They were large scale hastily build internment camps not unlike Bukele's CECOT, created to immediately remove antisocial elements from normal society. As Bukele fully eliminated gang activity, Hitler fully eliminated uncountable social ills with a single stroke of his pen.
You're comparing 1940s Europe to a 2020s Latin American gang prison, that alone tells me you have no grasp of historical scale, population logistics, or wartime governance. Bukele didn’t move half the country, didn’t shut down international rail lines, and didn’t declare half the population biologically unfit to exist in society.
Did you switch from talking about camps to deportation? You know those aren't the same things right?
No, I didn’t, you did. Deportation and camps are unsurprisingly linked processes. You don’t deport someone to nowhere. You deport them towards something, and I am pretty sure the “something” in this case wasn’t a border drop-off.
Do you want it in crayon?
Rothschild & Sons are war criminals.
Average Jew not bad but stinky.
German has a right to his own homeland.
Jew not German, Jew get out.
Thanks for confirming the contradiction. If the average Jew is “not bad” but must be expelled because of their bloodline, then you’re no longer talking about behavior, you’re talking about metaphysics. And I wouldn't have a problem if you were arguing from a clear, coherent metaphysical framework, like a strict idealist or traditionalist worldview that recognizes essence over action (Evola for instance), blood over will, I’d at least respect the consistency. But you're not doing that. This is my whole fucking issue, I don't give a shit about whether you believe Schlomo Goldstein got killed or not so you can deny him his elohim given right of forcing Germany to pay reparations for the holocaust for the next 2000 years - JUST BE CONSISTENT ABOUT YOUR BELIEFS.
You’re appealing to modern post-rationalist morality when it’s convenient: “the Jews were bad, they corrupted Weimar, they ruined banking, they are actually the evil racist anti-christians opposed to the ultimate good or european values” but then you pivot to a racial essentialism that doesn't actually care if a Jew is good, bad, assimilated, or apolitical. You want to expel based on birth, not crime, and yet you justify it using behavioral accusations. That’s a category error.
Either you believe in blood, and only blood, in which case Rothschild and the “stinky average Jew” are equally guilty by nature and then you should stop pretending there's a behavioral justification. Or, you believe in individual responsibility, in which case you're forced to distinguish between “good Jews” and “bad Jews,” at which point your mass expulsion fantasy becomes impossible to justify.
Yeah, uh, in 1944-1945 when Hitler finally dismissed the Jewish general staff members himself, because that's "the moment the bureaucracy caught up" or something.
Yeah dude, totally.
Thank you for making my point. If Jewish-descended soldiers or officers were purged in 1944, that proves racial purity wasn’t ignored, instead it was enforced as soon as the regime had time to comb through records. It wasn’t tolerance. It was triage. The Nazis delayed enforcement because they were getting fucked in every single front.
And I have news for you: that’s a problem for you, not me. Because if the Nazi state was letting known Mischlinge operate in high command roles up to 1944, then either;
- Their ideology was full of holes, or
- Their war priorities were more important than their racial doctrine.
Either way, it demolishes your earlier “Hitler solved the problem with a stroke of the pen” line. Apparently, that pen ran out of ink until Kursk lmao.
The fact you're kind of dead to rights wrong. Literally one sentence ago you were hammering on racial purity, now you're pretending I'm a schizo for pointing out the NIGGERS in his army.
Which Aryan racial purity tests would black people pass?
So let’s get this straight: one sentence ago, you were jerking off over ethnic purity (muh everyone deserves dey homeland and sheeeit), bragging about how Hitler heroically cleansed the Fatherland from "social ills" with the stroke of the pen, and now you're proudly pointing out how his armies had Muslims, Indians, Slavs, and fucking NIGGERS in uniform.
Pick one. Either racial essence matters or it doesn’t. If blood defines identity, if a jew is a jew no matter how loyal, how assimilated, how useful, then a Congolese Waffen-SS volunteer is still a jungle nigger, no matter how well he holds a rifle. But here you are, now celebrating the “diversity” of the Wehrmacht like some twisted affirmative action program for Third World fascists, you sound like a liberal NGO bragging about minority representation in government but with more jackboots and that's what fucking annoys me.
So what is it? Does race determine belonging? Because if that’s your line, then sorry for you but your foreign volunteers are racial pollutants. They're not proof of strength. They're proof of collapse according to your same logic.
The Nuremberg Trials had American judges. This isn't about the Soviet judiciary, this is about having a believable allegation. If you just show up with the facts and logic of "I don't like them, all get hanged" the other justices are going to be slack-jawed.
It wasn't a fair court by far, but you hang nobody if the judges expect you to have an allegation of any wrongdoing. The best you'll get is "waging a war of aggression" which was like a 15 year offense. The point of the trial is basically moot because it turned out your evil mortal enemy was actually a normal fucking guy.
Get bent nigger.
Alright, fine, you are right, this is not about the soviet judiciary as much as it is about their fabrication of the crimes so they could get their allies to believe them. So let's say it was all fabricated. The Soviets, in the middle of rebuilding a collapsed industrial base, reabsorbing half of Eastern Europe, suppressing armed uprisings in Ukraine and the Baltics, and preparing for Cold War escalation, somehow found time to forge
millions of pages of German-language documentation, construct entire fake camps with rail spurs and barbed wire, invent SS personnel rosters, fake the testimony of German generals, and coach witnesses in five languages, all while convincing the U.S. and Britain to play along in a court staffed by judges with no reason to trust them.
Let’s also assume Stalin, Churchill, Roosevelt, and every military tribunal judge in Nuremberg collectively said: “Hey, instead of just shooting these guys for wrecking half of Europe and starting (or getting provoked into, whatever) the deadliest war in human history, let’s invent a genocide for style points so our jewish masters can have control of the world”
You realize how monumentally retarded that is, right? Please tell me I am just going crazy and this somehow makes complete sense or help me rationalize it because maybe I have missed really important parts of the story.
You're telling me Stalin, whose whole regime ran on purges and paranoia, sat there and thought, "No no no, this time we need to make it look legit, let’s forge millions of documents in different languages, pay off the Americans, plant physical evidence across half of Europe, coach and torture a shit ton witnesses, and convince every surviving Nazi officer to play along too.” If it was all fake, then it was the most efficient, flawless, airtight global conspiracy in history, one that included Soviet, American, British, and French officials, plus thousands of captured German officers and bureaucrats, all coordinated without a single leak or contradiction
If anything comes to prove just how much a fucking master race the jews are that they somehow managed to trick the most intelligent and beatiful race in the world into working for them and fabricate all of this evidence for them to become the literal fucking GODS of the west.
