RPGnet Forums

Ye gods. I don't pay much regular attention to TTRPG drama, but are you telling me Beast is still some kind of political football over there? How many years has it been? Whacko.
They can't get over it because Beast inadvertently exposed their own kind as "the bad guys." They rushed to defend it because of its politics, only to be hoist by their own petard when the author was outed as a predator. That kind of shame lingers in the minds of people like them. Even years later they recoil from it.
 
Ye gods. I don't pay much regular attention to TTRPG drama, but are you telling me Beast is still some kind of political football over there? How many years has it been? Whacko.
Apropos of nothing 'Olivia' Hill is very proud of their work on Beast, and will still flame out whenever it gets brought up as being uncomfortably rapey.
 
The weird part is that the original Vampire -- hell, the whole vampire mythos in general -- is not exactly sensitive and cuddly. I know all these dipshits have been drooling over Twilight, but even Anne freaking Rice's vamps were pretty damn rapey, to say nothing of Dracula, Nosferatu, etc.

But no, it's Beast that gets their hackles up?

Weirdos.
 
The weird part is that the original Vampire -- hell, the whole vampire mythos in general -- is not exactly sensitive and cuddly. I know all these dipshits have been drooling over Twilight, but even Anne freaking Rice's vamps were pretty damn rapey, to say nothing of Dracula, Nosferatu, etc.

But no, it's Beast that gets their hackles up?

Weirdos.
Vampire has a lot of emphasis on introspective (or navel-gazey, if you don't like it) reflection on how being a Vampire makes you a monster that stands apart from humanity, cursed to live in the shadows- you know, the standard Goth shit.
Beast paints you being a demon in human flesh that devours people's fear and hopes as totally sick and rad and really, you're doing your victims a favor by mind-raping them and scarring them for life/actually killing them, and all of those humans are just stupid bigots for not accepting how cool and awesome you are!
So yeah, the fact that the latter was written by an actual rapist and has a sample antagonist who is essentially a paranoid rape victim who's portrayed as evil for not liking being tentacle-raped really makes its already stupid content take on a whole new, uglier level.
 
Imagine a website dedicated to fantasy, science fiction, horror, and other weirdness in game form being stupid enough to ban this guy.
He was banned for insulting people and detailing threads. But some of his stories are entertaining, like the one with the cop with breast implants. She kept showing them off to the point that his department installed an sexual harassment policy after she distracted an rookie.
 
Apropos of nothing 'Olivia' Hill is very proud of their work on Beast, and will still flame out whenever it gets brought up as being uncomfortably rapey.
Reading the start of the original 2017 thread that got locked, it's all quite reasonable for 11 pages then rapist BlackHat_Matt shows being an aggro douchebag defending a shitty rapey game for some reason. I'm guessing that this is where things probably started to go wrong. Maybe people can calmly and reasonably discuss something if the primary instigator, who was also protected by being a member of the RPG.net staff at the time, is no longer there? No, fuck that, don't warn anybody about how shitty this game is, shut everything down immediately!

And from reading the initial, calmer portion of the thread, it really does seem to have some serious problems as a game regardless of what you think of the premise, like the fact that each Beast can have its own feeding method and they can be quite involved, so you're splitting the GM's attention quite badly. Or the lore where most other supernaturals are inexplicably friendly to Beasts directly contradicts the Werewolf lore (apparently one of the two major factions should hate the shit out of these guys). Some of these problems seemingly came from late changes to the game to cater to oversensitive LGBT (the change from the Homecoming, where you realized that you were actually always a monster, to the Devouring where it was something that happens to you); there's some stuff that simply no longer makes sense with this change (like the reaction of the werewolf faction above). In-thread, people didn't know if it was a time problem, a budget problem, or what, but in retrospect it seems likely that egotistical douchebag Dave was too attached to his precious writing to throw stuff out that no longer fit.

The original premise, though, which comes across as Dave's justification for being a creep ("I can't help it, I was born this way with the soul of a Beast, and the people I prey on deserved it anyway")? Yeah, that's awful too, and it's also simultaneously really pathetic. When you have an RPG that's about being a unique mythical monster in the vein of Grendel or the Hydra or Medusa, people want to be a monster, not some weirdo who claims to have the "soul" of the beast (making him basically otherkin, who are incredibly lame). And then many of the acts that you can do to sate your bestial hunger are just incredibly lame petty shit, like the feminist sample character who verbally destroys comic book nerds who mansplain to her. Or you can be an asshole boss who makes his employees miserable, or a dickhead prosecuting attorney who loves to ruin peoples' lives, or a creepy burglar who makes his victims feel violated. And their society (which only really exists for metagame reasons) is cool and nonjudgmental no matter how pathetic or how evil the way that a given Beast feeds, just like a creep like David 'Olivia' Hill would want.
 
The weird part is that the original Vampire -- hell, the whole vampire mythos in general -- is not exactly sensitive and cuddly. I know all these dipshits have been drooling over Twilight, but even Anne freaking Rice's vamps were pretty damn rapey, to say nothing of Dracula, Nosferatu, etc.

But no, it's Beast that gets their hackles up?

Weirdos.
4.png

5.png

6.png
 
OK, I think I get it. It's not just the 'rapey' subtext that pushes their buttons, but the way that Beast (BtP) is framed from a storytelling perspective, what with the nu-Gamergate and marginalized person aspect bullshittery.

In other words, they're terribly sensitive about it because BtP is not too subtly suggesting that such 'marginalized' types could also be predators.

Am I getting it, or am I missing the mark?
 
OK, I think I get it. It's not just the 'rapey' subtext that pushes their buttons, but the way that Beast (BtP) is framed from a storytelling perspective, what with the nu-Gamergate and marginalized person aspect bullshittery.

In other words, they're terribly sensitive about it because BtP is not too subtly suggesting that such 'marginalized' types could also be predators.

Am I getting it, or am I missing the mark?
They're mad because in its attempt to create a game with a properly woke narrative it correctly (and by total accident, due to the writer's inability to be self-reflective) interprets SJWs as the bad guys and admits that they victimize normies into hating them. It's too on-the-nose.
 
I think my first exposure to RPGnet was back in 2010, I don't remember why but I came across a thread on Regdar, an iconic NPC from DnD 3.5 who was frequently killed in official artwork (basically it was because the designers resented being asked to include another white human male fighter in the iconic lineup). As a non-white male who usually supports social justice stuff I still found their response to the guy, who felt it was hateful to inflict humiliating and painful deaths on a character because they're a white male, to be disgusting.
These aren't cases of the moderators acting like power-hungry nuts, I guess this was before the board went completely insane, but I think that this shows the kind of hostility to anyone who won't jump aboard the "kill white men" train was common on the board even before the takeover.

Wasn't one of the villainous Heroes a young girl who had been put into a coma by a Beast and was hunting down Beasts in the dream world? Everything I heard about that game was so cartoonishly bad on every level that I didn't think that anyone defended it; I shouldn't be surprised that there's a contingent on RPGnet defending this shit.
 
Wasn't one of the villainous Heroes a young girl who had been put into a coma by a Beast and was hunting down Beasts in the dream world? Everything I heard about that game was so cartoonishly bad on every level that I didn't think that anyone defended it; I shouldn't be surprised that there's a contingent on RPGnet defending this shit.
It was so bad that for a brief time people on 4chan's /tg/ board ran meme games where they played the Heroes using a variant of the Hunter rules. Because they were pretty obviously in the right, and it made people mad to play them.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage
Wasn't one of the villainous Heroes a young girl who had been put into a coma by a Beast and was hunting down Beasts in the dream world? Everything I heard about that game was so cartoonishly bad on every level that I didn't think that anyone defended it; I shouldn't be surprised that there's a contingent on RPGnet defending this shit.
It was made by a sexual predator to appeal to other sexual predators, and rpg.net has a large Male Feminist Ally(tm) crowd. Do the math.
It was so bad that for a brief time people on 4chan's /tg/ board ran meme games where they played the Heroes using a variant of the Hunter rules. Because they were pretty obviously in the right, and it made people mad to play them.
It would probably be a better way to run them than the rules Beast provided, which had starting Heroes much weaker than starting Beasts and they had to kill Beasts to advance. But they were supposed to be your main threat? Just another way in which the game was broken as a game.
 
It was so bad that for a brief time people on 4chan's /tg/ board ran meme games where they played the Heroes using a variant of the Hunter rules. Because they were pretty obviously in the right, and it made people mad to play them.
I remember that hero write-up. If McFarlane was trying to flip the concept of hero and monster on it's ear to cover up his own predatory bullshit, he failed miserably. A little girl who got put into a coma by a beast and now haunts the dream realm from her coma to fight off beasts who are fucking with other other people?

That's a character I'd play. Straight up. Like, that is beautiful tragedy right there. She's been hurt by something that she had no control over and did nothing to deserve and was hurt in a fatal way. She will last as long as it takes for her parents to realize that they're fooling themselves by keeping her on life support. A character who knows that she's fucked and that there's no going back and who decides to spend what little time she has fighting to keep others from sharing her fate? That's just fucking beautiful. You could design an entire RPG around that concept alone and beast wastes it on a sample villain for a game that's just sexual predator apologia?

I blame the public school system.
 
The purity spiral begins
View attachment 1757398
30Days.png

I cannot stand these fucks. A friend of mine who posts there says that the mods are assholes who abuse their powers but that it's OK since they do it for free. Are there any moderators on any non-corporate forum who don't do it for free?

Also, looking through her profile I came across this thread.

is this Kickstarter board game vaguely antisemitic, or openly?​

JEWS.png

To sum up the thread, this game about conspiracy theories has references to conspiracy theories. A lot of conspiracy theories are used to disguise antisemitism. Therefore this game is antisemitic and full of Nazi dog whistles. Seriously, the only thing that is at all Jewish is a Star of David (formed from an Eye of Providene, a very common symbol combination) and a sentence that is vaguely reminiscent of something that a rabbi said over 2000 years ago and which has since been said (in various forms) by everyone from George Romney (Mitt's father) to Global Warming activist organizations to John Lewis without referring to Hillel the Elder. Oh, and the fact that the map of DC includes a little bit of New Jersey and Jews live in New Jersey, so pretty much a slam-dunk case.

I'm so used to really obvious antisemitic dog whistles being ignored with the lamest excuses, but I never thought I'd see something go so far to the other end of the spectrum. This is truly insane.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1757516
I cannot stand these fucks. A friend of mine who posts there says that the mods are assholes who abuse their powers but that it's OK since they do it for free. Are there any moderators on any non-corporate forum who don't do it for free?

Also, looking through her profile I came across this thread.

View attachment 1757527
To sum up the thread, this game about conspiracy theories has references to conspiracy theories. A lot of conspiracy theories are used to disguise antisemitism. Therefore this game is antisemitic and full of Nazi dog whistles. Seriously, the only thing that is at all Jewish is a Star of David (formed from an Eye of Providene, a very common symbol combination) and a sentence that is vaguely reminiscent of something that a rabbi said over 2000 years ago and which has since been said (in various forms) by everyone from George Romney (Mitt's father) to Global Warming activist organizations to John Lewis without referring to Hillel the Elder. Oh, and the fact that the map of DC includes a little bit of New Jersey and Jews live in New Jersey, so pretty much a slam-dunk case.

I'm so used to really obvious antisemitic dog whistles being ignored with the lamest excuses, but I never thought I'd see something go so far to the other end of the spectrum. This is truly insane.
Lol, the game actually seems pretty woketarded.
I suppose even the vaguest mention of things tangentially related to Jews in the context of malevolent plots is verboten. I wonder why that could be the case.
 
OK, I think I get it. It's not just the 'rapey' subtext that pushes their buttons, but the way that Beast (BtP) is framed from a storytelling perspective, what with the nu-Gamergate and marginalized person aspect bullshittery.

In other words, they're terribly sensitive about it because BtP is not too subtly suggesting that such 'marginalized' types could also be predators.

Am I getting it, or am I missing the mark?
I think that's part of it. I also think one of the quoted posters hits an aspect on the head when they say it's about how the game glorifies justifying abusing others because you weren't treated well yourself; even without picking up on the 'SJWs are actually the villains' part it's still understandable why people might be repelled by a game that justifies abusers in that fashion.

I always associate it with David 'Olivia' Hill, who clearly believes he's allowed to be a massive cunt to the world because he's a troon. Indeed, it's a pretty mask-off game that tries to be a sort of grim revenge story with anti-hero aspect. But it's so poorly written that it turns out that you're playing predators who are morally justified because reasons, also known as just really shitty people deluding themselves that they're in the right. It's not meant to be a direct allegory for how SJWs are horrible people whose fight for justice and equality actually just comes from poorly-disguised revenge, selfishness and envy, but again, it's written badly by people who are like that and want to make themselves out to be the PC. Not the NPC that 'normies' believe are good people, but they know the truth about who's truly good and evil in this world.

It's usually not a great idea to analyse a book as a psychological projection of the author/s, especially something that's required to have certain traits like books in the WoD franchise. But considering who the authors are and the batshit, confused nature of the books, it really has the feel of deeply unpleasant people justifying their thought processes so they're the good guys. Meaning you don't have to be one of those people who think only white people can be racist to see Beast as being fucked up abuser-defending bullshit.

Source: I haven't read the book, just one or two detailed dissections and the David Hill thread here.
 
Last edited:
Back