Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m really interested in what Bob has to say about Godzilla vs Biollante. Given his hatred towards right wingers, I’m really interested in what he thinks of some of the conservative themes it has.
He's one of those guys that believes science should be unrestrained. It matches his general ambivalence to outright genocidal outlook on sections of humanity. The first time I saw him state such a view about science was in his review of Splice. So, given that, he wouldn't like those ideas of scientists breaking the laws of nature and ethics found in said Godzilla film.
 
Last edited:
(This is not necessarily directed at you; it's for anyone who wants to troll Bob.)

Here's the thing about cows: we cannot predict how they'll react to outside stimuli. That unpredictability is one of the reasons we discourage troll ops. Chris-Chan is a good example. Ben Saint wanted to start the "Slime Saga" with Chris, but in spite of his best efforts (including throwing money at Chris), Chris would not rise to the bait. On the other hand, Chris absolutely flipped his shit when Sonic got blue arms, something nobody saw coming, which is why it was so funny when it happened.

Bob may flip his shit. But Bob may also look at the parody account and dismiss it without a second thought. DSP has haters who run a parody Twitter account (LightSydePhil), and DSP doesn't seem to care, yet the hater's autism is such that they don't stop.

If there is absolutely one person who can perfectly troll a cow, though, it is the cow themselves. Remember "a small amount for an average person?" Lindsay BTFOing Bob? No troll incited these incidents. They came about naturally. Nobody trolls Moviebob like Moviebob.

Sit back, grab some McDonalds, and enjoy the show, friendo.
Bob reads his thread, even though he tries to act like he doesn't. Talking about how he'll flip out about something guarantees that he won't do it, because he's spiteful like that. So don't do it.

:edit: Here's a question that's probably been asked and answered before but is still bugging me regardless: Is blobbo one of the lolcows who's in the top ten/twenty/fifty/hundred as far as pageviews go? How much interest is there in the Blob and his blubbery antics? He doesn't have a dedicated sub-forum so I don't think he's the single most gawked at moron on here, but surely he must be pretty high up the list, right?
You'd have to ask Null himself that. I don't believe that anyone else has the pageviews per thread data.

Is Boebert really out here thinking "WandaVision" (which, to a non Marvelfag like me, is a fucking silly name that reminds me of the Fairly Odd Parents more than anything else) is a striking piece of media? I guess in a Disney corporate sense it's a little different than the norm, but it strikes me as a pastiche of The Prisoner, that dating episode of Black Mirror, and capeshit you have to be "in the know" to understand.

This is an actual Lynchian sitcom. It's on Youtube Boebert. You can find it and watch it for free. Isn't Boebert supposed to be a media critic? Yet he never seems to know the first thing about media or cinema. I don't really know much about cinema, but it seems like I'm more qualified than Boebert to comment on media.
You probably are. I probably am, and I only know Film Studies 101-level stuff. There are three problems with Bob as a film critic. First, Bob is simply not a critical thinker. He barely rises above the "Here's how this thing and that thing are alike, and how they are different" level of analysis that is expected of a grade school student. He doesn't seem to know anything about the artistic language of film, and his own "work" shows that he has no understanding of the technical side either. He's at a TVTropes level because either he never learned this stuff, or he found it boring and forgot about it as soon as the test was over.

Which brings me to his next problem: he isn't curious. At all. He has a typical autistic pattern of greatly restricted interests and little or no curiosity about anything outside of them. He doesn't have an extensive knowledge of film because he so rarely watches anything outside of his personal interest level, even all-time great films. Undoubtedly, he was forced to watch a few of them in college, and as a result he can reference them to try to sound sophisticated. But the understanding isn't there because the interest isn't there. Well, the interest or the intelligence. That's the third problem: he's stupid. But we already knew that.
 
Which brings me to his next problem: he isn't curious. At all. He has a typical autistic pattern of greatly restricted interests and little or no curiosity about anything outside of them. He doesn't have an extensive knowledge of film because he so rarely watches anything outside of his personal interest level, even all-time great films. Undoubtedly, he was forced to watch a few of them in college, and as a result he can reference them to try to sound sophisticated. But the understanding isn't there because the interest isn't there. Well, the interest or the intelligence. That's the third problem: he's stupid. But we already knew that.
Someone said earlier that all his movie knowledge might come from his interactions at Blockbuster. I think that really might be the case. If nobody came into Blockbuster to rent Citizen Kane and then spoke to Boebert about it, then it's clearly not worth his time. It definitely fits into the autism pattern we see in cows, as you said.

I just find it so hard to believe he wouldn't try and live up to the title of "media critic" he claims to embody, despite living in a culturally dense city. It's one thing to not take film studies or literature classes at a college level where a professor pauses Barbarella or Space is the Place to talk about the artistic and aesthetic traditions coming to fore in the movies. It's another thing entirely to just not watch the movies and then reflect on them at all. It just makes me wonder...how can he consider himself to have a dignified life worth living? I guess he really is just a retard.
 
Last edited:
Bob reads his thread, even though he tries to act like he doesn't. Talking about how he'll flip out about something guarantees that he won't do it, because he's spiteful like that. So don't do it.


You'd have to ask Null himself that. I don't believe that anyone else has the pageviews per thread data.


You probably are. I probably am, and I only know Film Studies 101-level stuff. There are three problems with Bob as a film critic. First, Bob is simply not a critical thinker. He barely rises above the "Here's how this thing and that thing are alike, and how they are different" level of analysis that is expected of a grade school student. He doesn't seem to know anything about the artistic language of film, and his own "work" shows that he has no understanding of the technical side either. He's at a TVTropes level because either he never learned this stuff, or he found it boring and forgot about it as soon as the test was over.

Which brings me to his next problem: he isn't curious. At all. He has a typical autistic pattern of greatly restricted interests and little or no curiosity about anything outside of them. He doesn't have an extensive knowledge of film because he so rarely watches anything outside of his personal interest level, even all-time great films. Undoubtedly, he was forced to watch a few of them in college, and as a result he can reference them to try to sound sophisticated. But the understanding isn't there because the interest isn't there. Well, the interest or the intelligence. That's the third problem: he's stupid. But we already knew that.

Someone said earlier that all his movie knowledge might come from his interactions at Blockbuster. I think that really might be the case. If nobody came into Blockbuster to rent Citizen Kane and then spoke to Boebert about it, then it's clearly not worth his time. It definitely fits into the autism pattern we see in cows, as you said.

I just find it so hard to believe he wouldn't try and live up to the title of "media critic" he claims to embody, despite living in a culturally dense city. It's one thing to not take film studies or literature classes at a college level where a professor pauses Barbarella or Space is the Place to talk about the artistic and aesthetic traditions coming to fore in the movies. It's another thing entirely to just not watch the movies and then reflect on them at all. It just makes me wonder...how can he consider himself to have a dignified life worth living? I guess he really is just a retard.
I don't even know why he still pretends to be a film buff. His interest is clearly in politics, because that's all he talks about on Twitter, and his movie reviews are mostly politics.
 
Won't happen, Godzilla and kong will fight, sing and dance, but at the last minute a larger threat will show up and they will have to join forces to take it down, we all know that is a given.

Maybe they will show the definitive winner as in, one of the monster gets knocked out or is clearly cornered before the fight against the big bad monster.

kinda like it was clear that Superman won in the Batman V Superman movie (no duh), but in the end blah blah blah you guys know the rest.

But whatever, these hollywood kaiju flicks have been kinda shite really (to be fair, I don't like Kaiju movies), and the only one kinda decent is the Skull Island one, and just for john c reilly's character.
No, it's a modern movie.

Godzilla and King Kong will fight, and Kong will lose. Then, back at the base, Kong will realize that he is actually a she and put on a tutu, becoming Queen Kong. She will then confront Godzilla about his problematic trans-misogyny, and then they will fuck.
 
I don't even know why he still pretends to be a film buff. His interest is clearly in politics, because that's all he talks about on Twitter, and his movie reviews are mostly politics.
Because it's easier for him to convince himself he's a film expert than a political one, and gain an audience from it. Same with video games. Back in the early days of Game Overthinker he would constantly go into political/social commentaries without even bothering to cover games. Same with early Escape to the Movies, he'd start talking about shit tangentially related to the mvoie, especially if he didn't like it. Like talking about the Avengers 2 trailer for half his John Wick review.

I would say he does have a genuine love for some movies and some games, but he is insistent, like many psuedo-intellectual nerds, that his obsession with these certain properties means he's a huge part of their entire industries, with genuinely informed and insightful commentary. We know he loves the MCU and Mario, and if he just stuck to those he would have been fine. But this is Bob, so he needs to comment on everything.
 
It shows just how little Roberto knows about the Marvel universe when he didn't see the "Strucker Time Pieces. Strucker, it makes time for you" and didn't automatically know who it was. Yeah, it said "Hydra" on the watch, but that doesn't sum the whole damn thing up. The wife and I watched it and kind of busted on it, like the fucking gum. (But he doesn't have gears...)

It's not groundbreaking at all. What's that old movie with the bubbles? The Prisoner or something like that? THere's been a shitload of movies about people trapped in a false reality before, done very well, but Roberto doesn't reference a single one or make a single comparison.
 
View attachment 1850897View attachment 1850899
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1350342707743485952 (Archive)

His defensiveness over the eugenics jokes is one of my favourite examples of Robert's complete and utter lack of self-awareness. If this was the only time Robert had alluded to his love of eugenics, odds are no one would remember it and it would almost never get brought up. However, Robert constantly spergs about genetics, people being "necessary", Darwinism in the sense that everyone who disagrees with him is "unfit", and basically talks about people who disagree with him in the same way a Nazi talks about Jews. That tweet is brought up because it's an instance of him outright admitting to being a eugenicist.

Also, "troll forum primarily known for doxxing journalists and trading child pornography", ironic coming from a man who has a known for defending pedos and pedobait as well as associating with various doxxing accounts such as Edward "Emily" Gorcenski.
Leave it to CinemaBobert to sperg out over a guy with 30 followers, rather than literally anyone with any larger following who said the same thing. Anything to avoid the extra trouble of having to deal with more than one person. Dude is too lazy to even fight his own battles. He just QRT's and then silently encourages his fans to dogpile the Target of the Day by liking their tweets as they come up. No joke, he straight up monitors the notifications and the thread for at least a solid hour to give his boys a pat on the back for fighting the battles he's too fat and lazy to fight.

And of course his fans all believe his description of this site, just like they believe that it's the fault of "Internet Hate Mobs" that literally everyone else sees him as a fascist or a eugenicist, and that Bob is the One True Good Guy.
 
He's so asshurt that Musk doesn't want to immediately exterminate half the country who voted Republican, isn't he?
Yeah. If Movieblob had the power Elon Musk held he'd be nuking Alabama from orbit so he thinks that because Musk won't do that he's not truly superyah.

As an aside, I wonder what Roberto de las Peliculas thinks about Democrats in the areas he's willing to write off. There are lots of people in rural areas, even in the Deep South, who voted for Biden at the election and even voted for Bernie in the primaries. Are they inferior too?
Are we sure he's not an Asian Elephant who was accidentally dropped at a Boston hospital?
Elephants can actually remember shit.
Do the people who come up with these policies have shares in mask manufacturers?
That way he can feel righteous when he takes photos of unsuspecting women.
”why did you upskirt that lady?”
”Officer, I can explain! Someone on Twitter told me to.”
It's a shit show that was destined to fail, so the suits thought that suckers like Bob would love it if they added capeshit heroes in it.
And voila, Boebert eats it up like diabetes will eat his foot.
This honestly pisses me off. These people will buy anything, no matter how shit, if it has a token black character that's bordering on being a racist stereotype and some capeshit.
He's outright admitted this. Or at least, strongly hinted at it multiple times.
View attachment 1852132
View attachment 1852138
View attachment 1852139

Some years ago, reporting the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem, I spoke of "the banality of evil" and meant with this no theory or doctrine but something quite factual, the phenomenon of evil deeds, committed on a gigantic scale, which could not be traced to any particularity of wickedness, pathology, or ideological conviction in the doer, whose only personal distinction was a perhaps extraordinary shallowness. However monstrous the deeds were, the doer was neither monstrous nor demonic, and the only specific characteristic one could detect in his past as well as in his behavior during the trial and the preceding police examination was something entirely negative: it was not stupidity but a curious, quite authentic inability to think.
[snip]
“Cliches, stock phrases, adherence to conventional, standardized codes of expression and conduct have the socially recognized function of protecting us against reality, that is, against the claim on our thinking attention which all events and facts arouse by virtue of their existence.” -
Hannah Arendt http://jonudell.net/h/arendt.pdf

I know I've joked before that maybe Bob is Stalin reincarnated, but now I wonder if maybe he's Eichmann. They both seem quite banal in their evil.

“So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot.” -George Orwell
1) being full of hate and being happy tend to be mutually exclusive.
2) the thing that I always think about when I hear about the banality of evil is that these were real people who committed these crimes. The Nazis weren't cartoon monsters who went around being evil for shits and giggles and they didn't just wake up and decide they'd kill six million Jews - they were actual people who genuinely believed that anyone Hitler considered subhuman needed to die, and that's what always scared me about the Nazis.
3) what I like about Orwell is that despite being very left wing he was willing to criticise his own side as anyone who's read Homage to Catalonia knows.
You're wrong.

"The Blood of the Covenant is thicker than the water of the womb". Blood Covenants are the bonds formed with those you associate and labor with closely.
I'm sure the original proverb was ”blood is thicker than water”.
I have family like that, granted they are nowhere near as malevolent as Bob. They're just drunk off their own trite ideology that I try to minimize my communications with them to keep my sanity intact. Much like Bob, they prove why social media has been a blight on mankind.
I have a relative like that and I try to avoid him as much as possible. He's never been able to accept that I believe in God, support the monarchy and think that the will of the people should be supreme because, in his mind, stupid working-class people believe those things and I'm not stupid or working class so I have no business disagreeing with him.
But it seems that rhetoric which smacks of 'progress' while requiring none of the thought or restraint of real progress, is too alluring to the naturally lazy human logic.
Progressivism, in my opinion, is a religion and that explains why its adherents treat it with religious fervour.
 
:edit: Here's a question that's probably been asked and answered before but is still bugging me regardless: Is blobbo one of the lolcows who's in the top ten/twenty/fifty/hundred as far as pageviews go? How much interest is there in the Blob and his blubbery antics? He doesn't have a dedicated sub-forum so I don't think he's the single most gawked at moron on here, but surely he must be pretty high up the list, right?
You'd have to ask Null himself that. I don't believe that anyone else has the pageviews per thread data.
I wish that Null would add pageviews for all the threads. I would love to see how much interest everybody has in MovieBob.
 
Isn't Bob under six foot? I rarely see short officers up here that aren't women. Also, he really wants us to believe he went outside? If it's not to some movie theatre than he's at home in his basement Tweeting about his glorious revolution.
Nah, he's 6'2, thinking himself some sort of super imposing giant nobody would mess with. But from his general demeanor you could certainly think that he's an absolute manlet. Mentally he is.
 
Nah, he's 6'2, thinking himself some sort of super imposing giant nobody would mess with. But from his general demeanor you could certainly think that he's an absolute manlet. Mentally he is.

I have the definite impression that if you got into a real-life argument with Bob, you could reduce him to tears and incoherent rage by calling him an obese eternal virgin who no one has ever liked.
 
I have the definite impression that if you got into a real-life argument with Bob, you could reduce him to tears and incoherent rage by calling him an obese eternal virgin who no one has ever liked.
I think he'll just get pissy and super passive-aggressive. He won't start any real shit and will later claim on Twitter that he just silently stared down some MAGA Chud into submission with his impressive physique, because everyone bows down before the mighty Bobert.
 
Bob probably has retard strenght like those baboons that can eat your face off but they arent retardos like blobert
If Blob were a more active individual, I'd say it was likely he'd have the sort of stable, inexorable strength that you get from taking a bulk like that and moving it through a relatively normal working class life, but the guy is beyond sedentary. Normally a big fat guy like that who actually walks around and does things during the day will have legs like tree trunks that can move all that mass with surprising gusto. But Blob? I imagine he thinks he'd try, but I don't think he'd get very far before throwing a clot or something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back