Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[Dr Naomi Hunter]

Oh god, that eel tweet.

He’s such a half-assed know-it-all. Like a real life version of Cliff Clavin from Cheers.

 

[Meriasek]

Sometimes, when it's a slow day and Bob has less to tardrage about or is unable to cry or drink himself to sleep, EugenicsBob becomes WikiBob and reads random stuff to distract himself from his miserable existence. He could, dunno, improve his work or do something else productive, but that's for obsolete people. Evolved Bobs are already perfect.

 

[Koby_Fish]

Really, its a metaphysics, or a philosophical question. We can say for sure that a fetus is human, as in it has human features and dna. But my hand is human too. Whether something is a “person” or not is entirely philosophical. You can’t use some psuedo-scientific standard like “conscious” or “self-sufficient” because then everytime you went to sleep you would stop being a person. The only way to resolve this is metaphysics, which of course doesn’t prove anything. We can debate back and forth what a “person” actually is until the end of time, but science can’t tell us that anymore than science can tell us what is ethical. Its why science and ethics are different fields.

One particularly persuasive (imo) argument for allowing abortion is that we don’t allow organ harvesting without consent, even from dead people. This avoids the fetus question. Liberals and boomer cons will never understand this because they’ve never read a nonfiction book. Bob is worse because he is *just* well read enough to know this, but doesn’t care. He has said before he doesn’t “do” philosophy, which explains why his morals are so shit. He also thinks science can tell us right from wrong, which again, as Nazis and many others have demonstrated, isn’t the case. Like, no shit he ends up running afoul of leftists, ya need to actually think about stuff in order to get your beliefs in order. His only idea of “good” is what gives him a hard on.

of course, bob being the fedora tipping m'latheist, thinks that metaphysics doesn't reals, so he relies on "science" even when "science" isn't the answer to the question.

Plus I'm of the firm belief the only reason Blob is pro-choice is he thinks it's more likely that having this opinion and sperging about it all over twitter will get him laid.

 

[Peep Plops]

I think the most pathetic shit about Bob might be him replying to random pictures of animals/plants with blocks of text lazily copied from Wikipedia but sloppily re-written as to appear like he has all this knowledge stored inside that vacuous skull of his. Either that or his simping for any and all vagina havers who happen to cross his timeline.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

A truly smart person would know the info off hand and then give it out into an easy and digestible format instead of a wall of text. Does Bob truly think that smart people talk like this?

 

[Grotesque Bushes]

A truly smart person would know the info off hand and then give it out into an easy and digestible format instead of a wall of text. Does Bob truly think that smart people talk like this?

Truly smart people are Tony Stark and Bruce Banner, and they do have grand speeches in true cinematic masterpieces Marvel makes, and in comics too.
The fuck else did you expect, Bob to have work peers he looks up to that he admires for intelligence and experience?

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Bob wants to bang Amy Adams, doggy style LITERALLY!

Spoiler: He's "real good"

I know he's not actually saying he wants to bang a dog version of Amy Adams, murrsuit or otherwise, but the implication is that he wouldn't not be turned on by it.

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1289006522069135361

https://archive.vn/dLlpj

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1289150177387917314

https://archive.vn/hE1QP

Someone PLEASE notice that Bob's intelligence and ability to use Wikipedia!

Spoiler: it's an 80's reference

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1289110243595755521

MovieBob Productions on Twitter: "Holy shit - I had to check when I s…

archived 31 Jul 2020 11:50:15 UTC

archive.vn

As of this writing, no one has like, retweeted, or responded to Bobbyboi's super duper catch.

Gorilion dollar movie idea #2,388,581,089

Spoiler: "TITANIC but for 9-11"

Dyke who made She-Ra makes an equally dumb point.

https://twitter.com/Gingerhazing/status/1289037515035271169

Noelle Stevenson on Twitter: "It is very easy to imagine this as a le…

archived 31 Jul 2020 13:20:18 UTC

archive.vn

Now here comes the Bob

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1289157084228059136

MovieBob Productions on Twitter: "*(P.P.S. You've all accepted that w…

archived 31 Jul 2020 11:42:30 UTC

archive.vn

So I guess we know what else Bob is fantasizing about.

 

[Mola Ram]

know he's not actually saying he wants to bang a dog version of Amy Adams, murrsuit or otherwise, but the implication is that he wouldn't not be turned on by it.

Important to note: this was originally a novel, and if Bob really wants an answer to a creepy question that crawled directly from r/yiff, then he could look it up. Granted, there's no way of knowing how faithful an adaptation will be one way or the other, but there's no indication he even looked it up to see if it was based on anything.

Bob's tweets have no filter at all, which is one reason it's so hard to believe he means any of his nastier remarks as "jokes."

 

[John Andrews Stan]

His NPC syntax is completely fucking obnoxious and he’s never giving it up because he doesn’t even realize he’s doing it. Between that and his refusal to leave Lindsay Ellis the fuck alone, Bob’s brain is giving off Mountain Dew marinade vibes. How is he THIS clueless?

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Important to note: this was originally a novel, and if Bob really wants an answer to a creepy question that crawled directly from r/yiff, then he could look it up. Granted, there's no way of knowing how faithful an adaptation will be one way or the other, but there's no indication he even looked it up to see if it was based on anything.

Bob's tweets have no filter at all, which is one reason it's so hard to believe he means any of his nastier remarks as "jokes."

According to some of the comments, this Amy Adams fap fest was already made in 2017. I have no idea how similar either movie is to each other but I'm hoping that they stole whole cloth from this movie.

 

[Mola Ram]

According to some of the comments, this Amy Adams fap fest was already made in 2017. I have no idea how similar either movie is to each other but I'm hoping that they stole whole cloth from this movie.

Some further research shows the book isn't even out til next summer, so the movie and book are being made in tandem (hey, that means it'll be just as great as 2001: A Space Odyssey!). There's no way to answer Bob's question, but still, the failure to do even minimal research (on his "work account" no less) is classic Bob.

 

[Flexo]

According to some of the comments, this Amy Adams fap fest was already made in 2017. I have no idea how similar either movie is to each other but I'm hoping that they stole whole cloth from this movie.

I had no idea someone attempted to clone James Marsden.

 

[Kingfisher9000]

According to some of the comments, this Amy Adams fap fest was already made in 2017. I have no idea how similar either movie is to each other but I'm hoping that they stole whole cloth from this movie.

Was just about to post this. It came out fairly recently, I’m surprised Robert of Films hasn’t heard of it. Surely if he had, he wouldn’t be praising the blatant corporate theft of this premise from the female writer/director/star of the original.

 

[Mola Ram]

Was just about to post this. It came out fairly recently, I’m surprised Robert of Films hasn’t heard of it. Surely if he had, he wouldn’t be praising the blatant corporate theft of such a unique idea from the female writer/director/star of the original.

From what I can tell, the only difference is that the protagonist is single in the Amy Adams vehicle, so the angle of "neglectful and incompetent husband is saddled with new responsibilities" will be absent, where it was a defining theme in Bitch. Also, I suppose it's up in the air whether this is purely psychological or an actual metamorphosis. (I'm pretty sure Bitch is just a crazy lady.)

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Was just about to post this. It came out fairly recently, I’m surprised Robert of Films hasn’t heard of it. Surely if he had, he wouldn’t be praising the blatant corporate theft of this premise from the female writer/director/star of the original.

Because he wants to jerk off onto fur covered Amy Adams with a tail butt plug like Shane Dawson jerks off onto his cat.

From what I can tell, the only difference is that the protagonist is single in the Amy Adams vehicle, so the angle of "neglectful and incompetent husband is saddled with new responsibilities" will be absent, where it was a defining theme in Bitch. Also, I suppose it's up in the air whether this is purely psychological or an actual metamorphosis. (I'm pretty sure Bitch is just a crazy lady.)

Yeah from what I gather the wife just goes cuckoo bonkers, acts like a dog, and the husband realizes how much she does and means to the family by the end of the film or maybe he just shoots himself and the wife picks off the kids one by one. I can't confirm that last part but I'm really hoping that's the case.

 

[Kingfisher9000]

From what I can tell, the only difference is that the protagonist is single in the Amy Adams vehicle, so the angle of "neglectful and incompetent husband is saddled with new responsibilities" will be absent, where it was a defining theme in Bitch. Also, I suppose it's up in the air whether this is purely psychological or an actual metamorphosis. (I'm pretty sure Bitch is just a crazy lady.)

Idk apparently she has a baby and the baby becomes concerned she’s becoming a dog or something. It really sounds like they just lifted the idea (which was rather unique imo) and decided to churn out a book tie-in to get housewives interested.

EDIT: Apparently this is the “author’s” debut novel, no less. Impressive that she got a movie deal before it’s even finished!

 

[Mola Ram]

Because he wants to jerk off onto fur covered Amy Adams with a tail butt plug like Shane Dawson jerks off onto his cat.

Hey, to each his own. Just don't advertise it on Twitter.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Hey, to each his own. Just don't advertise it on Twitter.

Creepy Uncle Bob’s need to broadcast his sexual desires on Twitter makes me wonder just how secure he is in his heterosexuality. Not very, it would seem.

 

[BScCollateral]

Bob wants to bang Amy Adams, doggy style LITERALLY!

I'm going out on a limb and she really turns into a dog, because otherwise, there's no room for sequels.

Note: there is a horror film with a deliberately nightmarish tone, where it is ambiguous if the protagonist is responding to real events, or going insane. The title is a synonym for "Hallucination," which should settle that question.

Despite that, they made four sequels assuming the events were real.

 

[Mola Ram]

I'm going out on a limb and she really turns into a dog, because otherwise, there's no room for sequels.

Note: there is a horror film with a deliberately nightmarish tone, where it is ambiguous if the protagonist is responding to real events, or going insane. The title is a synonym for "Hallucination," which should settle that question.

Despite that, they made four sequels assuming the events were real.

Maybe, but feminist claptrap movies don't generally get sequels, because nobody watches the first one.

Also, beware the wrath of the Tall Man.