- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
Ron Toye AMA - Sheepdog avoids answering your questions
- Thread starter damian
- Start date
cwcvillemayoress
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
I meant that in a DM that you sent Nick Reikta you said that people should get YOUR permission to hug other people because you feel uncomfortable seeing them hug others without getting consent from you to hug the other person.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2019
What does any of this have to do with Vic's ability to be a VA? You make this sound like a threat; "Mess with Monica and someone's losing their job or chance of a comeback".
Vic defended himself against allegations, the behaviour of his legal counsel and Nick Rekieta has nothing to do with him. Am I reading this wrong?
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
@Ron Toye why are you so against Vic defending himself against these allegations? You're angry that he had the audacity to fight back in the court of law (which you and yours wanted to avoid) and that people defended him online - since that's the arena you chose to destroy him.
It's things like this that make a lot of people think you wanted him to disappear, only to be found dead in a ditch months later.
Second question: Just because Vic has had multiple sexual partners over his lifetime doesn't make him a predator - why do you keep trying to use this as a way to "support" your narrative? Follow-up: would you be okay with the plaintiff bringing up Monica's body count (even though he would never do that)? You keep talking about Vic's reputation in the community, are you aware of Monica's? Or Jamie's for that matter?
Where, post-2007, Monica could be seen (behind the scenes) being all cuddly with Vic. On at least one occasion she attended one of Vic's panels and was constantly trying to get his attention (post-2007). That she was seen repeatedly flirting with Vic (post-2007) "off-stage" and in front of fans, to the point that people thought she and Vic had a fling (completely possible, since they attended a ton of conventions together, post-2007).
Quick note: Ron, you don't own your actions. You're constantly blaming someone else. It's not Nick's or Ty's fault Vic's career is in shambles - you and Monica and Jamie and Funimation and a bunch of z-list orbiters did that. YOU JUST HAD A SHOW-RUNNER TELL YOU THAT VIC'S LAWSUIT IS THE REASON THEY INVITED HIM.
Because he was declaring to the world: No, I did not do these things of which they're accusing me. You're lying about Vic's words. How about you stop trying to gaslight people and be honest and THEN people might start believing you.
It's things like this that make a lot of people think you wanted him to disappear, only to be found dead in a ditch months later.
Second question: Just because Vic has had multiple sexual partners over his lifetime doesn't make him a predator - why do you keep trying to use this as a way to "support" your narrative? Follow-up: would you be okay with the plaintiff bringing up Monica's body count (even though he would never do that)? You keep talking about Vic's reputation in the community, are you aware of Monica's? Or Jamie's for that matter?
Where, post-2007, Monica could be seen (behind the scenes) being all cuddly with Vic. On at least one occasion she attended one of Vic's panels and was constantly trying to get his attention (post-2007). That she was seen repeatedly flirting with Vic (post-2007) "off-stage" and in front of fans, to the point that people thought she and Vic had a fling (completely possible, since they attended a ton of conventions together, post-2007).
Quick note: Ron, you don't own your actions. You're constantly blaming someone else. It's not Nick's or Ty's fault Vic's career is in shambles - you and Monica and Jamie and Funimation and a bunch of z-list orbiters did that. YOU JUST HAD A SHOW-RUNNER TELL YOU THAT VIC'S LAWSUIT IS THE REASON THEY INVITED HIM.
Because he was declaring to the world: No, I did not do these things of which they're accusing me. You're lying about Vic's words. How about you stop trying to gaslight people and be honest and THEN people might start believing you.
'Tis Dolan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2019
yeah, wElL rEsPeCtEd
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
This whole "community" is a batch of backstabbing pathetic cunts, so anyone can claim to be "respected" so long as you ignore what they say behind each other's backs.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
Riddle me this @Ron Toye ...
I understand you said that you came to the Farms with the express intent of speaking your piece and answering questions, which is perfectly fine.
However, given your behaviour on Twitter in which you responded to virtually everyone who spoke to you, gave rebuttals to your arguments and asked you legitimate questions, with you viewing them as people who "attacked" and "harassed" you, I am curious...by doing an AMA and deliberately ignoring/dodging questions, are you hoping to incite some sort of anger from us in order to collect our names and our words to try and illustrate that you are continuing to be "attacked" and "harassed"?
You clearly don`t like taking accountability for your actions so I wouldn`t be surprised if you have an ulterior motive by joining the Farms beyond a simple Q&A.
Which brings me to another series of questions - Why do you constantly parrot your past court-mandated therapy language as if you actually took any of that to heart? You keep referencing books to read, but there`s more to learning lessons than memorizing phrases and summaries. You need to internalize your therapy and ACT on what the lessons teach you. Your behaviour doesn`t illustrate any understanding of what you were mandated to learn. I`m sure you were told to write an essay or make a journal indicating your takeaways from your lessons and you just wrote what you think your instructors wanted to see.
Want to know who else was able to write a piece using all the proper language and material covered in his counselling and restitution courses when he got in trouble with the law? Eric Harris, the worst of the two psychopaths who shot up Columbine High School.
I know you have a very difficult time with reading comprehension, making logical arguments and emotional, mental and physical control, so please let me know if I need to write this in fewer words so that you may understand more clearly.
I understand you said that you came to the Farms with the express intent of speaking your piece and answering questions, which is perfectly fine.
However, given your behaviour on Twitter in which you responded to virtually everyone who spoke to you, gave rebuttals to your arguments and asked you legitimate questions, with you viewing them as people who "attacked" and "harassed" you, I am curious...by doing an AMA and deliberately ignoring/dodging questions, are you hoping to incite some sort of anger from us in order to collect our names and our words to try and illustrate that you are continuing to be "attacked" and "harassed"?
You clearly don`t like taking accountability for your actions so I wouldn`t be surprised if you have an ulterior motive by joining the Farms beyond a simple Q&A.
Which brings me to another series of questions - Why do you constantly parrot your past court-mandated therapy language as if you actually took any of that to heart? You keep referencing books to read, but there`s more to learning lessons than memorizing phrases and summaries. You need to internalize your therapy and ACT on what the lessons teach you. Your behaviour doesn`t illustrate any understanding of what you were mandated to learn. I`m sure you were told to write an essay or make a journal indicating your takeaways from your lessons and you just wrote what you think your instructors wanted to see.
Want to know who else was able to write a piece using all the proper language and material covered in his counselling and restitution courses when he got in trouble with the law? Eric Harris, the worst of the two psychopaths who shot up Columbine High School.
I know you have a very difficult time with reading comprehension, making logical arguments and emotional, mental and physical control, so please let me know if I need to write this in fewer words so that you may understand more clearly.
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2020
That is a great question. I appreciate the position he took when the allegations came out. He didn't call for people to harass her, make her life miserable, he encourage women to speak up, and to be listened to. People can make mistakes and when they own up to it and make the corrections needed then great everyone has messed up one way or another in the past. I will vote for him because I agree with many of the positions he takes and I think he is the best option available. Trump is a joke and a disgusting individual who should never been elected. I am ashamed that he is our president so not voting is the equivalent of voting for him. I will not take a chance at that man getting a second term.
You have made a lot of assumptions about me. My motive to join here is obvious. I felt like it and I enjoy either laughing at or with you all. I say what I want when I want. This has been consistent. I answer what I want when I want. I know that you all might think it is dodging but sometimes there are things I can't say yet. You all say I haven't taken ownership of my past, how does it feel to be a repeater of Nick's words? Do you have anything original to bring to the table? If not, thank you for your time, you are boring, and, one of the people I will be laughing at not with
That is probably due to people using Alt names vs their own. I respect the people who are, to use your sites terms, "Alpha" enough to go with their real names
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2019
"Our sites' terms"? Nigger you know nothing about this site. Nobody here uses that terminology unironically; and it's certainly not unique to the kiwi farms. That's like something you'd see on incels.is.That is probably due to people using Alt names vs their own. I respect the people who are, to use your sites terms, "Alpha" enough to go with their real names
Funnily enough we do have our own terminology here, it's just that that's not one of them.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2020
I give her little thought. She thinks she has a ton of influence in the industry but she doesn't. She is a nobody in the business, a con-agent who undervalues her people and this is some of the reasons why people are leaving her. She knows the truth, as you can see here, but likes to ride the line. Well, this came out months ago and I bet she is regretting it.
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
That is probably due to people using Alt names vs their own. I respect the people who are, to use your sites terms, "Alpha" enough to go with their real names
@AnOminous was referring to the convention community.
You were a child left behind, weren't you?
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2020
He was a Master Sargent in charge of base operations.
My statement stands
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
and the VA community mainly I think.
No, like everything this entire time, none of it stands, wheres that video with your ex? wheres the reciepts?My statement stands
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2020
LOL the logic of a child. Did you miss the 17 affidavits? Vic's deposition testimony, and us winning the lawsuit. The biggest receipt of all 17-0 about to be 34-0.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2019
17-0 17-0! SQUAAAK!
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
It would still be 17-0, it doesn't magically multiply.
And no, we didn't miss anything, we've seen it all, just not the video with your ex or any actual receipts yet.
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2020
We didn't have time to make one last week but here is her posting about the meeting we had, planning the video, for this week
damn, and you thought you had something. Must suck to get this receipt thrown in your face HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2018
My statement stands
No, it doesn't. At the very least, your reading comprehension skills are in the negative.
You should be taking remedial lessons at the local high school to catch up with the rest of us.
Riku
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2020
The only child logic I've saw until now was from yours truly, totally disregarding that those affidavits are pretty useless and most of them are actually stricken as being inadmissable hearsay+opinions by other parties but never the "victims of said events". Where's these mountains of proofs and receipts, my so called "changed&better man than Vic+Nick+Ty"?
I wonder what you'll say when even one of those claims comes back to haunt you down.
Oh yeah, something like "still 17-17 doesn't matter it'll be easy to win this just like we won with our epic non-existant receipts due to a technicality that got easily overruled! Vic Man Bad!
"? SQUAAAAAAK SQUAAAAAK SQUAAAAK!
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2020
Nick, is this you? How many alt accounts do you have? Squaaak I am made that my anime crush got destroyed in court even though I raised 300k for him and sent him to my friend and family estate planner squaaak cuck squaaaak rage. LOL