US Senate Votes to Allow FBI to Look at Your Web Browsing History Without a Warrant - “Stop having too much fun on the Internet”, the US government proclaims

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...t-your-web-browsing-history-without-a-warrant (a)

The US Senate has voted to give law enforcement agencies access to web browsing data without a warrant, dramatically expanding the government’s surveillance powers in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The power grab was led by Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell as part of a reauthorization of the Patriot Act, which gives federal agencies broad domestic surveillance powers. Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Steve Daines (R-MT) attempted to remove the expanded powers from the bill with a bipartisan amendment.

But in a shock upset, the privacy-preserving amendment fell short by a single vote after several senators who would have voted “Yes” failed to show up to the session, including Bernie Sanders. 9 Democratic senators also voted “No,” causing the amendment to fall short of the 60-vote threshold it needed to pass.

“The Patriot Act should be repealed in its entirety, set on fire and buried in the ground,” Evan Greer, the deputy director of Fight For The Future, told Motherboard. “It’s one of the worst laws passed in the last century, and there is zero evidence that the mass surveillance programs it enables have ever saved a single human life.”

The vote comes at a time when internet usage has skyrocketed, with tens of millions of Americans quarantined at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Privacy advocates have warned for over a decade that allowing warrantless access to web search queries and browsing history allows law enforcement to easily crack down on activists, labor organizers, or anyone else the government deems a threat.

“Today the Senate made clear that the purpose of the PATRIOT Act is to spy on Americans, no warrants or due process necessary,” Dayton Young, director of product at Fight For the Future, told Motherboard. “Any lawmaker who votes to reauthorize the PATRIOT Act is voting against our constitutionally-protected freedoms, and there’s nothing patriotic about that.”

- End of Article -
This is some of the worst news I've heard today. Absolutely no one wants a fed to look through their computer, not a single person. Such a fucking mess.
 
That's not an amendment.
According to the article you linked,
The Senate is expected to vote Wednesday to renew the 2001 Patriot Act, and Mitch McConnell is pushing an amendment to the law that would expand the FBI's surveillance powers.

An amendment proposed by McConnell would, for the first time ever, let the FBI collect records on Americans' web-browsing and search histories without a warrant.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: The Last Stand
Lol, I was actually getting my hopes up to vote Repubs, but the fact that they let this gay shit get through and it's probably going to be a bill signed, fuck 'em all.
To be frank, I was for more Republican support because many urban communities were dominated by the same party for decades and changed nothing at all. If the first option doesn't work, try the next.

Based on what you're saying and this current situation, I feel even if I DID get my wish, the problems that plagued those communities were stay the same or get worse depending on who gets in.

There's no integrity in politics. You better be ready to rip off and snake your way though any bill or legislation you want to pass.


Voting is for normies. Take the black pill, don't vote at all, sit out and laugh at the normies that do vote and laugh at the side that loses and seethes.
That was stupid, but you made me laugh.

African Americans and women fought for the right to vote in this country. I'm sure they'd be turning over their graves by our absence on the voting ballot.
 
According to the article you linked,

Yeah, it looks like they were lying. See here:


Only two amendments were considered, and neither had McConnell's name on it.

What seems to have happened is that the Daily Beast falsely characterized McConnell wanting the House/Jerry Nadler version of the bill passing as-is, without amendments, as itself an amendment. This got parroted by Business Insider, which has a similar slant.
 
Come at me feds, I always put a little piece of tape on my webcam and if they somehow manage to bypass that I always wear a disguise. :jaceknife:


unnamed.jpg
 
Last edited:
FFS, they can already do this. They've been able to do this for DECADES.
SMITH v. MARYLAND 1979!!
The "third party doctrine" holds that individuals have a reduced expectation of privacy when it relates to information knowingly shared with a third party, including cell phone companies. Therefore, such information is not protected by the Fourth Amendment and police don't need a warrant to legally access it.
 
And how exactly do they plan to get access to my browsing history without a warrant? I use a VPN and regularly delete my internet history. How are they going to get someone's browsing history from someone like me?

Also this is blatantly unconstitutional, a clear violation of the 4th amendment; how this was even considered, let alone by both parties is baffling.
Tell me again how Donald Trump and the Republican Party is better than any politician.

The Democratic Party will sell your soul for virtue points. The Republican Party will sell your soul for money.

What do they all have in common? Ignorant, out of touch, biased, baby boomers with such rabid support.
These people are too fucking old and have been in government far too long, we need term limits for members of congress.
 
RIP to the poor FBI agent who decides to look through my bookmarks and finds all the shit I've saved for the Furry Art Freakshow thread. None of it is actually illegal as far as I'm aware, but it's definitely a crime against human decency.

Edit: "They'll only use it to snoop on people who are already being investigated" is damn optimistic. If your name pops up in an interesting search they're going to file it regardless and just wait for you to slip up legally to introduce it in a "wow look at what we just found" sort of way. Feds are human and, much like the rest of us, are going to look into interesting personalities on the side for something to do in their downtime.
 
Last edited:
You can have an R or a D, and still, be the big gay. D's are probably worse due to their overrepresentation of propaganda, but that doesn't mean anything for R's, who have no balls of their own.

When it comes to the government and politics I always take the "Lewis Black" approach and just think both sides are fucking worthless by default.
 
Yeah, it looks like they were lying. See here:


Only two amendments were considered, and neither had McConnell's name on it.

What seems to have happened is that the Daily Beast falsely characterized McConnell wanting the House/Jerry Nadler version of the bill passing as-is, without amendments, as itself an amendment. This got parroted by Business Insider, which has a similar slant.
X Prime has a link to the entire thing here...

This is sensationalistic fake news.

Here's the situation:

1. Congress addresses renewal of FREEDOM Act, put forward by Nadler (D)
2. House Rules Committee offers amendment, possibly amending language in some legalese concern, more likely an in House procedural amendment (since it references HR 891) but text is not available. Amendment not voted on apparently.
3. House member Buck (R) introduces snarky amendment to rename bill, amnedment fails 35 - 376
4. In Senate, Wyden (D) with 13 co-sponsors (5 are R) introduces amendment to remove EXISTING ability to access browser history, fails 59-37.
  • 10 D senators voted against amendment (notable names: Feinstein, Manchin)
  • 27 R senators voted against amendment (notable names: McConnell, Graham, Rubio, Collins, Romney)
  • 33 D senators voted for amendment (too many notable names, pretty much everyone who is a big name in D senate members)
  • 24 R senators voted for amendment (notable names: Cruz, Grassley, Lee, McSally)
  • 2 I senators voted for amendment
  • 4 senators didn't vote (notable names: Sanders)
5. Vote fails by one vote, with almost as many R voting for amendment as against.
6. Lee (R) introduces another amendment with 22 co-sponsors from across spectrum. Unavailable text, but summary: "To improve the amicus provisions and require the disclosure of relevant information." This passes 77-19

The entire news article was to cast shade on the republican party as a gayop to get people to look at them badly.

Edit: The amendment related to web browsing has the summary: "To remove internet website browsing information and search history from scope of authority to access certain business records for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations."
 
Last edited:
My husband already called our senators to let them know he's pissed they voted against removing it. He's good at BTFO someone as politely as possible. It was all 'I'm wondering what you are going to do about the FBI abusing power to go after Flynn?' 'Mmhm, and in light of these revelations, what was your justification for renewing their ability to go through people's Internet history without a warrant?'

Just thought I'd share in case anyone else wanted to contact their guys about it.

Good for your husband, talking angrily to some minimum wage receptionist.

What part of politely did you not understand?
 
Last edited:
My husband already called our senators to let them know he's pissed they voted against removing it. He's good at BTFO someone as politely as possible. It was all 'I'm wondering what you are going to do about the FBI abusing power to go after Flynn?' 'Mmhm, and in light of these revelations, what was your justification for renewing their ability to go through people's Internet history without a warrant?'

Just thought I'd share in case anyone else wanted to contact their guys about it.
Good for your husband, talking angrily to some minimum wage receptionist.
 
Back