With that lack of self awareness they're like teenage boys without any of the chance for them to rape. People forget about the grooming and its understandable that they go way too easy on the mess they put themselves in.
I read once in the New York Times that a given pooner was using the bathroom at a gay bar and thought to herself “but what if the other men want to watch me pee, what would I do?” And apparently this quandary was so unsettling they had to leave the bar right then and there to see about getting that dick-o-plasty.
That story doesn't mesh, how has she gotten to the bathroom in the gay bar without realizing that she doesn't fit and frankendick isn't gonna change shit?
How much did both of these kids have to get molested by their weird uncle for them to be this interested in talking openly about prosthetic genitals? It's fucking weird. What little brother thinks about what's in his teenage sister's pants like this? Do I want to know? Why do I have the feeling that she'd be all too happy to show him the difference between a dildo and her "Mr. Limpy"?
Also, as an admitted late bloomer, I had no idea what a "dildo" actually was, much less being able to visually identify one, when I was 14. I knew vaguely that it was something sexual and would get a reaction out of people if I said it, but as far as the intended use, I was clueless. This kid not only knows what a dildo is, he's able to correctly classify a "prosthetic" penis as one. The Internet has been a blight on society.
You all did, you literally have been supporting for this for nearly 40 years, ever since the third wave crap started, don't pretend none of that happens just because the trannies are now making you miserable.
I blame the LGB community for the troon problem more than feminists. LGB added the T, openly support them by including them in their "pride" events/flag, and are allies when it comes to grooming and molesting children.
Some in the LGB community are pushing back, like the LGB Alliance and Gays Against Groomers, but only because lesbians are getting called transphobic for not wanting to have sex with a pig in a wig, because faggots are tired of seeing women in Grindr, and they want to distance themselves from troons when the blowback happens to save their precious gay marriage and adoption.
I somewhat agree it's the gays fault about the trannies. The fact the LGB states they included the T because the trannies then were just effeminate gay men always made me raise an eyebrow, since the trannies wanted to be perceived as straight women. How the fuck is that gay? That's just really bad internalized homophobia and/or really homophobic parents.
But at the same time, men are partly to blame too. It's men who were the ones who did the first surgeries, convinced that it was feasible for a man to become a woman, due in part to sexist beliefs. Why do you think trans woman are praised for being "SO STUNNING AND BRAVE!!"? Because women are viewed as lesser than men. That's why pooners never get called stunning and brave and everyone ignores them except for other women and pooners.
I don't believe for a second most feminists are happy with lesbians being converted into pooners by big pharma and the rise of m2f AGPs gentrifying every womens space out there.
BUT
The censorious cancel culture of church lady Anita Sarkesian/Slate/Jezebel/Wonkette feminism created a media-cultural clout complex that was more than happily adopted by and expanded by troons. There is a lineage there, if an indirect one. Much like how the gay rights movement did not have a troon focus at all until the big NGOs that control the discourse (in the establishment anyway) realized they had succeeded enough that their donations and media spotlights would disappear unless they pivoted to a new harder to achieve cause. But it wasn't harder to achieve because it was more useful to other actors...
In the end, Big Troon was bolstered artificially above, beyond, and even contrary the ideas of both movements because it was by far the most useful social justice cause to the establishment. The point was not to liberate or equalize society in order to look good and woke to avoid more systemic reforms elsewhere (especially economically) anymore, it was to create a group of absolute loyalists to corporate/ngo/media narratives who could be used as wreckers to sabotage anyone else and redirect radical energies. A group that requires other people change their lifestyle to fit their self esteem rather than just advocate for their own interests not being second class legally. A group so alienating it could only rely on establishment actors for protection, but oppressed enough to make a nice sounding media narrative and incapable to allying long term with anyone but its patrons.
I don't believe for a second most feminists are happy with lesbians being converted into pooners by big pharma and the rise of m2f AGPs gentrifying every womens space out there.
Fren… If that’s the case, then please explain why every feminist out there, who isn’t on some tiny radfem forum, pushes the “trans women are women” line.
Fuck, just the very fact that they had to make up a word like TERF to differentiate the non troon loving feminists from all other feminists, would seem to indicate that you’re wrong.
As for the rather retarded argument that women are totally just victims here, and not at all kowtowing (and pushing) to this degeneracy, just go on any social media site and see who’s constantly acting as handmaidens for trannies.
Any post deemed “transphobic” will get piled on by troons (of course) and women: Especoally young millennial women and the kind of older, middle class, white Karen who had a pussyhat in her profile pic a few years ago.
(Fuck, remember the women’s march in DC back in 2016? That was ARRANGED by women? Who put trannies up there as speakers? It sure as heck wasn’t men.)
I refuse to be responsible for the crowd of hysterical bipolar women that have infiltrated feminism. Unfortunately I also refuse to fight with them. Men just don't understand how badly they will wreck your life until they've let one in their house and put a baby in her.
Whenever woketards whine about colonizers, I just assume that they support cannibalism, human sacrifice, child marriage, sexual slavery, shit-eating, etc.
Anyway, the Christian Europeans were fascinated by cannibalism and made the indigenous people into savage violent animals, totally neglect the fact that the cannibalism was also done "out of love and the deepest of devotion".
By her argument, wouldn’t the Christians love the savages because their sacrement is whiterally cannibalism too? Decolonization is the most retarded shit ever. They will bitch about how evil colonizers didn’t fuck with hijras, but you’ll never hear them say shit about sati or child marriages. Ironically they are still being evil colonizers in their own definition, advocating tranny only because that’s hip in the west, shutting up about sati coz thats a No no in their current society.
Picture being in an absolute sexist Echo chamber of bs, im talking "women aren't human, women are only for cooking cleaning and sex, women always have shit ideas, women crying is ONLY for drama" ect ect ect. Then logically ask, would you want to BE a woman, if you started believing it? If emotionally distressed enough, delusions will become preferable. That seems to be how particularly the traumatized ones think, in my understanding.
The thing is, even when ppl genuinely believed “women are only good for cooking and cleaning and don’t have much intelligence”, and marital rape isn’t a ”real”, women weren’t pooning out. I can’t figure it out yet, but something is up. Maybe it’s because troonism exist only now and that belief (now delusion) leads to troon, or women never not had inherent worth as human beings, even when they can’t go to college.
Fren… If that’s the case, then please explain why every feminist out there, who isn’t on some tiny radfem forum, pushes the “trans women are women” line.
Fear. Women seem much more susceptible to social conformity and norm upholding. Its why they are both the greatest practitioners and victims both of cancel culture. As I said in my post, I am not letting lib women off the hook for this, but they hardly have a gender wide primary responsibility when compared to both sexes in the professions of journoscum and for profit drug companies. There were socialist women who warned about all of this way back when, but they were dismissed and called reactionaries by the libs.
I would also agree with your point about the pussyhat brigade if we were having this discussion back then. But things have shifted. The reality of the troon assault on womens spaces is no longer theoretical and has entered full blown reality, causing a backlash more from women it seems to me than generic male soy reddit ally types.
But anyway, if you are worried I am not dunking of women enough in this thread, keep in mind this is the Pooner Zoo, and theres nothing pooners are more of than the girliest emo women imaginable.
It was the Laverne Cox's of the world and a huge wave of privilege olympics and no one took you seriously if you had more "privilege". The more disadvantaged you were, the more rank you had. (Gay) Men in dresses saw they could get the ultimate asspats and spotlight because how dare you hurt their feelings and not see them as the women they were born as?? and here we are. Trans women (men) became the symbol of good LGB allyship for some reason? It is gay mens fault, ultimately. The feminists that kowtow to them suck, too.
You're describing an infiltration. Anyway, got any funny pooner content? I'd rather come together over ridiculous shit than argue about us wascally wammens.
The thing is, even when ppl genuinely believed “women are only good for cooking and cleaning and don’t have much intelligence”, and marital rape isn’t a ”real”, women weren’t pooning out.
Perspective plays a heavy part, this is what you don't understand. Yes, women were given less rights back then but that doesn't mean perspective of the average woman was absolute misery at being a woman. (happiness was actually higher then than now)
if I REALLY have to illustrate it, I can.
This is what women generally thought of things in the 50s or so that I believe you are talking about. Sure, song is about hitting, but its romanticized, made to seem sweet. Being hit didn't matter too much because it was viewed in a romantic context. Even if women were viewed as being for cooking and cleaning, it was generally as positive, like the heart of a home, cherished, loved, protected. And most women felt this way.
This is what pooners in question more or less THINK is the average experience of a woman. This is of course OBJECTIVELY negative. There's no way you can look at it and gleam positivity from it.
Even if the objective reality both girls went through was identical, the extremely different perspectives are what matters more.
And considering people are plugged into social media with algorithms manipulating them en mass with WHATEVER is funneled to them, its perfectly possible to create this. Feed a young girl a bunch of stories about abused women, feminist bs framing EVERYTHING as being about making women suffer , get them depressed about their future, then introduce a "before and after" pooner video with a deluded pooner smiling from ear to ear INSISTING this fixed all their problems.
You combine all that? yeah, you get a pooner. because if you THOUGHT your future was being enslaved, abused, ect (even if its bs) you'd probably grasp onto delusions to escape it.
