- Joined
- Sep 14, 2021
Thank you for the quoting and YES IT DOES BELONG HERE. It's time we acknowledged that sexual dimorphism and cartoon exaggeration is a thing. Even if the woman has a flat chest or has muscles, there's always something that will out her as biologically female. Even if the man is a twink with long hair, something will out him as a man. The people complaining just want everything to be androgynous twinkies then will complain "WHY DOES EVERYONE LOOK THE SAME?"I don't know if it belongs here, but I thought it was interesting regardless:
Remember those "How to draw books?" The ones that say "draw women with a thigh gap and long eyelashes and draw men with sharper angles than women" because "that is the right way" to them? The people whining about literal SEXUAL DIMORPHISM are like that. "No don't draw women looking like women the correct way is to draw them androgynous."
The problem is, just like with skinny twinks, the flabby designs SJWs like just don't suit a truly diverse, distinguishable cast. Of course, they'll all look the same. The soft artstyle these faggots like doesn't suit a diverse set of situations, either. You want the character to be in a rough environment full of fighting, conflict, and mean guys? The soft style is not going to convey that well.
Even worse, have you all noticed these androgynous looks only suited the youthful, younger characters best? Such as teens and those in their early 30s? After that, it's no longer cute once the characters reach old age.
Last edited: