Opinion Seattle Public Schools Want to Teach Social Justice in Math Class. That Hurts Minorities.

Seattle Public Schools Want to Teach Social Justice in Math Class. That Hurts Minorities.


Seattle’s public-school district has proposed a new math curriculum that would teach its students all about how math has been “appropriated” — and how it “continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities.”

A draft of the curriculum, which was covered in an article in Education Week, would teach students how to “explain how math and technology and/or science are connected and how technology and/or science have (sic) been and continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities of color,” as well as to “identify and teach others about mathematicians* of color in their various communities: schools, neighborhoods, places of worship, businesses, etc.”

Education Week reports:

If adopted, its ideas will be included in existing math classes as part of the district’s broader effort to infuse ethnic studies into all subjects across the K-12 spectrum. Tracy Castro-Gill, Seattle’s ethnic studies director, said her team hopes to have frameworks completed in all subjects by June for board approval.
If the frameworks are approved, teachers would be expected to incorporate those ideas and questions into the math they teach beginning next fall, Castro-Gill said. No districtwide—or mandated—math/ethnic studies curriculum is planned, but groups of teachers are working with representatives of local community organizations to write instructional units for teachers to use if they wish, she said.
As strange as it may sound, this proposed curriculum is not the first time that someone has argued for teaching math in this way. In fact, in 2017, an online course developed by Teach for America — titled “Teaching Social Justice Through Secondary Mathematics” — instructed how to teach their students how “math has been used as a dehumanizing tool.” Also in 2017, a University of Illinois math-education professor detailed what she saw as some of the more racist aspects of math, claiming that “mathematics itself operates as Whiteness.”

I wrote columns about both of these stories that year — and, at the time, most people likely saw them simply as examples of “fringe” beliefs, confined to only super-progressive, ultra-woke circles. With the announcement of this Seattle proposal, however, we can no longer reassure ourselves that this is the case. Now, the social-justice approach to teaching math has officially entered the mainstream (and taxpayer-funded!) arena.

This concerns me, and, believe it or not, that’s actually not because I despise “people and communities of color.” In fact, it’s quite the opposite: It’s because this approach to teaching math will only end up harming the very groups it claims it champions. As The American Conservative’sRod Dreher notes:

The young people who are going to learn real math are those whose parents can afford to put them in private schools. The public school kids of all races are going to get dumber and dumber.
Guess what? Minority students are far more likely to attend public school than whites. In fact, according to Private School Review, “[t]he average percent of minority students in private schools is approximately 28 percent.”

In other words? The minority students, the members of the very groups that this curriculum presumably aims to aid, are actually going to be learning less math than they would have without it — because they will be spending some of that class time learning about how math’s racism has hurt them. Ironically, one of the curriculum’s goals is to teach students how to “critique systems of power that deny access to mathematical knowledge to people and communities of color,” and yet, that’s exactly what the district itself would be doing with it.

The historical contributions of communities of color are important, and students should study them. A better place to study them, though, would (quite obviously) be a history class, not a mathematics one. Mathematics classes should be for mathematics lessons; this is especially important considering the fact that math is exactly where American students (of all races) struggle compared to students in other countries. In fact, according to a Pew Research study from 2017, American students ranked 38th out of 71 countries in the subject. If we want to fix this, we need to focus more on math, instead of looking for ways to teach less of it in the very classes where our students are supposed to be learning it.

The bottom line is: If Seattle’s school district really wants to help minority students excel in mathematics, the last thing it should be doing is proposing a math curriculum that would teach less of it in the schools that they’re most likely to attend.
—————————-

A reasonable article for once. It’s true though, the last thing those kids need is less math in math class.
 
The proposed curriculum is bat shit, it sets out a list of questions that should be "explored" in the classes one of which is "who's to say what is correct?" I mean look at this

Screenshot_20191023-050358.png

These people should stick to their made up subjects where they can argue all day about how their nonsense is correct because fuck it. STEM doesn't work that way you are right or wrong and no amount of feels will change that.
 
The proposed curriculum is bat shit, it sets out a list of questions that should be "explored" in the classes one of which is "who's to say what is correct?" I mean look at this

View attachment 981825

These people should stick to their made up subjects where they can argue all day about how their nonsense is correct because fuck it. STEM doesn't work that way you are right or wrong and no amount of feels will change that.

How does the simple idea that objective truths exist scare these people so much? "Who gets to say if an answer is right?" Gee, I don't know, how about the person who observes that if you take two objects, then place two more objects next to them, you suddenly have four objects in that group? I get it guys, you really have to jerk yourselves off to your postmodernist "everything is relative there's no such thing as objective truth" bullshit, but that shit doesn't fly with shit that actually matters like mathematics and science.
 
How does the simple idea that objective truths exist scare these people so much? "Who gets to say if an answer is right?" Gee, I don't know, how about the person who observes that if you take two objects, then place two more objects next to them, you suddenly have four objects in that group? I get it guys, you really have to jerk yourselves off to your postmodernist "everything is relative there's no such thing as objective truth" bullshit, but that shit doesn't fly with shit that actually matters like mathematics and science.
All these faggots are still mad about nearly failing their college algebra general education class when getting their creative writing degree
 
The proposed curriculum is bat shit, it sets out a list of questions that should be "explored" in the classes one of which is "who's to say what is correct?" I mean look at this

View attachment 981825

These people should stick to their made up subjects where they can argue all day about how their nonsense is correct because fuck it. STEM doesn't work that way you are right or wrong and no amount of feels will change that.
Here’s the answears from my bigbrain:
  1. The teacher. The same person who holds power in all classrooms.
  2. Yes, someone needs to lead the class.
  3. I dunno, God? Yawhooah? Muhhamed? The fact that if I have one banana, and get another banana, I now have two bananas. Math is one of the very few things not up to interpretation, especially not in high school. It has laws, not ’guidelines’.
  4. PEMDAS. The laws of math. A computer, if needed. If you put in the number, and every step checks out with the laws, you get the right answer. It’s not writing, there’s only one set of correct answers.
  5. The ones who get the right answers the quickest most reliably. Not the people who are trying to pull this shit here.
  6. No. I can name things where stats and such were manipulated and framed in a way to achieve a certain goal, but that’s not math’s fault.
  7. The aforementioned stats that are drummed up to be worse than reality are used to justify increased control and decreased rights. But again, not math’s fault.
 
Last edited:
The proposed curriculum is bat shit, it sets out a list of questions that should be "explored" in the classes one of which is "who's to say what is correct?" I mean look at this

View attachment 981825

These people should stick to their made up subjects where they can argue all day about how their nonsense is correct because fuck it. STEM doesn't work that way you are right or wrong and no amount of feels will change that.
Some of those would actually fit in a critical thinking class, but they don't have a place in a math class.
 
“explain how math and technology and/or science are connected and how technology and/or science have (sic) been and continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities of color,” as well as to “identify and teach others about mathematicians* of color in their various communities: schools, neighborhoods, places of worship, businesses, etc.”
I love it. It's teaching the antithesis of science and math. Math is always certain, the numbers do not lie, you just need to know how to read them. There is no ambiguity in math besides the theoretical. Science seeks to test hypotheses to see whether they hold up every time so that the results can be used more practically. A cellphone is the result of math and science so the next obvious solution is to say "NO NO NO it's all oppressive and mean-spirited and marginalizing and everyone hates you, that's why this thing was ever made!" What a great lesson for kids. The world hates you and every miraculous technological advantage given to the human race is just to spite you.

Decolonize your mind, give in to the voodoo.
 
If I had to guess what they think math being opressive is, I’m going with the “Despite making up 13% of the population...” thing.
Statistics. You can't argue with statistics by evidence. BUT, you can make the case of:
  • Is the data correlative with the results?
  • How did they receive their data?
  • What methods did they use to get to that result?
  • What data is missing and how/why?
Vice versa. I could ask 100 people what's their favorite pizza toppings out of two or three choices, but manipulate that data to say: "Oh 50% don't like cheese." Because 50% said either pepperoni or sausage but not cheese, therefore cheese is unpopular.
 
Back