Tech you miss/ new tech trends you hate - ok boomers

Even though VWs are terrible and cheap, but even on a shitty car if someone manages to crash 4 gearboxes in under 60,000 miles then I'd be willing to suspect the problem doesn't lie entirely with the gearbox...
Dude drives like a granny, we always mocked him for that.

His previous car was a used honda his dad sold to him that was nearly 20yo, the gearbox was fine.
Used to have a toyota a few years ago. OK car but they're ass in ice and snow so I had to get rid of it. As soon as toyota's ABS computers detect ice they just go LMAO I GIVE UP YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN GL!

Even on the new ones. Went for a ride last winter in a friend's (at the time) brand new 2020 camry and we almost died when the ABS computer completely gave up and we slid into an intersection. I guess their programmers are too busy to work on that problem, they probably took that team and reassigned them to in-car tik tok integration or some other dumb shit nobody asked for.
Get some snow tires and/or buy a subaru or some other AWD car if you live in some frozen wasteland.
 
I bought a TV recently. There is literally only one button on the TV itself. Pressing it brings up this menu:
tvmenu.jpg

You're screwed if you ever lose the remote. And I used to complain about them hiding the buttons on TVs so you have to navigate by feel. I didn't realize that remote-less TV usage was going to get even worse than that. At least it isn't a smart TV.
 
Last edited:
I bought a TV recently. There is literally only one button on the TV itself. Pressing it brings up this menu:
View attachment 2817832
You're screwed if you ever lose the remote. And I used to complain about them hiding the buttons on TVs so you have to navigate by feel. I can turn off the light if I don't want to see the buttons. At least it isn't a smart TV.
There's going to be a modding scene for TVs as a necessity. Companies just plain don't give a shit about the usability of their menus on multiple devices, let alone the big screen they think should only be used to consume streaming media.
 
I bought a TV recently. There is literally only one button on the TV itself. Pressing it brings up this menu:
View attachment 2817832
You're screwed if you ever lose the remote. And I used to complain about them hiding the buttons on TVs so you have to navigate by feel. I can turn off the light if I don't want to see the buttons. At least it isn't a smart TV.
Speaking of buttons, it was a bit of a gamechanger when I got my first monitor that used a multi-direction button for selecting things instead of a row of 4 regular ones.
 
Speaking of buttons, it was a bit of a gamechanger when I got my first monitor that used a multi-direction button for selecting things instead of a row of 4 regular ones.
I'm a fan of the single nipple/joystick control for navigating OSDs. There are some RC transmitters like the TBS Crossfire that use a similar control and it's great.
 
Websites forcing you to log in or sign up to access content.

"Internet-of-Things" ISM band modules in every device from your fridge to your car to your toaster to your light switch - huge security risk

5G and nu-Cellular technology that solely exists for the purpose of multi-billion dollar Telecom companies to milk guberment subsidies. The whole "5G causes cancer / ebolaids / is mind control / whatever" pysop was designed to deliberately poison the well and cloud information surrounding what is essentially a massive grift by companies like AT&T. Also the security risks posed by our Chicom friends manufacturing all the equipment too. Even after the Huwaei import ban. This could not possibly go wrong. I love China and His Honorable Xi Jing Ping.
I believe the main reason for the 5G push is just the massive increase in tracking that having so many tinier nodes closer together, and closer to where devices will be connected will allow for INCREDIBLY easy triangulation even if you rip GPS out of every one of your devices. If a 5g cellular device is ever used you can bet all of the even more accurate data of its potential real world location is being saved on NSA mega servers somewhere.
 
The worst aspect about those smart fridges is knowing that the resources used to design it, engineers, marketers, manufacturers and even distributors, could all have been used to design a product that, I dunno, lasts longer than 6 years? But no, longer-lasting appliances cut into profit margins and we can't have that!

When I talked to some engineers at an appliance company they said they design for a life of 7-8 years. And if you could find some certain products of theirs from the 80s or earlier to buy it because they were basically bullet proof.
 
I believe the main reason for the 5G push is just the massive increase in tracking that having so many tinier nodes closer together, and closer to where devices will be connected will allow for INCREDIBLY easy triangulation even if you rip GPS out of every one of your devices. If a 5g cellular device is ever used you can bet all of the even more accurate data of its potential real world location is being saved on NSA mega servers somewhere.
GM is already pushing this. They have Onstar since the 2G days that would automatically detect if your car was in an accident and call 911. More recently they pushed the vehicle to vehicle (V2V) intercar networking thing that apparently shares information from one car's sensor's to another's like some sort of AWACS for cars and retarded drivers.

 
GM is already pushing this. They have Onstar since the 2G days that would automatically detect if your car was in an accident and call 911. More recently they pushed the vehicle to vehicle (V2V) intercar networking thing that apparently shares information from one car's sensor's to another's like some sort of AWACS for cars and retarded drivers.

Can you still rip this kind of shit out without needing to tear the entire car apart?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: AnotherPleb
Can you still rip this kind of shit out without needing to tear the entire car apart?
You might be able to on earlier versions of Onstar, but newer ones are directly linked with the ECU. There have been instances where stolen GM cars have been remotely disabled via Onstar, so I'd imagine the effort to remove it is not trivial.
 
Schools are now dependent on online learning. Not every course is meant to be taken remotely for a number of reasons. Moreover, it's creating more of a dependency on technology which can affect social and basic skills. Are we actually learning anything? If so, why spend thousands of dollars to just be broadcasted a lecture?
 
I hate that "don't reinvent the wheel" has been taken to it's (il)logical conclusion for programmers. One article I've read was about a javascript npm package called is_promise and how it broke for a few hours. This thing at the time of this post gets 8 million weekly downloads and the whole package is just one function with ONE(1) line of code, and it broke because something completely unrelated to said line of code. I like 3rd party libraries, they make my life easier, but shit like this is surreal.
 
I bought a TV recently. There is literally only one button on the TV itself. Pressing it brings up this menu:
View attachment 2817832
You're screwed if you ever lose the remote. And I used to complain about them hiding the buttons on TVs so you have to navigate by feel. I didn't realize that remote-less TV usage was going to get even worse than that. At least it isn't a smart TV.
This shit's always been a problem if you ask me. I've had to buy replacement remotes for two different older CRT TVs. They had face buttons, but they lacked the navigation options to do what I want (which was to play older video games). The remote should ideally be for convenience, but it seems to me that hasn't been the case for 20+ years.

Weirdly, eBay's got damn near every remote ever made and for dirt cheap too. All you need to do is find your TV model, find the remote that corresponds to it, and you can easily find it for $5. I've done this twice.
 
This shit's always been a problem if you ask me. I've had to buy replacement remotes for two different older CRT TVs. They had face buttons, but they lacked the navigation options to do what I want (which was to play older video games). The remote should ideally be for convenience, but it seems to me that hasn't been the case for 20+ years.

Weirdly, eBay's got damn near every remote ever made and for dirt cheap too. All you need to do is find your TV model, find the remote that corresponds to it, and you can easily find it for $5. I've done this twice.
Considering how popular universal remotes were in that era, maybe there's a universal remote product you can program yourself? Just guessing, but I remember using them. Thanks for the ebay tip, will keep that in mind.
 
Considering how popular universal remotes were in that era, maybe there's a universal remote product you can program yourself? Just guessing, but I remember using them. Thanks for the ebay tip, will keep that in mind.
There was a manufacturer(Logitech?) of universal remotes that had a large online database of remotes and the specific IR signals they used.
 
There was a manufacturer(Logitech?) of universal remotes that had a large online database of remotes and the specific IR signals they used.
The Logitech Harmony series of universal remotes I believe. They worked with almost everything. Some android phones and tablets also came with an IR blaster you could use as a remote, which was pretty cool.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Smaug's Smokey Hole
I bought a TV recently. There is literally only one button on the TV itself. Pressing it brings up this menu:
View attachment 2817832
You're screwed if you ever lose the remote. And I used to complain about them hiding the buttons on TVs so you have to navigate by feel. I didn't realize that remote-less TV usage was going to get even worse than that. At least it isn't a smart TV.
Speaking of TVs it really pisses me off that modern TVs sold in the UK and Europe somehow manage to come with a composite input but not a SCART input.

There's also the thing with 50Hz mode still not being an option on quite a few smartphone cameras, purely because every fucking website online just re-encodes 25FPS to 29.97FPS jankily, and of course three quarters of the planet should just deal with flickery lighting shite in their pictures and videos.
 
Back