You know, someone at work pointed out a stat that makes the general resentment the media/HOF voters have for the Patriots franchise into some perspective.
Every dynasty in the Super Bowl era has had a ton of their players AND THEIR COACH enshrined into the Hall. 70's Steelers? 10 players and Knoll. 80's 49ers? 5 players and Walsh. 90's Cowboys? 6 players, Jimmy Johnson. The 1985 Bears, who won just the ONE ring (though in an admittedly impressive, call your shot fashion), have 6 players. Ditka's in too, but I'm pretty sure that's as a player because lmao he was not a HOF coach.
The 00-10's Patriots? 3 players, only 1 indisputably as a Patriot, Ty Law. Richard Seymour and Randy Moss also are in. But Vinatieri, still the #1 top scorer all time, isn't in it. Vince Wilfork isn't in it. Right now the only players who are certain to get in as Patriots are Brady and Gronk, so 3 total. Include Seymour and Moss and you get 5 players. A 20 year reign of terror that resulted in fewer HOF players than the fucking 1985 Bears.
I get why the old guard among the owners were pissy, Kraft was nouveau riche and two legendary franchises, the Colts and Steelers, had their plans for the 2000's totally thrown off by Bill and his cutthroat way of doing business. But why the media seems to overall resent this team so much, especially when the 2nd dynasty started to come into being (that's when I stopped being mad and admitted to myself I was seeing something I wasn't going to see happen again), I don't know.