SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

Deleted now. Did anyone archive it?

EDIT:
runitscourse.png

Fuck right off, Vezaz. You're backing down because this piece wasn't cashing in those sweet-sweet dopamine upvotes like you thought it would. Learn to read the room you fucknut.
 
Last edited:
What an ill-considered thing to write. It would have been so easy for that author to channel whatever they’re feeling about the community clusterfuck into something SLIGHTLY less of an interpersonal “fuck you.” The glue that really holds a community together, huh.

(Garth Marenghi): But we’ve known writers who use subtext, and they’re all cowards.
 
Deleted now. Did anyone archive it?

EDIT:
View attachment 1950654
Fuck right off, Vezaz. You're backing down because this piece wasn't cashing in those sweet-sweet dopamine upvotes like you thought it would. Learn to read the room you fucknut.
lol as if the controversy and death spiral was its engineered purpose. At least have the nuts to stick by it until the deletion counter ticks down.
 
Good. Glad someone thought to grab it.
What an ill-considered thing to write. It would have been so easy for that author to channel whatever they’re feeling about the community clusterfuck into something SLIGHTLY less of an interpersonal “fuck you.” The glue that really holds a community together, huh.

(Garth Marenghi): But we’ve known writers who use subtext, and they’re all cowards.
All they're missing out of Garth Marenghi's style is the repetition of the word "maggots."
 
Just a side note, but I usually do a search for “scp kiwifarms” to find the thread directly and yesterday I found this. (Archive.)
I guess someone is trying to warn people about Bright, but that website doesn’t appear to have been updated in a while.
>Peters, apparently in a wedding dress
:story:
Deleted now. Did anyone archive it?

EDIT:
View attachment 1950654
Fuck right off, Vezaz. You're backing down because this piece wasn't cashing in those sweet-sweet dopamine upvotes like you thought it would. Learn to read the room you fucknut.
Happily, somebody remembered to (archive) everything.
 
fucking cowards should just write the deletion in-universe as one of those faggy metafictional SCP's they love so much.

Don't give them ideas. It'll be one of those vague spiteful articles that definitely aren't poking fun at a person the author and community supposedly doesn't like.

While true, seeing them be stupid enough to publish something like that while the community is this divided will be even better.

So if you're reading this SCP, do it! It'll fix everything, and I'm sure it will be a very smart and quirky tale to challenge the narrative norm.


:story:
 
Last edited:
EDIT:
View attachment 1950654
Fuck right off, Vezaz. You're backing down because this piece wasn't cashing in those sweet-sweet dopamine upvotes like you thought it would. Learn to read the room you fucknut.
He deleted it himself instead of having staff do it. That can't be a coincidence.
 
Alright, I admit my SCP lore is a little rusty, but what the fuck am I reading here.

No, seriously, I'm asking. What's this Lizard in Harmony thing about?
You know 682? Someone wrote a tale where 682 is used as a metaphor for Roget/Harmony self-destructing everything she did on the wiki. It's gone now, but you can find an archive closer to the top of this page of the thread.
 
You know 682? Someone wrote a tale where 682 is used as a metaphor for Roget/Harmony self-destructing everything she did on the wiki. It's gone now, but you can find an archive closer to the top of this page of the thread.
The best part is the implication that SCP wiki/discord was some sort of healthy, functioning society, innocently minding its own business, BUT THEN ALONG CAME HARMONY AND RUINED EVERYTHING!
 
The best part is the implication that SCP wiki/discord was some sort of healthy, functioning society, innocently minding its own business, BUT THEN ALONG CAME HARMONY AND RUINED EVERYTHING!
There's a reason why people compare the wiki's inner community to a cult. People on the inside very often believe the wiki and its staff are not capable of doing anything majorly wrong. Every piece of evidence to the contrary is dismissed as either a minor problem at best or a lie manufactured by one of their many scapegoats.
 
Last edited:
There's a reason why people compare the wiki's inner community to a cult. People on the inside very often believe the wiki and its staff of not being capable of doing anything majorly wrong. Every piece of evidence to the contrary is dismissed as either a minor problem at best or a lie manufactured by one of their many scapegoats.
The reaction to the spergery is the most telling factor. Normally, if a crazy tranny on the internet says "I'm a horrible person, but THESE people are just as bad!" the proper response would be "You're a horrible person? lol k weird flex tho."

Instead, they went batshit crazy and sent up the batshit signal, hoping and praying for batshitman to come and save them from the ebil EBIL lizard!

And to this day, they wonder how we ever knew there's chum in the water.
 
People on the inside very often believe the wiki and its staff are not capable of doing anything majorly wrong. Every piece of evidence to the contrary is dismissed as either a minor problem at best or a lie manufactured by one of their many scapegoats.
A search of the logs for the word "pedo" was interesting. Log dump warning. This is going to be a demonstration as to how staff both willfully ignore the uncomfortable reality of sex pests among them and how/why they downplay, postpone, or dismiss accusations about them when they should be as clear as day. Some protect them, some enable them, some join them, but most people are just too submerged in the herd to either say what they are thinking while it is happening, and dare to be the odd one out among their peers. They are weak people, is the bottom line.
First, I thought this exchange was interesting...
<Piefish> Connie is properly getting on me tits
<ProcyonLotor> what've they done now
<Ard> she's a royal pain in the arse
<Piefish> It's just the negative shit she's posting on fb rn because of 049
<Piefish> like fs just downvote and move on
<ProcyonLotor> Why isn't she banned from the official page given her social media history?
<ProcyonLotor> She's banned from the unofficial one, I know that
<Piefish> I was asking that on the IO discord
<Ard> Just ban her outright
<Ard> She has contributed literally nothing of value anywhere
<Piefish> I think it's down to my discretion but was gonna check
<Piefish> ikr
<ProcyonLotor> Ban her, seriously.
<ProcyonLotor> She contributes nothing and harasses people offsite.
<Piefish> lemme check I'm ok to first
<Piefish> I doubt there'd be a problem
<Modern_Erasmus> Seriously her constant harassment and slander should have gotten her banned a while ago
<Ard> she's worse than scantron because at least scantron writes
<Modern_Erasmus> Yeah
<ProcyonLotor> from the new facebook post
<ProcyonLotor> "rewrite managed to be worse than original cos original didn't have kaktus"
<ProcyonLotor> that's not quite harassment
<trets> A formerly banned user who was unbanned and has proceeded to shit on pretty much everything
<TombGames> ConnieCommie should definitely fuck off forever
<Modern_Erasmus> And let’s not forget the whole “Bright is a pedophile accusation”
<trets> And currently is harassing Kaktus and TheeSherm for ????REasons
<trets> Well, I should say "Harassing"
<Modern_Erasmus> ARD: she’s claiming sherm is a transphobe off site and implying it on site
<Ard> Fuck's sake
<Ard> Unless she provides links then fucking
<Ard> Remove her
<trets> I don't know if it counts as actual harassment, as I don't have a good metric to compare it to
<Ard> Does anyone remember the person who posted a dick pic in 17 and claimed it was from kaktus?
<trets> I have no idea how
<Ard> Shit stirring and public smearing
<Ard> Expunge her
<Ard> She is a waste of bandwidth
<Ard> We neither need nor want her around. Remove her from the Facebook and the Discords and whatever. Hell, we've already established precedent for taking offsite activity into account.
<TombGames> I'm not opposed to removing her from anything related to the site tbh
<Ard> ban her from the facebook page. this isn't some woman bravely accusing a harasser. this is a dumbass flinging her shit at someone with zero proof on a medium which offers possibly the easiest ways to GET proof
<TombGames> She posted a picture of pepe with an AK47 and an Irish flag along with the comment "up ira"
<TombGames> please remove her from existence
<TombGames> in this context it looks like she's some sort of harassment bot having a fucking meltdown
<trets> Also, I've never gotten a good answer on this
<Piefish> We're gonna go ahead and ban
<Piefish> got 6 screenshots of them being toxic over youtubers
<ProcyonLotor> sweeeeet
<TombGames> honestly I don't feel removing her is actually a disciplinary issue so much as a safety concern
<ProcyonLotor> but seriously, people should be talking to harassment
<Piefish> Is it worth adding it to O5?
<TombGames> Piefish: I would keep it off 05 for now
<shaggydredlocks> P sure shes TheBigCon over on the subreddit due to similar kiss-up bs about the 049 rewrite...that user has been shitting on the sub for forever now.
<TombGames> in the event that harassment takes it as a harassment case, they keep stuff off of 05 generally
<ProcyonLotor> ...I do not understand how she is not seeing a pattern.
<Piefish> TombGames, good point
<TombGames> in the event that they don't I'm going to summon admins and make the case that public safety is greater than individual freedom
<TombGames> which may or may not go over well with most of them being american
<ProcyonLotor> no, no, I'm probably the most "USA USA USA" fucker in here and nah, fuck individual freedom here
<ProcyonLotor> will heavily support you on that front, TombGames
<Chaoffline> As a disc member I'd just like to say I do support the notion of pre-emptively banning her
<Piefish> like they hate sherm for some reason and they are telling other users what appears to be bullshit
<trets> How the fuck does connie have 60 thousand karma on reddit
<Chaoffline> trets: probably reposts
<ProcyonLotor> yeah, see, if we're judged on the quality of the friends we keep
<ProcyonLotor> well, none of connie's friends would be any better than sherm lemme tell ya
<Piefish> Protip: You can't be judged on the friends you keep if you have no friends
<TombGames> I mean, to some extent you can judge people on their friends, but you can't really judge people based on some guy they might've been ok with saying a thing once
<ProcyonLotor> well, sure, you can judge someone by who's close to them
<Ard> yeah like
<Ard> let's be real
<Ard> how many gay people in here made jokes at gay peoples' expenses before finding out they were gay themselves
<ProcyonLotor> hell, ARD, my boyfriend and I still call guys faggots in private conversation
<Ard> ProcyonLotor: Lmao
<ProcyonLotor> Can a disc or admin up to date on the issue make an 05 post for connie?
<Roth> If connie continues to spread slander, lies an insults upon social media I would have them banned from our media.
<DrMagnus> What the hell did connie do now?
<trets> DrMagnus: continuing to harass Sherm
<Roth> Calling sherm a transphobe and sexist
<Piefish> lately getting salty over 049
<Dexanote> Okay
<Dexanote> Hello
<DrBleep> Dex wants logs of discussion
<Dexanote> Please give me a Tldr on ConnieCommie discuss
<Dexanote> Now.
<Dexanote> Asap
<Dexanote> I wanted them gone for weeks since an embarrassing 180+ post flamewar
<ProcyonLotor> incredible and sustained toxicity throughout scp social media, both official and unofficial.
<DrMagnus> dexanote: So far? Just talked about how no one has any issues banning her from everywhere.
<Piefish> She's been banned from FB for almost constantly posting negative shit when we share yotuber videos, lately getting salty over 049
<DrMagnus> And she's added nothing to anything beyond shit-slinging and alienating people for literally the smallest of reasons.
<Dexanote> Sherm banned her from a discord for harassment
<ProcyonLotor> dexanote: you count as harassment team, right?
<DrMagnus> This is pretty blatantly harassment
<Modern_Erasmus> dexanote: also making a lot of public attacks against bright, sherm, and Kaktus
<Piefish> She's also been spreading lies on FB about sherm being transphobic
<Dexanote> I am aware of the attacks
<Dexanote> I wanted her gone for weeks
<Dexanote> Didn't know anyone else would be okay
<DrMagnus> ...did anyone not want her gone?
<trets> Is this something we could potentially kick up the chain to Facebook itself for harassment
<DrMagnus> oh god, that would be great.
<DrMagnus> But, that might backfire.
<Dexanote> Is it remove member or block member
<DrMagnus> She could probably cook up a sob story about sherm being transphobic with some thin as fuck evidence, and potentially cause shit.
<Lily> Why is she being so edgy
<DrBleep> dexanotre probably safe to shoot for block member, and then remove them.
<DrMagnus> Lily: I guarantee you she's young, and wants attention. Nothing more.
<Dexanote> No shit
<Dexanote> She's getting that attention
<Dexanote> By harassing a content creator
<Chaoffline> dexanote: Just checking in to confirm that I support a ban of connie from the wiki
<DrBleep> dexanote remove the member
<Dexanote> Removed member.
<DrBleep> Sweet
<Dexanote> .tell theraven do not reapprove Connie Finley or alt to the FB group
<Dexanote> Embarrassment of a person
<Roth> Does anyone know if they have tumblr/twitter
<DrBleep> Ok, so... not disc in any official capacity, but Tuomey, Procy, and Chao have voted for wikiban
<Dexanote> Drbleep we will handle that later
<DrMagnus> She called me ableist.
<DrMagnus> And that upsets me.
<ProcyonLotor> I'm pretty sure I, somehow, have yet to publicly invoke her ire, despite being among the earliest to call for her ban
<DrMagnus> She's one of the people who criticized my works on the subreddit +facebook when I plug.
<DrMagnus> She claims I don't write non-cis, non-het, non-neurotypical people.

... given that it was in mid-2018. This was almost 2 years prior to KF starting to uncover Bright as a pedophile. Recall that nothing discovered and presented ITT was news or unavailable to staff. There's a podcast where Dr.Mann is interviewed and when asked about how Bright is kinda.... odd and questionable, he brushes it off like "oooh, that's just Bright!". Yet somehow, the info in the posts were enough to cause Bright's "stepping down".

Here in the transcript, they are talking about a user who genuinely does sound like a real cunt; CommieConnie, a Roxie 2.0 if you will. Anyone calling people ableist and the like would be rightly chased out of here as well.

I'm not making the case that they shouldn't have banned her. But turns out she was dead-on-balls accurate with Bright, if only that. Here we see the staff truly caring more about her "edginess", the insults she gave 049, the disagreements she had with the FB staff, and her general criticism of what they were doing at any given time. They collectively are annoyed by this person -- which is fair -- but use that annoyance to disregard some claims that they could have taken more seriously and maybe considered if they were more level-headed and less of a clique. I believe their prides and egos, and authorities, were so central to their operations, that they were unable to look past insults to them into the bigger issues.

For example, they say that this Connie would need evidence of her claims about someone being anti-trans or whatever. But they don't bring this up for the claims of Bright being a sex pest. I think I know why, and I think they did/do too. The odd thing is, there was enough from Bright's behavior by then -- the 13 year old's boobs tale, the request for nudes on his 36th birthday at the least -- for staff to have known to take this more seriously. They likely buried their heads in the sand regarding it, because they didn't want to come to terms with the reality.

The dead-reflex inability to step back and think for a second in the midst of fellating each other turns out to be a critical failure in the staff's ability to be objective, particularly with harassment cases. This is how they can seemingly be silent and unaware of someone like SaX being a major creep for a long long time, then claim to have known it all along after he was finally banned:

<LadyKatie> I feel like five years from now somebody will ask about some prominent staff member who got banned very recently today but would not be known to a new staffer "wait, what did X do?" and we'd all be like 'HOO BOY LET ME TELL YOU SOME SHIT." assuming we're all still here which I think some of us might be
<trets> LadyKatie: that's gonna be the cimm for the most recent example
<Modern_Erasmus> trets: well... sax now
<LadyKatie> yeah both of them
<LadyKatie> And like always, I have VERY STRONG OPINIONS about both
<Dexanote> May I say something about Sax
<Dexanote> Sax hasn't contributed to anything at all in a staff capacity since before I was a mod.
<Modern_Erasmus> true
<Dexanote> No, like.
<Dexanote> That's /damning/.
<LadyKatie> Sax being in sssc was surprising to me
<Dexanote> LadyKatie, thats uhhhh partially my fauilt
<taylor_itkin> why the fuck WAS sax in here?
<Soulless> taylor_itkin, because SSSC used to be for staff and also people staff thought were cool
<Taffeta> ARD: technically I cheated my way in here
<Ard> Taffeta: you were a 13 year old acting like a 30 year old
<Taffeta> ARD: god christ I just realised Sax was *in here* when I dropped that bombshell
<Ard> Taffeta: i think sax assumed you were a boy
-----
<Roget> soulonphone: did I tell you that e4d and tox quit from RPC in solidarity with Xiao after the latter was banned for being a pedophile
<LadyKatie> Wait Sax got banned from rpc?
<Roget> their one reasonable mod (coupon) approached me asking about xiao
<taylor_iOStkin> Sax got banned from RPC.
<Roget> and I said "he's a dangerous predator who should be banned immediately, I don't even like RPC but I wouldn't wish something like that on my worst enemy"
-----
<LadyKatie> It's amazing sax was around as long as he was
<LadyKatie> Seriously, how did this guy get that far without setting off every alarm bell?
<taylor_iOStkin> LadyKatie: Sax was an op in 19 for years
<LadyKatie> And he was weird then
<LadyKatie> He's always been weird
:<DrBleep> Sax was always weird but it wasn't
<DrBleep> until I found out about the other stuff that it really became apparent
<DrBleep> I thought he was just quirky

...while comments like this were out there:
sax: [3223/3373] 2017-12-13 sly161: Cant wait to read the vagina scip
-----
<AbsentmindedNihilist> decibelle he can be cantacted through kik
<Quikngruvn> Ugh, what a potentially problematic name.
<Quikngruvn> "Kik" is one letter away from an ethnic slur.
<Tuomey> it's also like
<Tuomey> a social media/sex thing
<ProcyonLotor> It's got a bit sexting scene
<ProcyonLotor> *big
<Taffeta> I know it as 'that thing you use if you want to send nudes to all your other friends in hs' thing
<Tuomey> where there are 13 yos and camshow blogs on the same site
<saX> ... two things that should never go together.
<saX> Hooray.
<saX> I may be a bit of a waste person,
<saX> But I haven't descended to 'Kik'-level waste.
----
<Sax|Cloud> Don't make me get the pneumatic dildo cannon
<Sax|Cloud> ... yes, my buddy created one.

This stuff is right in their faces, but they need completely detached observers like those here on KF to point out to them that they are enabling and harboring a bunch of people who shouldn't be in positions of significance, power, or influence. All the people we are bringing up now, they will claim to have not known enough about if and until public pressure again forces their hands away from their eyes.
 
Last edited:
Back