Says the idiot who thinks "ignorant" "mayonnaise ghouls" are secretly controlling the world.
The trans white-knight saga continues. Bobby's only move: ad hominem.
View attachment 1323807
View attachment 1323816
Note Kelly's "small-souled pathetic man" comment is directed towards
Shawn, the man with the skull-wearing-shades avatar, but I'm sure it applies to Bob equally. Note also how Bobby deliberately misconstrues Kelly's reasoning. She is not saying "something must be moral if the majority consent to it". She is saying "you should not fire someone for holding popular opinions, whether the opinion is morally justified or not".
When the debate is framed around trannies, Bobby suddenly cares about the supposed well-being of the "most marginalized" (c.f. out-of-job mayonnaise ghouls)
View attachment 1323814
View attachment 1323834
"People don't get fired for 'having shitty beliefs'" is a common refrain from that debate. But this is a lie. Look at
what happened to Maya Forestater.
View attachment 1323842
Continuing from the Peter Coffin tweets that I included in
my previous entry, Bobby hates Coffin but he still tries to stand in the good grace of Breadtube's top banana, Nicholas "Natalie" "Contrapoints" Parrott.
View attachment 1323811
Tip to Bobby: Contrapoint is generally considered problematic beyond redemption by the transgenders.
+ + + +
A side-effect of the tranny talk is that Bobby's eugenicist history is dragged into the light.
View attachment 1323845
If Bobby had apologized for his "joke", on "many occasions", I want to see at least one occasion of it.
Inane raging at President Trump:
View attachment 1323792
Never mind getting laid, has Bobby been to a concert?
Look, I don't give a rat's ass if you're a troon. I don't live in the most metropolitan area, but I still know a troon who works at a business I shop at, no problem with her. One of my online friends is a troon, I get along with her just fine too (and yes, I do see a little irony in my calling out Bob's "I have a rural family member" last post). If you sincerely believe that you're the opposite gender, then you do you. I don't think there's such a thing medically and that it's a psychological issue that would be better off treated than encouraged, but if you're a full-grown adult and you're not being a dick, you can do whatever you want. I'll respect you and call you whatever you want to be called, though if I knew you pre-transition, you're going to have to cut me some slack until I get used to it.
Where I and many others have a sticking point is with the trans lobby, the ones who are demanding we upend thousands of years of social norms and forcing us to call a man a woman or a woman a man when our brains say "uh, no they're not." Every time a man smashes a woman's sports record to the point no biological woman could hope to reclaim the title, we're supposed to accept it without question, none less than feminists. We're supposed to open up sex-segregated spaces to anyone regardless of the consequences, regardless of those who would take advantage of such leniency. And of course, these are the people who are making children and teenagers so confused about their bodies that they're denying themselves a normal puberty and pumping themselves full of the wrong hormones, leaving increasing tales of regret and suicide behind them.
And it really doesn't take much research to find out
the monied interests behind the trans lobby (long read, but tons of sources). For some it's ideological, for others there's a financial benefit to increasing troondom everywhere, and often times it's both. Despite how Bob is trying to brush off the criticism with a hamfisted Nazi metaphor, there's clear evidence of who these people are and what they're trying to do. There's no scapegoat here.
Like a lot of people, I'm very much a "live and let live" sort of guy. But also like a lot of people, I resent being told how I should live my life by moral busybodies of any stripe. And I
really have a problem with these modern-day Puritans demanding that people lose their livelihoods and starve to death just because they disagree with their opinions. These people are too stupid to understand that oppressing the oppressors doesn't really work in the long run, especially if the "oppressors" actually aren't. I firmly believe that that's what a lot of even the "moderate" types want. Bobby is just doing us a favor by putting it out there with no filter.
Why do I feel like Bob and his ilk would look at that map and say "See? Trump did not respond quick enough so he can kill all the 'people who matter' so he can secure a second term."
Because they were already doing it months ago. Back when the Wu Flu was just kicking off and it was primarily concentrated in a few (Democrat) cities, the conspiracy theory going around the lefties was that Trump was intentionally holding back aid so that all the Dems would die off, and he was only going to bother mobilizing support for his supporters. To me, it was clear projection onto Trump of their desires of what they'd like to do, revealing that they'd rather have their political opposition die off than try to win them over, probably die off horribly too.
It's obvious to anyone with half a brain (so not a commie, heyooo) that a city is not a good place to be in a pandemic situation. It just so happens that most metropolitan areas are Democrat-run, while most rural areas are home to Republicans. There was no malice at play, just basic facts. Doesn't stop dummies like the one
@Flexo posted from their conspiracy theories though. Party of science, my ass.