Stinkditch Meta Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
+1, I agree. Btw, I saw this meme on the Patriot Post who says it all.

And sorry if that clip might not fit that thread but it was worth to share. It talk about the spectacular collapse of the trans movement and I think then Lucas and LFJ will dislike that video.
Thought her video was good and put in a few historical bits on where the pronoun madness came from. Haven’t watched a video of hers in a while but happy she’s still at it against the nonsense.
 

A magical talking vagina helps her trans woman best friend travel back in time in order to acquire a uterus - altering the entire multiverse in the process. Coming March 8th. Follow us on Instagram: / intothemenstrualverse Starring Emma Jacqueline, Julia Rothstein, Scott Pincus, Jennifer Hsu. #stopmotion #claymation #sparker #animation #independentfilm
Wow I actually remember this guy's deranged story from a couple of years ago. He made this short (which is what his film is now based on). The troongina makes female anatomy sound like cool fun accessories you can buy, then threatens violence against the woman as soon as she starts talking about her body and what women actually have to deal with.


And here is what he looks like

1668951290709.png
 
International Women's Day is tomorrow. Will we get another sillypoo banger?
 
Every community I'd have remote interest in, they'd infest. They'd push their filth, their disease. You could never argue against anything they had to say, like a rat they'd bounce back, constantly moving goals. They're a protected class and any criticism is "hatred" or a "*phobia".

Gradually, I began to hate them.
 
Since I'm seeing more and more examples of normalizing the sexualization of children, I was curious about finding examples of language trying to loosen the boundaries between adult and kid.

Interestingly, today my homepage on YouTube had a video of a young girl ranting like an "adult." I put together a script to scrape comments and scan for specific keywords or phrases. The script filters them by phrases that promote the child as more mature or intelligent than a child and whatnot. I want to compare to similar videos released prior to the spread of LLMs.

It's super rough right now, but I ran it on a 6-year-old video with a similar theme. The new video had like 2-3x the same phrases across the board as the older one. Too early to tell if that means anything, of course.

Shit like this:

"what a beautiful little adult in a child’s body, but very switched on"
"thats and adult child!"
"she's hilarious. more intelligent conversation than adults."
"how adorable is she!!?! so mature beyond her years"
"that child is super smart, gifted. i've heard less intelligent rants from folk 3 times her age. god bless her, i hope she gets the guidance she needs and the schooling that will develop her natural talent. we need more like her. x"
"i can't believe the level of maturity in this tiny person."
"i'm 31 and wanting this child to be my best friend because she exudes the maturity that is becoming increasingly difficult to find in people my age. not lewd, not crude. sassy, reasonable, and capable!"
"5 with the maturity of a 55 yr old dinner lady,, amazing!"

Admittedly, some of these might be innocent on their own, but if we can update the keyword selection, prune the data, and turn the scraping onto enough videos, I'm sure we could notice trends that weren't there before LLM's if something's really up. I doubt people would have wildly different comments a few years back if these were truly organic.

I think finding evidence of mass manipulation to shift public opinion could be a cool thread. Plenty of other related keywords, too. I expect to see more promotion of the virtuous pedophile and how we need to give them a chance to break their stigma. Is there anything like this on the Farms already?
 
Last edited:
PL but I was one such child. I was well-spoken beyond what people would expect from kids. Knew factoids about things because I liked reading a lot. But it's an illusion. I was still very much a kid, still immature and unwise to the world. There is no such thing as being mature and wise beyond your years.

Anyone who doesn't treat a child as a child regardless of how that child comes across is someone to keep a very close, beady eye on.
 
I'm not sure what to do with my therapist friend. Every time we get into politics talk she says something like "oh I have so many clients who are in vulnerable groups" and I know she means troons. Teen troons. I'm no doctor, but I've read enough on this site and seen enough in real life to know these people are mentally ill and encouraging their delusions is like telling an anorexic that she's right to think she's fat. I want to just tell her I think those kids need help, just not the xeno-hormonal kind.
On the other hand, I have another friend who works in a literal mental hospital and says it's jam-packed with teens who think they're the opposite sex and anyone who doesn't see this as a social contagion is out of their mind. I'd love to get the two of them in a room together.
 
School district in Illinois orders girls to get undressed in front of boy

This has it all, including handmaidens invoking the spectre of 'genital checks', pronoun demanders, and one accusation that objection was based on the 'white supremacy' of the cishet husbands of the mothers who object.

How can there be any hope? Every speaker, except for one, had gathered to speak in favour of the school's policy of shaming girls who did not want to dress in front of a boy.

Illinois public school administrators tried to force a 13-year-old girl to change clothes in front of a biological male, in accordance with the district’s “inclusive” bathroom policy that allows transgender students to use whichever locker room corresponds with their chosen gender, the mother of the girl said at a Deerfield School District 109 School Board meeting on Thursday evening.

When Nicole Georgas’s 13-year-old daughter came home from Shepard Middle School on February 5, she was frightened and upset: A boy had been in the girl’s bathroom.

Georgas’s daughter was told by Deerfield administrators that because the male student identified as a female, he could use the girl’s locker room and bathroom, Georgas said. Although Georgas expressed to the school that the district was “in clear violation” of President Donald Trump’s recent executive order that restricts males from participating in female sports and using female changing rooms, her daughter’s teachers and principal reiterated that under direction from the district’s legal counsel, the male student could use whichever bathroom corresponded to his chosen gender.

Then, Georgas said, “the situation went from bad to worse.”

“A few days later, the male student was present in the girls locker room. Feeling violated, the girls made the choice to not change into their PE clothes with the biological male student present,” Georgas said at the meeting.

Administrators then supervised the locker room to ensure that all girls were changing into their physical education clothes without protest, Georgas claimed. District 109 Assistant Superintendent for Student Services Joanna Ford, Assistant Principal Cathy Van Treese, and Director for Student Services Ginger Logemann tried to force the girls to change in front of the male student, Georgas said;
when contacted, the district and administrators did not respond to National Review‘s requests for comment.

“The girls just want their privacy and they want their locker room back,” she said. “There are gender neutral options. This is my daughter’s story, and the story of many other young girls who have been forced at the difficult age to do something they know and most adults know is wrong.”

According to Georgas, administrators offered to move her daughter to a different PE unit.

Georgas’s school board testimony was booed on Thursday evening by a large audience of transgender activists who spoke in support of the district’s bathroom policy.

Charlie Friedman, a transgender person and parent of a transgender middle schooler, lauded the Illinois gender-inclusive bathroom policy that “protects trans, non-binary, and gender non-conforming students from the type of bullying that this parent represents,” Charlie said, pointing to Georgas. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker has loudly supported gender inclusive bathroom laws in the state.

“The discomfort or privacy concerns of other students, teachers, or parents are not valid reasons to deny or limit the full and equal use of those facilities based on a student’s gender related identity,” Charlie added. “Instead any student, teacher or other individuals seeking more privacy should be accommodated by providing that individual with a more private option.”

Charlie, the director of operations for Trans Up Front, a non-profit advocacy organization, promised to “dig in to contact our coalition” to pressure the school board to enforce the bathroom policy.

A host of other activists spoke as well. One mother of a transgender student suggested that the board implement more education on transgenderism in schools and said, “A lot of transgender people pass. You wouldn’t know that they’re transgender. And so, what do you want to do? Like, have genital checks of people? Talk about privacy and invasion of privacy! That is a logistical hurdle that you would not want to even try to accomplish.”

Georgas has filed a civil rights complaint with the Department of Justice.

Deerfield is “committed to inclusive practices that ensure equitable outcomes across educational environments for all students,” the district says on its website, and places priority on “identity development and equity best practices,” and ensuring “inclusion of diverse populations and perspectives.”

In February, after Trump began to issue a flurry of executive guidance scaling back so-called inclusive gender policies, the district’s superintendent Michael Simeck said that “District 109 is committed to providing a safe, inclusive, and high-quality education for all students.”

Parents across the country have protested transgender bathroom policies, including in Virginia, where a registered male sex offender was allowed to gain access to a public school pool’s female locker room, because he identified himself as female. Jen McDougal, a mother of a nine-year-old girl who was exposed to the man’s penis after swim practice, spoke with National Review in February about the trans bathroom policy that allowed a sex offender to lurk around children

“It’s an abuse of women’s right to feel safe in public spaces,” McDougal said. “I understand there are a lot of people who say you can’t take away a person’s right to use a bathroom that they feel is appropriate for them. But this loophole is what created this situation for us. And he was allowed to enter that restroom, that facility, because he identified as transgender.”

If you want to lose hope in humanity for an indefinite amount of time, the pro-trans speakers here attend the school board meeting. They look, sound, and argue exactly as you expect.

 
If you want to lose hope in humanity for an indefinite amount of time, the pro-trans speakers here attend the school board meeting. They look, sound, and argue exactly as you expect.
The woman who's quoted in the article starts speaking at 43:12, but I wanted to point out that when she finishes at 46:13, multiple people boo and someone shouts out "Why are you obsessed with children's genitals?" despite the fact that she never, not once, brought up genitals.
 
School district in Illinois orders girls to get undressed in front of boy

This has it all, including handmaidens invoking the spectre of 'genital checks', pronoun demanders, and one accusation that objection was based on the 'white supremacy' of the cishet husbands of the mothers who object.

How can there be any hope? Every speaker, except for one, had gathered to speak in favour of the school's policy of shaming girls who did not want to dress in front of a boy.
relevant Anna Slatz tweet:
captiveaudience.png
boy troon needs girls to participate in his delusion to provide *validation*, if the girls were simply allowed to leave his trans identity would cease to exist
 
fingers crossed that this hasn't already been posted

fuckingstupidassirreversibledamage.jpg


some fucking mouthbreathing ape on Twitter decided the analyse the cover of the gender critical book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing our Daughters. Needless to say they haven't read it but what gets me most is the complete misinterpretation of the title. OP associates it with the idea that women who have had sex, or been raped, etc, are "damaged goods". Just because the word "damage" is in the fucking title.
 
fingers crossed that this hasn't already been posted

View attachment 7101207

some fucking mouthbreathing ape on Twitter decided the analyse the cover of the gender critical book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing our Daughters. Needless to say they haven't read it but what gets me most is the complete misinterpretation of the title. OP associates it with the idea that women who have had sex, or been raped, etc, are "damaged goods". Just because the word "damage" is in the fucking title.
They’re really telling on themselves with this analysis, especially with the “pulling down dress” line. It’s not a dress, it’s an older style of children’s undergarment that was essentially a tank top attached to shorts.
 
fingers crossed that this hasn't already been posted

View attachment 7101207

some fucking mouthbreathing ape on Twitter decided the analyse the cover of the gender critical book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing our Daughters. Needless to say they haven't read it but what gets me most is the complete misinterpretation of the title. OP associates it with the idea that women who have had sex, or been raped, etc, are "damaged goods". Just because the word "damage" is in the fucking title.
All the commentary about the little girl is bizarre because it's clearly in the style of paper dolls, if not an actual vintage paper doll (the cover was designed by John Caruso, but I can't find more of his work, and I'm not sure if he's the illustrator anyways). I thought the OP was a male troon because it's just so... obvious?

I'm sure that retard would've made the same arguments if they'd used any other paper doll too. See this?
Paper Doll - Toodles.jpg

Toodles here is clearly displaying anxiety with the way she's looking down and to the side, and her open legs and white-knuckle grip on her shorts is a clear indication that she's a victim of !CHILD MOLESTATION! which is why her gender dysphoria is fake, because conservatives think that trans men are trans because of childhood sexual abuse, when they're doing it to be their true selves. The dresses are meant to display how trans men defy gender roles and therefore can't really be men, and the baby dolls are there to remind everybody about how little girls are only meant to pump out babies. The blue jumper and swimsuit are placed at the bottom, beneath the feminine apparel, to show how AFABs being masculine and transitioning to male is a lowly thing compared to being an adorable breedable little girl, and the fact that it's a paper doll points to how conservatives want to buy and sell little girls for sex. What do you mean I'm being a creep? Projecting?! YOU put a skimpy little whore on the cover, YOU'RE the pedophile!
 
Last edited:
Back