Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, then I guess that means that Bob thinks that Mayo-Ghouls don't count as undesirables. You know, in spite of what he types out every fucking day.
to moviebob, the undesirables are the ones who are holding him back from his Soopeeryah Fyootchah, delaying the upload of his consciousness into a robot body like Ghost in the Shell simply by believing in a Higher Power.
 
Besides, do the entirety of Trump's voters not live in Bob's own head rent free?
Along with the ”dirtbag left”, yes.
I'm sure Moobiebob thinks Nazi means anyone who is racist and bigoted and (secretly) wants to gas the undesirables. Because apparently ONLY the Nazis were racist and bigoted and desired to gas the undesirables.
Which is incredibly ironic, but whatever.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Flexo and Koby_Fish
To be completely pedantic, a lot of the "virtues" of monarchy and the "vices" of democracy are really a result of differing technologies. When it takes a day or two for new to arrive via horseback from the furthest reaches of the kingdom it's just a practical challenges of tech kept a limit on the King's tyranny.

North Korea and China are apt demonstrations today of how badly a monarchy could have gotten with modern tech at their cruelty's disposal. (Even if they want to avoid being monarchies in the most pedantic sense.)

So to sum up: do not take as a positive what was temporal happenstance.
Not really. You look at how monarchies taxed and governed their subjects, and it's nowhere near as bad as it is now.

The Roman Empire, for example, would have a base tax rate of about 10%, and on a bad day, it can go up to 30%. Here in America, the income tax alone will take 30% of your earnings before the IRS even comes in to collect their share. Not to mention that even liberal "democracies" had laws up the ass restricting speech and gun ownership, and after 9/11, (some would say even before) our security and intelligence apparatus and their deeds would put even the Oprichniki to shame.

I mean, where else can an intelligence organization like the CIA get away with spiking CITIZENS OF THE COUNTRY with LSD? ( https://www.npr.org/2019/09/09/7589...d-control-torture-lsd-and-a-poisoner-in-chief / https://www.history.com/news/did-the-cia-secretly-dose-people-with-lsd ) If a monarch tried to do that, not only would his peasants revolt, but his lords would denounce him, and maybe even other royal family members would be leading the charge against him. In a modern-day republic where people just take it as an accepted truth that democracy = freedom, they sure as hell can get away with using citizens as guinea pigs for their crazy experiments. Or doing stupid shit like sending guns to drug gangs (Operation Fast and Furious) or financing terrorists (Operation Cyclone).

Sure, monarchies have invaded other countries for taxation, slavery, and exploitation, and in the case of some, they've even eradicated entire tribes now and then, (like Spain with the Aztecs/Incas) but that can hardly get close the crimes done at the hands of so-called democracies, such as slavery, (which existed in America up to 1860) eradication of entire tribes, (which kept on going up until the 20th century) and forced sterilization (which continued up until the end of WW2). Democracies are no better than monarchies, hence why the Founding Fathers wanted a very limited government, with them being very aware that a democracy can be just as oppressive as a one-man dictatorship. And of course, Communist China did start off as a sort of "republic" in that they won the support of local farmers and the populace, and gained their support against the Guomindang, before they went full mad tyrant and began eradicating entire segments of the populace for defying them.

This is what I was talking about when it comes to virtues and vices of monarchies and democracies. With monarchs, the worst thing they've done is push down on peasants to pay taxes or go brigand and attack other nations for lebensraum and resources. As much as the average American would like to imagine medieval life as Game of Thrones, in actuality, many Medievalists can tell you that such a portrayal is hardly accurate. If you want a clearer picture of what went on in those Medieval days, go read up Regine Pernoud's books on the Medieval Era, such as "The Crusaders" and "Those Terrible Middle Ages!" The era of monarchs is hardly as bad as the democracy-lovers tend to portray it to be.

To put it in modern terms, having a monarch was more like having a president for life who still has to ass-kiss enough people to gain their support, because they're afraid that if they lose the support of enough bishops, lords, and towns/cities, they could get overthrown by their dissatisfied subjects who could just as easily crown someone else in their stead. Especially since having standardized national armies were a modern innovation, for eons the kings relied on whatever bannermen who supported them and whatever mercenaries they could hire, and those guys could just as easily join the opposite team and support usurpers instead. Both Western European monarchs and Asian monarchs have been overthrown now and then, with Byzantium having at least 30 Emperors get overthrown violently while some Chinese dynasties ended with them losing the Mandate of Heaven and the people's support.

I'm sure Moobiebob thinks Nazi means anyone who is racist and bigoted and (secretly) wants to gas the undesirables. Because apparently ONLY the Nazis were racist and bigoted and desired to gas the undesirables.
Basically, yes. Bob also doesn't see the irony in being a nationalist (his "proud of being an American geek" stance) and a socialist, while hating the Nazis. Apparently he forgot what the term stood for.

to moviebob, the undesirables are the ones who are holding him back from his Soopeeryah Fyootchah, delaying the upload of his consciousness into a robot body like Ghost in the Shell simply by believing in a Higher Power.
Speaking of, do you think Bob would upload his brain into a female robotic shell if he had the chance? Just so he can troon out and virtue signal about being a transsexual woman?

Bob and his simps always like to chuckle amongst themselves about how Bob lives in our heads rent free.

Yes, I admit that I think about Bob a lot. I have no shame in regards to this. It's perfectly natural to be fascinated by such aberrant curiosities as him.

My attitude about it is the same as Kyle from PKA, who freely admits that he's fascinated by Wingsofredemption, and thinks about him almost every day.

Besides, do the entirety of Trump's voters not live in Bob's own head rent free?
It's actually funny, since I usually forget about Bob whenever I'm not on this thread. The most I do is laugh whenever someone makes fun of him, then I forget all about him afterwards.

Trump and his voters will forever live in Bob's head due to them being everything he despises.

Bob only really likes his husband friend Mario and Godzilla I sincerely doubt he care about anything else involving japan or it's people. You could make make the argument that he has a fascination with china and the ccp since he loves defending them at every turn
Mario is a staunch monarchist who keeps putting Princess Peach back into power instead of instituting a socialist democracy for the Mushroom Kingdom in her absence. That, and Mario is still owned by Japanese companies, so I can see them using Mario as anti-CCP propaganda if the CCP doesn't stop screwing with the Japanese. So in both national interests and personal political stances, Mario is the exact opposite of everything Bob stands for. Which is ironic as all hell, but also funny as fuck.

Robert is a modern-day Commodus, and Chris Chan is a modern-day Elagabalus.

Now I'm wondering if that makes KF a modern-day De vita Caesarum.
I'm pretty sure those two Emperors were more dignified than Movieblob and Chris-Chan, despite all their flaws and vices.

For someone who claims to have ”studied Seminary-level [sic] scripture under Jesuits” and attended ”Mass conducted [sic] in Old Latin [sic]”, he really doesn't understand Latin.

Whenever he speaks about his Catholic upbringing, he reminds me of Alberto Rivera.
For the curious, Alberto Rivera was a Spanish fraudster who discovered he could make a quick buck by telling Prods lies about the Catholic Church and the Jesuits. He claimed that:
• he was a ”lay Jesuit” - as the Society of Jesus is an order of priests, laymen cannot join it.
• he was ordained at the age of 17 - canon law says you have to be 23 to be ordained as a deacon, and 25 to be ordained as a priest.
• he brought down a Protestant seminary in Guatemala by having sex with a member of a Catholic Action group - this would not only be sinful, but ignores the fact that there is one Protestant seminary in Guatemala and it has never closed.
• he renounced Catholicism at an open-air Mass in front of 50,000 people. There is no evidence that this Mass actually took place.
• he was persecuted by the Spanish Inquisition, who locked him up in a mental hospital in Barcelona and forced him to recant his renunciation. The Spanish Inquisition was disbanded well over a century before Rivera claimed this happened.

All of this is not just completely batshit, but sounds like the sort of thing Blob would say to get clout on Woke Twitter.
I can't claim to have studied under the Jesuits, but I have studied about them, and I have seen a Latin Mass. And I can safely say that even the modern-day woke Jesuits would have issues with Bob's stances such as his continued pestering of white Republicans or his close ties with the woke godless crowd. Especially with him trying to get Hotdog Girl to confirm him as a friend. Even they would have no choice but to call Bobbert a freak after that.

Meanwhile, if we did get the old 16th Century Jesuits who sung Mass in Latin all the time, they'd burn Bobbert at the stake for heresy. I can see Robert Bellarmine setting Movieblob's ass on fire for more than a few of his beliefs, mostly ones pertaining to his views on the "Superior Future".

The likely response of a 16th-century Jesuit to Bob's madness.

People will speak of Abraham, Moses, the Prophets, Jesus Christ, and the Apostles in 2,000 years. Moviebob will be forgotten by all except the Farms (if we're still around by then.)

"...and to the dust you shall return."
Bob would never accept that. To him, the "Superior Future" will create a sort of TNG-style future where all religion is relegated to the backburner for "enlightened" secular thinking.

But we all know that the Power of Christ will compel Bob to be silent when the time comes.

Prior to being Christianized, areas beyond the Roman Empire had such arrangements. Women would flock to the households of the rich and powerful, and poor men would be left with none. Rather than go gay, these poor men formed brigand bands to maraud the rich man's property- and this included raping his harem. Family lines would be traced through the mother because many did not know their father.

Christianity put a stop to that by enforcing monogamy. With more partners available, brigands became married men and settled down, and while banditry didn't disappear entirely, it was reduced substantially.
Ironically enough, removing the marriage arrangement of Christianity is giving rise to the harem mentality again. Charismatic and powerful men can choose from a bevy of women for them to use and dispose of like wet wipes when they've grown bored of them, while the nerds are left with hentai and whatever scraps the jocks deigned to leave to them.

How ironic that Bob supports SJW leftists who want to get rid of the Christian idea of marriage, when all that will do is end with him being old and alone and not having a woman to warm his bed at night.

In all honesty, I'd hope not. Robert's rampant incompetency and pathetic nature is important to humanity in its own way. Society has strayed from what is good and just purely by allowing such filth as Robert and his family to thrive, and as long as Robert's body of work is allowed to survive, he could serve as a cautionary tale for future humans, who will hopefully manage to rid the Earth of gastropods like Robert. With luck, his existence will survive as a prime example of the epitome of human obsolescence and retardation.
At the very least, it'll be something funny for future generations to laugh at. Like a sort of Don Quixote for SJW spergs.
 
I'm pretty sure those two Emperors were more dignified than Movieblob and Chris-Chan, despite all their flaws and vices.
The difference is that Chris Chan never ha d a country to rule.
And I can safely say that even the modern-day woke Jesuits would have issues with Bob's stances such as his continued pestering of white Republicans or his close ties with the woke godless crowd.
St Ignatius of Loyola is probably looking down and shaking his head.
 
Abraham (and most of the patriarchs, actually, just look at everything Jacob does) aren't exactly great people. This is the most famous occasion during which he bargains with God, but on two different occasions he lies about being married to Sarah so that he can be safe when living in Egypt and Canaan. He essentially pimps out his wife to the Pharaoh and king of the Amorites so that they won't kill him. Of course, the theological point is that God had already promised Abraham that his descendants would be as numerous as the stars, they would go through a captivity and exodus, etc. So him fearing for his life is essentially doubting what God said earlier. On the second occasion (with the Amorites) the king is such a great person that God appears in his dream and says "Don't fuck this broad if you don't want to be afflicted with plagues. She's the wife of my main dude Abraham." So the king of the Amorites actually comes off as much better than Abraham in the story—he sends off Abraham after making a pact with him and giving him a bunch of treasure.

The other occasion during which Abraham bargains with God is when God makes the covenant with him and says that Sarah will have a child through whom Abraham's lineage will descend. Abraham and Sarah are old, he already had Ishmael with Hagar, and he basically doesn't believe him. So he asks that God ensure Ishmael's life. God assents, but says while he will make Ishmael into a great nation his covenant will pass through Isaac, not Ishmael. Sarah laughs at this whole thing—she's 90, how can she have kids? But when she does conceive, she names Isaac after the verb for laughter.

Abraham doesn't outsmart God in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah. If anything, Abraham bargaining to stop the destruction if a number of good people can be found blows up in his face, since he can't actually find that (small) number of good people. The cities are destroyed in spite of Abraham's bargaining. There is midrash on Genesis 22 and the Binding of Isaac that has Abraham bargaining with God after he ends up not sacrificing his son to basically make sure God remembers the covenant they made whenever Isaac's descendants start acting up, too.
Thank you very much! I had all my Bible studies mixed up but remember Abraham doing questionable things and God going "oh, that Abe...",
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Koby_Fish
That really depends on how many people Bob decides to take with him when he goes.

His legend may live on in infamy.
For me, him having a heart attack after AOC BTFO's Kamala Harris in the 2024 primaries and Blob realises that his waifu and him are fighting for completely different things is a lot more likely than the saga of Elliot Bobger, and is also far funnier.
 
What do you think the chances are that MovieBob comes out as trans?
After Jimquisition and Philosophy tube (a leftie media critic and breadtuber respectivly) came out for the sake of clout, I suspect that Bob is consedering it. He seems like the kinda guy who has AGP and would try to get some woke pussy or atleast more relevancy.
 
For someone who claims to have ”studied Seminary-level [sic] scripture under Jesuits” and attended ”Mass conducted [sic] in Old Latin [sic]”, he really doesn't understand Latin.

Whenever he speaks about his Catholic upbringing, he reminds me of Alberto Rivera.
For the curious, Alberto Rivera was a Spanish fraudster who discovered he could make a quick buck by telling Prods lies about the Catholic Church and the Jesuits. He claimed that:
• he was a ”lay Jesuit” - as the Society of Jesus is an order of priests, laymen cannot join it.
• he was ordained at the age of 17 - canon law says you have to be 23 to be ordained as a deacon, and 25 to be ordained as a priest.
• he brought down a Protestant seminary in Guatemala by having sex with a member of a Catholic Action group - this would not only be sinful, but ignores the fact that there is one Protestant seminary in Guatemala and it has never closed.
• he renounced Catholicism at an open-air Mass in front of 50,000 people. There is no evidence that this Mass actually took place.
• he was persecuted by the Spanish Inquisition, who locked him up in a mental hospital in Barcelona and forced him to recant his renunciation. The Spanish Inquisition was disbanded well over a century before Rivera claimed this happened.

All of this is not just completely batshit, but sounds like the sort of thing Blob would say to get clout on Woke Twitter.
Ding ding ding. TLM spergery: No way in hell Blob would have served at a TLM anywhere in the Archdiocese of Boston at the time. The Archdiocese was hostile to it and everything Catholic at the time. Only the SSPX were operating in the area, I *think.* In fact, the trad community is still treated like dirt in Boston.

Bob is a liar who lies. Shocking.
 
Ding ding ding. TLM spergery: No way in hell Blob would have served at a TLM anywhere in the Archdiocese of Boston at the time. The Archdiocese was hostile to it and everything Catholic at the time. Only the SSPX were operating in the area, I *think.* In fact, the trad community is still treated like dirt in Boston.

Bob is a liar who lies. Shocking.
I'm not a Bostonian, but knowing how hostile some people are to the notion of celebrating Mass in the same way it was celebrated for hundreds of years, that honestly doesn't surprise me. Besides, we all know that if he was vaguely associated with the SSPX he'd be talking about being brainwashed by a ”secret uber-misogynist group of traditionalist incel softboys” or whatever, so it can't be that.

As an aside, I love how he mentioned one of the priests apparently being in Opus Dei when we all know he only put that in there to impress wokists who read the Da Vinci Code once.
 
I'm not a Bostonian, but knowing how hostile some people are to the notion of celebrating Mass in the same way it was celebrated for hundreds of years, that honestly doesn't surprise me. Besides, we all know that if he was vaguely associated with the SSPX he'd be talking about being brainwashed by a ”secret uber-misogynist group of traditionalist incel softboys” or whatever, so it can't be that.

As an aside, I love how he mentioned one of the priests apparently being in Opus Dei when we all know he only put that in there to impress wokists who read the Da Vinci Code once.
Read up on the history of Mary Immaculate of Lourdes Parish in Newton and how the parishioners were treated. It’ll piss you off right nicely. I went to “the basement Mass” at the cathedral while visiting Boston, it was sad. Generally, people are depressed and browbeaten, including the priest (who was screamingly heterosexual, thank God).

To keep the subject Bob related, what he fails to realize, is that not every so-called progressive is hostile to other languages. Like so many wokists, he doesn’t realize what an American supremacist he really is; unless it’s spoken in Current Year American English, and revolves around consumer culture, it’s not worth preserving. That’s why he’s such utter shit at using “big” words. In a way, he can’t grasp the concepts behind them.

I’ve seen libs utterly in awe at the TLM. They may never be religious, but they can get it. Not everyone is as dim as you, Bob.
 
For me, him having a heart attack after AOC BTFO's Kamala Harris in the 2024 primaries and Blob realises that his waifu and him are fighting for completely different things is a lot more likely than the saga of Elliot Bobger, and is also far funnier.
I agree, the odds of Bob actually going postal seem slim to non-existent because, despite his social media bluster, we all know he's an impotent pussy who would grab a woman for a human shield if a car backfired near him.

Perversely, though, that's why I think it might happen: because Bob going full Dylan Roof (if only in the hope the cops would buy him Burger King, too) is the last thing any of us would expect.
 
unless it’s spoken in Current Year American English, and revolves around consumer culture, it’s not worth preserving.
Bob is the sort of person who read Brave New World and thought it was a utopia.

As an aside, this whole conversation reminded me of a scene in that book where the schoolboys at Eton, who were raised in a society where they got everything they wanted and were brought up to worship a cult of progress, were unable to understand why the Catholics on the Savage Reservation showed penitence and genuine spirituality. The cult of consumerism, which Bob bows down before, views any adoration of anything apart from the Almighty Dollar as heretical, which explains why Blob constantly attacks religion.
 
The cult of consumerism, which Bob bows down before, views any adoration of anything apart from the Almighty Dollar as heretical, which explains why Blob constantly attacks religion.
It's amazing how the consoomers have become the modern day religious zealots that they so staunchly critisized in the past. And it makes me laugh.

But the most important is that if you compare them to religious zealots they will laugh in your face and call you a nutjob for even making that comparison because they believe in "nothing" rather than the man in the sky. They just made a cut cardboard substitute for religion but they cannot cope with the fact that they are what they would despise the most. But with Bob i would say it's the resentment for being a "former catholic". How much do you thin Bob thinks he's a hardened survivor that was behind enemy lines for going through catholicism and still be "normal" instead of the typical quaker?
He never reads books, only skimming through Wikipedia articles while having his thesaurus with him.
He would claim he read the book if there was a movie out of it.
 
Ew5FauxW8AERa70.jpg

Chris likes The Synder Cut:
Untitled.png

Bobby doesn't (anyone expected otherwise?), although he grudgingly accepts Synder has improved upon the original Justice League.
-.png

Bobby thinks, despite the improvements, it is still inferior to Mortal Kombat:
Untitled.png

Untitled.png

Nash! long time no see!
Untitled.png

Not sure if Synder Cut:
Untitled.png

Does Bobby know who Atlas is?
Untitled.png

Untitled.png
Yeah that's right. This makes Bobby's comment even more inscrutable.

MCU and The Falcon.
0.png
"All citizens are ungrateful pricks," I can't see why it could happen unless your heros are like Carol Denvers.

Yet wokesters aren't satisfied with The Falcon, because the show won't let them indulge in their favorite racial grudgewank:
Untitled.png

Three-way conference call between Bobby, Chu-chu, and Nymphomachy. About wrestling and capeshit.
Untitled.png

More on the fixing of wrestling matches:
52.png

+ + + +
Guns:
1.png

Bobby thinks Elon Musk is dumb enough to trade his colossal wealth for "magic beans":
Untitled.png
I wonder who is dumber, the one with the money bag or the one who can't make him part with it?

Bobby's still lashing at Candice Owens, that ungrateful Auntie Tom who dares to disrespect Cardi B.
Untitled.png

"Homophobic" cartoon:
Untitled.png
I can't make sense of that chick's tweets.

Peter Coffin. I can't be bothered to find out about what's that about:
52.png

1.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back