My claim is that there are enormous graves full of ash and crushed bones at the sites of alleged death camps, that you have no explanation for.
Full of what kind of ash? Wood and trash type ash? Or are you asserting that every last centimeter is bone and ash from human remains? Since even the most favorable reading of the studies you've posted, which were shoddily done and poorly documented, mention wood debris and sand as a large portion of what they found.
And, as we exhaustively covered the last time you tried to claim that there were mass graves, the burden of proof is on you, to prove that some burned people in pits are linked to anything. It doesn't matter how small or large these pits may be, or the
actual volume of human cremains (since they were mixed with sand), they don't prove anything except that some bodies were burned and dumped in a mass grave. Were they typhus victims? Starved because supply lines were bombed? Bled to death after botched circumcisions? It is a mystery.
that you have no explanation for.
I might as well just rehash our prior discussion.
You have the burden of proof, faggot. Nobody has to present and defend an alternative hypothesis, you need to prove yours.
John Doe "obliterated" the study by apparently agreeing it may have been accurate but that it showed nothing remotely suspicious.
No. I asked what the presence of possibly burned human remains
directly proves. You have to start with your evidence and then build to a conclusion with links of logic, instead of starting from your conclusion and trying to crowbar in anything you can without any connection (or tortured logic.)
Everything must be twisted and contorted to fit your pre-determined final conclusion, a memo about some Hauptmann's boot polish purchases is held up as proof there was Jew-ash everywhere, a photo of two men holding a woman is a 'prisoner being thrown into a crematorium' despite there being nothing else but trees and a fence in the photo, and a
possible finding of
some burned human remains is proof-positive that Jews were incinerated in an industrial fashion on direct orders from the Fuhrer.
Except that isn't true, none of these things prove your ultimate conclusion, they are only twisted and forced to a shape that
may fit into a pattern that you are trying to wish into existence. Most of it ends up even being contradictory when you try to look at your overall pattern, because you are trying to twist each individual bit in isolation to fit your end conclusion, instead of seeking truth. Take for example the whole cremation debacle. A simple question about 'where did they get the fuel needed to cremate the millions of corpses?' turned into a three ring circus where the cadavers were emaciated and starved - except for the fat ones the Nazis rendered down to use as fuel, which were all then incinerated in their super-crematoriums that ran on jew fat - except for the ones burned in the open pits shown in their photos, and you won't ever see a picture of the super crematorium because photos were banned - but also we have all these pictures of everything but the crematoriums, with bonus continual bad faith and constant attempts to flip the burden of proof and demanding other people defend positions they never claimed.
This is conspiratard level thinking at the best, and outright deception at its worst. The basic neutral position where full faith and credit is given cannot be sustained in the face of such duplicity, and the only ones to blame are the people that refuse to engage in even a modicum of good faith. Even here you continue to twist and misstate other people's positions to burden shift sneakily.
"There is no confirming evidence that positively demonstrates every detail of a position I assigned to you, therefore you are wrong and I am right."
"Uh, that's cool and all, but then where is your positive evidence proving your thesis?"
