US Senate Votes to Allow FBI to Look at Your Web Browsing History Without a Warrant - “Stop having too much fun on the Internet”, the US government proclaims

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...t-your-web-browsing-history-without-a-warrant (a)

The US Senate has voted to give law enforcement agencies access to web browsing data without a warrant, dramatically expanding the government’s surveillance powers in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The power grab was led by Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell as part of a reauthorization of the Patriot Act, which gives federal agencies broad domestic surveillance powers. Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Steve Daines (R-MT) attempted to remove the expanded powers from the bill with a bipartisan amendment.

But in a shock upset, the privacy-preserving amendment fell short by a single vote after several senators who would have voted “Yes” failed to show up to the session, including Bernie Sanders. 9 Democratic senators also voted “No,” causing the amendment to fall short of the 60-vote threshold it needed to pass.

“The Patriot Act should be repealed in its entirety, set on fire and buried in the ground,” Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight For The Future, told Motherboard. “It’s one of the worst laws passed in the last century, and there is zero evidence that the mass surveillance programs it enables have ever saved a single human life.”

The vote comes at a time when internet usage has skyrocketed, with tens of millions of Americans quarantined at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Privacy advocates have warned for over a decade that allowing warrantless access to web search queries and browsing history allows law enforcement to easily crack down on activists, labor organizers, or anyone else the government deems a threat.

“Today the Senate made clear that the purpose of the PATRIOT Act is to spy on Americans, no warrants or due process necessary,” Dayton Young, director of product at Fight For the Future, told Motherboard. “Any lawmaker who votes to reauthorize the PATRIOT Act is voting against our constitutionally-protected freedoms, and there’s nothing patriotic about that.”

- End of Article -
This is some of the worst news I've heard today. Absolutely no one wants a fed to look through their computer, not a single person. Such a fucking mess.
 
I think they forgot that was a thing.

When it comes to the Senate, there are no Term Limits, and by design it was meant to be the forum of the aristocracy and the socially powerful to the total detriment of the plebes. This is not a bug. Its a design feature. What the Senate has done has been in total accordance to its function and precisely as designed by the founders of the American Republic.
 
Seriously, nobody make the mistake of thinking that the FBI appreciates favors; only total 100% alignment is enough. The NAY votes will be protected only so long as they are politically or financially useful, and not a moment longer.

And if anything has come out of the Trump years, lets hope it is that at the end of the day, every Jury of Americans empaneled for the next century will by default assume the FBI is lying to them. If you ever find yourself on the jury and the evidence comes down to "the FBI says the dude did it," assume the FBI framed the dude. Because the FBI has shown itself to be completely untrustworthy. And liars. If we followed Sharia law (Inshallah) the word of an FBI Agent should count less then a woman, a whore, or worse, an actor.
 
Last edited:
Maybe a 1000 years from now or 500 at best, if this country survives that long. Timothy McVeigh will seen as some sort of Guy Fawkes figure who tried to fight the FBI. Future anonymous masks will be based on his face.

Guy Fawkes was seen as a villain back then and it took a comic book to change that image. Same with Spartacus, who army was only interested in raping and looting and yet Hollywood portrayed him as a noble figure looking for freedom.
 
Maybe a 1000 years from now or 500 at best, if this country survives that long. Timothy McVeigh will seen as some sort of Guy Fawkes figure who tried to fight the FBI. Future anonymous masks will be based on his face.

Guy Fawkes was seen as a villain back then and it took a comic book to change that image. Same with Spartacus, who army was only interested in raping and looting and yet Hollywood portrayed him as a noble figure looking for freedom.
This country will crumble within 2 generations, but that's a discussion for another time.
 
And if anything has come out of the Trump years, lets hope it is that at the end of the day, every Jury of Americans empaneled for the next century will by default assume the FBI is lying to them. If you ever find yourself on the jury and the evidence comes down to "the FBI says the dude did it," assume the FBI framed the dude.

Sadly, worship of federal agencies seems to be becoming highly partisan.

Don't get accused by the FBI of anything in a blue state, basically.
 
Would that be more proof that Donald Trump is an opportunistic con man? He wants yes men around him. Mitch should've been the first to go.

And what would Trump do about this? Nothing. If anything, it'll give him leeway to monitor criticism against him. He boasts about "protecting freedom" and censorship but having the government monitor Internet usage is just as dangerous as Google doing that.

This is why net neutrality is very important to defend. If you give them an inch, they would certainly go a mile. The internet is one of the last beacons of free, open information and speech in the modern world. It's bad enough that corporations and mobs like to inconsistently regulate what people say or watch (which many right wingers like to mention). But are oblivious for when the government would want to do it because Republicans are doing it.

Fucking baby boomer government trying to control something they don't even understand.

And yes, @The Pink Panther, I said baby boomer again. If they want to make laws like this, they should follow them as well.

I'd love to see what they do behind closed doors.
Well...

It's not the government you should blame. You see, I know a certain group of people. Individuals from the one country they haven't gotten kicked out of yet. They occasionally wear their little circle hats that somehow fit on their head, walk with top hats as big as Lincoln, and they have clown-sized shoes and they wear black suits. What could it possibly be, goy?

Also, libertarians btfo'd
 
Last edited:
Well...

It's not the government you should blame. You see, I know a certain group of people. Individuals from the one country they haven't gotten kicked out of yet. They wear their little circle hats that somehow fit on their head, walk with top hats as big as Lincoln, and they have clown-sized shoes and they wear black suits. What could it possibly be, goy?
Can you please spare me when you become a black israelite?
 
Will i be arrested for looking at jojo memes?

No. You'll be arrested for criticizing the state or for disputing a media narrative or dating the police chief's daughter without his consent... But the JoJo memes will be what they retroactively use to do it when they use this to look through your history.

Make Everyone Guilty. Selectively Enforce. <-- This has always been the way.
 
Can you please spare me when you become a black israelite?
You don't need to be one of those larping medieval dipshits to make a difference.

qhse7vkex8o21.jpg
 
When it comes to the Senate, there are no Term Limits, and by design it was meant to be the forum of the aristocracy and the socially powerful to the total detriment of the plebes. This is not a bug. Its a design feature. What the Senate has done has been in total accordance to its function and precisely as designed by the founders of the American Republic.
The problem is that now Senators are directly elected by the voters; That was the purpose for the House in the first place.
Voters elected people in the House for their interests; State Legislatures voted for Senators for the interests of the states.

But the obsession with expanding suffrage to everything bricked that system.
 
The problem is that now Senators are directly elected by the voters; That was the purpose for the House in the first place.
Voters elected people in the House for their interests; State Legislatures voted for Senators for the interests of the states.

But the obsession with expanding suffrage to everything bricked that system.
Switching it back to state legislatures would probably make state elections more important than they are now.
 
Back