- Joined
- Nov 10, 2021
Might not be popular, but I think its absolutely correct. Although I would argue its not some high watermark almost 8 years later. At a games core if its broken and boring, no amount of polish will change the core.Not a popular take but you could see a glimpse of this sterile blandness in Fallout 4 vs. F3 and NV. Every gametard I knew was disapointed by F4 at launch but today its some high watermark almost 8 years later.
No Man's Sky is infinitely better today than at launch, but moment to moment, the core gameplay elements of NMS still feel like they did back then.
Same with Cyberpunk 2077, Skyrim, or any game really. Its why Early Access in my opinion is such a bad idea for a lot of different titles. Sure you might have "Finished" the game five years later, but during the first year of your early access if I felt like I achieved some mechanical mastery over the game, revisiting it just feels like me redoing a system I'm probably already bored with for a lot longer.
It is why in my opinion, there is no real fixing Starfield. You can add more things to do in the game, but you cannot redo the core of how you do it.