Opinion Seattle Public Schools Want to Teach Social Justice in Math Class. That Hurts Minorities.

Seattle Public Schools Want to Teach Social Justice in Math Class. That Hurts Minorities.


Seattle’s public-school district has proposed a new math curriculum that would teach its students all about how math has been “appropriated” — and how it “continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities.”

A draft of the curriculum, which was covered in an article in Education Week, would teach students how to “explain how math and technology and/or science are connected and how technology and/or science have (sic) been and continues to be used to oppress and marginalize people and communities of color,” as well as to “identify and teach others about mathematicians* of color in their various communities: schools, neighborhoods, places of worship, businesses, etc.”

Education Week reports:

If adopted, its ideas will be included in existing math classes as part of the district’s broader effort to infuse ethnic studies into all subjects across the K-12 spectrum. Tracy Castro-Gill, Seattle’s ethnic studies director, said her team hopes to have frameworks completed in all subjects by June for board approval.
If the frameworks are approved, teachers would be expected to incorporate those ideas and questions into the math they teach beginning next fall, Castro-Gill said. No districtwide—or mandated—math/ethnic studies curriculum is planned, but groups of teachers are working with representatives of local community organizations to write instructional units for teachers to use if they wish, she said.
As strange as it may sound, this proposed curriculum is not the first time that someone has argued for teaching math in this way. In fact, in 2017, an online course developed by Teach for America — titled “Teaching Social Justice Through Secondary Mathematics” — instructed how to teach their students how “math has been used as a dehumanizing tool.” Also in 2017, a University of Illinois math-education professor detailed what she saw as some of the more racist aspects of math, claiming that “mathematics itself operates as Whiteness.”

I wrote columns about both of these stories that year — and, at the time, most people likely saw them simply as examples of “fringe” beliefs, confined to only super-progressive, ultra-woke circles. With the announcement of this Seattle proposal, however, we can no longer reassure ourselves that this is the case. Now, the social-justice approach to teaching math has officially entered the mainstream (and taxpayer-funded!) arena.

This concerns me, and, believe it or not, that’s actually not because I despise “people and communities of color.” In fact, it’s quite the opposite: It’s because this approach to teaching math will only end up harming the very groups it claims it champions. As The American Conservative’sRod Dreher notes:

The young people who are going to learn real math are those whose parents can afford to put them in private schools. The public school kids of all races are going to get dumber and dumber.
Guess what? Minority students are far more likely to attend public school than whites. In fact, according to Private School Review, “[t]he average percent of minority students in private schools is approximately 28 percent.”

In other words? The minority students, the members of the very groups that this curriculum presumably aims to aid, are actually going to be learning less math than they would have without it — because they will be spending some of that class time learning about how math’s racism has hurt them. Ironically, one of the curriculum’s goals is to teach students how to “critique systems of power that deny access to mathematical knowledge to people and communities of color,” and yet, that’s exactly what the district itself would be doing with it.

The historical contributions of communities of color are important, and students should study them. A better place to study them, though, would (quite obviously) be a history class, not a mathematics one. Mathematics classes should be for mathematics lessons; this is especially important considering the fact that math is exactly where American students (of all races) struggle compared to students in other countries. In fact, according to a Pew Research study from 2017, American students ranked 38th out of 71 countries in the subject. If we want to fix this, we need to focus more on math, instead of looking for ways to teach less of it in the very classes where our students are supposed to be learning it.

The bottom line is: If Seattle’s school district really wants to help minority students excel in mathematics, the last thing it should be doing is proposing a math curriculum that would teach less of it in the schools that they’re most likely to attend.
—————————-

A reasonable article for once. It’s true though, the last thing those kids need is less math in math class.
 
Statistics. You can't argue with statistics by evidence. BUT, you can make the case of:
  • Is the data correlative with the results?
  • How did they receive their data?
  • What methods did they use to get to that result?
  • What data is missing and how/why?
Vice versa. I could ask 100 people what's their favorite pizza toppings out of two or three choices, but manipulate that data to say: "Oh 50% don't like cheese." Because 50% said either pepperoni or sausage but not cheese, therefore cheese is unpopular.
Isn't that what 2010's liberals do all the time?
 
This initiative is spearheaded by Tracy Castro-Gill, or "TenaciousT". (archive)

I don't know if she's thread worthy right now, but she is posting a lot of stupid shit on the internet and it might metastasize into a thread later, who knows.

1571809082236.png
TenaciousT; The “Activist Teacher”
The first time I was called an “activist teacher” it was meant as an insult. It’s also the moment when I knew I had the power to move people, even if it was moving them to insult me. My name is Tracy Castro-Gill. People call me TenaciousT. By people, I mean me.
I’m an educator in Seattle Public Schools. I’ve been with my district for 5 years now, and in that short time I have become so deep in racial justice activism that it’s the first answer to both questions, “What do you do for a living?” and “What are your hobbies?” Now, let me be clear: I am an introvert with anxiety disorder, so you will rarely see me at marches and rallies. I do attend them when I can, but part of why I am compelled to start a blog is to help people understand how activism and leadership don’t need to be loud, public acts. You may occasionally find me at teacher conferences leading workshops, but most of what I do happens in small groups behind closed doors, and I am rarely credited for it.
Having said that, I am an award winning educator. In 2017, I was recognized for my work on developing an ethnic studies program in Seattle Public Schools by my local NAACP chapter. I was chosen as the 2019 Puget Sound Education Service District’s Regional Teacher of the Year for my work on racial justice in the district and with my union, the Seattle Education Association; specifically, The Center for Racial Equity.
In addition to my “day job,” I was recently appointed to the Teaching Tolerance Advisory Board. For those who aren’t sure, Teaching Tolerance is the education advocacy program of the Southern Poverty Law Center. I’m honored and excited to learn with other anti-racist educators from across the country!
I am also a doctoral student! My focus is on curriculum, assessment, and instruction especially as it pertains to the creation and implementation of ethnic studies and racial justice… go figure! So, expect some blog posts of my writing assignments. I’m learning a lot about my own district and work in this process.
Other than my doctoral assignments, you can expect blog posts about my thoughts on racial justice (like the title says), reflections on my work and the work of my colleagues, opinions about news related to racial justice and education, and information on how to contact me and where to find me when I do make public appearances!
Follow me!
Twitter @TCastroGill
Facebook: The Teacher Activist

People have been having very bad run-ins with her in the past - surprise surprise, lots of people getting called racist, slapfighting and circle jerks. The following link has a lot of stuff - I didn't find the slap-fight interesting but there's definitely a lot of content.

https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-strange-case-of-tracy-castro-gill.html
(archive)
Backstory
It all started on April 30th when Castro-Gill issued this throwdown on her Facebook page (which, oddly, is open to all) and on Twitter. I didn't even know who she was until someone else alerted me. What seems to have set her off was the issue of the K-12 Science adoption (which she both favored AND hated - you can see this in what she first said about me below).

**Disclaimer** I am not on the clock for Seattle Public Schools.
MELISSA WESTBROOK IS A RACIST.

THE PEOPLE WHO FOLLOW HER BLOG ARE RACISTS.
Can we please judge the science adoption on the merits of the content, not on the shit Westbrook and her fanatic followers make up?
I don't know MaryMargaret Welch well, so I won't speak to her character, but I have seen how Westbrook and her group of torch bearers have gone after individuals and initiatives...
I also know that many of the teachers opposing Amplify are white, male teachers and women in STEM positions are subject to misogyny.
I don't like online curriculum. In fact, I am opposed to it. Actually, I'm opposed to any pre-packaged, corporate ed. curriculum, and I see it as a necessary evil, especially in schools that are under-resourced with teachers who are doing their best to keep their heads above water, and especially in schools where being a teacher means being a social worker.
If you're going to critique the content of Amplify, cool, but don't do it because a racist mob of malcontents told you to - which is where the KUOW piece originated in the first place. Westbrook was bragging about it on her blog...

Tracy Castro-Gill In full transparency, my own child hates Amplify, and that could be because pilot schools were told to "teach it with fidelity." No curriculum should be taught with fidelity. That's the antithesis of culturally responsive and critical pedagogy. But I can't stomach the toxic whiteness coming from Westbrook and her crew. And - it doesn't matter if my privileged kid doesn't like it. My privileged kid will be just fine. What matters is families of color are asking for it...

So there you are folks. If you're reading this blog, you're a racist. Tracy knows all.

See that dog whistle in there "torch bearers"? Funny how one person's activist is another person's "torch bearer."

To note, I talk to public education reporters all the time; I don't need to brag about anything.

She then said this at Facebook:
Westbrook is over on Twitter telling on me. I should unblock her on Facebook and have some fun.

Sue Peters is part of it but Westbrook is the lead torch bearer. And who else is calling out these racist fools, cuz I ain't seen it nowhere else?

Then, after the Science Adoption vote, there was this comment at my thread on that vote (bold mine):

SfRVOG7Ua3VTW6i72u2bjJZLb0057ky0t2I9u1q_vz1i72ny4AnFBuTY1Ps3od2jKa3Rr040KFo=s0-d-e1-ft
Anonymous said...

Congratulations! We poked that mean old racist Melissa Westbrook and her blog's readers in the eye and won a battle against those nasty white people in north Seattle. Sure, this means kids are going to have serious mental and physical problems with a screen-based curriculum, won't learn science, kids of color will see their learning and success rates plummet, and teachers will be laid off, deskilled, and see their salaries capped or even cut, while corporations and investors laugh all the way to the bank. But it was all worth it to show those entitled and privileged white parents that they don't get to make all the decisions around here. Round of applause everyone!!

Tenacious 5/30/19, 10:40 AM

I deleted this comment because it violated blog policy. My spidey sense (and common sense) tells me it was her. She denies it was her and has threatened to sue me for saying so. Yes, I should have been more circumspect and said something like, "It sounds like her. I mean, her self-nickname is "Tenacious" and she uses that at both Twitter and her blog. She admitted on Facebook her own kid hated Amplify and that she hates packaged curriculum like Amplify. She has publicly called me a racist. But no, it couldn't possibly be her."
 
I don't think it's a super contentious statement to say that the way mathematics is taught, especially in the US, is utter dogshit. I feel like stuff like the history of mathematics, the philosophy of math, etc would make for good elective courses, and do have some place in the core curriculum, but certainly shouldn't be the main focus.

Fundamentally though, this isn't going to make kids more interested in mathematics - it's only going to further bore them by adding on language and terminology they will more than likely have no interest in, vestigial components, rather than starting with the basics: why mathematics is interesting to begin with.
 
I can understand a class on Dindunomics, but there is no such thing as Dindunometry.
You need Dindu calculus to calculate the volume of someone's butt.

NOBODY invents math.
They discover it.
Hey, take that filthy Mathematical Platonism out of my DinduQueer discourse!
(Incidentally there is a bizarre book in which the author argued that Mathematical Platonism is associated with political conservativism.)
 
Last edited:
This initiative is spearheaded by Tracy Castro-Gill, or "TenaciousT". (archive)

I don't know if she's thread worthy right now, but she is posting a lot of stupid shit on the internet and it might metastasize into a thread later, who knows.

View attachment 981909


People have been having very bad run-ins with her in the past - surprise surprise, lots of people getting called racist, slapfighting and circle jerks. The following link has a lot of stuff - I didn't find the slap-fight interesting but there's definitely a lot of content.

https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-strange-case-of-tracy-castro-gill.html
(archive)

She looks just like I imagined she would. Lol
 
How does the simple idea that objective truths exist scare these people so much? "Who gets to say if an answer is right?" Gee, I don't know, how about the person who observes that if you take two objects, then place two more objects next to them, you suddenly have four objects in that group? I get it guys, you really have to jerk yourselves off to your postmodernist "everything is relative there's no such thing as objective truth" bullshit, but that shit doesn't fly with shit that actually matters like mathematics and science.

Social justice ultimately boils down to power plays by the left. The fact that math is objective is extremely triggering to a group that wants to control and decide everything.
 
This initiative is spearheaded by Tracy Castro-Gill, or "TenaciousT". (archive)

I don't know if she's thread worthy right now, but she is posting a lot of stupid shit on the internet and it might metastasize into a thread later, who knows.

View attachment 981909


People have been having very bad run-ins with her in the past - surprise surprise, lots of people getting called racist, slapfighting and circle jerks. The following link has a lot of stuff - I didn't find the slap-fight interesting but there's definitely a lot of content.

https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-strange-case-of-tracy-castro-gill.html
(archive)

God, please do a thread. This person is going to be responsible for a lot of mind-rot if they successfully shoehorn all this garbage in alongside the common-core crap.

Logically, I would think (I know, lol, my first mistake) that the SJW crowd would actually really flock to math simply because it's the one field that relies on subjectivity less than just about any other field. But again, the whole "scared of the objective truth" thing. If she really wanted to help fucking marginalized people or whomever, she'd advocate teaching useful day-to-day math, like: how to balance a checkbook and not drown in overdraft fees, how to create a budget so that you at least make your paycheck last the whole pay period, how to calculate loan interest (and thus stay as far as possible from payday loan places) and so on. You know, stuff that might actually help poor people elevate themselves. But no. Woke points more important.

Edit: I have firmly believed for many years that one's success with math is hugely dependent on the quality of the teachers (and thus their teaching strategies). If you get a shit teacher who's also forced to push Commmon Core, you don't get the concepts, you feel dumb and buy into the whole "durr, math is hard" kind of thinking; it's very tough to get someone out of that kind of rut once they fall into it. Make the classrooms smaller, quit using the goddamn gym (or gender studies) teachers to teach algebra, stop with the goddamn common core (seriously, don't start by teaching the kids shortcuts, they'll never understand the underpinnings like that) and you'll see America's math test scores start to rise.
 
Last edited:
This initiative is spearheaded by Tracy Castro-Gill, or "TenaciousT". (archive)

I don't know if she's thread worthy right now, but she is posting a lot of stupid shit on the internet and it might metastasize into a thread later, who knows.

View attachment 981909


People have been having very bad run-ins with her in the past - surprise surprise, lots of people getting called racist, slapfighting and circle jerks. The following link has a lot of stuff - I didn't find the slap-fight interesting but there's definitely a lot of content.

https://saveseattleschools.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-strange-case-of-tracy-castro-gill.html
(archive)
She doesn't look brown enough to be developing "ethnic studies". Judging by the name "Castro" -- she's at most White - Hispanic on the census. She should resign and let a non-white person have her job.

Are white liberals trying to make minority kids fail in school? They're definitely trying to make minority kids feel like victims 24/7, which is hardly going to give them the necessary confidence to do well.
That's the issue I have with liberal ideology surrounding race. Overt racism is in your face, but liberals often practice a kind of soft racism. The idea that POC can't actually do anything on their own and need white people to fix things for them. That's still racist. If you truly believe in equality, you just remove any barriers to success and let people succeed or fail on their own.
 
The proposed curriculum is bat shit, it sets out a list of questions that should be "explored" in the classes one of which is "who's to say what is correct?" I mean look at this

View attachment 981825

These people should stick to their made up subjects where they can argue all day about how their nonsense is correct because fuck it. STEM doesn't work that way you are right or wrong and no amount of feels will change that.
Oh come on. Those aren't the worst quotes.
B7A09F31-2D78-42E3-AE4C-0E4B71811CC0.jpegE08459B9-D060-4FDF-B4A6-9C797755A390.jpeg
These are way worse. "Can you recognize when someone is being mathematical" is not only an insult to mathematics, it's torturing English as well.
 
I love it. It's teaching the antithesis of science and math. Math is always certain...

I mean - kinda, Math past a certain point doesn't have numbers (you miss them). Get into analysis (real, complex, number theory) and past a certain point of complexity and your ability to know what has been proven is questionable. In theory Fermat's last theorem has a proof, in reality people still question it.

I agree for the applied side of math you are (generally) dealing with something concrete, which can be quite appealing, but if you want that I suggest engineering.

All that said, Seattle is dumb. Last I checked Asians and Indians fucking dominate higher math. Are they not non-white?
 
I mean - kinda, Math past a certain point doesn't have numbers (you miss them). Get into analysis (real, complex, number theory) and past a certain point of complexity and your ability to know what has been proven is questionable. In theory Fermat's last theorem has a proof, in reality people still question it.
I did say
There is no ambiguity in math besides the theoretical.
 
Back