He's so asshurt that Musk doesn't want to immediately exterminate half the country who voted Republican, isn't he?
Yeah. If Movieblob had the power Elon Musk held he'd be nuking Alabama from orbit so he thinks that because Musk won't do that he's not truly superyah.
As an aside, I wonder what Roberto de las Peliculas thinks about Democrats in the areas he's willing to write off. There are lots of people in rural areas, even in the Deep South, who voted for Biden at the election and even voted for Bernie in the primaries. Are they inferior too?
Are we sure he's not an Asian Elephant who was accidentally dropped at a Boston hospital?
Elephants can actually remember shit.
Do the people who come up with these policies have shares in mask manufacturers?
That way he can feel righteous when he takes photos of unsuspecting women.
”why did you upskirt that lady?”
”Officer, I can explain! Someone on Twitter told me to.”
It's a shit show that was destined to fail, so the suits thought that suckers like Bob would love it if they added capeshit heroes in it.
And voila, Boebert eats it up like diabetes will eat his foot.
This honestly pisses me off. These people will buy anything, no matter how shit, if it has a token black character that's bordering on being a racist stereotype and some capeshit.
He's outright admitted this. Or at least, strongly hinted at it multiple times.
View attachment 1852132
View attachment 1852138
View attachment 1852139
“
Some years ago, reporting the trial of Eichmann in Jerusalem, I spoke of "the banality of evil" and meant with this no theory or doctrine but something quite factual, the phenomenon of evil deeds, committed on a gigantic scale, which could not be traced to any particularity of wickedness, pathology, or ideological conviction in the doer, whose only personal distinction was a perhaps extraordinary shallowness. However monstrous the deeds were, the doer was neither monstrous nor demonic, and the only specific characteristic one could detect in his past as well as in his behavior during the trial and the preceding police examination was something entirely negative: it was not stupidity but a curious, quite authentic inability to think.
[snip]
“Cliches, stock phrases, adherence to conventional, standardized codes of expression and conduct have the socially recognized function of protecting us against reality, that is, against the claim on our thinking attention which all events and facts arouse by virtue of their existence.” -Hannah Arendt
http://jonudell.net/h/arendt.pdf
I know I've joked before that maybe Bob is Stalin reincarnated, but now I wonder if maybe he's Eichmann. They both seem quite banal in their evil.
“So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot.” -George Orwell
1) being full of hate and being happy tend to be mutually exclusive.
2) the thing that I always think about when I hear about the banality of evil is that these were real people who committed these crimes. The Nazis weren't cartoon monsters who went around being evil for shits and giggles and they didn't just wake up and decide they'd kill six million Jews - they were actual people who genuinely believed that anyone Hitler considered subhuman needed to die, and that's what always scared me about the Nazis.
3) what I like about Orwell is that despite being very left wing he was willing to criticise his own side as anyone who's read Homage to Catalonia knows.
You're wrong.
"The Blood of the Covenant is thicker than the water of the womb". Blood Covenants are the bonds formed with those you associate and labor with closely.
I'm sure the original proverb was ”blood is thicker than water”.
I have family like that, granted they are nowhere near as malevolent as Bob. They're just drunk off their own trite ideology that I try to minimize my communications with them to keep my sanity intact. Much like Bob, they prove why social media has been a blight on mankind.
I have a relative like that and I try to avoid him as much as possible. He's never been able to accept that I believe in God, support the monarchy and think that the will of the people should be supreme because, in his mind, stupid working-class people believe those things and I'm not stupid or working class so I have no business disagreeing with him.
But it seems that rhetoric which smacks of 'progress' while requiring none of the thought or restraint of real progress, is too alluring to the naturally lazy human logic.
Progressivism, in my opinion, is a religion and that explains why its adherents treat it with religious fervour.