- Joined
- Oct 1, 2014
Kinda off topic, but does that bitch play the ukulele? She seems like the type of asshole that would.
She does and she writes all the songs for the show.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kinda off topic, but does that bitch play the ukulele? She seems like the type of asshole that would.
SU critical gets asked why they spend their time sperging over a kids cartoon
View attachment 512320
I dunno. Yeah, they're cringey tards getting salty about a kids cartoon, but the fandom is so autistic and pants-shittingly dumb that bronies look good by comparison.
That and Rebecca Sugar always seems to come off as a pretentious cunt to me.
Kinda off topic, but does that bitch play the ukulele? She seems like the type of asshole that would.
Edit:
What a cunt.
How are they specialized eye candy? They have schnozes that would make a toucan jealous and their bodies are stick thin. It's like one of the least sexy designs they could've came up with.
this is a lot to take in.. pearls are literally made in the context of the show to be servants, eye-candy, etc. pearl literally says something like they 'stand around and look pretty'... good god
To us. Gems don't necessarily share our sense of aethetics.Which is odd as their designs aren't very appealing.
I think it's less how they look and more how Pearls are valued in reality; wealthy women wearing pearl necklaces/etc.Which is odd as their designs aren't very appealing.
Back in the day people extended on that even further. Gems are replaceable life draining creatures made to fit a role they are made for exclusively. Some gems are made just to be the "uwu" ones, and thinking of a whole species just made for that matter tells something worrying about the progressive creators of this show.Yeah, in the context of the show they are a status symbol. Out of all gems they're the ones talked about as being nothing more than property, which is borderline fucked up but...people who own them are the bad guys? SU Critical can analyze everything except the actual plot.
I'm not sure what's dumber: the fact that they call the pearls' posing being sexualized eye candy despite the fact they're clearly modeled after ballerinas, the fact that they don't grasp that the antagonists who are essentially gem royalty would have personal servants, or the fact that they fail to grasp that them having servants is supposed to seem creepy to emphasize that they're antagonists.