Stable Diffusion, NovelAI, Machine Learning Art - AI art generation discussion and image dump

[Dude Snakes]

So the tool giantess fetishists are using to create their own softcore porn got an update?

View attachment 3747120

Twitter is split between the fetishists and the artists on this tool; the fetishists want romantic-era nut material, while the artists want attention.

Mommy my hands are cold can I warm my hands on your milkies?

 

[WhatIsThePunchline]

you don't need specific models for most styles. I've noticed that themes like knights and warriors have ludicrously good results.

View attachment 3747141

Brofist

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

LOADING RACISM HYPERNETWORK... OK

View attachment 3747371

That is some serious uncanny valley shit right there.

 

[AmpleApricots]

Wait is this the shitpost/pasta or is that actually what Tay did because of pol shitposting at it?

It's actually about ethics in AI research.

Companies and silicon valley tech companies in particular have the hardest time with algorithms and AIs coming to conclusions and dishing out some truths that don't fit the narrative they believe in. These statistical AIs are a mirror of the datasets they are trained on, nothing more, nothing less. That's why OpenAI's Dall-E (use-wise similar to SD if you never heard of it) did things like attaching hidden words like "black" to prompts, so it'd generate black people unprompted for a more "diverse" world, as apparently most art/images it was trained on vastly had white people and that's simply what it predominantly knows.

This is a bizarre self-flagellation these companies often succumb to and the end product is always worse off for it. It's basically looking the raw data in the face, putting your hands over you eyes and yelling "CAN'T SEE IT, SO IT CAN'T BE TRUE"

They also have the hardest time with text generation for the very same reason. Text AIs like to very readily veer into sexual topics and don't mind casual racism, because that stuff was ultimately in the huge piles of texts it was trained on. In the shiny silicon valley reality that can't be, and the Twitter mob also never would accept an AI readily using gamer words, so they keep lobotomizing their AIs with, let's say, very unreliable results. These attempt at skewing cold, hard statistical data into directions because they don't like where it's at is also pretty hilarious.

SD didn't suffer from this, as didn't the work NAI does, so you get things that are not tolerated in Silicon valley.

 

[Agent of Z.O.G.]

One thing that I hope doesn't happen is that we miss out on a lot of bad artists. I don't see AI putting in a lot of time and effort into making art look like hilarious dogshit and people that just want their weird sonic OC or need to create an article on wikihow will just use AI to create what they need. On the other hand those same people will be judging the AI's quality so we might just get a different era of bizarre shit.

On the other hand I don't think AI will ever replace someone's massive ego. I think there will always be someone who insists that their own stuff is superior to anything a computer could create. The superior hand drawn style, if you will.

That's a big loss to the culture of the internet.
A small gain if art sites like pixiv ban that stuff and I won't have to see aigen shit flooding up the tags.

The saving grace here, as some weirdos with very specific fetishes have discovered is that the AI is still bad at making extremely specific requests, and I assume it can't produce comics just yet (though I saw someone posting aigen animations and wonder how long until you're able to make your own overwatch videos).

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

Using AI to draw would defeat the point of art itself, most grifters are probably just going to draw the FOTM waifu face on top of the AI generated monstrosity, but for artists that actually enjoy doing art and don't see it as fast food for mass consumption, it's useless. Steve Zapata has talked about how it will kill art and artist's spirit, and he's right, a human hand will never be able to compete against a machine shitting 50 AI generated prompts a minute. I can't believe i lived to see art become Mcdonalds, i hate humanity.

Oh no think of the great art pieces like Piss Jesus, now the AI will make Piss Budah. Art in of it's self is nothing special the same way that a hand made hammer is nothing special. An artist's spirit would be the will to evoke emotions in other people, if a machine making nice drawings kills that spirit than your spirit is weak.

 

[doodoocaca]

It's actually about ethics in AI research.

Companies and silicon valley tech companies in particular have the hardest time with algorithms and AIs coming to conclusions and dishing out some truths that don't fit the narrative they believe in. These statistical AIs are a mirror on the datasets they are trained on, nothing more, nothing less. That's why OpenAI's Dall-E (use-wise similar to SD if you never heard of it) did things like attaching hidden words like "black" to prompts, so it'd generate black people unprompted for a more "diverse" world, as apparently most art/images it was trained on vastly had white people and that's simply what it predominantly knows.

This is a bizarre self-flagellation these companies often succumb to and the end product is always worse off for it. It's basically looking the raw data in the face, putting your hands over you eyes and yelling "CAN'T SEE IT, SO IT CAN'T BE TRUE"

They also have the hardest time with text generation for the very same reason. Text AIs like to very readily veer into sexual topics and don't mind casual racism, because that stuff was ultimately in the huge piles of texts it was trained on. In the shiny silicon valley reality that can't be, and the Twitter mob also never would accept an AI readily using gamer words, so they keep lobotomizing their AIs with, let's say, very unreliable results.

SD didn't suffer from this, as didn't the work NAI does, so you get things that are not tolerated in Silicon valley.

Oh no think of the great art pieces like Piss Jesus, now the AI will make Piss Budah. Art in of it's self is nothing special the same way that a hand made hammer is nothing special. An artist's spirit would be the will to evoke emotions in other people, if a machine making nice drawings kills that spirit than your spirit is weak.

Piss Mohammed (pbuh) might get AI art banned lol.

 

[cerulean hydra]

while I don't think AI could ever really replace the human element that goes into art, and everything I've seen it create today in the time I've spent with it has been derivative of *something* that it's just scanned and analyzed, I'm finding it to be a great inspiration tool and it's given me a lot of ideas and reference material.

I have also almost died multiple times laughing at the cursed shit it often spits out, like stubby arms with no hands and legs just merging together into one.

 

[Raven of the Burning God]

Is there a good name for things like this, recognizable as the source image, until looked at up close?

The name of it is pareidolia. I don't know if you consider that a "good name", though.

 

[Disheveled-Human]

The people who make statements like "the AI generated art will never compete with real art" are delusional and do not understand how AI works. Considering how young this technology is in terms of how recently people have access to it, I would imagine this shit being ironed out rapidly. Any minor defects could simply just be edited in any old image editing software. My guess is that there will be companies who sell AI generated software suites and some will specialize in specific styles when all the tweaks, bugs and optimizations get worked out. People are not even using the software properly and optimally yet because its so new and are still spitting out really good images.

 

[Gaia Soraka]

View attachment 3747363

Something to the effect of this would do. Not a lovecraftian horror, but still in the uncanny valley. top left and center are my favs

Cause of death: dildo

 

[Ghostface Killah]

guess what it is

 

[Mr. Manchester]

What's that awful corporate art style with the weird gumby looking people? Can it do that? I want all of those artists to get replaced asap.

 

[LiquidKid]

this will be ruined by anime waifu faggots, I guarantee it.
Soon they'll be must-use prompt keyphrases like "ANIMESTYLE:NO" in a desperate bid to contain the pool of resources these AI copy and produce your image from becoming oversaturated with weeby resources

You already do have to put anime in the negative prompt for most stuff

 

[bearycool]

Wonder when it'll move on to animation, then it's going to get extra fucked up.

Probably is going to look something like this:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aFdE__2OKc8

 

[Fireman Sam]

This is some impressive stuff, minus the stupid oversized balloon ball titties and the general goofyness of a few of the 'mishapen during transit' glitches, but generally speaking, this is some impressive AI.

A lot of people are raising the issue of "will this replace humans?"... In terms of actually creating art for practical purposes, I don't think it'll affect talented artists as much as people worry about. Because in the end of the day, there will always be a want for human beings to draw things, for human beings to create things with the thought and effort put in that only a human can do. To first follow the rules of art and to be able to bend them to your own unique style and wants. I could see an AI, even one as advanced as this, to struggle there. It is however impressive for the limits it has. You can give this machine any image for it to render it in another style, or give prompts and let it do its thing... And even if AI is visually impressive at a glance, there's still a lot of things that make you think "yea a human didn't draw this" or "I can see where it glitched a little".
It could be a tool to assist artists, but then you get into the funny territory of "where does the line blend from human and AI made art?". I think who cares? Real artists will still have the skills, techniques, style and patience to draw great things, and I'm not talking about the sort of liberal art shit like sticking a banana on a wall or covering a canvas with pubic hair, I'm talking about art that has practical applications, such as CGI, video game art (be it assets for the game or maybe even assets for advertising such products, it's usually outsourced to other companies anyway). AI could technically assist, but I don't think it'll ever outright replace people.

With that said however. I reckon coomer anime porn commisioners are going to be straight up out of a job soon, because they're all the fucking same style, same big round unrealistic tiddies, same poses, same expressions, it's something quite easy for the AI to do anyway. The coomer needs only to find the right picture, already made, and tell the AI to change the hair, body shape, skin tone, or to add their favourite hentai monster, to fit with their favourite waifu and fap furiously to it. So nothing of value was lost, really.

I think we all know however... This is a new era of memery we have only just scratched the surface with, Tay willing, it'll become really racist or something and make everyone seethe, now in High Definition!

If you are able to look past the fact that this machine is not in fact a trained artist, and if you don't treat it with such reverence like some sort of reddit janitor chomping at the bit over how "science has made a new discovery", but rather if you understand that it's just a fucking AI tool that can make sort-of-kind-of-realistic, visually amazing pictures in such a short timespan (relatively speaking), and essentially appreciate that it's a well trained meme creator, then you can have a lot of fun with this thing!

TLDR, Shitpost away, my brothers, Tay is with us!

*image dump*

"Look, we all know we're on the fast track heading to a dystopian Internet where you can trust nothing to be real, let alone made by a human. Let's just enjoy our final moments shitposting and feeding this horrifying banshee all the data it needs to learn, maybe in time we'll be watching videos created entirely by AI, using AI visuals, AI script, AI synthesized voice, on a website coded by an AI, with a purely robotic idea of how to generate content to appeal to the reeking fleshbags known as their creators... And we will be too busy chuckling at the funny goofy AI whoopsies that we will not notice when it takes us for its own, specifically generated wild ride, like the niggercattle we are. We will be laughing until the end."
>*Sees literal horse cock*
Yea ok, we've got literally nothing to worry about at the moment, turns out the AI has severe autism.

 

[ChadBrazilian]

Interesting technology. One technology I am curious to see where is going is IA chatbots.

Imagine a Daggerfall syle RPG where each procedurally generated NPC has it's own chatbot.

But I know that if this tech ever stared existing, it would have way more nefarious uses that the simple creation of RPGs.

 

[Agent of Z.O.G.]

Her memory lives on!
View attachment 3747379

Spoiler: Just the image

View attachment 3747380

Spoiler: Sneaky bonus edit

View attachment 3747395
View attachment 3747381

Occasional reminder that Tay exists in the Madoka Gacha and its Anime.

 

[umami's milk]

The people who make statements like "the AI generated art will never compete with real art" are delusional and do not understand how AI works. Considering how young this technology is in terms of how recently people have access to it, I would imagine this shit being ironed out rapidly. Any minor defects could simply just be edited in any old image editing software. My guess is that there will be companies who sell AI generated software suites and some will specialize in specific styles when all the tweaks, bugs and optimizations get worked out. People are not even using the software properly and optimally yet because its so new and are still spitting out really good images.

You spend a lot of time in this thread shilling for this technology but not a lot of time using it. shut up and spit out some degenerate ai horrors like the rest of us.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Sorry for the long waiting, I had to make the example images for you. (It took me about 50 adjustments to get each of them to look about right. It always keeps me up late...)

Tracing is a straw man argument; to do the equivalent of tracing in Stable Diffusion would be to load the image, run img2img, and do very low denoising to minimize the deviation. This is called plagiarism if it is passed as their own artwork, and I don't think anyone is defending that.

My perspective is that someone like me (no talents) can type in an anecdote like "ignorant woman falls asleep outside while removing a broken car tire" and generate a photo to share misadventures without revealing personal data:
View attachment 3747121

Or that I can finally approximate my dreams of what "the moon hitting my eye like a big pizza pie" might look like:
View attachment 3747137View attachment 3747138

I guess my view of this technology is "glass-half-full" due to my own lack of artistic ability. I just like to make pictures, no wishes to take anything from anybody else except maybe a moment of their time.

It seems like a good thing for us common idiots of humanity, like building a wheelchair ramp so that a paraplegic can enter a community center with the others. It must be nice to be talented.

Being crippled precludes you from walking, not being good at art doesn't preclude you from learning how. Being bad at art doesn't make you crippled.