RPGnet Forums

“Hurr durr finally comics for whites men!”

I’m confused… A black man creating comics that white men enjoy… Isn’t that a good and progressive thing?

Do these faggots only appreciate black men, when they’re imaginary bulls impregnating their imaginary wife?!
 
Yes. Conservative black people are anathema to liberals, as they have dared to speak out against their betters.
They will openly call Clarence Thomas, who faced the same false accusation (sexually abusing a white woman) that Democrats say caused lynchings, a house nigger for daring to oppose the party that bayed for his blood.
 
They will openly call Clarence Thomas, who faced the same false accusation (sexually abusing a white woman) that Democrats say caused lynchings, a house nigger for daring to oppose the party that bayed for his blood.
They hate Clarence Thomas with a passion, and not just because he’s black, is an uppity conservative and far more successful than your average critical theory shitlib could ever be.

They hate Clarence Thomas because he’s proof that they’re wrong and a living embodiment of how fucked Democrat policies are.

The man was born in a shack with a clay floor, and thanks to hard work and a brilliant mind succeeded beyond the wildest dreams of your average womens studies major-barista.

Meanwhile, Black Democrats usually can only get anywhere because of grievance policies and “black representation” and once they’re SELECTED (not elected) by the local Dem machine, hand out juicy contracts to friends and family and run cities into the ground.
 
Back to banning people for having the wrong opinion.

View attachment 3499963
View attachment 3499972
View attachment 3499964
View attachment 3499965
View attachment 3499966

And yet when Arachne and Zeea drop into threads to make political drive-by cheapshots and get pissy when someone criticizes them, you give them a pass because they have the right opinions.


View attachment 3499967
View attachment 3499968
Jfc, that thread with wmarshal's ban gave me a headache. Apparently in {$current_year} it's a far-right, evil nazi dogwhistle to state that U.S. is a fucking REPUBLIC -- as defined in the Constitution and reaffirmed in the Pledge of Allegiance -- and to then provide a civics lesson thereof. Poor old Bill from "Schoolhouse Rock" must be rolling over in his grave filing cabinet.

According to these galaxy-brained posters: this crazy idea of U.S. being a Republic only exists in some "reactionary ether", and it means that only the Republican Party should rule, and black people shouldn't vote.
RPGnet - Republic1.png
RPGnet - Republic2.png
RPGnet - Republic3.png


On a lighter note, I think "Tony Sneedano" is my new favorite user name lol.
RPGnet - TonySneedano.png
 
Jfc, that thread with wmarshal's ban gave me a headache. Apparently in {$current_year} it's a far-right, evil nazi dogwhistle to state that U.S. is a fucking REPUBLIC -- as defined in the Constitution and reaffirmed in the Pledge of Allegiance -- and to then provide a civics lesson thereof. Poor old Bill from "Schoolhouse Rock" must be rolling over in his grave filing cabinet.

According to these galaxy-brained posters: this crazy idea of U.S. being a Republic only exists in some "reactionary ether", and it means that only the Republican Party should rule, and black people shouldn't vote.
View attachment 3501555View attachment 3501556View attachment 3501557

On a lighter note, I think "Tony Sneedano" is my new favorite user name lol.
View attachment 3501559

Well, at least they're demonstrating all the intellectual rigor one tends to develop when one spends all of one's time in a cast-iron echo chamber.
 
Yeah, I found it extremely telling that there's a big movement to impeach Thomas and not any of the white justices. Also, going after people choosing to refer to the entirely accurate description of the US as being a republic for one's hill to die on is just weird to me.
 
They will openly call Clarence Thomas, who faced the same false accusation (sexually abusing a white woman) that Democrats say caused lynchings, a house nigger for daring to oppose the party that bayed for his blood.
He was never accused of sexually assaulting anyone, just making inappropriate comments and referring to pornography of some sort ("Long Dong Silver"). Some of the accusations of what he said by Anita Hill didn't even sound like something a human would actually say. In any event, they were completely irrelevant to his fitness.
 
Yeah, I found it extremely telling that there's a big movement to impeach Thomas and not any of the white justices. Also, going after people choosing to refer to the entirely accurate description of the US as being a republic for one's hill to die on is just weird to me.
Agreed, especially when you realize that "it's turtles republics all the way down, man". At every level of government from Federal, to State, to County, to Local - we simply do not put the actual "writing of the laws" up to a public vote, or even to public discussion/feedback most of the time. That's precisely what elected officials are for - to represent our interests, to have the expertise (lol) to govern effectively, and to enact laws for the greater public good. At least in theory.

But regardless of the efficacy (or not), it's their job to legislate, that duty is not delegated to the people. One does not simply walk into Congress and propose legislation.
Republic - Walk Into Congress.png

And then to top it off, I have no idea how a representative form of government supposedly suppresses voting. If anything, it seems to make voting even more important, to ensure that those you elect will truly represent the will of the people. The "mob rule" mentality that they espouse over at RPG.net works fine for small groups, like enacting the by-laws of your Raccoon Lodge with 20 members, but it tends to break down into chaos with larger groups because there's competing interests and more complex systems to consider.
 
And then to top it off, I have no idea how a representative form of government supposedly suppresses voting. If anything, it seems to make voting even more important, to ensure that those you elect will truly represent the will of the people. The "mob rule" mentality that they espouse over at RPG.net works fine for small groups, like enacting the by-laws of your Raccoon Lodge with 20 members, but it tends to break down into chaos with larger groups because there's competing interests and more complex systems to consider.
There is this sentiment among leftist urbanites that representative democracy is bad because there is anything resembling equal representation for states in the Senate. They think that Wyoming still being allowed the bare minimum representation of 1 congressional rep and 2 senators means that their vote counts far more nationally than Californians who guarantee 55 votes to Democrats every election. I hate it, as no amount of “land doesn’t vote” quips fixes the fact that nearly the entire Heartland can have policy dictated to them by some asshole in NYC or LA that has never seen a field in their life simply because they have more voters crammed in their bughives.
 
There is this sentiment among leftist urbanites that representative democracy is bad because there is anything resembling equal representation for states in the Senate. They think that Wyoming still being allowed the bare minimum representation of 1 congressional rep and 2 senators means that their vote counts far more nationally than Californians who guarantee 55 votes to Democrats every election. I hate it, as no amount of “land doesn’t vote” quips fixes the fact that nearly the entire Heartland can have policy dictated to them by some asshole in NYC or LA that has never seen a field in their life simply because they have more voters crammed in their bughives.

They like to portray the two chambers of the Republic as some kind of uniquely American evil, when the fact is that there are dozens of other Republics/democracies around the world that has a similar setup: One chamber of elected officials that is based on population (like the House of Representatives), and one higher chamber that represents States irrespective of their population (like The Senate).

The reason is simple: It’s a great system of checks and balances and ensures that a few population rich areas don’t lord over the rest of the country.
 
Agreed, especially when you realize that "it's turtles republics all the way down, man". At every level of government from Federal, to State, to County, to Local - we simply do not put the actual "writing of the laws" up to a public vote, or even to public discussion/feedback most of the time. That's precisely what elected officials are for - to represent our interests, to have the expertise (lol) to govern effectively, and to enact laws for the greater public good. At least in theory.

But regardless of the efficacy (or not), it's their job to legislate, that duty is not delegated to the people. One does not simply walk into Congress and propose legislation.

And then to top it off, I have no idea how a representative form of government supposedly suppresses voting. If anything, it seems to make voting even more important, to ensure that those you elect will truly represent the will of the people. The "mob rule" mentality that they espouse over at RPG.net works fine for small groups, like enacting the by-laws of your Raccoon Lodge with 20 members, but it tends to break down into chaos with larger groups because there's competing interests and more complex systems to consider.
Direct democracy, like communism, only works in very small, very tightly knit groups. Once you expand past the point where everyone knows everyone else things go downhill quickly into mob rule and unelected demagogues.
 
Direct democracy, like communism, only works in very small, very tightly knit groups. Once you expand past the point where everyone knows everyone else things go downhill quickly into mob rule and unelected demagogues.
Ironically, the lunacy of rpgnet shows exactly this in microcosm.
 
Apparently in {$current_year} it's a far-right, evil nazi dogwhistle to state that U.S. is a fucking REPUBLIC
Also, going after people choosing to refer to the entirely accurate description of the US as being a republic
I mostly just assumed that they're confusing the terminology for the never-ending imaginary war between Republicans and Democrats, since one their posters thought that it was an autistic reference for it.

Ironically, the lunacy of rpgnet shows exactly this in microcosm.
That forum is more of an really gay oligarchy than anything else.
 
Last edited:
There is this sentiment among leftist urbanites that representative democracy is bad because there is anything resembling equal representation for states in the Senate. They think that Wyoming still being allowed the bare minimum representation of 1 congressional rep and 2 senators means that their vote counts far more nationally than Californians who guarantee 55 votes to Democrats every election. I hate it, as no amount of “land doesn’t vote” quips fixes the fact that nearly the entire Heartland can have policy dictated to them by some asshole in NYC or LA that has never seen a field in their life simply because they have more voters crammed in their bughives.
Yeah, the flyover states may as well not even exist at any level of our government if there's a 1 person - 1 vote setup. Thing is, we do sort of need those states given that they represent a great deal of our national resources such as food and minerals. Given that California currently exists only as a vampire leeching off water and power from the surrounding states, that should be proof enough that they are far from a self-sustaining unit who doesn't need the little states in the middle. I expect very few states could actually exist totally independent if cut off entirely from the rest of the country and forced to generate all of their own food, water, and power.
 
I expect very few states could actually exist totally independent if cut off entirely from the rest of the country and forced to generate all of their own food, water, and power.
There are number of sci-fi novels that deal with that premise, notably Damnation Alley and Hardwired. The latter especially paints what a clusterfuck it would be if every state became its own island with tariffs and protectionism. Pic related.

1256px-Map_of_the_Holy_Roman_Empire,_1789_en.png
 
Every lib that hates Clarence Thomas just proves his worldview more and more right, which is that white liberals are extremely racist pigfuckers who need to be crushed. Hard to disagree with him after the last month
So does that mean that most of Autistic Thunderdome is, in fact, liberal?
 
And then to top it off, I have no idea how a representative form of government supposedly suppresses voting. If anything, it seems to make voting even more important, to ensure that those you elect will truly represent the will of the people. The "mob rule" mentality that they espouse over at RPG.net works fine for small groups, like enacting the by-laws of your Raccoon Lodge with 20 members, but it tends to break down into chaos with larger groups because there's competing interests and more complex systems to consider.
I just find it funny that we've seen before RPG.net bitch about capitalism when capitalism is literally pure democracy in action (with dollars acting as the voting machines). Give them what they want, and they still bitch about it.
 
Back