The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

[NoTimeToLose]

People that larp as the handmaiden stuff secretly want to get tied up and to be held down by republican man Cletus' wife while he thrusts his heated, veiny, and throbbing MAGA cock deep into their womanhood.

It's like whenever AOC goes schizo about conservatives and her Pocahontas pussy

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

People that larp as the handmaiden stuff secretly want to get tied up and to be held down by republican man Cletus' wife while he thrusts his heated, veiny, and throbbing MAGA cock deep into their womanhood.

It's like whenever AOC goes schizo about conservatives and her Pocahontas pussy

Man: Has opinion on something
The retort: I have a pussy and I won’t fuck you, what now incel?

 

[Muh Vagina]

That's incorrect.

A woman can get an abortion at any stage of pregnancy, for any reason in the following states/territories:

Alaska
Colorado
New Jersey
New Mexico
Oregon
Puerto Rico
Vermont
Virginia
Washington D.C.

Can you explain why you think elective abortions beyond the stage of viability should be allowed?

Again, you're an uneducated retard. All of those states specifically state that those abortions are performed when the fetus is no longer viable. Nobody is choosing to abort in the third trimester for shits and giggles. You incels just keep proving that you don't know jack shit about the female body.

 

[JambledUpWords]

you don't know jack shit about the female body.

How do we know you’re a woman?

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

How do we know you’re a woman?

Can you define “woman”?

 

[JambledUpWords]

Can you define “woman”?

Something that @Muh Vagina is not

 

[Unarmed Gunman]

All of those states specifically state that those abortions are performed when the fetus is no longer viable.

So now you're just making shit up? el oh el

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

Something that @Muh Vagina is not

That’s because there’s no women on the Internet.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

I should had probably posted this one under Deviantart horrors but even that place isn't spared from the abortion debate from the random comments I saw by luck, well if we could call this luck. https://archive.ph/L0RKH (try https://ghostarchive.org/archive/0Qm0p if Archive.today is slow)

And we can count on Jessica Alba to do a big oopsie about abortion thinking then France is more open than America and she got a Pikachu surprised face when she learned then France is more restrictive.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/jess...ance-over-abortion-theres-one-glaring-problem ( https://ghostarchive.org/archive/rwk59 )

...“You have croissants AND Women’s Rights? Damn, take me back,” Biel posted to her Instagram on Friday, captioning a photo of her and her husband, musician and actor Justin Timberlake, standing in front of the Eiffel Tower in Paris, France.

“Have you looked up the abortion laws in France, or….?” one person commented on the post. Another wrote, “Sooo France has abortion up to 14 weeks…. You cool with that????”

Indeed, France has stronger restrictions on abortion than America....

 

[Muh Vagina]

How do we know you’re a woman?

Something that @Muh Vagina is not

What would I have to gain by pretending to be a woman on a forum filled with incels?

So now you're just making shit up? el oh el

No. Maybe stop reading the Daily Wire?

You have to be super uninformed about the female body if you believe that women would actually abort a viable fetus at nine months. And at that point, it's an induction of labor, not an "abortion" per se.

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

Can you define “woman”?

Better yet Girl

Guy
In
Real
Life

 

[Unarmed Gunman]

You have to be super uninformed about the female body if you believe that women would actually abort a viable fetus at nine months. And at that point, it's an induction of labor, not an "abortion" per se.

Uh.....women kill their own kids after their born too, so lets not pretend it never happens. If a woman can kill her toddler she can abort at 38 weeks, stop pretending otherwise.

And nobody is arguing it is the norm, the question is why would you be against regulations preventing elective abortions from ever occurring past the stage of viability? You won't touch that question for some strange reason.

 

[Adolphin]

Look, I know that religious and conservative people do not like abortions, but it is simple. Tell me, what kinds of individuals are going to have an abortion? We have niggers that fuck like chimps, crackheads, potheads, drug addicts of all kinds, single moms, women with holes more worn than NASCAR tyres, unstable households, fetuses with uncurable hereditary diseases, alcoholic moms, stupid teenagers, people with untreated STDs, and various other malignant groups. Most of those people now will be unable to have abortions in several states, which means that they will give birth to children with various hereditary and fetal diseases. Worse, those children will grow up in shitty environments, leading to epigenetic damage, thus long-term dysgenics. No individual that believes in some natural morals will persistently engage in the behaviours described above or even have children in those environments. Unwillingly, abortions have become the greatest eugenics tool in our society. Abolishing them has been a grave mistake. Personally, I would even boost their promotion, especially for the Third Word (which is fortunately seeing massive decreases in fertility in the last years). Promoting abortions to the extreme means that we will indirectly solve overpopulation, cull out the worst, and allow only those who truly care about their future live on. Of course, governments will continue to be shitty, but please think about all this.

Also, I do not give a damn about women's rights.

 

[Skitarii]

Look, I know that religious and conservative people do not like abortions, but it is simple. Tell me, what kinds of individuals are going to have an abortion? We have niggers that fuck like chimps, crackheads, potheads, drug addicts of all kinds, single moms, women with holes more worn than NASCAR tyres, unstable households, fetuses with uncurable hereditary diseases, alcoholic moms, stupid teenagers, people with untreated STDs, and various other malignant groups. Most of those people now will be unable to have abortions in several states, which means that they will give birth to children with various hereditary and fetal diseases. Worse, those children will grow up in shitty environments, leading to epigenetic damage, thus long-term dysgenics. No individual that believes in some natural morals will persistently engage in the behaviours described above or even have children in those environments. Unwillingly, abortions have become the greatest eugenics tool in our society. Abolishing them has been a grave mistake. Personally, I would even boost their promotion, especially for the Third Word (which is fortunately seeing massive decreases in fertility in the last years). Promoting abortions to the extreme means that we will indirectly solve overpopulation, cull out the worst, and allow only those who truly care about their future live on. Of course, governments will continue to be shitty, but please think about all this.

Also, I do not give a damn about women's rights.

Too bad nazi faggot

 

[Ghjkl63]

Look, I know that religious and conservative people do not like abortions, but it is simple. Tell me, what kinds of individuals are going to have an abortion? We have niggers that fuck like chimps, crackheads, potheads, drug addicts of all kinds, single moms, women with holes more worn than NASCAR tyres, unstable households, fetuses with uncurable hereditary diseases, alcoholic moms, stupid teenagers, people with untreated STDs, and various other malignant groups. Most of those people now will be unable to have abortions in several states, which means that they will give birth to children with various hereditary and fetal diseases. Worse, those children will grow up in shitty environments, leading to epigenetic damage, thus long-term dysgenics. No individual that believes in some natural morals will persistently engage in the behaviours described above or even have children in those environments. Unwillingly, abortions have become the greatest eugenics tool in our society. Abolishing them has been a grave mistake. Personally, I would even boost their promotion, especially for the Third Word (which is fortunately seeing massive decreases in fertility in the last years). Promoting abortions to the extreme means that we will indirectly solve overpopulation, cull out the worst, and allow only those who truly care about their future live on. Of course, governments will continue to be shitty, but please think about all this.

Also, I do not give a damn about women's rights.

Dont care didnt ask

 

[Nauseated Courgi]

Ultimately I think that it is best to air on the side of caution and be pro life. I can live with myself if I am wrong. I am not so sure that pro-choicers can do so if they are wrong and fully grasp the gravity of this issue.

I could. Person or no, I'd perfer that the child be dead than be brought into a family that doesn't want it.

 

[Anti-Intellectual]

I could. Person or no, I'd perfer that the child be dead than be brought into a family that doesn't want it.

I'd rather the family that doesn't want it to be responsible by using the multitude of birth control options before abortion is even a question. Then adopting out the child if those options fail.

 

[Nauseated Courgi]

I'd rather the family that doesn't want it to be responsible by using the multitude of birth control options before abortion is even a question. Then adopting out the child if those options fail.

That's the ideal solution, but then there's the issues that come with foster care and adoption centers.

What if that child never gets adopted? At that point, the child is forced to put up with that BS until they're kicked out at the age of 18.

Why potentially make the child go through that when you could save it the pain and prevent it all together?

 

[Anti-Intellectual]

That's the ideal solution, but then there's the issues that come with foster care and adoption centers.

What if that child never gets adopted? At that point, the child is forced to put up with that BS until they're kicked out at the age of 18.

Why potentially make the child go through that when you could save it the pain and prevent it all together?

Because there is a chance for the child to make it in life, with death its the end and there is no hope.
If pain in life is the metric by which you judge it worthy of living, then I have a coffin to sell to you.

 

[mickey339]

For your consideration:

View attachment 3449128

It's an unfortunate reality that many women have to get abortions in order to be financially secure.