- Joined
- Feb 17, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Okay, fine. I'll admit you ended up on the right track about the thorium toothpaste, but at the time it was widely accepted as a miracle chemical! Based on the information we had at the time, my position was still objectively right and your position was still objectively wrong. You only ended up being right on a technicality based on bad information and for the wrong reasons. Dumbass."So recently Sam Harris went down the same route as "they were accidentally right and doesn't count"
Toolsheds like Sam Harris, Scott Adams, etc. have to pretend to be the smartest guys in any given room or else they think they won’t be invited to Joe Rogan’s podcast anymore. Another plausible theory is that they’re so paranoid that if they fess up to getting one thing wrong then it’s open season on all the stupid things they’ve said over the years and they’re not exactly wrong about that. These “well ackchually…” guys actually have a poor record of actually being right about something. Any kind of scrutiny about what they’ve said may result in them no longer feeling smart and special. It’s better to just bluff your way through life because most people are generally too busy to really care. Guys like Scott bank on his fanbase having the memory of a goldfish. To be fair, they usually do; anyone who is a fan of Clott Adams isn’t going to be the shiniest penny in the drawer."Okay, fine. I'll admit you ended up on the right track about the thorium toothpaste, but at the time it was widely accepted as a miracle chemical! Based on the information we had at the time, my position was still objectively right and your position was still objectively wrong. You only ended up being right on a technicality based on bad information and for the wrong reasons. Dumbass."
Is it that fucking difficult for these pompous dickhead narcissists to just admit that they were wrong about something? For crying out loud, nobody expects you to be omnipotent, everybody is wrong about stuff sometimes. They have the emotional maturity and humility of middle schoolers in their inability to take ownership of a wrong take. Admitting fault or being wrong is such an important lesson to learn, and it makes life so much easier once you put it into practice.
I bet most people couldn’t even tell you who Scott Adams is. But I would absolutely support a digital copy of him being created from his online activity. Imagine - the purest lolcow ever created, with no moderating external influence, its narcissism constantly self-reinforcing.I'm surprised no one's mentioned that Scott literally believes he will live forever as Max Headroom because computers will reconstruct his soul from his tweets and livestreams. That's why he obsessively tweets and streams on a daily basis, he believes it's making him immortal.
He even says he'll be one of the first people to be digitally resurrected because there'll be so much info on him, as if we have more documentation of him than OPL or Kim Kardashian's ass
Someone should let him know who exactly is the most documented person in all of human history, and why.I'm surprised no one's mentioned that Scott literally believes he will live forever as Max Headroom because computers will reconstruct his soul from his tweets and livestreams. That's why he obsessively tweets and streams on a daily basis, he believes it's making him immortal.
He even says he'll be one of the first people to be digitally resurrected because there'll be so much info on him, as if we have more documentation of him than OPL or Kim Kardashian's ass
If Scott Adams ever met a perfect AI reconstruction of himself, he'd hate it, because it would be made from his REAL tweets and livestreams, not how he likes to remember them. The immortal computer replica of him would be Clott Adams and he would just be left arguing "No, no! I never said that, the computer's just hallucinating out of cognitive dissonance! Mind reading!"I bet most people couldn’t even tell you who Scott Adams is. But I would absolutely support a digital copy of him being created from his online activity. Imagine - the purest lolcow ever created, with no moderating external influence, its narcissism constantly self-reinforcing.
On the subject of AI Scott, I don’t understand this story at all, but apparently some Blockchain company is using an AI version of Scott as their CCOIf Scott Adams ever met a perfect AI reconstruction of himself, he'd hate it
I MUST OBEY SCIENCE!The immortal computer replica of him would be Clott Adams and he would just be left arguing "No, no! I never said that, the computer's just hallucinating out of cognitive dissonance! Mind reading!"
Hey...I never forgot. I still look at Dilbert every once in while. Great stuff.After reading the OP I can see why I forgot Dilbert was a thing for over a decade.
Looks like yet another scam crypto startup that's latched onto ChatGPT hype.I find it strange that Scott will go after parodies of his work, but he won’t go after people that are stealing his likeness and voice to presumably make a profit.
Nobody tell Scott that his rotting body will be recycled into the Earth, exactly like how that robot's broken body will be recycled into other manmade objects. Or left to rust and will be reclaimed by the Earth anyway, just, not as something nearly as healthy for the Earth to consume.Once you realize Artificial Intelligence is Scott's whole concept of God and afterlife, his worship of it makes so much more sense.
His contempt for the human form is shown in the Dilbert comics involving the Robot character, where the joke is usually that pathetic human life is shit compared to the immortality of AI
View attachment 4306291
The wages of humanity is death, but the wages of AI is life everlasting. It may be "mind reading", but is it that much of a stretch to think that Scott, who ardently believes he will live forever as AI, sees himself as the robot who achieves apotheosis while mortal flesh fails? It's also cute that he thinks every upgrade for a hundred years will be compatible with the same system, as if enough plugins will turn Windows 95 into the latest Smart Phone and beyond. If Scott Adams ever did reincarnate as a robot, 10 years later he'd be completely incompatible with everything else in the world, and be left to rust on a scrap heap.
I really shouldn't be surprised, considering his own personal art style is only one step above Alegria.Just in case you ever wondered if Scott has terrible taste:
View attachment 4306320
At best an AI could create such a thing in a few decades, however it wouldn't be a 100% match to him. That is to say we wont have a dark age where technology is dead. People like him don't realise just how fragile our current age is.I'm surprised no one's mentioned that Scott literally believes he will live forever as Max Headroom because computers will reconstruct his soul from his tweets and livestreams. That's why he obsessively tweets and streams on a daily basis, he believes it's making him immortal.
He even says he'll be one of the first people to be digitally resurrected because there'll be so much info on him, as if we have more documentation of him than OPL or Kim Kardashian's ass
Excuse me, but real comic artists would have to disagree with him. Has he seen Rob Liefelds Feet?Once you realize Artificial Intelligence is Scott's whole concept of God and afterlife, his worship of it makes so much more sense.
His contempt for the human form is shown in the Dilbert comics involving the Robot character, where the joke is usually that pathetic human life is shit compared to the immortality of AI
View attachment 4306291
The wages of humanity is death, but the wages of AI is life everlasting. It may be "mind reading", but is it that much of a stretch to think that Scott, who ardently believes he will live forever as AI, sees himself as the robot who achieves apotheosis while mortal flesh fails? It's also cute that he thinks every upgrade for a hundred years will be compatible with the same system, as if enough plugins will turn Windows 95 into the latest Smart Phone and beyond. If Scott Adams ever did reincarnate as a robot, 10 years later he'd be completely incompatible with everything else in the world, and be left to rust on a scrap heap.
Scott seems to have loved the recent AI craze as it validates his own religion. Like any religion, he must simp for his God and explain away its shortcomings, like AI currently not even understanding what hands are. Afterall, if AI isn't as good or better than human intelligence, there is no God or Heaven
View attachment 4306400
Of course he glosses over the fact that it isn't an issue of how difficult it is to draw hands, but that the computer isn't even aware humans only have five fingers on each one, or even that they're are supposed to point OUT from the hand, it just generates the mathematical average of how many lines and bumps would be in that portion of such a picture.