US The Army is launching a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting to reverse enlistment shortfalls - While the Army will still look at increased bonuses and push the health care and education funding in the military, money is not likely to be a key driver for recruits.

1000.png


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Army is launching a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting to focus more on young people who have spent time in college or are job hunting early in their careers, as it scrambles to reverse years of enlistment shortfalls.

A major part of this is the formation of a new professional force of recruiters instead of relying on soldiers randomly assigned to the task.

Army Secretary Christine Wormuth, in an interview with The Associated Press, said some of the changes will begin in the next 90 days but a wholesale transformation will take years.

“We have not been recruiting very well for many more years than one would think from just looking at the headlines in the last 18 months,” Wormuth said, adding that the Army hasn’t met its annual goal for new enlistment contracts since 2014.

Last year, the Army fell 15,000 short of its enlistment goal of 60,000 while competing with higher-paying companies in a tight job market and trying to overcome two years of the coronavirus pandemic, which shut down access to schools and public events. In the fiscal year that ended Saturday, the Army brought in a bit more than 50,000 recruits, falling short of the publicly stated “stretch goal” of 65,000.

Army officials, however, said that number still allows the service to meet its required total strength of 452,000. They said the Army also signed up an additional 4,600 recruits for future contracts, in an effort to build back the pool of delayed-entry recruits, which had eroded. Those recruits will go to basic training over the next year.

On Tuesday, Wormuth told reporters in a briefing that the Army has not yet decided what the new fiscal year’s recruiting goal will be, but said it would likely be less than 65,000. The lower number, she said, also reflects the fact that the size of the Army has been shrinking from the 485,000 level during the peaks of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

In testimony before Congress during his confirmation hearing, Gen. Randy George, who is now chief of staff of the Army, called recruiting " the No. 1 challenge that we face and the one thing that we have to be focused on.” And he said the service must better tailor its messaging and marketing.

The Navy and the Air Force also fell short of their recruitment goals for the fiscal year that ended Saturday, but leaders said both did better than predictions earlier this year. The Marine Corps and the tiny Space Force have said they would meet their enlistment targets.

Marine leaders, including Brig. Gen. Walker Field, who heads the Corps’ eastern recruiting region, have said one key to their success is choosing the right recruiters and encouraging successful ones to stay on. The Marines are also repositioning recruiting stations to areas where populations have grown.

The Army’s recruiting increase this year is considered a short-term victory made possible by a number of new and upgraded programs and benefits. But Wormuth said it will take systemic changes in how the Army approaches the labor market and sells the service as a career to turn things around.

At the same time, she said the Army must concentrate on the things it can change since there are many things it cannot, such as lack of fitness among youths and unwillingness to serve.

While recruiters have long relied heavily on high school seniors or graduates to fill the ranks, Wormuth said they need to reach beyond that pool and seek applicants on job sites like ZipRecruiter, Indeed or Glassdoor.

“The vast majority of people who are out there making employment decisions are people who have more than a high school education,” Wormuth said. “We need to figure out how to talk to that much broader labor market.”

She said that as more students go on to college, high school graduates now make up just 15% to 20% of the labor market. And the Army gets about half of its recruits from that shrinking population.

“We are not abandoning the high school market by any means,” Wormuth said, but by 2028 she wants the Army to have one-third of its recruits to have more than a high school diploma, rather than the current one-fifth,.

Part of that is showcasing the Army’s higher-tech jobs with computers, satellites and artificial intelligence to lure those who may still think of the service as just infantry troops.

The other major change, which will begin to form in the coming months, is the transition to a professional recruiting workforce. Rather than using soldiers who are “voluntold” to take on a special assignment as recruiters, the Army is establishing a new permanent and specialized enlistment workforce.

There are currently about 8,000 Army recruiters, and only a bit more than a third have recruiting as their actual job classification.

The change will mirror how private companies work and will take several years. But Wormuth said the Army will quickly start a pilot program to begin identifying and training the new force. As part of the process, the Army will use a new aptitude test designed to identify soldiers who have a higher potential for being successful recruiters.

Other changes will include planning larger Army career fairs and restructuring the command leadership, elevating the head of recruiting to a three-star job with a four-year term for more continuity.

And, while the Army will still look at increased bonuses and push the health care and education funding in the military, money is not likely to be a key driver for recruits. And recruiters will need to sell the less tangible benefits of service.

“At the end of the day, I think that what offsets what we don’t offer in terms of compensation we make up for with being part of something bigger,” Wormuth said. “Ask anyone wearing a uniform in my office. They will tell you that what keeps them re-enlisting or staying until 20 years or beyond is the people and doing something that really matters.”

Article Link

Archive
 
I had a longer, funnier post mostly typed out, but I decided to keep it short:

If you didn't have to register with the Selective Service when you turned 18, I don't want to hear a fucking word leave your mouth about the draft, military affairs, or even foreign policy.
I'm actually quite curious about that. Is there even any punishment for not putting yourself into SS? I did when I was eighteen. Even though I'm medically ineligible for service (depending on how long they expect my class of unfit to stay alive in a conflict, lol) but I hadn't heard a peep from my peers about having to sign up when we turned 18 well over a decade ago. I don't remember my peers getting letters in the mail about signing up. It seems quite forgotten in the grand scheme of things. Even I was unaware of having to sign up until my grandfather told me to do so. I had always assumed it was an automatic process. And you show up when your bingo ball birthday is pulled. Are most people just unaware it even exists?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GlobohomoSapiens
You get a letter in the snail mail telling you it's time to die for Israel if they give the word.

If you don't sign up, you lose access to certain benefits (student aid being the primary one), and can get thrown in prison, depending on which DoD tranny you piss off.

If you were born American and never got a letter at 18, it either went to the wrong address, they somehow already knew you were medically ineligible, or some other roundabout explanation.

For those who are medically eligible and never signed up, well, you might want to look into that. lol

Screenshot_20231009_124205_Brave.png


Fun fact, Selective Service isn't even allowed to take registrations from women (I said women, not "women"), yet both are allowed to serve.

That's why you shouldn't take a single fucking thing any woman says seriously regarding the draft/military/foreign policy/etc, and it's every man's obligation to tell them to shut their dickholes on the subject.
 
If you didn't have to register with the Selective Service when you turned 18, I don't want to hear a fucking word leave your mouth about the draft, military affairs, or even foreign policy.
I'm actually quite curious about that. Is there even any punishment for not putting yourself into SS? I did when I was eighteen. Even though I'm medically ineligible for service (depending on how long they expect my class of unfit to stay alive in a conflict, lol) but I hadn't heard a peep from my peers about having to sign up when we turned 18 well over a decade ago. I don't remember my peers getting letters in the mail about signing up. It seems quite forgotten in the grand scheme of things. Even I was unaware of having to sign up until my grandfather told me to do so. I had always assumed it was an automatic process. And you show up when your bingo ball birthday is pulled. Are most people just unaware it even exists?
I remember just receiving a letter without signing up. I think they do it automatically now.
 
If they instituted a draft that may be just be the powder keg that sends this country into chaos, there is absolutely no shot they do that. The far more likelier option is that they offer massive, unprecedented incentives to enlisting. I'm talking six figure signing bonuses (40% of the trillions of dollars in circulation were printed in the last 3 years, gtfo saying that this can't happen), veteran housing initiatives, completely free schooling for life; all of the stuff that would scratch the itch that Gen Z/Millennials are so desperate to have but feel are next to impossible to obtain these days.
The more you guys talk about how a new American draft would play out, the more I want it to happen. Just imagine zoomers and alphas being on the frontlines of a war, trannies and stronk independynt wamen getting shot or raped by sandniggers and Tyrone the barebones high school graduate being forced to figure out how to hit a target hundreds of miles away with a rocket or missile. And the most qualified help Tyrone can turn to is Pablo who is an intersectional racism major.
 
The more you guys talk about how a new American draft would play out, the more I want it to happen. Just imagine zoomers and alphas being on the frontlines of a war, trannies and stronk independynt wamen getting shot or raped by sandniggers and Tyrone the barebones high school graduate being forced to figure out how to hit a target hundreds of miles away with a rocket or missile. And the most qualified help Tyrone can turn to is Pablo who is an intersectional racism major.
Sounds about normal with most current crayon eaters imo
 
The more you guys talk about how a new American draft would play out, the more I want it to happen. Just imagine zoomers and alphas being on the frontlines of a war, trannies and stronk independynt wamen getting shot or raped by sandniggers and Tyrone the barebones high school graduate being forced to figure out how to hit a target hundreds of miles away with a rocket or missile. And the most qualified help Tyrone can turn to is Pablo who is an intersectional racism major.
All of those would get the cushy desk jobs at base.
 
Want to improve recruiting rates? Here is my simple plan. Fucking Rome had this shit figured out and provided it's soldiers tangible benefits on top of any plunder they were entitled to from sieges.

1) Huge ass bonus AND payment upon end of an enlistment term (Compounded with reenlistments, etc.)

2) Promise of government given land and property to active duty frontline troops (Sorry Shaniqua and Tracey at HQ)

3) No more forever wars

4) A functioning system for veterans that doesn't leave a lot of them homeless, addicted to drugs, or suffering a variety of other problems. A nation that can't take care of it's veterans is a nation that deserves no respect.
 
Last edited:
4) A functioning system for veterans that doesn't leave a lot of them homeless, addicted to drugs, or suffering a variety of other problems. A nation that can't take care of it's veterans is a nation that deserves no respect.
I thought the main lesson we should have learned from Vietnam was to never let veterans get treated like that again. What politicians learned was to spread useless platitudes of support while telling them to get fucked through policy.
 
I thought the main lesson we should have learned from Vietnam was to never let veterans get treated like that again. What politicians learned was to spread useless platitudes of support while telling them to get fucked through policy.
everyone's policy towards the common man's status for the past hundred years has been to beat them until they comply and until morale improves
for some reason they're surprised they won't comply and morale is nonexistant
 
The anti-draft riots for Vietnam were primarily organized by Marxist agitators. The big difference between the 1960s and the 1940s is that Marxists had honed domestic political agitation to fine art. For example, the '67 Pentagon riot was organized by outspoken Marxists, Abbott Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, Allen Ginsberg, and...hey! HEY! SHUT UP! THAT'S JUST A COINCIDENCE!
The older generations also had the ability to claim being forced to fight and die without representation. Because whenever a combat scenario would happen, they'd eventually start drafting younger and younger and eventually go below the age of suffrage. So they at least had the face of arguing for rights which eventually led to the right to vote being reduced to 18 years old. We don't even have that now-a-days; no sense of taxation or conscription without representation, no 9/11, the country isn't even fucking cohesive. A draft would be a fucking nightmare to pull off.

I thought the main lesson we should have learned from Vietnam was to never let veterans get treated like that again. What politicians learned was to spread useless platitudes of support while telling them to get fucked through policy.
D.C.'s favorite Vietnam veteran is that sellout fraud John Kerry. Anytime that dude pops up, I instinctually go the opposite. I don't care if he introduced a bill called the "Save Puppies and Sunshine Act," I'd be against it because his name is on it.

3) No more forever wars
Cool it with the anti-semitism.
 
I thought the main lesson we should have learned from Vietnam was to never let veterans get treated like that again. What politicians learned was to spread useless platitudes of support while telling them to get fucked through policy.

What they learned is we would have won in Vietnam if only we'd had more fat little sheboons in the infantry.
 
Wouldn't work. The French make theirs work by demanding they learn French and assimilate French culture. Americans don't insist on learning English or liking American culture. Plenty of Americans hate American culture as it is.
I think they'd probably make them learn ebonics and nigger culture

The fucking draft also backfired horribly last time we did it thanks to an unpopular war and a divided USA. We've got the latter for sure, and there's little doubt that unless we personally were attacked a full mobilization would be incredibly unpopular.
The thing is we now have 2 wars whose popularity is big on either side; one side loves Ukraine, the other wants to suck Israel's dick. All that's left is China attacking Taiwan, and the politicians will be jumping at the chance to send our young men into the meat grinder.

The more you guys talk about how a new American draft would play out, the more I want it to happen. Just imagine zoomers and alphas being on the frontlines of a war, trannies and stronk independynt wamen getting shot or raped by sandniggers and Tyrone the barebones high school graduate being forced to figure out how to hit a target hundreds of miles away with a rocket or missile. And the most qualified help Tyrone can turn to is Pablo who is an intersectional racism major.
I think you may actually see unity in Tyrone and Jethro beating the shit out of the MPs that try to drag them into the meat grinder.
 
The medical draft is true bullshit. Up to age 45. That is crap. At least women are required to participate in the medical draft on an equal basis.
 
The recruitment crisis tells me that the people in charge really are not that smart. There's a certain sort of dissident observer who thinks every single thing is "just part of a plan," that everything right now is playing out exactly as Klaus Schwab, George Soros, and the like wants it to. But the problem with that thinking is, if nobody's going to pick up a rifle at your bidding, you don't have power. The Germans found this out the hard way in the Napoleonic Wars. When the French came marching across Germany, the average peasant just didn't care whether his ruler spoke French or German. It didn't affect him - best for the war to end ASAP and for him to get on with planting season.

They've spent years, decades even, destroying everything about society that stood in the way of their perfect future. Like soft, faggoty little Stalins, they see every form of normal social bonds and loyalty as a threat to their own power. If a man is loyal to his country, to his wife, to his family, to his church, or to his community, it might get in the way of open borders, or Net Zero, or "trust and safety," or any of these other utopian schemes. Be loyal only to coom, consoom, because if do as you're told, you can coom and consoom even more.

Except by destroying all our social bonds and their foundations, there's nobody to fight their wars now. Fat, compliant, ethnically diverse, gender-nonconforming little consoomers can't handle a ruck march. The GWOT was supposed to show that technology has made the common infantryman obsolete (there were one-sided debates about this in the 1990s in our newspapers). We were supposed to win the war via overwhelming technological power, computer-controlled wunderwaffen that women can operate just as well as men. Except both wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, devolved into quagmires where, once again, white guys with rifles and dirty boots had to do all the real work...and we lost. The omniscient planners lost both wars.

What we're seeing now is all these decades of planning unraveling. It's all falling apart. Donald Trump wasn't supposed to win in 2016. Floods of illegal aliens were just supposed to replace white people at their jobs, not choke Chicago and NYC. And the Predator drone was supposed to make physical fitness and the white, male infantryman obsolete. We're supposed to be entering the era where fat little sheboons snap their fingers sassily as their push-button weapons annihilate Russia and Iran, while white males can do nothing but cope, seethe, and overdose on fentanyl. Instead, nobody wants to join their Diversity Supersquad, and nobody's afraid of it, either, because everyone can see from Afghanistan to Ukraine that the new, fat, self-indulgent, feminized America is incapable of winning a fight.

thanks for coming to my ted talk
 
This is why they're preparing to bring back the draft. If they absolutely can't get people to voluntarily join they will have no choice but to conscript.
Well then it's a good thing I'll be hitting middle age before they can get this thing off the ground, they claim all these benefits for signing up but in reality they fuck over the people who do the actual work while Mark Milley jacks off to current year propaganda and most of the brass have never been to war themselves.
 
I think they'd probably make them learn ebonics and nigger culture


The thing is we now have 2 wars whose popularity is big on either side; one side loves Ukraine, the other wants to suck Israel's dick. All that's left is China attacking Taiwan, and the politicians will be jumping at the chance to send our young men into the meat grinder.


I think you may actually see unity in Tyrone and Jethro beating the shit out of the MPs that try to drag them into the meat grinder.
Nigger culture teaches young men to shoot each other over shoes and no one understands ebonics. Such an American Foreign Legion would collapse faster than wet cardboard.
 
Back