That's one of the best parts about following Bob. Whenever he puts out a garbage take that rightly gets backlash (so, pretty much all the time), he always doubles down. Always. He never thinks "huh, maybe they have a point, maybe I was wrong," he just immediately fires off more tweet screeds about how he's so smart and we're just too dumb to understand his brilliance. He doesn't even just ignore it, which would still do him a much bigger favor. Nope, he's gonna die on that hill, every single time.
Like this example. The idea of the foppish aristocrat is centuries old and heavily ingrained within culture, and anyone with half a brain could look at that and understand that that's what the filmmakers were going for. The elites in the Capital lived a life of decadence, and one need only look at the bizarre things that come out of fashion shows to see what they'd use to flaunt their wealth. It's so basic that it doesn't need explanation, it's a decent example of visual storytelling.
Bob, on the other hand, thinks that "crazy fashion = gay." Real galaxy-brain take there.
I also like how he completely glosses over the fact that the "media" the Capital produces involves children violently murdering each other for the elites' amusement. Yeah, no, I'm sorry, forced child murder definitely constitutes evil to me.
