- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
They're lurking more.Why though?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're lurking more.Why though?
There is literally nothing you can post on 4chan that won't get you dogpiled by a bunch of bitter, angry coomers who spend their entire day watching cuck porn. It's just not fun and there's zero actual discussion there, so why go? At least with Reddit you can have fun making them piss and shid because they deserve it, but on 4chan you just get the feeling that these are broken human beings who are one bad day away from roping.Why though?
I have a feeling that sites like 4chan have geographical or some other type of user segregation. When you visit a site you might visit website A, and someone else is on website B, you will see different content and users.Does anybody else feel like numbers don't add up sometimes? Like 4chan is supposedly this famous website with millions of views daily but so many threads on even popular boards are slow? And like 40% full of bots? Why does it seem like only half a dozen people ever comment on some boards? Is it really that dead?
Does it really make sense in a population of 7 billion globally? Even if less then half of them are online? Just high thoughts.
When I was shilling stuff on reddit, I just copied comments from one subreddit to another to farm karma. You can literally just shuffle meanings and phrases to make new comments and nobody would notice. This is what click farms did when Facebook and Youtube became mainstream, and this was over 15 years ago. With some scripts I could imagine someone did a decent comment scraper that looks pretty legit.Its probably been a thing for a while, the public announcement of chat GPT thingy was likely not the literal first ever time such a thing was made.
Wouldn't that be pretty easy to prove via TOR, VPN, archives not matching up, or plain old comparing with online "friends" who live on another continent?I have a feeling that sites like 4chan have geographical or some other type of user segregation. When you visit a site you might visit website A, and someone else is on website B, you will see different content and users.
Might be sorting by screen resolutions, OS, web browser, maybe even by the VPN brand itself etc. There are many ways to create finger prints of users and track their habits and start segregating them by their IRL identity. Just your keystrokes on your keyboard can give away who you are.Wouldn't that be pretty easy to prove via TOR, VPN, archives not matching up, or plain old comparing with online "friends" who live on another continent?
All social media addicts are cringe regardless age.Have you ever sat there and watched a boomer trying to use social media? It'll really change your perspective.
The 'cuck gets views because it's a porn dump. It's slow because most people who have things to say get deterred by all the schizos and spammers who abuse the 'cuck's anonymity. I could improve the 'cuck if I had enough money to buy it from Hiro, but one of the big ways to improve it would be to do a Codename:V and rangeban the entire regions the spammers live in -- that would make it unusable to people unfortunate enough to live in those ranges.Does anybody else feel like numbers don't add up sometimes? Like 4chan is supposedly this famous website with millions of views daily but so many threads on even popular boards are slow? And like 40% full of bots? Why does it seem like only half a dozen people ever comment on some boards? Is it really that dead?
Does it really make sense in a population of 7 billion globally? Even if less then half of them are online? Just high thoughts.
It's not even worth having any commonly used social media accounts anymore and it hasn't been for years, all the content in this day and age is either complete slop, woke nonsense or bots that aren't even being altered to try fit in. Dead Internet 100% isn't a theory anymore and is completely proven fact, look at the absolute garbage being milled out into more commonly used search engine results as another prime exampleSocial media at a minimum is a cesspit of AI/bots now. My Twitter account is endlessly spammed with rando follows from bot accounts and my facebook feed is almost entirely bot/ai jibberish inter spread with the most bizarre advertising.
I want to give a big shoutout to Pseudiom: his channel is super underrated. He does deep-dive video essays akin to Frederik Knudsen or EmpLemon. I've seen his video on Dead Internet Theory, and thought he did a great job.It's about 3 years old, but here's a good vid on it:
Here's the problem with people who refer to it as a "conspiracy theory": I don't think anyone is literally saying that the internet is 100% "dead" or totally overrun with bots -- but rather, the general idea is that the majority of the internet is bot traffic. And by majority, I don't mean something ridiculous like 90% of the internet is dead -- but that there's a larger amount of bot traffic/AI spam vs. real users. It could be 55-45, it could be 60-40 with bots being the majority. Who knows. One thing's for certain, is that it's fucking annoying and counterproductive for shills like Wikipedo to automatically dust it off as a mere "conspiracy theory", since that was done deliberately with malice in order to lump Dead Internet Theory with dubious crackpot theories like flat earth, chemtrails, etc. By labeling it as that, it raises a red flag from normies and skeptics, and instead makes it seem as if it's Qanon schizo-LARPing for a person to be concerned with increased bot traffic and AI spam.[PreserveTube]
New video from The Linux Experiment about this very theory. His consensus: it's all about making a quick buck from advertising and clueless boomers. He fumbles a bit on bot posts on sites and leaves it as a crackpot theory with only a brink of truth.
In other words, I don't think it's a really good take.
What a fucking retard, he should kill himself[PreserveTube]
New video from The Linux Experiment about this very theory. His consensus: it's all about making a quick buck from advertising and clueless boomers. He fumbles a bit on bot posts on sites and leaves it as a crackpot theory with only a brink of truth.
In other words, I don't think it's a really good take.