Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • Happy Easter!

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess I can aid to the shitfest here even though if only to try to add my two cents to more off-topic discusion.
Cyberpunk as a genre is a product of its time, a world in the brink or collapse where all that really matters is keeping oneselfs humanity, that overall feel is very real in todays world and will be for the foreseable future even if it is not as "romantic" as it is on the many artistic works in the genre. We are not seeing authors LARP cyberpunk really because they understand it but rather because they like the aesthetics and want them for their basic means. Despite the fact that most works are quite pessimistic or at least far from ideal you get authors pretending they can masquarade their consumer revolutions and give it some value. If anything the pessimism of most cyberpunks works (even though I dont feel pessimism is the term) feels all the more justified because corporation fed droning excuses of humans want to pretend they are Rick and Morty.

Now another semi off-topic thing I feel like venting about is when people describe others as "decent" which get worse when they add human being at the end. Semantics yadda yadda. How easy is for you to get stripped of your humanity these days based on stupid and vapid political opinions and even consider that the nutcases of breadtube are the most decent of us all when not even they stand each other. Back to Bob, if "decency" is a value tied to political performance, does that encompass his disgusting views or is it just value measured in likeability + right side of history?

I rest my autistic case your Blobness.
 
Three if you count how Bob needs Chris to stick up for him. “Busts his ass” will never not make me crack up. :story:

View attachment 1376354

Oh, we’re entertained all right, Christopher.
Chris doesn't understand that white knighting for Bob, bro or no, isn't a good look. Dude, the point isn't to CONSOOM that which Bob puts out. The point is to laugh at his autism and COONSOOMerism (and yours by extension when you insert yourself, geez). I take it Chris is a-ok with the at least passive genocide of the monstrous mayonnaise wasteland ghouls? Was papa chipman a white-guilt riddled liberal who wore his white guilt on his sleeve? hell, is mama chipman that way? Were they the examples their children follow?

I love my siblings but sure as hell I wouldn't white knight for their autistic asses online. Especially not if they behaved like either of the Chipman bros.
 
1592180800077.png

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1272301765615136768 (Archive)

The irony of Robert whining about other people block-evading. "no bad tactics only bad tactics" unsurprisingly Robert's a bad target by his own standards.
 
Gradually, I began to hate him.
It's because the new series are chock full of stuff nazis (and people with a semblance of taste whatsoever) hate, isn't it? Because that's a recurring pattern with this specimen.
Actually no. His reasoning is that the show is still a mirror on society like it was in the 90s, incorporating pop-culture references, celebrity cameos and satire to continue to mock society. He says the reason people hate the show now is because they're manbabies who never grew up and don't like change. Apparently mirrors do not exist in the basement world of Bob Chipman.

I guess I can aid to the shitfest here even though if only to try to add my two cents to more off-topic discusion.
Cyberpunk as a genre is a product of its time, a world in the brink or collapse where all that really matters is keeping oneselfs humanity, that overall feel is very real in todays world and will be for the foreseable future even if it is not as "romantic" as it is on the many artistic works in the genre. We are not seeing authors LARP cyberpunk really because they understand it but rather because they like the aesthetics and want them for their basic means. Despite the fact that most works are quite pessimistic or at least far from ideal you get authors pretending they can masquarade their consumer revolutions and give it some value. If anything the pessimism of most cyberpunks works (even though I dont feel pessimism is the term) feels all the more justified because corporation fed droning excuses of humans want to pretend they are Rick and Morty.

Now another semi off-topic thing I feel like venting about is when people describe others as "decent" which get worse when they add human being at the end. Semantics yadda yadda. How easy is for you to get stripped of your humanity these days based on stupid and vapid political opinions and even consider that the nutcases of breadtube are the most decent of us all when not even they stand each other. Back to Bob, if "decency" is a value tied to political performance, does that encompass his disgusting views or is it just value measured in likeability + right side of history?

I rest my autistic case your Blobness.
I once wrote a paper on how the Cyberpunk genre is very humanistic, rediscovering ones humanity in an artifical world like you said, as well as a reflection of what it means to be human when our artificial constructs act more human than a flesh and blood person. Think Batty and Deckard from Blade Runner where Batty is more of a traditional protagonist and normal person when compared to Deckard who is a soulsess, cynical automation for most of the movie. It's about questioning the world and trying to find something comforting in a soulless meaningless world. Bob is the exact dolt who would welcome the corporate dominated Cyberpunk dystopia because it looks cool and would offer a shallow escape from the real world. He's already an automation based on how repetitive and predictable his Twitter is.
 
I only became aware of Bob a few months ago and hadn’t seen this yet. I’d ask if he ever walked it back, but I know the answer.

View attachment 1376290

Good lord, Bob is an authoritarian psychopath. Plus the stereotype of the Trump supporter he hates is the last kind of person who would just let the government seize their land.
 
45.png
And all these "several people" were "assigned male at birth", like Faith Naff.

5.png
C.K. Thompson is a troon and he e-begs for facial feminization. No information except he is part of this twitter.

She-Ra tops Trump! Love trumps Hate!
53.png

5.png
And She-Ra doesn't have shit to do with you, CreepyBob.

+ + + +
Bobby does film criticism. Unfortunately, he mistakes "making the audience reflective about themselves" as "insulting the audience".
6765.png
Bobby's take is symptomatic of the snowflake culture: anything that makes you question yourself -- even in an ultra-consumerist product like MCU -- is an "insult".

Bobby justifies being a capitalist scum:
634.png
I don't think "post-scarcity" is the only alternative to Capitalism. (Hint: Chairman Mao).

Police against thee, not against me or my pet niggers:
53.png

74.png

Bob being lazy and cheap:
-.png
 
View attachment 1376811
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1272301765615136768 (Archive)

The irony of Robert whining about other people block-evading. "no bad tactics only bad tactics" unsurprisingly Robert's a bad target by his own standards.
One of his defenders in the comments used the US nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a defense. Whoa dude, is defending that woke now? :lit:

Another one used "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" which on top of generally being used for lazy false equivalencies, isn't really a "tactic" it's more of a complaint about an ambiguous label. A better example of a tactic that pretty much everyone considers bad would be torture. Or rape. I guess the argument doesn't work so well in that case.

She-Ra tops Trump! Love trumps Hate!
View attachment 1377044

Police against thee, not against me or my pet niggers:
View attachment 1377074
She-Ra has just under 60K tweets and Trump's birthday has 120K. Learn how to count Robert.

And yeah, the police should definitely be sicked on people for... preventing vandalism. Damn we live in bizarro world. If you were to say ten years ago that taking down Confederate monuments was going to lead to calls to tear down a statue of Columbus, people would probably have accused you of doing a slippery slope fallacy.
 
Not understanding the difference between modern era and modern architecture like a true autist
View attachment 1377228
Like the hypocrite he is Bob craps on people who dwelled in their childhood past.

Neuschwanstein Castle is an impressive castle architecturally, especially for the time period it was built where it's heating system was centrally operated so servants didn't have to re-stoke the fireplace in every room and had a primitive swimming pool. The whole castle was built so some weirdo King could live like a loner neet in a basement and never have to interact with his servants or anyone except for Richard Wagner and his mother.

Fun fact: Ludwig II had a summer home where his dining room had this advanced elevator system that would lower the table into the kitchen so his servants could set the table and raise it up so Ludwig wouldn't have to interact with them. At dinner he would then recite from memory entire conversations French politicians had during the Revolutions with no one else around.
Surprised he didn't bring up Ludwig II put the family is debt by making castles like a true autist in one of Bob's famous trivia outbursts.
He didn't just put his family in debt he put the whole state of Bavaria in debt. There's a reason that one day he was found floating facedown in a lake from a "mysterious" drowning accident
 
Last edited:
Surprised he didn't bring up Ludwig II put the family is debt by making castles like a true autist in one of Bob's famous trivia outbursts.
Google imaging searching didn't bring up that info so he didn't know it was an argument he could make.

Also, 1890 ain't THAT modern. Imagine if a politician today tried running on a platform that was popular in 1890...
 
Bobby justifies being a capitalist scum:
View attachment 1377058
I don't think "post-scarcity" is the only alternative to Capitalism. (Hint: Chairman Mao).
Once again gonna pick out one of these tweets so I don't go insane.

I'm assuming this is part of the whole Cuck Windbag "ree people are pirating my books despite the fact nobody wanted them even when they were free" saga. I've mentioned before that we should go back to the Roman system of giving actors the same societal standing as prostitutes, but I'm starting to feel like we should lump all creatives in that same boat if they're going to act like petulant children because their products can be had for nothing (sorry, @Mola Ram, I know you've said you've done some writing but surely you'll see it's for the greater good).

Dipshits like Windbag, Orci/Kurtzman, and basically everyone who's worked in comics over the past decade or more are not "artists." They produce bland pop culture dictated by corporate mandate, focus grouped to hell and back, and aimed at the lowest common denominator. Most of these people get paid regardless of how much of this pablum is consoomed because their contracts pay them ahead of time, and (especially in Hollywood) frequently don't get paid afterward no matter how much it gets pirated thanks to creative accounting.

The fact is, if you want to make money in a creative field, you need to make something good, or at least something that resonates well enough with enough people to sell. If you make a decent product, then it won't matter how much it gets pirated, because you'll get plenty of support from paying customers to offset any potential losses. In this day and age, piracy is a given, so quit complaining about it and make something worth buying.

The fact that Bob is lumping himself in as an "artist" is hilarious, as is his belief that any of these lefties can actually build a post-scarcity socialist utopia. The only thing funnier Bob demanding his hypothetical audience pay him, despite the fact that Bob doesn't even charge money for any of his shit since he puts it all online for free. With prevalent use of AdBlock, he could easily never see a dime. He should thank his lucky stars that there are hundreds of bigger idiots than he willingly parting with their money every month, although as he's wont to say...
1592196038002.png

...tick tock.
 
I’ve always thought that people who bang on about the purity of their bloodline have a screw loose. Further confirmation:

2E8CB0FD-4323-4756-938A-67324BB77062.jpeg

He really doesn’t realize how creepy it is for him to keep tweeting imagery from his spank bank. You don’t have to have autism in order to be an obliviously grotesque incel — but it helps!

94933C60-7FFD-47C7-85D3-6B50AE17AEEA.jpeg
 
Once again gonna pick out one of these tweets so I don't go insane.

I'm assuming this is part of the whole Cuck Windbag "ree people are pirating my books despite the fact nobody wanted them even when they were free" saga. I've mentioned before that we should go back to the Roman system of giving actors the same societal standing as prostitutes, but I'm starting to feel like we should lump all creatives in that same boat if they're going to act like petulant children because their products can be had for nothing (sorry, @Mola Ram, I know you've said you've done some writing but surely you'll see it's for the greater good).

Dipshits like Windbag, Orci/Kurtzman, and basically everyone who's worked in comics over the past decade or more are not "artists." They produce bland pop culture dictated by corporate mandate, focus grouped to hell and back, and aimed at the lowest common denominator. Most of these people get paid regardless of how much of this pablum is consoomed because their contracts pay them ahead of time, and (especially in Hollywood) frequently don't get paid afterward no matter how much it gets pirated thanks to creative accounting.

The fact is, if you want to make money in a creative field, you need to make something good, or at least something that resonates well enough with enough people to sell. If you make a decent product, then it won't matter how much it gets pirated, because you'll get plenty of support from paying customers to offset any potential losses. In this day and age, piracy is a given, so quit complaining about it and make something worth buying.

The fact that Bob is lumping himself in as an "artist" is hilarious, as is his belief that any of these lefties can actually build a post-scarcity socialist utopia. The only thing funnier Bob demanding his hypothetical audience pay him, despite the fact that Bob doesn't even charge money for any of his shit since he puts it all online for free. With prevalent use of AdBlock, he could easily never see a dime. He should thank his lucky stars that there are hundreds of bigger idiots than he willingly parting with their money every month, although as he's wont to say...
View attachment 1377345
...tick tock.

That steep negative gradient would have to be worrying to him. Oh well, it's just a jerb.
 
The sad thing is, I've seen and known all sorts of creative people who make very little. Being successful requires a combination of talent, luck and marketing. And you'll have to hustle and find your own market to cater to, since many of the large media production companies have gatekeepers whose job it is to filter out art its paymasters don't want people to see and boost art its paymasters want people to see. Why do you see so much SJWism crammed into comics and cartoons today? Because the media companies are run by SJWs who want to push that sort of stuff onto the populace. The reason Bob himself can't turn "professional" is mostly because his brand of SJWism is hateful and gives the SJW Endgame away. Bob's also a talking ham with a weird head. If he were an attractive, vaguely Jewish looking woman with dyed hair and problem glasses, he'd have a much easier time breaking into show business, regardless of his message or level of talent.

EDIT:
I’ve always thought that people who bang on about the purity of their bloodline have a screw loose. Further confirmation:

View attachment 1377386

As if Bob gave two raw shits about treason. He'd be perfectly fine with Treason if it were being committed against the Evil Trump Regime. And I'm willing to bet there were plenty of members of Bob's family that had less than stellar views about race and sex. Is Bob going to travel to the family cemetery and knock down the gravestones of everyone of his kinsmen who had unenlightened opinions about race? The dangerous thing about tearing down the monuments of the past is that it sets a precedent. Whatever ugly monstrosities that Bob and his ilk plan on erecting in the wake of their cultural victory, are almost certain to be torn down once people get sick of the SJWs and their incessant screeching. Just look at the former Soviet Union. The Communists erected all sorts of Brutalist buildings and statues of Lenin in the wake of their rule, but many of them got torn down once the Soviet Union fell. Just recently, the Russian Orthodox church consecrated this newly built chapel to commemorate the deaths of the Romanovs, who were supposed to be erased from history forever. Who won that battle, eh, Bob?

The thing about history is that it never ends, and it has no right sides. Most of the "art" that the SJWs are pumping out today are just the type of mealy propaganda that will age like fine milk and be dumped from popular memory within a few years of this SJW fad ending. When people of the future think of Star Wars, they'll think of the original trilogy. No one will remember the feminist dreck that Disney put out. They'll only remember the SJWs as a group of people that did damage to the cultural landscape, not contribute to it.

And Bob's still crowing about that idiot ancestor of his who drunkenly stumbled off the Mayflower, isn't he? If you look at John Howland's geni.com profile, he was a servant and he only had two known ancestors. Hardly a royal pedigree there. Howland did become a successful landowner and live to a ripe old age, but that was something he accomplished on his own. It wasn't because of someone he was related to. And it's dead certain that none of his successful genes filtered down to the Chipman clan.
 
Last edited:
I’ve always thought that people who bang on about the purity of their bloodline have a screw loose. Further confirmation:

View attachment 1377386
This is begging for one of those "My ancestor!" comics.

Also "Any sign of their existence." Geez, I know people like to pull out this quote a lot, but when you say it that directly...

1592200061282.png
 
What gets me about the “MUH ANCESTORS!” shit is: Who cares? (And you don’t count.) When your ancestors came to America matters about as much as when they took their first solid shit. It’s not relevant to the conversation in any way. You’re just trying to boast about something that had jack shit to do with you. Pathetic.
 
What gets me about the “MUH ANCESTORS!” shit is: Who cares? (And you don’t count.) When your ancestors came to America matters about as much as when they took their first solid shit. It’s not relevant to the conversation in any way. You’re just trying to boast about something that had jack shit to do with you. Pathetic.
When Robert tries to boast about something actually related to him though, people don't believe him and laugh at him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back