I find the prospect of repossessing 14 Branchland unlikely. They would need to fall behind in mortgage payments for some time and not keep up. With social security from Chris and Barb coming in, as well as any unknown funds related to Bob's passing (does she get to collect his social security and/or pension, as is sometimes done), they should be able to keep up payments as long as spending does not spiral out of control. If Barb does not receive additional social security/pension due to Bob's demise, then that loss of income would necessitate a firmer grip on the purse strings, preventing the 31 year old manchild from blowing his money on as many frivolities as in previous years, which is likely the case with absence of the PS4 life upgrade. Foreclosing on a house can take a very long time. Once it is done, there also is the process of eviction, which can prolong it, especially if done by someone who is knowledgeable about the law and is trying to get more time.
I think another very real possibility to consider is state intervention due to the hoarding or adult protective services getting involved due to the unsafe, unclean environment Barb is forced to live in with her debilitating health problems. Bob feared the county getting involved due to the hoarding, as revealed dramatically in one of his rare appearances on one of Christian's videos. Now that Barb's health has declined and the fact the conditions in the house are so deplorable, that could be cause for adult protective services to get involved. IF they did, at this stage nothing would or could be done of a serious nature. Barb is still in control of her mental faculties and is not so far gone that they could force her into a nursing home. Nor could they charge Chris for elder abuse, as he is not the one that created the hoard. But one could argue that as the able-bodied, more competent adult in the household, he could partly be to blame for neglect, as he allows those conditions to persist. Barb is unable physically to clean it up, and if Chris is forcing his mother to subsist in those conditions, regardless of the fact she started it, that is an issue where he is at fault. That he is autistic is not as relevant, as he is a fully functional, competent adult (not an "adult child," as some would say), nor does it matter that he is not the owner of the house. He does have some kind of responsibility because Barb is in a compromised physical state, is elderly, and could arguably be said to have some mental health issues, as witnessed by the past hoarding. At most they would probably have adult protective care workers in there to evaluate the situation, write reports, try to correct the actions, and help Barb receive any care that she requires but may not be receiving. It is not likely that Chris at this time would be charged with anything, but if Barb's condition worsens and he does not do something to help, then that could be a possibility later on. As her health worsens and she becomes increasingly frail, she will in effect become not a prisoner of a hoard she created, but instead a hoard that Chris allows to exist out of neglect, an important distinction. Look at it from the perspective of what is going to happen 10 years from now, if Barb still lives and is trapped inside that filth because Chris can't be bothered to clean it up. The guilt in that case is rather more plain to see than it may perhaps be now. So, in summary, I think the possibility of the county or state getting involved due to the hoard or to future elder abuse/neglect is another issue.
I think another very real possibility to consider is state intervention due to the hoarding or adult protective services getting involved due to the unsafe, unclean environment Barb is forced to live in with her debilitating health problems. Bob feared the county getting involved due to the hoarding, as revealed dramatically in one of his rare appearances on one of Christian's videos. Now that Barb's health has declined and the fact the conditions in the house are so deplorable, that could be cause for adult protective services to get involved. IF they did, at this stage nothing would or could be done of a serious nature. Barb is still in control of her mental faculties and is not so far gone that they could force her into a nursing home. Nor could they charge Chris for elder abuse, as he is not the one that created the hoard. But one could argue that as the able-bodied, more competent adult in the household, he could partly be to blame for neglect, as he allows those conditions to persist. Barb is unable physically to clean it up, and if Chris is forcing his mother to subsist in those conditions, regardless of the fact she started it, that is an issue where he is at fault. That he is autistic is not as relevant, as he is a fully functional, competent adult (not an "adult child," as some would say), nor does it matter that he is not the owner of the house. He does have some kind of responsibility because Barb is in a compromised physical state, is elderly, and could arguably be said to have some mental health issues, as witnessed by the past hoarding. At most they would probably have adult protective care workers in there to evaluate the situation, write reports, try to correct the actions, and help Barb receive any care that she requires but may not be receiving. It is not likely that Chris at this time would be charged with anything, but if Barb's condition worsens and he does not do something to help, then that could be a possibility later on. As her health worsens and she becomes increasingly frail, she will in effect become not a prisoner of a hoard she created, but instead a hoard that Chris allows to exist out of neglect, an important distinction. Look at it from the perspective of what is going to happen 10 years from now, if Barb still lives and is trapped inside that filth because Chris can't be bothered to clean it up. The guilt in that case is rather more plain to see than it may perhaps be now. So, in summary, I think the possibility of the county or state getting involved due to the hoard or to future elder abuse/neglect is another issue.