US The Army is launching a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting to reverse enlistment shortfalls - While the Army will still look at increased bonuses and push the health care and education funding in the military, money is not likely to be a key driver for recruits.

1000.png


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Army is launching a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting to focus more on young people who have spent time in college or are job hunting early in their careers, as it scrambles to reverse years of enlistment shortfalls.

A major part of this is the formation of a new professional force of recruiters instead of relying on soldiers randomly assigned to the task.

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth, in an interview with The Associated Press, said some of the changes will begin in the next 90 days but a wholesale transformation will take years.

“We have not been recruiting very well for many more years than one would think from just looking at the headlines in the last 18 months,” Wormuth said, adding that the Army hasn’t met its annual goal for new enlistment contracts since 2014.

Last year, the Army fell 15,000 short of its enlistment goal of 60,000 while competing with higher-paying companies in a tight job market and trying to overcome two years of the coronavirus pandemic, which shut down access to schools and public events. In the fiscal year that ended Saturday, the Army brought in a bit more than 50,000 recruits, falling short of the publicly stated “stretch goal” of 65,000.

Army officials, however, said that number still allows the service to meet its required total strength of 452,000. They said the Army also signed up an additional 4,600 recruits for future contracts, in an effort to build back the pool of delayed-entry recruits, which had eroded. Those recruits will go to basic training over the next year.

On Tuesday, Wormuth told reporters in a briefing that the Army has not yet decided what the new fiscal year’s recruiting goal will be, but said it would likely be less than 65,000. The lower number, she said, also reflects the fact that the size of the Army has been shrinking from the 485,000 level during the peaks of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

In testimony before Congress during his confirmation hearing, Gen. Randy George, who is now chief of staff of the Army, called recruiting " the No. 1 challenge that we face and the one thing that we have to be focused on.” And he said the service must better tailor its messaging and marketing.

The Navy and the Air Force also fell short of their recruitment goals for the fiscal year that ended Saturday, but leaders said both did better than predictions earlier this year. The Marine Corps and the tiny Space Force have said they would meet their enlistment targets.

Marine leaders, including Brig. Gen. Walker Field, who heads the Corps’ eastern recruiting region, have said one key to their success is choosing the right recruiters and encouraging successful ones to stay on. The Marines are also repositioning recruiting stations to areas where populations have grown.

The Army’s recruiting increase this year is considered a short-term victory made possible by a number of new and upgraded programs and benefits. But Wormuth said it will take systemic changes in how the Army approaches the labor market and sells the service as a career to turn things around.

At the same time, she said the Army must concentrate on the things it can change since there are many things it cannot, such as lack of fitness among youths and unwillingness to serve.

While recruiters have long relied heavily on high school seniors or graduates to fill the ranks, Wormuth said they need to reach beyond that pool and seek applicants on job sites like ZipRecruiter, Indeed or Glassdoor.

“The vast majority of people who are out there making employment decisions are people who have more than a high school education,” Wormuth said. “We need to figure out how to talk to that much broader labor market.”

She said that as more students go on to college, high school graduates now make up just 15% to 20% of the labor market. And the Army gets about half of its recruits from that shrinking population.

“We are not abandoning the high school market by any means,” Wormuth said, but by 2028 she wants the Army to have one-third of its recruits to have more than a high school diploma, rather than the current one-fifth,.

Part of that is showcasing the Army’s higher-tech jobs with computers, satellites and artificial intelligence to lure those who may still think of the service as just infantry troops.

The other major change, which will begin to form in the coming months, is the transition to a professional recruiting workforce. Rather than using soldiers who are “voluntold” to take on a special assignment as recruiters, the Army is establishing a new permanent and specialized enlistment workforce.

There are currently about 8,000 Army recruiters, and only a bit more than a third have recruiting as their actual job classification.

The change will mirror how private companies work and will take several years. But Wormuth said the Army will quickly start a pilot program to begin identifying and training the new force. As part of the process, the Army will use a new aptitude test designed to identify soldiers who have a higher potential for being successful recruiters.

Other changes will include planning larger Army career fairs and restructuring the command leadership, elevating the head of recruiting to a three-star job with a four-year term for more continuity.

And, while the Army will still look at increased bonuses and push the health care and education funding in the military, money is not likely to be a key driver for recruits. And recruiters will need to sell the less tangible benefits of service.

“At the end of the day, I think that what offsets what we don’t offer in terms of compensation we make up for with being part of something bigger,” Wormuth said. “Ask anyone wearing a uniform in my office. They will tell you that what keeps them re-enlisting or staying until 20 years or beyond is the people and doing something that really matters.”

Article Link

Archive
 
Nobody wants to serve an illegitimate "commander in chief" installed by massive, obvious fraud and rolling 30,000 troops into our capitol.
The fact the military is woke is just the cherry on top.
If they want recruitment to return, they should oust the illegitimate dementia patient beclowning and shredding our so-called "republic"
 
I learned that a newspaper is a far deadlier weapon than a machine gun. A gun may kill a few men but the newspaper will kill an entire nation.

What would violence do against the Army? They have tanks and helicopters. I would be blown into spaghetti sauce in moments. But what if I spent years telling anyone who would listen that the military was packed with rapists and drunks?
 
This is the one thing Tumblrites in power never considered. If their ideology was popular, people would fight for it, right? Nope. Their ideology is backwards and only pushed by the elites because it was so useful.

To the common man, wokeshit is the reason why they are miserable. In fact, everything Yuri Bezmenov talked about when it came to the misery the common Soviet layperson is experiencing under Communism has come true here. The constant lies, the double-faces people must wear, they know the problem but not allowed to complain about it (Deplatformed by big tech which may as well be the Ministry of Truth). Though the difference is, this Communist state is 'pretending' to be a democracy. Even if its a piss-poor job.

I have another radical idea that will 100% increase recruitment rates. Expunge every single communist or left-leaning person within the military and the government as well as removing every useful idiot responsible for wokifying public education. This plan will shoot up military recruitment rates by 1000%. In short, never.
 
I will not follow orders from a man in a dress (except for maybe Jack Churchill)

All those lives and machines we wasted in Afghanistan.... for years.... and the only thing the media cared about was that the Taliban's first act upon victory was closing the LGBTQ schools... depriving Afghani children the right to become trans girlboss HR directors someday........... all you Gold Star Families out there? Well, yeah, I guess you suffered loss too, but, THEIRS WAS WORSE! THINK OF THE CHILDREN! THE POOR CHIDLREN WHO WILL GROW UP THINKING GENDER IS BINARY!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
...
Any war we fight right now will be lost, guaranteed.
Winning doesn't matter. Didn't matter in any of the last wars we fought. What matters is 1. A distraction from the intentional destruction of our country. 2. A way to funnel more tax dollars into corporate pockets. 3. A way to kill excess males, especially any who might feel any loyalty for their country.

Number 3 is the most important. China has an excess of young men in a country where historically an excess of young men has led to revolution. The US needs to get rid of all but the most soy men or risk some of us fighting back while they implement 2030. Russia has a larger chunk of their male population that does nothing but drink and commit crimes. War would be helpful to all participants, especially if it's one like Afghanistan or Vietnam with no real goals that can be ended without concessions.
 
Last edited:
It's going to be real damn embarrassing when it fails to make any noticeable change in recruitment, though the schadenfreude will be great.

If I won the lottery tomorrow I'd spent at least five or ten million dollars on anti-recruitment advertising for the armed forces just to drive the stake into the heart of the MIC further.
 
Fix those systems so I don't need to become a trained killer to have basic health and education.

Fuck the United States military.
As someone who came of age in the wake of 9/11, I did once upon a time consider signing up for the military soon after high school, but my parents insisted I go to college instead. I didn't like college very much for a number of reasons, but maybe it was for the best considering that now they're promoting the TikTok/vaping/Fortnite cocksuckers over everyone else, and fucking failing at that.
Winning doesn't matter. Didn't matter in any of the last wars we fought. What matters is 1. A distraction from the intentional destruction of our country. 2. A way to funnel more tax dollars into corporate pockets. 3. A way to kill excess males, especially any who might feel any loyalty for their country.

Number 3 is the most important. China has an excess of young men in a country where historically an excess of young men has led to revolution. The US needs to get rid of all but the most soy men or risk some of us fighting back while they implement 2030. Russia has a larger chunk of their male population that does nothing but drink and commit crimes. War would be helpful to all participants, especially if it's one like Afghanistan or Vietnam with no real goals that can be ended without concessions.
Fewer men are actually dating women anyway, so getting rid of most of us wouldn't really affect the birth rate as most of us are already undesirable by Current Year standards in the first place.

Earth is a desolate wasteland ravaged by social media idiocy.
 
Things I have seen going wrong on Twitter the last month:

  • A contractor leaving the entire deployment's food on the sand at NTC for a battalion. The battalion was told by their leadership there would be no hot food for the duration of the exercise.
  • CO's deciding unilaterally they can override medical profiles
  • SNCO's sleeping with officers mass punishing all lower enlisted because they lost their hat. (4X on this one)
  • Barracks overflooded with shitwater regularly.
  • Barracks full of black mold.
  • Contractors deciding they didn't want to feed everyone because someone got misgendered and closing the chow hall
  • The military having an inability to get enough uniforms for entire divisions
  • No power to a section of base that resulted in 4 units not having barracks power
  • The floor falling out in a barracks
  • 100% of a unit's vehicles no longer safe to drive
  • Mass punishment because a female leader felt like male enlisted thought she was fat. (not called fat, she just THOUGHT they thought she was fat)

Yeah, I wonder why nobody is fucking joining.
 
My pet theory for poor recruitment numbers is stuff like Uber and DoorDash ensured young people could get a job easily. So there was less desperation where a guy could feel like he had zero employment opportunities and needed to join the army just to exist.
 
I swear, the military is some sort of convoluted welfare program.
It's so great giving them ludicrous funding so our dregs can be made (wo)men at our expense for driving a forklift or whatever and jacking off in camo for four years.
Be sure to thank them for their 'service' and remember to know your place, civilian.
 
No sane, thinking young person wants to join the new Woke Army and fight and possibly die for Woke America. Making the world safer for troon pedophiles is not a lure to enlistment to anyone not a troon pedophile.

And that bit about attracting a more educated recruitment pool? Some of the best soldiers I've known were former gang kids ordered by judges to join the Army or go to jail. Their lives were turned around by military service. They got the structure, discipline, and sense of belonging they had always craved and which was why most of them had joined gangs in the first place.

Any war we fight right now will be lost, guaranteed.

Maybe the US will copy the late Han dynasty and create an army of convicts by making most punishments military service
 
She said that as more students go on to college, high school graduates now make up just 15% to 20% of the labor market. And the Army gets about half of its recruits from that shrinking population.
Wormuth said, but by 2028 she wants the Army to have one-third of its recruits to have more than a high school diploma, rather than the current one-fifth,.
Half the crop of current recruits has a HS degree, but right now only 1/5 has more than a HS degree? Do they really let HS dropouts in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Corpun
Back