- Joined
- Apr 19, 2021
David Cope. You can still find the EMI source code if you look for it. It's terrifyingly simple for its capability.I remember over 10 years ago something of a similar controversy when a programmer created an AI into which he fed composers works and had them generate new pieces, and no one could tell the difference. It didn't revolutionize instrumental works, and as far as I can tell, no one even uses that stuff for creative prompts. No one is making an AI Bach for new Baroque pieces, even though programming-wise it would be trivially easy, as the rule sets for that sort of music are very narrow.
Emily Howell has released several albums of instrumental music, but as far as I know Recombinant hasn't released the source for her.
EMI is over 30 years old and Emily Howell is about 15.
David Cope cope.You see, what the AI produced could be recognized to it's era and often to it's inputted composer, but what was also interesting was how forgettable everything it generated was.
Please go look up who Recombinant has various agreements with and understand that roughly E V E R Y T H I N G available for you to consoom with your earballs has one of Emily Howell's children involved.
The criticism is always so inarticulate. You know that AI generated art simply has to lack that je ne sais quoi, so it's uh... uncanny. Soulless. Forgettable. Not at all like uncanny soulless and forgettable real art.Looking at this AI art, I get the same feeling in many respects (ironic, since my forum Avatar is AI art). What we remember best is how it currently fails, and no one wants to look at this stuff other than to meme, shitpost, produce visual filler material, or, what it will likely end up doing the most, producing shit for coomers to bust a nut.