- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Can't complain about Proxmox, forgot that I have it running. I just don't try fitting a square peg into a round hole.it's the best tool for the job
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can't complain about Proxmox, forgot that I have it running. I just don't try fitting a square peg into a round hole.it's the best tool for the job
Odd how it went unnoticed given how Linux runs 3/4th of world's IT infrastructure or something like that.
Sure. Meanwhile. This is the longest I think I've seen someone seeth in any of these threads. Just walls of text everyday crying because Linux doesn't try to copy what e-daddy bill Gates did.I just don't try fitting a square peg into a round hole.
This sounds to me like you want to turn this into some personal grudge because you don't like my opinions on Linux and I'm not exactly interested in that. If you're physically incapable of reading my posts, and you have a personal issue with me, feel free to use that Ignore button. There's no shame in that.Sure. Meanwhile. This is the longest I think I've seen someone seeth in any of these threads. Just walls of text everyday crying because Linux doesn't try to copy what e-daddy bill Gates did.
No I'm just saying what you're doing. Posting seething walls of text. And pressing the "I'm not mad you're mad" button on everyone else you're seething at.This sounds to me like you want to turn this into some personal grudge because you don't like my opinions on Linux and I'm not exactly interested in that. If you're physically incapable of reading my posts, and you have a personal issue with me, feel free to use that Ignore button. There's no shame in that.
The rot set in even before XP's release, while Ballmer was still firmly in control. MS had to abandon Longhorn (which had begun development before XP went to market) and rebase it onto onto a version of server 2003 for the Vista release, because of a combination of feature creep, retarded management interference, and shit just plain breaking existing systems. Vista and 7 are full of wrappers around that Server 2003, NT 5.1-era code that nobody understood any more; Vista in particular was a steaming, heaping mess of badly written code and half-baked ideas thrown into a pot in the name of getting something out of the door. The only significant change SatNad made to Microsoft's OS development trajectory was to fire the QA team.Windows NT is an solid core design that has been ruined by Microsoft being full of Jeets since Ballmer left.
It's funnier if you have some familarity with IT and as such recognize that the letters 'RDB' mean that Oracle was almost certainly involved somewhere, and that this probably had nothing to do with Windows NT, but involved many layers of bad third party shitware:I have a funny;
'In 1997, while operating off the coast of Cape Charles, Virginia, the USS Yorktown experienced a complete propulsion system failure after a crew member entered a zero into a database field. This caused an attempted division by zero in the ship's Remote Data Base Manager, resulting in a buffer overflow that crashed all the computers on the ship’s network. The ship’s propulsion system, which was controlled by these computers running Windows NT 4.0, became inoperable, forcing the vessel to be towed back to Norfolk Naval Station. Reports from both civilian contractors and Navy officials confirmed that such failures had required the Yorktown to be towed back to port on more than one occasion.'
If you want to be elitist about an OS that noobs can't use, try a BSD?No. It doesn't. That's what makes Linux great. Go back to windows and use that shit. Or move to Mac if you don't like it.
I don't care about people wanting to try Linux or use it. And I don't care if people that aren't skilled use Linux. Neither of those have anything to do with what you quoted.If you want to be elitist about an OS that noobs can't use, try a BSD?
Linux is the only competitor to Windows or Mac left in any form. It can get there but I would be optimistic to think anyone is trying.
Linux's greatest strength is also its greatest weakness after all.No. It doesn't. That's what makes Linux great.
I have already said a few times why I don't use Windows. Ever since 7 its just gotten worse and worse, and the experience from 10 and 11 is so bad (and I also didn't use anything that really kept me on Windows other then a few odd utilities) that I decided to jump ship.Go back to windows and use that shit.
No, I've really stopped caring as much as time goes on as Modern Windows really is that bad and 10 (which I can't stand) was just the start. Its why I jumped for "greener pastures" you could say. As I had never really used a Unix system before it took quite a while to get used to, and in some ways I still am.It sounds like you're crying every time you boot up your machine with how much you complain on here.

Technically it's GNU/Linux/systemd if you want to be that autistically specific. But even then it's a bottomless technicality based on an arbitrary cutoff. You might as well call it GNU/Linux/systemd/[etc]/LibreOffice/FirefoxI just treat people like GNU/Linux (Yes, GNU/Linux) as regular and mainstream thing. When I someone say task manager I just look weirdly and ask If he mean htop or btop.
No, Richard.Yes, GNU/Linux
Most of the apps I interact with are actually KDE, so GNU/Linux/systemd/plasma. I also do a tonne of stuff with my browser, so maybe it would be more accurate to say GNU/Linux/systemd/plasma/Microsoft Edge. Oh, but I've also spent a lot of evenings playing BG3 lately, so GNU/Linux/systemd/plasma/Microsoft Edge/Steam. Or in order, Plasma/Microsoft Edge/Steam/Linux/systemd/GNU.Technically it's GNU/Linux/systemd if you want to be that autistically specific
Ive tried running the nix package manager and found it difficult but I imagine starting from scratch with nixos would be easier then trying to integrate nix into an established system.I don't understand the hate for NixOS. While it's true the initial setup requires significant time investment to create a functional configuration, and both the community and documentation sucks (though the system becomes increasingly self-documenting as you dive deeper, and AI tools can help bridge the knowledge gap), the long-term benefits are exceptional.
The ability to maintain a unified configuration across all your machines - managing dotfiles, secrets, and system settings through the configuration. The built-in rollback functionality eliminates the fear of system-breaking changes, while automatic garbage collection ensures your environment stays lean. Want to test GNOME after using KDE? Simply modify your configuration. If unsatisfied, roll back or adjust your settings - your system returns to its previous state..