The Disorderlies But It's The TOS Gang isn't very good Star Trek, even if it's a nice 80s Fish Out Of Water comedy with Trek jokes
30 seconds into the episode (I skipped the previously on segment as I don't care) and has the be the most aggressively anti-Trek thing I've ever seen.
I haven’t watched the show in a while, but weren’t they something like 900 years in the future relative to the rest of Star Trek at this point? They’ve basically reset the universe and could have told any story they want and still the best they can come up with is reusing plot points from a 30 year old episode?
You mean you don't like Super Michael Burnham doing something on the outside of a ship at warp, then hard cut to faggots at a cocktail party?
Yet again, it turns out that I picked the wrong username.
Hindsight is 20/20
Let me guess...Michael Burnham ends up being the Alpha Progenitor by the end of the season, thus not only saving all life in the galaxy but being responsible for its creation as well.
I've tried watching them. It's whatculture though, it's the normiest of norm websites.
IV came out before TNG started. At that point like half of the Star Trek episodes involved going back in time or going down to planets that resembled some era of 20th century earth and having a little adventure where they pretend not to be space men. Fair point that it doesn't resemble what came after, and liking it or not is entirely subjective, but I'd argue The Voyage Home was exactly what Star Trek had been up to that point.
He found a way
>Red Directive
I just saw Nitpicking Nerd's review. There's a reason why no other Trek show went back to that episode. It was a bad idea to try to rationaly explain the Star Trek galaxy.
It actually fit Roddenberry's idea that people would be "over" religion by then, until DS9 came along and inserted it squarely in the centre of the show.
Too bad Roddenberry's Idea was only in a few seasons of TNG
I didn't mind the way it was implemented in DS9. At least it was different
