The Skeptic Community - Pseudo-intellectuals ranting on Youtube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
yeah.
i mean i get it, it's fun to watch someone sperg out. that's 95% of what i do here on this site.
but if you're gonna claim intellectual superiority, then why not go after the sjws that will put up a better fight/debate? have a better following? and NO i don't mean "block everyone on twitter, mainstream feminist/activist, has a bit on MTV" types.

That's the problem though. SJWs are the low hanging fruit. They've built a business on pwning special snowflakes or opportunists like Laci Green so when that completely loses steam what will they go after next? Without an easy enemy they have nothing to add other than what many before them have expressed.

Blaire is the only one who does that. The Laci Green debate was fun and you got something out of it from both sides. The only thing you'll get from the majority of skeptics is MTV is racist.

Blaire is a prime example of someone who profits off of the pursuit of low hanging fruit. It's not surprising that they happen to be a former SJW turned anti-SJW in 2015, the year it started to get popular and profitable. I've seen the "debate" with Laci Green. It was unproductive and boring. They had the opportunity to grill one of the most notorious feminists yet managed to talk about nothing that hasn't been discussed before. Laci Green is not red pilled. She or MTV realized social justice is becoming unprofitable so they're testing out the waters before changing their business tactics. It's amazing how easily anti-SJWs are convinced that she's on their side despite the fact that she never said she'd give up social justice or feminism.
 
That's the problem though. SJWs are the low hanging fruit. They've built a business on pwning special snowflakes or opportunists like Laci Green so when that completely loses steam what will they go after next? Without an easy enemy they have nothing to add other than what many before them have expressed.



Blaire is a prime example of someone who profits off of the pursuit of low hanging fruit. It's not surprising that they happen to be a former SJW turned anti-SJW in 2015, the year it started to get popular and profitable. I've seen the "debate" with Laci Green. It was unproductive and boring. They had the opportunity to grill one of the most notorious feminists yet managed to talk about nothing that hasn't been discussed before. Laci Green is not red pilled. She or MTV realized social justice is becoming unprofitable so they're testing out the waters before changing their business tactics. It's amazing how easily anti-SJWs are convinced that she's on their side despite the fact that she never said she'd give up social justice or feminism.
Did you watch Blaire's debated with VeganGains? That was infuriating because VeganGains is a pretentious asshole who has no respect for non-vegans.
 
Latest mpreg photo of Armoured Skeptic

View attachment 228037


Huh. I guess good looking people can be feminist. I'm guessing they didn't insult his looks though since that would make then look stupid. Also salty. Not surprised Armored looks like that though since Shoe keeps calling him "daddy." I think she actually prefers a dad-bod over what most women would find attractive.

yeah.
i mean i get it, it's fun to watch someone sperg out. that's 95% of what i do here on this site.
but if you're gonna claim intellectual superiority, then why not go after the sjws that will put up a better fight/debate? have a better following? and NO i don't mean "block everyone on twitter, mainstream feminist/activist, has a bit on MTV" types.

Well some do go after feminist academia(like TL;DR) and I think Vernaculis has gone after several feminists that aren't low-hanging fruit. But if you want views then going after low-hanging fruit is the option most would choose. I mean look at Shoe's video "reacting to my audience survey results." A large majority want her to "debunk dumb, silly things", which is what the majority of "skeptics" already do. It's clear that most just want to laugh at feminists and what they do(although I think most of us do it here as well) instead of having actual debates with "not-so mainstream" feminists. Those videos don't garner views so they don't do it.
 
Most of the smaller channels beat the same dead horse over and over again and yet wonder why their channels stagnate and don't grow. I shit you not, there are still channels that make responses to Milo Stewart and 36 questions for men. I don't want to subscribe to 50 different channels that make the same, boring, repetitive content where they XD over the latest triggered feminist and circle jerk over how BASED milo yianopoulos is.
 
vegans are 100 times more low-hanging fruit than sjws
they are the bottom of the barrel
Blaire isn't any more or less than other skepticals, just admit you wanna fuck a tranny

You could at least quote me if you're going to project. You don't need my approval to stick your dick into a tranny's hot pocket.

Did you watch Blaire's debated with VeganGains? That was infuriating because VeganGains is a pretentious asshole who has no respect for non-vegans.

Nah, not interested. I don't care what some salad shooter thinks. I'd rather jerk off to porn while listening to a brown man surf the dank web.
 
If you're willing to sit through it, I would like to bring up a comparison:



Notice how much less brick headed & exhausting the former is than the latter. Jim is relaxed, flexible, he's able to convey his points concisely, & overall sounds like a reasonable person. Sam on the other hand will not let you breath, keeps a tight leash on wrongthink & walls off any notion that doesn't fit his narrative. One will debate a point with you & the other will shout you down with insults, interrupt you & refuse you a word in edgewise because you're a waste of time and he's always right. This is the difference between a real skeptic and an idealogue.
 
Blaire is the only one who does that. The Laci Green debate was fun and you got something out of it from both sides. The only thing you'll get from the majority of skeptics is MTV is racist.
All I see from people like armoured skeptic, andywarski, etc, is "X is racist towards white people" or something along those lines
Let's be realistic, myself and plenty of others disagree with racism of any kind, especially with people trying to push the stigma that being racist to white people is okay and/or racism towards white people isn't real. OR just finding any way to make their own prejudices/biases seem justified.

But, if people are constantly making videos about it and constantly complaining/ripping into them instead of actually doing something, people are gonna view the conservatives or right leaning people as whiny crybabies like SJWs are. Then it turns into an even bigger shit show
 
Latest mpreg photo of Armoured Skeptic

armoured-skeptic-pregnant-png.228037
i want to cum inside him
 
Now this is a little old but scratch point does make a good point about the skeptics hypocrisy about age hell at least we wait until a lolcow is 18

Ah yes, another thing I never liked about the skeptic community, their selective bias in who's an idiot and isn't based solely on ideology; their sycophantic willingness to never criticize someone who shares their viewpoints so long as they express that viewpoint, no matter how poorly they represent or misunderstand it. A bullet is a bullet until it doesn't fire from the rifle.
 
Huh. I guess good looking people can be feminist. I'm guessing they didn't insult his looks though since that would make then look stupid. Also salty. Not surprised Armored looks like that though since Shoe keeps calling him "daddy." I think she actually prefers a dad-bod over what most women would find attractive.



Well some do go after feminist academia(like TL;DR) and I think Vernaculis has gone after several feminists that aren't low-hanging fruit.
King Crocoduck as well.
 
If you're willing to sit through it, I would like to bring up a comparison:



Notice how much less brick headed & exhausting the former is than the latter. Jim is relaxed, flexible, he's able to convey his points concisely, & overall sounds like a reasonable person. Sam on the other hand will not let you breath, keeps a tight leash on wrongthink & walls off any notion that doesn't fit his narrative. One will debate a point with you & the other will shout you down with insults, interrupt you & refuse you a word in edgewise because you're a waste of time and he's always right. This is the difference between a real skeptic and an idealogue.
Only watched some snippets of them, but you can still tell the very stark differences. Metokur here at times agrees with Destiny(the same guy who kept ramming against Jontron) that no one wants someone invading their house as an illegal immigrant would to a country while both being calm. Naked Ape here is being a stuck upped middle schooler who feels the need to call someone he doesn't like a "poopoopeepeehead".
 
Usually I see some kind of skull or Dark Ages iconography slapped onto a suit. This would inevitably lead to Armoured Skeptic accusing them of being a clone because apparently he owns the image of a suit or something. He kind of apologized for that eventually, but it was really cringeworthy.

TL;DR basically made this in video form and it's a somewhat entertaining sporking of the ideas, though he focuses more on the "Animated avatar" batch.



It's entertaining to watch until you realise that they're making money off of the attention you're giving them for all this shit.

Only if you...

 
Not surprised Armored looks like that though since Shoe keeps calling him "daddy." I think she actually prefers a dad-bod over what most women would find attractive.

Im surprised she didnt get a thread
here before,anyone whos this public about their daddy kink must have some form of autism
I swear every video of them together just turns into the lovey-dovey crap you expect to see on someone who's 2 weeks on a relationship, not over two years
 
Well some do go after feminist academia(like TL;DR) and I think Vernaculis has gone after several feminists that aren't low-hanging fruit. But if you want views then going after low-hanging fruit is the option most would choose. I mean look at Shoe's video "reacting to my audience survey results." A large majority want her to "debunk dumb, silly things", which is what the majority of "skeptics" already do. It's clear that most just want to laugh at feminists and what they do(although I think most of us do it here as well) instead of having actual debates with "not-so mainstream" feminists. Those videos don't garner views so they don't do it.
Yeah, I've noticed the 'low hanging fruit' trend too. And I don't even hate it. Laugh at and mock dumbass feminists/SJWs all you want - they deserve it. I guess what many people (myself included) have a problem with is most of the skeptic youtube crowd claims to have some kind of intellectual and/or rational superiority, to have better research etc. when it's pretty clear that they don't. Going 'lol you're re.tarded' at a video some of their followers sent them isn't some fancy intellectual debate technique. Just own your shit. You like to laugh at dangerhaired idiots? Cool. It doesn't make you the greatest philosopher of our time so drop the rational, debunker etc. shit. You're not James Randi exposing Peter Popoff, you're laughing at a teenager or college student.
 
Back