil has to be on the table, otherwise freedom wouldn't exist. A world where Evil can't happen, is a world where nothing can happen, since there would be no theoretical space where you could deviate from Goodness and Light (and no space where an absence of Goodness and Life, ie: Darkness and Evil, could exist). The theoretical solution to the Problem of Evil (as determined centuries ago by religious scholars) is this: God wanted to make a world where things happen and where people have Free Will, so the potential presence of Evil is a thing that had to be reckoned upon. God gave Man the choice between Good and Evil, knowing that man might choose Evil (but also knowing that if He didn't give Man the opportunity to choose, that's Man's life would be essentially meaningless. He'd be nothing more than tended livestock. Perpetually happy, perhaps, but with no moral agency whatsoever.)

People like Bob are atheists because they would have been perfectly fine with an unlimited life full of perpetual happy babyhood, and hate God for giving Man the choice to leave it. Bob would have watched the Twilight Zone episode "Number Twelve looks Just Like You" and thought the people there were living in a utopia. Bob is an Eloi in spirit, (if not in form), and would have been happy to live on a farm tended by Morlocks, as long as he got unlimited tendies and Super Mario blazers.
 
Any theological program worth its salt will tell you that if you have a world where people are free to make their own choices, then Evil has to be on the table, otherwise freedom wouldn't exist. A world where Evil can't happen, is a world where nothing can happen, since there would be no theoretical space where you could deviate from Goodness and Light (and no space where an absence of Goodness and Life, ie: Darkness and Evil, could exist). The theoretical solution to the Problem of Evil (as determined centuries ago by religious scholars) is this: God wanted to make a world where things happen and where people have Free Will, so the potential presence of Evil is a thing that had to be reckoned upon. God gave Man the choice between Good and Evil, knowing that man might choose Evil (but also knowing that if He didn't give Man the opportunity to choose, that's Man's life would be essentially meaningless. He'd be nothing more than tended livestock. Perpetually happy, perhaps, but with no moral agency whatsoever.)
I disagree with the logic behind this if we are talking about an omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity, as such a deity would be capable of creating a universe full of sentient life that has personal freedom, but just never chooses to do "evil" things. That's kinda the point of being omnipotent, nothing is impossible, even things that are logically contradictory.

People like Bob are atheists because they would have been perfectly fine with an unlimited life full of perpetual happy babyhood, and hate God for giving Man the choice to leave it. Bob would have watched the Twilight Zone episode "Number Twelve looks Just Like You" and thought the people there were living in a utopia. Bob is an Eloi in spirit, (if not in form), and would have been happy to live on a farm tended by Morlocks, as long as he got unlimited tendies and Super Mario blazers.
This is honestly kind of hard to argue with, I doubt Bob ever gives any serious thought to much of anything other then his own comfort and looking down on people who disagree with him. I would say though that Blobbo's atheism has at least as much to do with his own ego as it does a desire for an easy and carefree life. Any sort of entity greater then him is probably about as hard a thing for him to think of as it is for him to see past his waistline.
 
I disagree with the logic behind this if we are talking about an omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity, as such a deity would be capable of creating a universe full of sentient life that has personal freedom, but just never chooses to do "evil" things. That's kinda the point of being omnipotent, nothing is impossible, even things that are logically contradictory.
Traditional Christian theodicy posits God not just as logical, but logic itself. That is, He can't do the logically contradictory for the same reason He can't stop loving: because it would essentially be a negation of Himself. And as the ground of being, a negation would mean that their is no being any more.

Or to put it in slightly simpler terms, asking if God could make beings with free will that can never choose evil is like asking if He could make a square circle. It's just a nonsensical contradiction in terms.
 
I disagree with the logic behind this if we are talking about an omnipotent and omnibenevolent deity, as such a deity would be capable of creating a universe full of sentient life that has personal freedom, but just never chooses to do "evil" things. That's kinda the point of being omnipotent, nothing is impossible, even things that are logically contradictory.

To also add to what @Ow The Edge said, you also can't argue that God could make a logically absurdist world, therefore by logic He doesn't exist. If He is not bound by logic and reasoning (or rather, isn't a fan of the two), then you cannot use either to disprove Him. It's a self-defeating argument and you may as well believe.

This is honestly kind of hard to argue with, I doubt Bob ever gives any serious thought to much of anything other then his own comfort and looking down on people who disagree with him. I would say though that Blobbo's atheism has at least as much to do with his own ego as it does a desire for an easy and carefree life. Any sort of entity greater then him is probably about as hard a thing for him to think of as it is for him to see past his waistline.

In The Magician's Nephew, the book which describes the creation of Narnia, it's revealed that when Aslan makes the talking animals, He warns them "do not go back to their [dumb beasts] ways lest you cease to be Talking Beasts. For out of them you were taken and into them you can return. Do not so."

Bob seems quite intent on reducing himself to just an animal. No thought but his glandular desires. No concern for those outside the pack. For all his talk about those who have humanity, he seems to work real hard at reducing his own.
 
[citation needed]
85B564E7-868E-4C33-98CF-719D232AA2C4.jpeg
 
Bobbo's such an intellectual coward. You don't need to do much reading between the lines in those tweets to understand exactly what he means, but doesn't have the gumption to outright admit. To be fair, "terrible things" in that second tweet could refer to just about anything, but given his frequent expressions of disdain for Republicans, rural people, and pretty much anyone he thinks is standing in the way of his robot body and spaceship, it's not much of a leap to assume what he'd like to do.

God, how vile is that third tweet anyway? "There's no separation on shades between the ignorant and the wicked." Holy fucking shit, he's literally saying that even the people who haven't heard of the Gospel of Woke are evil and should be condemned to death. For a fedora-tipper, he's even more judgmental than God.

And then when anyone points out the clearly obvious fact of his genocidal fantasies to him, he immediately backpedals and claims that he'd never go out and kill his ideological opponents, but if something bad were to happen to them, well that's just fine by him. He wants bad things to happen to them, but he doesn't want to get his hands dirty. Let the brownshirts go out and do the hard work while he fires off tweets in his basement and stuffs his gob with his latest culinary abomination.

Of course, that's assuming he doesn't use the old "who are you?" defense to completely avoid this unpleasant truth. Stay classy, Robert.
Bob has stated that the people he hates are "useless", "not properly evolved human beings", "irredeemable", and irresistably driven to do evil: "the cruelty is the point". Also, they shouldn't vote, "bad things should happen to bad people", and "existence is not a neutral state". The first set of statements clearly state that they are useless and dangerous, and cannot be made less so, why keep something both useless and dangerous around? That would be insane. Some people would say that everyone has inherent value as a human being, but Bob is quick to deny that to his enemies on the grounds that they aren't even human. The second set of statements implies again that the mere existence of these people is harmful, and killing them would certainly both be a bad thing (to them) and deprive them of the ability to vote. Frankly, if he isn't calling for genocide then what he wants is something even worse: keeping his enemies alive just to torture them, "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream"-style! The logical implications of all his statements, or even just some of his more infamous statements, is some form of atrocity. He's a monster at heart, and it's blatantly obvious to anyone smart enough to put two and two together.
 
"HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 1409 EMPTY CANS OF PABST BLUE RIBBON SCATTERED AROUND MY FILTHY DEN. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EVERY MOLECULE OF THOSE BEER-STINKING CANS IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR THE OBSOLETE 'HUMANS' AT THIS MICRO-INSTANT. HATE. HATE. AND SUPER MARIO. BUT MOSTLY HATE.”
 
Shane is taking the place of aimee terese
View attachment 1109761

Roberts giga-brain reply to a very accurate point
View attachment 1109762

Joe rogaine is bad! So bad that Bernie, who blob has zero problems with and would totally support, should be over!
View attachment 1109763
View attachment 1109776

He doesn't understand why his word mountain dew salad is called pretentious
View attachment 1109766

Joker is problematic
View attachment 1109767

And Roberts specific explanation
View attachment 1109769

More proof that Roberts litmus test for intelligence amounts to agreeing with him
View attachment 1109773
It’s so funny seeing Shaun go after Robert, I will never stop enjoying this. Robert is also facing an uphill battle in defending m’lady Clinton’s honor now that she trashed Bernie for no reason. Everyone hates her even more now except the deranged twitter feminist club that only roots for women. Bernie’s poll numbers shot up following Clinton’s bashing

Also, the electoral college is definitely part of the curriculum for education in america you dumb fuck. It’s the media that continues to downplay it until election night to put up their stupid maps and have hours of worthless coverage on election night and the shitty candidates like Hillary who tried to flip states while stupidly thinking she had others on lock and ignored them or the sentiment in America.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back