SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
D.Va said:
847 added two whole paragraphs replacing mention of women with whoever identifies as women, and removed the bit about women being too near the SCP getting incapacitated. Also all these men who interact with the doll are evil and treat women as objects, etc.
Click to expand...

So no surprise, literal troon shit.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Larry Trainor, Mexican_Wizard_711, The Decimator and 8 others
CFOperator, the administrator and creator of the RPC Authority, may have been banned from the SCP wiki. (I say may have because the information appears inconclusive and I don't really have a way to check, other than asking him, and I'd rather not waste his time.) The reason for this was a screenshot of him inciting a downvote brigade.

cfo-kinch-discord.png


No, he's just pointing out a shit article is shit. What a heinous act.

RPC Authority thread. There isn't really too much of note (save for the following quote), though, just "the staff is shit", something everyone already knows.

Professor_JD said:
This is some serious nonsense, I've looked at all the 'Evidence' the SCP mods have gathered and don't see anything that supports their claims. CFO said 'Tranny?' And? Is he not entitled to say the word tranny? CFO calls something bad and provides a link to it, to let other people judge it themselves. He does not tell anyone to intentionally attack the article, downvote it or harass the author. I myself have linked friends to terrible fanfiction years ago to critique and laugh at it, does that then make me a harasser too?

CFO has a private discussion with Kaktus, who then shares that discussion. Which really only reflects badly on the SCP users. CFO also shows screenshots of users seriously and maybe non-seriously talking about uploading bad articles intentionally to the RPC Authority, which they at least seem to be taking a little more seriously: http://05command.wikidot.com/forum/t-6314817/preventing-downvote-bombing-on-rpc-authority

Oh and Kinch had a post included where they blame CFO for not banning harrassers fast enough. I mean okay I guess? Is CFO even the sole person responsible for that?
Click to expand...

O5 Command thread

Tuomey Tombstone said:
Information was volunteered that CFOperator has been calling for downvotes on Kinch's 4000 entry. Contest staff will, of course, be alerted.

Screenshot of the RPC discord:

[previously embedded image]

This is downvote brigading plain and simple.

I move for an immediate ban.
Click to expand...

DrClef said:
If CFOperator had otherwise been an upright and decent user, I'd agree with you, but his short history as a site member shows a clear pattern. A couple of examples:

http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-6294411/rpc-authority#post-3860866
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-1218274/scp-7143-j#post-3859317
http://www.scp-wiki.net/forum/t-6274592/4000contestcwwktkb#post-3860123

Each of these threads shows the same pattern: CFOperator comes into some thread vaguely related to RPC Authority and makes some statement calculated to get an emotional response. He then draws out the argument by using rhetorical tricks and switching up the goalposts in order to try and get people arguing with him over and over until they do or say something stupid. Then CFO comes in again and says, "AHA! You broke these rules because you were pissed off at a troll! Now you should get in trouble!" Classic play from Alt-Right playbook: redefining the victim.

I've become convinced that the only reason he's even on SCP Foundation right now is to stroke his own ego and show off for his userbase. I am also convinced that this will end in one of two ways: either he sticks around for a while and trolls it up and gets a bunch of users upset at him, or we ban him and he uses it as evidence that we're a bunch of overreaching mods "for no reason." Given these two choices, I'd rather just cut the knot right now and tell him to go on his merry way.
Click to expand...

I encourage people here to make their own judgments, but the aforementioned links seem like they just show CFOperator pointing out shit is shit. Apparently, that's bannable, now, if the person who wrote it is one of the Kool Kidz.

dankaar said:
My worry isn't so much about CFOperator, but all the people he's gonna show this thread to should he get banned. The ones on the fence? The ones whose kneejerk reaction isn't "pfft, they're just salty SJW assholes"? They're the ones who need the proof we're acting in good faith, not him.

Building a case; showing that he's not acting in good faith? That's good supporting evidence to show that we're not doing this because we have some bias against him.
Click to expand...

Oh, I wonder why people would possibly think that about you. What a shocker.

Tuomey Tombstone said:
The majority of people who are going to think we're SJW assholes already think it; that damage has been done by the video and the general backlash at us.
Click to expand...

I wonder if they'll ever realize that Metokur's video didn't do the damage, they did. All it did was publicize their actions. Personally, I'd lamented the slow decline into SJW nonsense for quite a while, long before any public controversy, and I suspect many have, as well.

Leveritas said:
Got a few PMs yesterday, didn't have time to collate them yesterday.

+ First message:
+ My reply:
+ Civil so far:
+ I tell him what I think:
+ Then he gets nasty:
+ So I don't really have any good will for him left, needless to say:
I stand by what I said earlier, we need to reel in users that are being unnecessarily vehement to users of both wiki's, or we're no better than them. That said, CFOperator lost what little credibility he had and the site is better off without him, at least if you ask me.
Click to expand...

Recommend reading it for yourself. tl;dr CFOperator asks staff to prevent their users from causing trouble, but apparently, that's too much.

Basically, more typical staff drama, with zero self-awareness on the SCP wiki's part.
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: AoS, OhGoy, A Cold Potato and 2 others
CFOperator has been permabanned from the SCP wiki.

SoullessSingularity said:
image.png


In light of the above image and with the knowledge CFOperator has been linking articles on the official channels of the RPC discord for the explicit purpose of garnering negative reviews, I would like to advocate for a permanent ban for He instigation of downvote brigading behavior.
Click to expand...

Except there's zero proof of him instigating downvote brigades ("God, this article is shit." does not count) and nothing to suggest the person in the image has anything to do with CFOperator.

SoullessSingularity said:
With a final vote, CFOperators ban has been extended from 24 hours to permanent; they may appeal in one year. CFOperator will be notified as such once I am off my shift at work, or if another person messages them as such, whichever is sooner. I would like to encourage the user in question with the screenshot also be written up and disciplined appropriately.
Click to expand...

This is your forum. This is your forum on SJW.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: AoS and HIVidaBoheme
CFOperator's permaban from the SCP wiki was sustained, because apparently, if you're in a position of authority, saying "god, this article is terrible" is exactly the same thing as "go downvote this."

Full proceedings here.

IRC proceedings said:
<Soulless>: Yes, in particular, as an administrator of another site created explicitly with the desire not to be involved with the SCP Foundation, linking to our articles with the explicit desire of showing some negative thing, to an official channel for which you have authority and social push, is a basic social dynamic that contextually encourages the people around you to also view something negatively.
<Soulless>: I'm unaware if you are unaware of how people function in groups, so that is the explaination.
<Soulless>: If you would like more clarification of how people function in groups, I can link you wikipedia on social dynamics.
Click to expand...

It's mainly nonsense like this stated in different ways, showing precisely why the staff are considered a bunch of utter dipshits with zero self-awareness.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Larry Trainor, poggies123_, ToS and 7 others
TiberianWizardry said:
CFOperator's permaban from the SCP wiki was sustained, because apparently, if you're in a position of authority, saying "god, this article is terrible" is exactly the same thing as "go downvote this."

Full proceedings here.



It's mainly nonsense like this stated in different ways, showing precisely why the staff are considered a bunch of utter dipshits with zero self-awareness.
Click to expand...

>link you wikipedia on social dynamics

:thinking:

For a collective that looks to write clinical tone articles, and appear scientific it's quite :dumb: to cite wikipedia. I mean, they try to be all smarter than thou...
 
  • Agree
Reactions: OhGoy, Uncanny Valley, A Cold Potato and 1 other person
Mind if I jump in on this one?

I wrote a few SCP back in the day myself (they were never any big ones anyone would know), before all this shit happened, and I can say that even then the pretentiousness was there. People would blow off new writers without giving them chances, and any ideas were shut down. But I never got involved until this stuff began.

Two years pass, and suddenly I get an email on my SCP account a few days ago tellingme that one of my entries has some problematic language on it. So problematic, that they actually tried to call a moderator and get it removed.

Apparently the problem was that I had labeled depression and anxiety as "social personality disorders". Now, I'm no psychologist, so it was an easy mistake. They threw shit at me all over the place for accidentally using the wrong terminology on a scientific-esque site... One that had no problem shooting down opinions. And surprise surprise, this only became a problem after the whole 2721 incident.

Since then I pulled my articles down and moved over to RPC, which is much nicer towards writers. I'm still getting downvoted by bots and all that, but I guess it's better than being sent letters criticizing an error.

If you guys want, I can try to answer some questions about what happened leading up to all this.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Larry Trainor, poggies123_, The Decimator and 16 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back