Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
When it doubt, just have the offending account removed. Typical.

The most annoying thing about Bob is that he won't at least acknowledge that his rhetoric is even vaguely extremist or genocidal.
It's the dive into blatant 1984 shit. The Right Side of History© has the power to decide what extremism and genocide are.
 
How exactly would the Roman empire tax more of a people that were largely illiterate? You're not exactly going to be able to report on your income if you can't write it down now are you?
The tax collectors wrote it down for you. They'd look at the wealth you have, and confiscate 10-30% of it. Also, people in Ancient Rome were literate, as even poor people would scribble notes and graffiti on the city walls.

And like I said, we can see now China experimenting on people even worse than the CIA's little drug efforts. (not to mention what was done over in Europe)
Yes, and Red China is a republic that went off the deep end, not a monarchy.

No, they did not. Hiring foreign weirdos to join your army isn't the same as giving guns to druglords and terrorists that were way beyond your control. That's why the French Foreign Legion wasn't as harmful to France as the Afghan terrorists and Mexican druglords are to American interests. Byzantium, for instance, used foreign mercenaries like the Turcopoles, the Varangian Guard, and the Latinkon to bolster their forces in many instances, and that didn't do as much harm to them as helping terrorists in Afghanistan or arming druglords in Mexico did to the USA.

I'm not saying the era of monarchs was bad - I'm saying what kept it from being bad was the primitive nature of technology NOT anything inherent to monarchy itself. You even prove this point by comparing modern democracies to primitive monarchies when primitive democracies (i.e. America during it's first hundred years or so) lacked the faults you bring up. If the issue was endemic to any kind of representational government, then it should have all arisen much sooner within America. But most of them did not. Almost every fault you bring up results once society reached a technical level capable of carrying out that fault - and that we can see other pseudo-monarchial systems (or even the fun of WW2 Japan) in the modern world pull the same kind of shit proves the point: it's not the system of government, it's man's own flaws.

TL;DR - you keep making the assumption that limitations of reality were limitations of the system. That is a category error.
Not really. Again, monarchies had many checks and balances on their system that isn't due to primitive technology-it was more due to the system being reliant on oaths and personal honor. The truth is, republican governments, with their national armies and bureaucracies that have long since predated things like cell phones, internet, and airplanes, were far more powerful and had a greater potential for tyranny than even the worst of the monarchs did.

Heck, just look at the Roman Republic. As a kingdom, the worst they had was Tarquin the Proud, who bossed people around and raped some Vestal Virgin, but under the Republic, they had senators and aristocrats who drove poor farmers out of business by replacing them with slave labor taken from wars. Which explains why the plebians supported a dictator for life/Emperor replacing the Senate as the locus of Roman power.

In the same vein, monarchical armies numbered in the tens of thousands, whereas America during the Civil War, not even 100 years old, was able to field a massive army of 600,000 troops, while their president suspended Habeas Corpus and threw people in jail without a trial. When Charles I tried to do that in the English Civil War back in Great Britain, he got his head chopped off. Lincoln got away with it in the USA despite the fact that most of the military elite and most of the fighting men of the country fought against him, while many immigrants AND citizens didn't approve of his war and saw him as a tyrant, even in the North. All because the republic he served had a bureaucratized system that oppressed anyone who disagreed and had no problems drafting them to die fighting in the South. Both Lincoln and Charles I faced against foes who had good commanders and fighting men, yet Lincoln won and Charles I lost his head.

And yes, in the American Civil War, neither side had airplanes, cell phones, or the internet. At most, they had telegrams that could easily be cut by the enemy, as well as rail lines and trains that can also be raided by cavalry.

TL;DR - you're assuming monarchies weren't capable of great tyranny because they had limits to their system based on them not having the proper technology. I now refer you to the Aztec Empire which was radically different from other monarchies and which reserved the right to sacrifice anyone to the gods at any given time. Monarchs could easily have been more tyrannical than the modern republics of today if they wanted to, and many ancient monarchies before the rise of Roman/Western Civilization WERE that tyrannical. Western monarchs couldn't be as tyrannical as say, Civil War America because there were legal checks and balances that prevented monarchs from having too much power, and even in absolute monarchies like Spain, the monarch still has to act in the interests of his people, especially when his troops come from the local populace instead of foreign borders.

He would be a much happier man if he actually believed anthropogenic climate change will lead to extinction and did activism. He just does nothing while he waits to consume the Princess Peach look-like sexbot from China to collect all his information for blackmail.
Aren't the sexbots coming from Japan? Or am I missing something?

It's a pretty common sentiment, and leads into the larger idea of a revolution to forcibly collectivize society. Blob-type wannabe revolutionaries see captains of industry as middlemen between science and progress, holding back developments for their own profit. Blob hates Elon because he's the one who's decided to put effort into electric cars and better battery technology instead of gay luxury space communism.
It always makes me laugh when the so-called freedom-lovers create tyrannies that would make Nero blush. Bob is exactly the kind of guy who would want to fund gay luxury space communism where the plebians are forced to live under stringent rules, while the elite get to do as they please.

Blob doesn't care about laying real building blocks for cleaning up some of the dirtiest parts of human presence on earth. A real and meaningful victory in the fight against anthropogenic climate change, such that it may be, is worthless to Blob if he thinks it means waiting longer for a government funded Princess Peach sexbot that dispenses Quarter Pounders
It pretty much is the fate of every Communist to hate those who actually could fix the Third World. Mostly because if the Third World's problems are actually fixed, these wannabe-revolutionaries would have nothing to do and no purpose in life.

Everyone wishes he was just raised on nothing but sci-fi movies and capeshit, but people like this actually do things according to their shallow/superficial beliefs. He just stands there, doing nothing. Not even climate change activism that he could get paid for.
Most of these beliefs Bob clings to did not come from sci-fi or capeshit films. Especially since most of those films during the time of Bobbert's youth would be mostly focused on fun and schlock, not spreading Communist nonsense. Most of these beliefs came from friends, cliques, and professors who were spreading this crap among their peers and students.

It's the dive into blatant 1984 shit. The Right Side of History© has the power to decide what extremism and genocide are.
When the wrong people kill off a populace, it's genocide. When those in the "right side of history" dispense with undesirables, it's seen as righteous justice. Bob is just that kind of guy who'd see things that way.

Consumerism is an attempt to replace God with an idol; a golden calf, if you will. It will fail because, by its very nature, religion requires a benevolent higher power and the invisible hand is not by any means benevolent.
The Invisible Hand is as Darwinian as nature itself. Worshiping it will get you the same thing if you worship nature; a disaster brought about by the very same thing you adore. Just as a nature-lover isn't safe from being killed by animals or getting struck by lightning, so too are the consumerists not safe from losing their entire fortunes consuming worthless crap that they end up despising when the fad dies down.

Bob acts like being a lapsed Catholic makes him special, so I'd assume so.
It's basically a badge of pride for these degenerates to say that you came out of this traditional religious upbringing and became a fedora-lord atheist.

I find it hilarious how Bob is trying to pick a fight with the richest man in the world, especially when he's probably the best bet for delivering the Superyah Fyoocha.
Blob's lucky that the guy doesn't have the time to respond to him.

Because they listened to "THE NAZIs" tm
It's been like that ever since the Mass Effect 3 fiasco in 2012. What should have just been an argument between Casey Hudson and some fanboy spergs became a bigger conflict when out of nowhere, "enlightened" journalist types (which included Movieslob) responded by attacking the fans for wanting to get what the game promised them: an ending that would make their choices matter. Yet the people who would attack other games for less offensive crimes sprang up to defend their corporate superiors with bullshit excuses like "artistic integrity".

And from then on in, we saw the journalists do it again and again, defending "women in gaming" from "mysoginist" gamers, going up against the "racist, sexist, homophobic" Orange Man, and so on. They've been defending the corporate elite from the populace for nine fucking years, and maybe even longer in the case of others. Which explains why Bob hates it when companies listen to the plebs, because it makes people like him, who fancy themselves the patricians of this new world, look impotent by comparison.

I think that for him and any fedoramancer out there, "getting out" of religion is a huge badge of honor that proves that they are smarter than the sheeple that believe in God. Like an addict that brags about how you only need will and support to quit drugs, only to show how much better he is.
Basically, yes. They all act as if they survived having this great injustice being inflicted upon them, when all they did is grow up amongst some prudes. Which isn't really that bad, considering that some kids on this Good Earth get drafted into the army before they reach their teens, while others work in sweatshops for a dime a day to make those girl power shirts that Bobbert's coreligionists love to wear.

I've heard some horror stories about some Christian households mistreating their kids, but so far, what Bob seems to have gone through is nowhere near as bad as say, some kids growing up under some religious nut who beat them for grabbing an extra cookie in the middle of the night.

Bob's beliefs, to put it simply, are a reaction against Catholicism.

For me, and for a lot of other Catholics, a key feature of our faith is that compared to God we are humble, and that we should remain humble before God. For Bob, humility is a cardinal sin and pride is a virtue; for him, no target, even God himself, is spared from his attempts to instate a Supeeryah Fyoocha.
For Catholics, piety is a virtue; for Bob, piety is a sin and Machiavellian cynicism is a virtue.
For Catholics, the holiest woman that ever walked this earth - the Blessed Virgin Mary - is a model of chastity and purity, who was a virgin before, during and after the birth of Jesus and who was conceived without sin. For Bob, the holiest women in his worldview are an e-thot with massive cybernetic tits, a D-list movie critic who argues for the mass murder of the unborn, and a politician in a state of mortal sin who insults people on Twitter.

It therefore follows that Moviebobism's view on intelligence; that is, that intelligence is inherently interlinked with ideology and that unintelligence is sinful, is a reaction to the Christian belief that intelligence, as well as the other ”talents” that people may have, are gifts from God and that those without them are just as worthy of human dignity and of God's grace. Bob didn't say it himself, but when I read his posts I'm reminded of that old quote:
”In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any phony god's [sic] blessing, but because, [sic] I am enlightened by my intelligence.”
Basically, Catholicism and any religion that calls for humility before God sees pride as a mortal sin. And not the kind of pride you get from getting a medal for winning a spelling contest, no. The kind of pride one has that makes them think they're better than everyone. Catholicism's holiest human being aside from Christ Himself is a woman who surrendered herself meekly to God and carried out her duty to Him, not asking God for anything in return. Meanwhile, Bobbert prances around, priding himself on his intelligence while seeing a God who blesses people as phony. A good person would react to being given gifts of wisdom and intelligence with humility and respect. Bob gets euphoric about his supposed intelligence and feels enlightened and above others because of it.

He's on that highway to Hell, alright. Hopefully he gets a flat tire and pulls back before it's too late.
 
Last edited:
Aren't the sexbots coming from Japan? Or am I missing something?
Research comes from Japan, but China is interested in lowering prices for the masses and my joke is based on fear about a Chinese company trying to buy Grindr. Which could allow foreign adversaries blackmail the army with their sexuality and STDs.
 
Research comes from Japan, but China is interested in lowering prices for the masses and my joke is based on fear about a Chinese company trying to buy Grindr. Which could allow foreign adversaries blackmail the army with their sexuality and STDs.
Interesting. China can weaponize sexbots. Maybe they'll send one for free to Movieslob, tailored to his own tastes. Then they threaten to reveal his fetishes to the public if he doesn't do as he's told. To be frank, that's a rather elegant and sinister way to control someone.
 
Interesting. China can weaponize sexbots. Maybe they'll send one for free to Movieslob, tailored to his own tastes. Then they threaten to reveal his fetishes to the public if he doesn't do as he's told. To be frank, that's a rather elegant and sinister way to control someone.
And infect him with Wuhan Flu at the same time. China might really have the ability to genocide incels!
 
I don't think it's just that, there was an episode of the Chipman Bros podcast where they talked about Musk. Now, I didn't listen to it, I'm just going by what was posted here, but apparently Bob considers Musk a fraud who hasn't delivered on his promises of space ships, despite the fact that Space X had been able to send astronauts to space and are still up there. Now remember that tweet where Bob was whining about how it was 2019 and he should have been exploring the stars in a robot body.

He hates Elon Musk for not having already built a fully functional Enterprise. Because he's too dumb to understand how actual space travel works.
So, Bob is pretty much that Joker scene from the Harley Quinn cartoon, where Joker bitches at Batman for not giving him an electrical car.
 
I don't think it's just that, there was an episode of the Chipman Bros podcast where they talked about Musk. Now, I didn't listen to it, I'm just going by what was posted here, but apparently Bob considers Musk a fraud who hasn't delivered on his promises of space ships, despite the fact that Space X had been able to send astronauts to space and are still up there. Now remember that tweet where Bob was whining about how it was 2019 and he should have been exploring the stars in a robot body.
I was the one that posted it. Damn, listening to their podcast is an endurace test.
The gist of it is that Bob is really bitter that Musk being the best option at making spaceships and venturing into space instead decided to ditch it in favour of making electric cars and developing rockets that he will sell to the US and Russia because he's a greedy filthy asshole that prioretizes his personal gain rather than giving him his much deserved Superior Future™.
This pretty much condemned Musk in his eyes, making him irredeemable of the sin of not giving the glorious Chancellor Robert of Films the great future he kindly asked for.

Also, as a sidenote. Chris keeps making podcasts but none with Bob since the last one. Has Bob realized he was bringing some unwanted attention to himself or something else might have happened?
Basically, yes. They all act as if they survived having this great injustice being inflicted upon them, when all they did is grow up amongst some prudes. Which isn't really that bad, considering that some kids on this Good Earth get drafted into the army before they reach their teens, while others work in sweatshops for a dime a day to make those girl power shirts that Bobbert's coreligionists love to wear.

I've heard some horror stories about some Christian households mistreating their kids, but so far, what Bob seems to have gone through is nowhere near as bad as say, some kids growing up under some religious nut who beat them for grabbing an extra cookie in the middle of the night.
A lot of people paint having been in a Catholic or religious education/household as hardcore indoctrination. Not the "You don't go out until you can tell me the 7 deadly sins by memory" but more on the vein of "Recite the psalm 93 right now or you get the belt again" kind of place.

I could tell some stories on this matter but i don't want to get off topic. The gist of it is that people will make it sound like they were in some sort of hardcor cultist situation when in reality they just took religious education and maybe some people around them were a bit more passionate or weird about it. But when you resent that education or those values, you make it sound like you were taken prisioner in Vietname and you got out of some prision camp deep in the jungle 10 years later.
 
I was the one that posted it. Damn, listening to their podcast is an endurace test.
The gist of it is that Bob is really bitter that Musk being the best option at making spaceships and venturing into space instead decided to ditch it in favour of making electric cars and developing rockets that he will sell to the US and Russia because he's a greedy filthy asshole that prioretizes his personal gain rather than giving him his much deserved Superior Future™.
This pretty much condemned Musk in his eyes, making him irredeemable of the sin of not giving the glorious Chancellor Robert of Films the great future he kindly asked for.

Also, as a sidenote. Chris keeps making podcasts but none with Bob since the last one. Has Bob realized he was bringing some unwanted attention to himself or something else might have happened?
Honestly, I wouldn't be shocked if Chris actually looked at the shit Bob tweets and thought "Hookay...His my bro and I love him...But this shit ain't gonna get me viewers and will probably sink me even more. Maybe if I get rid of his ass, it'll get a tad better."
 
China does see non-masculine males as beneath them, so this might actually be one of their plots, yes.


If we look at the kind of men China wants, Bobbert would likely not even come close to their ideal specimen.
Bobert wouldn't fit within any system as an ideal specimen. Every state and society that did what he wants to do the mayghouls would reject and ostracize him at best. I know he doesn't think physical ability should be highly prized, but there is a good goddamn reason why societies value people with such prowess: it just gets shit done and is better for the general well-being. Intelligence is important and needed as well but we've all demonstrated that his word-salad tweets are only their to mask how decisively average he actually is in that area. So, that's two strikes against him and he easily strikes out swinging because of his addiction problems. He's clearly got an alcohol issue (maybe not a major one, but still), he can't stop eating slop and gaining weight, and he's hopelessly fused to his Twitter account. For such a wannabe revolutionary, he doesn't realize that such movements have no room or tolerance for those who are hooked on something other than the end goal. In short, he's a useless hog that is lucky to live in the time that he does and isn't ideal even in his own country, let alone any of the others.
 
You could probably catch Bob in a causality loop over whether white people are actually able to be defined as "undesirables".
Your mistake is assuming that Blob thinks.
He cannot put past his hatred for the fact fans got what they wanted and he was wrong.
I'd be very unsurprised if he sees the Snyder cut as a form of populism and attacks it because, in his mind, populism is evil.

Unless, of course, it's being done by well-endowed women.
Epic Futurist supremacy guy doesn't approve of the South African's business.
On that note, I'd love to see his reaction if someone told him that Elon Musk was the first African-American billionaire.
I would kill to see that thread so much
I can't remember who it was that wrote it, but it was written by a leftist ”educator” if that gives you any pointers.
The Invisible Hand is as Darwinian as nature itself. Worshiping it will get you the same thing if you worship nature; a disaster brought about by the very same thing you adore. Just as a nature-lover isn't safe from being killed by animals or getting struck by lightning, so too are the consumerists not safe from losing their entire fortunes consuming worthless crap that they end up despising when the fad dies down.
Worshipping the invisible hand leads to the same result that worshipping Satan does, with the exception that Satan had a rationale for doing evil while the invisible hand is an unthinking process.
Blob's lucky that the guy doesn't have the time to respond to him.
I could say the same about almost every blue check Blob ”interacts” with.
A lot of people paint having been in a Catholic or religious education/household as hardcore indoctrination. Not the "You don't go out until you can tell me the 7 deadly sins by memory" but more on the vein of "Recite the psalm 93 right now or you get the belt again" kind of place.
It's on the same level as white women that wear shirts with ”we are the granddaughters of the witches you could not burn” written on them.

They read books and support causes that make oppression the be-all and end-all of life, as well as a handy get out of jail free card when people try and hold them accountable. So they look for a way to become oppressed, which in this case means claiming to have been brought up by ”fundamentalists”. It's the same sort of thing that leads to male feminists trooning out.
 
I was the one that posted it. Damn, listening to their podcast is an endurace test.
The gist of it is that Bob is really bitter that Musk being the best option at making spaceships and venturing into space instead decided to ditch it in favour of making electric cars and developing rockets that he will sell to the US and Russia because he's a greedy filthy asshole that prioretizes his personal gain rather than giving him his much deserved Superior Future™.
This pretty much condemned Musk in his eyes, making him irredeemable of the sin of not giving the glorious Chancellor Robert of Films the great future he kindly asked for.

Also, as a sidenote. Chris keeps making podcasts but none with Bob since the last one. Has Bob realized he was bringing some unwanted attention to himself or something else might have happened?
Oh, okay. So does he assume that because Musk is investing in other projects, that's taking away all the money from Space X that would have allowed scientists to develop warp technology? Because I assume that's what his little brain thinks.

As for the podcasts, Chris probably assumed getting Bob on would get him more hits and patreon dollars, but when that failed he decided not to bother asking him again and is hoping that someone else will get him that payday. Although if he'd gotten his brother to post an episode of the podcast to Bob's channel, that possibly would have helped, but probably not much.
 
Bob's a thin-skinned sore winner. Bob likes to win, of course, but the win isn't the really important thing. The thing Bob really likes about winning is seeing someone he hates, lose. He is consumed with thoughts about vindictive retribution. All that self-hate that he constantly feels, and he takes those feelings and tries to block them by obsessively spewing his revenge fantasies. Turn it into anger, Bob, and scream online. That's sure to make your life better.
The one thing we should all be eternally grateful for is that, owing to his crushing mediocrity, Bobbert will never amount to anything more than a verified Twitter sperg. Without a doubt, were he to actually attain any small amount of power, he would immediately abuse it to punish anyone he perceived to have slighted him in some way, up to and including anyone who pointed out he was acting like a lunatic.

I'd love to know what has to go wrong in a man's life that they're still harbouring such childish revenge fantasies in their forties. There are plenty of fat, burnout losers out there, but I've seen few as maliciously bitter as Bob Chipman.
 
The one thing we should all be eternally grateful for is that, owing to his crushing mediocrity, Bobbert will never amount to anything more than a verified Twitter sperg. Without a doubt, were he to actually attain any small amount of power, he would immediately abuse it to punish anyone he perceived to have slighted him in some way, up to and including anyone who pointed out he was acting like a lunatic.

I'd love to know what has to go wrong in a man's life that they're still harbouring such childish revenge fantasies in their forties. There are plenty of fat, burnout losers out there, but I've seen few as maliciously bitter as Bob Chipman.
I'm sorry to disagree, but he wouldn't leap to immediate punishment.

The priorities of performative male feminists that attain power is to first quid pro quo every poor girl into ratcheting up his gut and massaging his stumpy manhood.

Punishments follow shortly afterward.
 
I'm sorry to disagree, but he wouldn't leap to immediate punishment.

The priorities of performative male feminists that attain power is to first quid pro quo every poor girl into ratcheting up his gut and massaging his stumpy manhood.

Punishments follow shortly afterward.
In most cases yes, but Bobby is so utterly consumed by hate I don't think he'd be able to wait that long, even if there was a knob-polishing on the cards.
 
In most cases yes, but Bobby is so utterly consumed by hate I don't think he'd be able to wait that long, even if there was a knob-polishing on the cards.

Wasn't he a mod on the Escapist's forums for about five minutes? I seem to recall an incident where he had mod/banning power somewhere and -- of course -- abused it so quickly and so egregiously that he was removed so fast that the keyboard barely had time to get sweaty. It would have been during Gamergate, I think.
 
Wasn't he a mod on the Escapist's forums for about five minutes? I seem to recall an incident where he had mod/banning power somewhere and -- of course -- abused it so quickly and so egregiously that he was removed so fast that the keyboard barely had time to get sweaty. It would have been during Gamergate, I think.
I've not been on The Escapist since the holy autism war so I can't say for sure, but I seem to recall all content creators for the site had heightened forum privileges, so it's certainly plausible.
 
Bobert wouldn't fit within any system as an ideal specimen. Every state and society that did what he wants to do the mayghouls would reject and ostracize him at best. I know he doesn't think physical ability should be highly prized, but there is a good goddamn reason why societies value people with such prowess: it just gets shit done and is better for the general well-being. Intelligence is important and needed as well but we've all demonstrated that his word-salad tweets are only their to mask how decisively average he actually is in that area. So, that's two strikes against him and he easily strikes out swinging because of his addiction problems. He's clearly got an alcohol issue (maybe not a major one, but still), he can't stop eating slop and gaining weight, and he's hopelessly fused to his Twitter account. For such a wannabe revolutionary, he doesn't realize that such movements have no room or tolerance for those who are hooked on something other than the end goal. In short, he's a useless hog that is lucky to live in the time that he does and isn't ideal even in his own country, let alone any of the others.
Both physical and mental prowess should be prized. You can't have one without the other.
 
So now Bob has told us that he Is: a gym freak who bench 300 LBS, a badass who own guns, a piece of hunk who can chase tail everyplace he goes and now he Is a big brained genius versed in latín who not only know the Cristian dogma but also participated in the church structure as an altar boy? This dude Is legit insane, he totally lost His mind AND the ability to recognize reality
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back